Results for 'Modern Synthesis'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  45
    Evolutionary Chance Mutation: A Defense of the Modern Synthesis' Consensus View.Francesca Merlin - 2010 - Philosophy & Theory in Biology 2 (20130604).
    One central tenet of the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis , and the consensus view among biologists until now, is that all genetic mutations occur by “chance” or at “random” with respect to adaptation. However, the discovery of some molecular mechanisms enhancing mutation rate in response to environmental conditions has given rise to discussions among biologists, historians and philosophers of biology about the “chance” vs “directed” character of mutations . In fact, some argue that mutations due to a particular kind (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  2. Foreword to Julian Huxley's "Evolution: The Modern Synthesis".Massimo Pigliucci & Gerd Müller - 2010 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Gerd Müller (eds.), Evolution: The Modern Synthesis The Definitive Edition Edition. MIT Press. pp. 1-8.
    A new conceptual essay introducing one of the classics of the evolutionary biological literature.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  3
    Marine Invertebrates, Model Organisms, and the Modern Synthesis: Epistemic Values, Evo-Devo, and Exclusion.Alan C. Love - 2009 - Theory in Biosciences 128:19–42.
    A central reason that undergirds the significance of evo-devo is the claim that development was left out of the Modern synthesis. This claim turns out to be quite complicated, both in terms of whether development was genuinely excluded and how to understand the different kinds of embryological research that might have contributed. The present paper reevaluates this central claim by focusing on the practice of model organism choice. Through a survey of examples utilized in the literature of the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  23
    Review Of: Julian Huxley, Evolution: The Modern Synthesis – The Definitive Edition. [REVIEW]Ehud Lamm - 2010 - Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science.
    The review focuses on Huxley’s debt to Richard Goldschmidt and Cyril Darlington. I discuss the conceptions of the genome developed by Goldschmidt and Darlington and their continuing relevance.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  2
    Developmental Biology, Natural Selection, and the Conceptual Boundaries of the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis.David J. Depew & Bruce H. Weber - 2017 - Zygon 52 (2):468-490.
    Using the evolution of the stickleback family of subarctic fish as a touchstone, we explore the effect of new discoveries about regulatory genetics, developmental plasticity, and epigenetic inheritance on the conceptual foundations of the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis. Identifying the creativity of natural selection as the hallmark of the Modern Synthesis, we show that since its inception its adherents have pursued a variety of research projects that at first seemed to conflict with its principles, but were accommodated. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  23
    The Fate of Darwinism: Evolution After the Modern Synthesis.David J. Depew & Bruce H. Weber - 2011 - Biological Theory 6 (1):89-102.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  96
    The Hardening of the Modern Synthesis.Stepi Ien Jay Gould - unknown
    In 1937, just as Dobzhansky published the book that later generations would laud as the foundation of the modern synthesis, the American Naturnlist published a symposium on "supraspecific variation in nature and in classification." Alfred C. Kinsey, who later became one of America's most controversial intellectuals for his study of basic behaviors in another sort of WASP,1 led off the symposium with a summary of his extensive work on a family of gall wasps, the Cynipidae. In his article, (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  8.  39
    The Softening of the Modern Synthesis.Joeri Witteveen - 2011 - Acta Biotheoretica 59 (3):333-345.
    The Modern Synthesis has been receiving bad press for some time now. Back in 1983, in an article entitled “The Hardening of the Modern Synthesis” Stephen Jay Gould criticized the way the Modern Synthesis had developed since its inception in the 1930s and early 1940s (Gould 1983). Back then, those who would later become known as ‘architects’ of the synthesis were united in their call for explaining evolution at all levels in terms of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  13
    The Modern Synthesis: Its Scope and Limits.Elliott R. Sober - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:314 - 321.
    This paper locates the contributions of Kauffman and Ayala to this symposium in the context of recent discussions of the adequacy of the Modern Synthesis. The neglect of morphology and development described by Kauffman is understandable in view of the belief that selection is the most powerful evolutionary force. His idea that properties of order may be explained by nonselective mechanisms is also examined. The paper subsequently takes up Ayala's criticism of S.J. Gould's view that macroevolution is a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  13
    Are Punctuationists Wrong About the Modern Synthesis?Benton M. Stidd - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):98-109.
    A common criticism of punctuated equilibria as an evolutionary theory is that it erects a straw man by characterizing the modern synthesis as being devoid of mechanisms that bring about rapid speciation and abrupt changes in morphology. Thompson supports this view and argues that the modern synthesis does not entail gradualism, all-pervasive adaptationism, or extrapolationism and that punctuationists have mischaracterized the theory on all these points; properly understood the synthetic theory is hierarchical and able to explain (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  5
    Disciplining and Popularizing: Evolution and its Publics From the Modern Synthesis to the Present.Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 45 (1):111-113.
