Results for 'Miranda Fricker Crisp'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  28
    7 Virtue Ethics in the Twentieth Century.Miranda Fricker Crisp, Brad Hooker, Simon Kirchin, Kelvin Knight, Adrian Moore & Daniel C. Russell - 2013 - In Daniel C. Russell (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  2. I—Miranda Fricker: The Relativism of Blame and Williams's Relativism of Distance.Miranda Fricker - 2010 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):151-177.
    Bernard Williams is a sceptic about the objectivity of moral value, embracing instead a qualified moral relativism—the ‘relativism of distance’. His attitude to blame too is in part sceptical. I will argue that the relativism of distance is unconvincing, even incoherent; but also that it is detachable from the rest of Williams's moral philosophy. I will then go on to propose an entirely localized thesis I call the relativism of blame, which says that when an agent's moral shortcomings by our (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  3.  49
    FORUM: Miranda FRICKER’s Epistemic Injustice. Power and the Ethics of Knowing.Miranda Fricker - 2008 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 23 (1):69-71.
    This paper summarizes key themes from my Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing ; and it gives replies to commentators.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  68
    An Interview with Miranda Fricker.Susan Dieleman - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (2):253-261.
    Miranda Fricker?s research carefully negotiates the fields of ethics and epistemology, and the places and points where they overlap and intersect. Her 2007 text Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing is particularly noteworthy in this regard. It seamlessly integrates these research areas and, in so doing, turns a critical eye on the common assumption that feminist epistemology, characterized by its focus on the role of gender oppression within knowledge practices, is a marginal field of social epistemology. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  5.  8
    Miranda Fricker on McDowell. [REVIEW]Miranda Fricker - 1998 - Women’s Philosophy Review 18:93-94.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Comments on Miranda Fricker's Epistemic Injustice.Sanford Goldberg - 2010 - Episteme 7 (2):138-150.
    Miranda Fricker's Epistemic Injustice is a wide-ranging and important book on a much-neglected topic: the injustice involved in cases in which distrust arises out of prejudice. Fricker has some important things to say about this sort of injustice: its nature, how it arises, what sustains it, and the unhappy outcomes associated with it for the victim and the society in which it takes place. In the course of developing this account, Fricker also develops an account of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  43
    Comments on Miranda Fricker's Epistemic Injustice.Sanford Goldberg - 2010 - Episteme 7 (2):138-150.
    Miranda Fricker's Epistemic Injustice is a wide-ranging and important book on a much-neglected topic: the injustice involved in cases in which distrust arises out of prejudice. Fricker has some important things to say about this sort of injustice: its nature, how it arises, what sustains it, and the unhappy outcomes associated with it for the victim and the society in which it takes place. In the course of developing this account, Fricker also develops an account of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8. Miranda Fricker, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing[REVIEW]Michael Brady - 2009 - Analysis 69 (2):380-382.
    Miranda Fricker's book Epistemic Injustice is an original and stimulating contribution to contemporary epistemology. Fricker's main aim is to illustrate the ethical aspects of two of our basic epistemic practices, namely conveying knowledge to others and making sense of our own social experiences. In particular, she wishes to investigate the idea that there are prevalent and distinctively epistemic forms of injustice related to these aspects of our epistemic lives, injustices which reflect the fact that our actual epistemic (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Miranda Fricker, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing[REVIEW]M. Kusch - 2009 - Mind 118 (469):170-174.
  10.  56
    Miranda Fricker, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing[REVIEW]Kathleen Lennon - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):177-178.
  11.  55
    Miranda Fricker, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing[REVIEW]Ward E. Jones - 2009 - Ratio 22 (3):369-373.
  12.  53
    Miranda Fricker, 'Epistemic Injustice – Power and the Ethics of Knowing'. [REVIEW]Kristian Høyer Toft - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (1):117-119.
  13. Miranda Fricker and Jennifer Hornsby, Eds., The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy Reviewed By.Susan Dwyer - 2000 - Philosophy in Review 20 (6):410-413.
  14.  95
    Miranda Fricker, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing[REVIEW]Sabina Lovibond - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (1):147-151.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. By MIRANDA FRICKER.Rae Langton - 2010 - Hypatia 25 (2):459-464.
  16.  91
    Miranda Fricker, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing[REVIEW]Lorraine Code - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (3).
  17.  17
    Miranda Fricker and Jennifer Hornsby, Eds., The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy:The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy.Diana Tietjens Meyers - 2001 - Ethics 112 (1):145-148.
  18. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing.Miranda Fricker - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
    Fricker shows that virtue epistemology provides a general epistemological idiom in which these issues can be forcefully discussed.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   736 citations  
  19. Epistemic Justice as a Condition of Political Freedom?Miranda Fricker - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1317-1332.
    I shall first briefly revisit the broad idea of ‘epistemic injustice’, explaining how it can take either distributive or discriminatory form, in order to put the concepts of ‘testimonial injustice’ and ‘hermeneutical injustice’ in place. In previous work I have explored how the wrong of both kinds of epistemic injustice has both an ethical and an epistemic significance—someone is wronged in their capacity as a knower. But my present aim is to show that this wrong can also have a political (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  20.  26
    Pure Intuition: Miranda Fricker on the Economy of Prejudice.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2008 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 23 (1):77-80.
    Two aspects of Miranda Fricker’s book are criticised: the implicit assumption that ethical theory can solve fundamental problems in epistemology, and the excessive reliance on testimony as a fundamental source of knowledge. Against the former, it is argued that ethical theories are based on cultural prejudices to a higher extent than epistemological theories. Against the latter, argumentation is proposed as a more important epistemic practice than testimony.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  90
    Pure Intuition: Miranda Fricker on the Economy of Prejudice.Bonilla Jesús Zamora - 2008 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 23 (1):77-80.
    Two aspects of Miranda Fricker’s book are criticised: the implicit assumption that ethical theory can solve fundamental problems in epistemology, and the excessive reliance on testimony as a fundamental source of knowledge. Against the former, it is argued that ethical theories are based on cultural prejudicesto a higher extent than epistemological theories. Against the latter, argumentation is proposed as a more important epistemic practice than testimony.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Book Reviews: Miranda Fricker and Jennifer Hornsby, Eds, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Xiii + 280 Pp. ISBN 0—521— 62469—X, £13.95. [REVIEW]Pamela Sue Andersson - 2002 - Feminist Theory 3 (1):119-121.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  3
    Intuition and Reason, Miranda Fricker.Richard Gaskin - 1995 - Philosophy 70 (272).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  43
    Book Review: Miranda Fricker and Jennifer Hornsby. The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2000. [REVIEW]Ann Garry - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (4):230-232.
  25. Replies to Alcoff, Goldberg, and Hookway on Epistemic Injustice.Miranda Fricker - 2010 - Episteme 7 (2):164-178.
    In this paper I respond to three commentaries on Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. In response to Alcoff, I primarily defend my conception of how an individual hearer might develop virtues of epistemic justice. I do this partly by drawing on empirical social psychological evidence supporting the possibility of reflective self-regulation for prejudice in our judgements. I also emphasize the fact that individual virtue is only part of the solution – structural mechanisms also have an essential role (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  26. Pure Intuition: Miranda Fricker on the Economy of Prejudice.Jesús Pedro Zamora Bonilla - 2008 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 23 (1):77-80.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. What's the Point of Blame? A Paradigm Based Explanation.Miranda Fricker - 2016 - Noûs 50 (1):165-183.
    When we hope to explain and perhaps vindicate a practice that is internally diverse, philosophy faces a methodological challenge. Such subject matters are likely to have explanatorily basic features that are not necessary conditions. This prompts a move away from analysis to some other kind of philosophical explanation. This paper proposes a paradigm based explanation of one such subject matter: blame. First, a paradigm form of blame is identified—‘Communicative Blame’—where this is understood as a candidate for an explanatorily basic form (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  28.  65
    The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology.Miranda Fricker, Peter Graham, David Henderson & Nikolaj Jang Pedersen (eds.) - 2019 - New York, USA: Routledge.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  23
    Forgiveness—An Ordered Pluralism.Miranda Fricker - 2019 - Australasian Philosophical Review 3 (3):241-260.