    This paper serves as an introduction to a special collection of papers exploring the centrifugal and centripetal forces in the process of disciplining and popularizing the science of evolution in the period preceding and after the modern synthesis of evolution.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  5
    The Modern Synthesis: Einstein and Kant.Friedel Weinert - 2009 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 14 (2):193-216.
    The paper discusses the Kantian legacy in modern views about scientific theories. The aim of this paper is to show how Einstein's philosophy of science, which was inspired by his physics, offers a specialized version of the Kantian synthesis of Empiricism and Rationalism. In modern physical theories Kant's a priori conditions become 'constraints', as shown in Einstein's use of principle theories. Einstein's use of principle theories shows how constraints are used to steer the mapping of the rational (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  53
    Modern Synthesis is the Light of Microbial Genomics.Austin Booth, Carlos Mariscal & W. Ford Doolittle - 2016 - Annual Reviews of Microbiology 70 (1):279-297.
  14. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis.Julian Huxley - 1944 - Philosophy 19 (73):166-170.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   154 citations  
  15.  11
    The Unmaking of a Modern Synthesis: Noam Chomsky, Charles Hockett, and the Politics of Behaviorism, 1955-1965.G. M. Radick - unknown
    A familiar story about mid-twentieth-century American psychology tells of the replacement of behaviorism by cognitive science. Between these two, however, lay a borderland, muddy and much trespassed-upon. This paper relocates the origins of the Chomskyan program in linguistics there. Following his introduction of transformational generative grammar, Chomsky mounted a highly publicized attack on behaviorist psychology. Yet when he first developed that approach to grammar, he was a defender of behaviorism. His anti-behaviorism emerged only in the course of what became a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. What Genes Can't Do: Prolegomena to a Post Modern-Synthesis Philosophy.Lenny Moss - 1998 - Dissertation, Northwestern University
    The concept of the gene has been the central organizing theme of 20th century biology. Biology has become increasingly influential both for philosophers seeking a naturalized basis for epistemology, ethics, and the understanding of the mind, as well as for the human sciences generally. The central task of this work is to get the story right about genes and in so doing provide a critical and enabling resourse for use in the further pursuit of human self-understanding. ;The work begins with (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  6
    A Pluralist Framework to Address Challenges to the Modern Synthesis in Evolutionary Theory.Philippe Huneman - 2014 - Biological Theory 9 (2):163-177.
  18.  7
    Traversing the Conceptual Divide Between Biological and Statistical Epistasis: Systems Biology and a More Modern Synthesis.Jason H. Moore & Scott M. Williams - 2005 - Bioessays 27 (6):637-646.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  19.  26
    Critics and Criticisms of the Modern Synthesis: The Viewpoint of a Philosopher.Jean Gayon - unknown
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  20.  11
    Language Joshua Whatmough: Language: A Modern Synthesis. Pp. X + 270. London: Secker and Warburg, 1956. Cloth, 25s. Net.D. M. Jones - 1958 - The Classical Review 8 (01):56-57.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  23
    Extending the Modern Synthesis with Ants: Ant Encounters.Heikki Helanterä - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (6):935-944.
  22.  5
    Evolutionary Chance Mutation: A Defense of the Modern Synthesis' Consensus View.Francesca Merlin - 2010 - Philosophy and Theory in Biology 2 (20160629).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  2
    The Unmaking of a Modern Synthesis: Noam Chomsky, Charles Hockett, and the Politics of Behaviorism, 1955–1965.Gregory Radick - 2016 - Isis 107 (1):49-73.
  24. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis.Julian Huxley - 1944 - Science and Society 8 (1):90-93.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  8
    Some Punctuationists Are Wrong About the Modern Synthesis.Not By Me - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):74-86.
    Benton Stidd has defended the position that punctuationists are not wrong about the inadequacy of the synthetic theory of evolution for explaining evolution. The thrust of his defense is that arguments to the contrary by Thompson involve a rational reconstruction along logical empiricist lines, which is insensitive to historical and social forces in a way that the Kuhnian Weltanschauung view that he espouses is not. I argue in this paper that Stidd has entirely misunderstood my arguments, that the soundness of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  7
    Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. By Julian Huxley, M.A., D.Sc., F.R.S. (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. 1942. Pp. 645. Price 25s.). [REVIEW]John S. L. Gilmour - 1944 - Philosophy 19 (73):166-.
  27.  3
    Some Punctuationists Are Wrong About the Modern Synthesis.Paul Thompson - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):74-86.
    Benton Stidd has defended the position that punctuationists are not wrong about the inadequacy of the synthetic theory of evolution for explaining evolution. The thrust of his defense is that arguments to the contrary by Thompson involve a rational reconstruction along logical empiricist lines, which is insensitive to historical and social forces in a way that the Kuhnian Weltanschauung view that he espouses is not. I argue in this paper that Stidd has entirely misunderstood my arguments, that the soundness of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Evolution. — The Modern Synthesis.J. Huxley & T. H. Huxley - 1950 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 6 (2):207-207.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Sewall Wright, Shifting Balance Theory, and the Hardening of the Modern Synthesis.Ishida Yoichi - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 61:1-10.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Editorial: How Best to “Go On”? Prospects for a “Modern Synthesis” in the Sciences of Mind.Kevin Moore & John Cromby - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis The Definitive Edition Edition.Massimo Pigliucci & Gerd Müller (eds.) - 2010 - MIT Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  1
    A Synthesis of Many Levels of Constraints as a Modern View of Development.Derek Harter & Shulan Lu - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):498-499.