    ABSTRACT There are two kinds of forgiveness that appear as radically different from one another: one presents forgiveness as essentially earned through remorseful apology; the other presents it as fundamentally non-earned—a gift. The first, which I label Moral Justice Forgiveness, adopts a stance of moral demand and conditionality; the second, which I label Gifted Forgiveness, adopts a stance of non-demand and un-conditionality. Each is real; yet how can two such different responses to wrongdoing be of one and the same kind? (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  30. Rational Authority and Social Power: Towards a Truly Social Epistemology.Miranda Fricker - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (2):159–177.
    This paper explores the relation between rational authority and social power, proceeding by way of a philosophical genealogy derived from Edward Craig's Knowledge and the State of Nature. The position advocated avoids the errors both of the 'traditionalist' (who regards the socio-political as irrelevant to epistemology) and of the 'reductivist' (who regards reason as just another form of social power). The argument is that a norm of credibility governs epistemic practice in the state of nature, which, when socially manifested, is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   72 citations  
  31. Group Testimony? The Making of A Collective Good Informant.Miranda Fricker - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2):249-276.
    We gain information from collective, often institutional bodies all the time—from the publications of committees, news teams, or research groups, from web sites such as Wikipedia, and so on—but do these bodies ever function as genuine group testifiers as opposed to mere group sources of information? In putting the question this way I invoke a distinction made, if briefly, by Edward Craig, which I believe to be of deep significance in thinking about the distinctiveness of the speech act of testimony. (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  32. Epistemic Injustice and a Role for Virtue in the Politics of Knowing.Miranda Fricker - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (1/2):154-173.
    The dual aim of this article is to reveal and explain a certain phenomenon of epistemic injustice as manifested in testimonial practice, and to arrive at a characterisation of the anti–prejudicial intellectual virtue that is such as to counteract it. This sort of injustice occurs when prejudice on the part of the hearer leads to the speaker receiving less credibility than he or she deserves. It is suggested that where this phenomenon is systematic it constitutes an important form of oppression. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  33.  2
    Alison Stone on The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy by Miranda Fricker and Jennifer Hornsby. [REVIEW]Alison Stone - 2001 - Women’s Philosophy Review 27:87-92.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  17
    The Epistemic Life of Groups: Essays in the Epistemology of Collectives Michael S. Brady and Miranda Fricker, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016; 255 Pp.; $74.00. [REVIEW]Marcus Hunt - 2017 - Dialogue 57 (4):916-918.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Book Review. The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy Miranda Fricker Jennifer Hornsby. [REVIEW]Annette Baier - 2001 - Mind 110 (438):464-468.
  36. 10. Can There Be Institutional Virtues?Miranda Fricker - 2010 - In T. Szabo Gendler & J. Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 3--235.
  37. Scepticism and the Genealogy of Knowledge: Situating Epistemology in Time.Miranda Fricker - 2008 - Philosophical Papers 37 (1):27-50.
    My overarching purpose is to illustrate the philosophical fruitfulness of expanding epistemology not only laterally across the social space of other epistemic subjects, but at the same time vertically in the temporal dimension. I set about this by first presenting central strands of Michael Williams' diagnostic engagement with scepticism, in which he crucially employs a Default and Challenge model of justification. I then develop three key aspects of Edward Craig's ‘practical explication' of the concept of knowledge so that they may (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  38.  14
    Knowledge and Groups: Michael S. Brady and Miranda Fricker : The Epistemic Life of Groups: Essays in the Epistemology of Collectives. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, $74.00 HB.Chris Dragos - 2017 - Metascience 26 (2):215-218.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  2
    Social Epistemology: What’s in a Name?: Miranda Fricker, Peter J. Graham, David Henderson, and Nikolaj J.L.L. Pederson (Eds): The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. London: Routledge, 2019, 490 Pp, £190.00 HB.Chris Dragos - 2020 - Metascience 29 (3):399-401.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  34
    The Epistemic Life of Groups: Essays in the Epistemology of Collectives, Edited by Michael Brady and Miranda Fricker: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, Pp. Vii + 255, £45. [REVIEW]Helen E. Longino - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (2):401-404.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  18
    The Epistemic Life of Groups, Michael Brady and Miranda Fricker , Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016, Vi + 255 Pp ISBN 978–0–19‐875964‐5, £45.00. [REVIEW]Alexander Prescott‐Couch - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):897-900.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Powerlessness and Social Interpretation.Miranda Fricker - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):96-108.
    Our understanding of social experiences is central to our social understanding more generally. But this sphere of epistemic practice can be structurally prejudiced by unequal relations of power, so that some groups suffer a distinctive kind of epistemic injustice—hermeneutical injustice. I aim to achieve a clear conception of this epistemicethical phenomenon, so that we have a workable definition and a proper understanding of the wrong that it inflicts.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  43. The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy.Miranda Fricker & Jennifer Hornsby (eds.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
    The thirteen specially-commissioned essays in this volume are written by philosophers at the forefront of feminist scholarship, and are designed to provide an accessible and stimulating guide to a philosophical literature that has seen massive expansion in recent years. Ranging from history of philosophy through metaphysics to philosophy of science, they encompass all the core subject areas commonly taught in anglophone undergraduate and graduate philosophy courses, offering both an overview of and a contribution to the relevant debates. Together they testify (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  44. Epistemic Oppression and Epistemic Privilege.Miranda Fricker - 1999 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (Supplement):191-210.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  45.  8
    The Epistemic Life of Groups: Essays in the Epistemology of Collectives.Michael S. Brady & Miranda Fricker (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
    Groups engage in epistemic activity all the time--whether it be the active collective inquiry of scientific research groups or crime detection units, or the evidential deliberations of tribunals and juries, or the informational efforts of the voting population in general--and yet in philosophy there is still relatively little epistemology of groups to help explore these epistemic practices and their various dimensions of social and philosophical significance. The aim of this book is to address this lack, by presenting original essays in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  46.  12
    The Epistemic Life of Groups. Essays in the Epistemology of Collectives Michael S. Brady and Miranda Fricker Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016, 272 P. [REVIEW]Olivier Ouzilou - 2016 - Dialogue 55 (3):551-553.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  19
    New British Philosophy: The Interviews.Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom (eds.) - 2002 - Routledge.
    From popular introductions to biographies and television programmes, philosophy is everywhere. Many people even want to _be_ philosophers, usually in the café or the pub. But what do real philosophers do? What are the big philosophical issues of today? Why do they matter? How did some our best philosophers get into philosophy in the first place? Read _New British Philosophy_ and find out for the first time. Clear, engaging and designed for a general audience, sixteen fascinating interviews with some of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  48. The Value of Knowledge and The Test of Time.Miranda Fricker - 2009 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 64:121-138.
    The current literature on the value of knowledge is marred by two unwarranted presumptions, which together distort the debate and conceal what is perhaps the most basic value of knowledge, as distinct from mere true belief. These presumptions are the Synchronic Presumption, which confines philosophical attention to the present snapshot in time; and the Analytical Presumption, which has people look for the value of knowledge in some kind of warrant. Together these presumptions conceal that the value of knowledge might inhere (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  49.  11
    Scepticism and the Genealogy of Knowledge: Situating Epistemology in Time.Miranda Fricker - 2010 - In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
    My overarching purpose is to illustrate the philosophical fruitfulness of expanding epistemology not only laterally across the social space of other epistemic subjects, but at the same time vertically in the temporal dimension. I set about this by first presenting central strands of Michael Williams' diagnostic engagement with scepticism, in which he crucially employs a Default and Challenge model of justification. I then develop three key aspects of Edward Craig's ‘practical explication' of the concept of knowledge so that they may (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  50.  50
    Styles of Moral Relativism : A Critical Family Tree.Miranda Fricker - 2013 - In Roger Crisp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics. Oxford University Press.
    This chapter focuses on the different styles of moral relativism. The history of moral relativist thinking features different branches to the family tree, each representing a different impetus to relativism, and so producing a different style of moral relativist thought. At the root, however, is a broadly subjectivist parent idea that morality is at least in part the upshot of a shared way of life, and shared ways of life tend to vary markedly from culture to culture. The discussions cover (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000