    The debate of nativisim versus empiricism is over the relative importance of evolutionary versus ontogenetic mechanisms. This is mostly seen today as a false dichotomy. The synthesis of these positions provides a modern viewpoint of grounded category formation. This combined view places equal importance on feedback between these levels in guiding development, and is more appropriately compared to culturalist positions.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  7
    Defining Art Culturally : Modern Theories of Art - a Synthesis.Simon Fokt - unknown
    Numerous theories have attempted to overcome the anti-essentialist scepticism about the possibility of defining art. While significant advances have been made in this field, it seems that most modern definitions fail to successfully address the issue of the ever-changing nature of art raised by Morris Weitz, and rarely even attempt to provide an account which would be valid in more than just the modern Western context. This thesis looks at the most successful definitions currently defended, determines their strengths (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  30
    Is Non-Genetic Inheritance Just a Proximate Mechanism? A Corroboration of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis.Alex Mesoudi, Simon Blanchet, Anne Charmantier, Étienne Danchin, Laurel Fogarty, Eva Jablonka, Kevin N. Laland, Thomas J. H. Morgan, Gerd B. Müller, F. John Odling-Smee & Benoît Pujol - 2013 - Biological Theory 7 (3):189-195.
    What role does non-genetic inheritance play in evolution? In recent work we have independently and collectively argued that the existence and scope of non-genetic inheritance systems, including epigenetic inheritance, niche construction/ecological inheritance, and cultural inheritance—alongside certain other theory revisions—necessitates an extension to the neo-Darwinian Modern Synthesis (MS) in the form of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES). However, this argument has been challenged on the grounds that non-genetic inheritance systems are exclusively proximate mechanisms that serve the ultimate function (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  35. Synthesis, the Synthetic a Priori, and the Origins of Modern Space-Time Theory.Robert DiSalle - 2010 - In Michael Friedman, Mary Domski & Michael Dickson (eds.), Discourse on a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science. Open Court.
  36. Complexity Theory and Geographies of Health: A Modern and Global Synthesis.Anthony Gatrell - forthcoming - Complexity.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  25
    Critical Synthesis on Urban Knowledge: Remembering and Forgetting in the Modern City.David Gross - 1990 - Social Epistemology 4 (1):3 – 22.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  8
    DNA Dispose, but Subjects Decide. Learning and the Extended Synthesis.Markus Lindholm - 2015 - Biosemiotics 8 (3):443-461.
    Adaptation by means of natural selection depends on the ability of populations to maintain variation in heritable traits. According to the Modern Synthesis this variation is sustained by mutations and genetic drift. Epigenetics, evodevo, niche construction and cultural factors have more recently been shown to contribute to heritable variation, however, leading an increasing number of biologists to call for an extended view of speciation and evolution. An additional common feature across the animal kingdom is learning, defined as the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  6
    Modern Architecture: A New Technical-Aesthetic Synthesis.Carl W. Condit - 1947 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 6 (1):45-54.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  13
    Modern Confucian Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Knowledge: Xiong Shili.Jana S. Rošker - 2009 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 36 (3):376-390.
  41.  9
    Book Review:Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Vol. 1: Positivism, Presuppositions, and Current Controversies. Jeffrey Alexander; Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Vol. 2: The Antinomies of Classical Thought: Marx and Durkheim. Jeffrey Alexander ; Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Vol. 3: The Classical Attempt at Theoretical Synthesis: Max Weber. Jeffrey Alexander; Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Vol. 4: The Modern Reconstruction of Classical Thought: Talcott Parsons. Jeffrey Alexander. [REVIEW]Karol Soltan - 1985 - Ethics 95 (4):951-.
  42.  4
    Mimetic Culture and Modern Sports: A Synthesis.Bruce Bridgeman & Margarita Azmitia - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):751.
  43.  2
    Ontology Obscures Phylogeny. Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought. Niles Eldredge. [REVIEW]Wallace Arthur - 1988 - Bioessays 9 (1):37-38.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  1
    Faith, Reason and Modern Psychiatry: Sources for a Synthesis[REVIEW]S. D. - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):713-713.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  1
    A Synthesis of Many Levels of Constraints as a Modern View of Development.S. Lu D. Harter - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4).
  46.  11
    Rethinking the Synthesis Period in Evolutionary Studies.Joe Cain - 2009 - Journal of the History of Biology 42 (4):621 - 648.
    I propose we abandon the unit concept of "the evolutionary synthesis". There was much more to evolutionary studies in the 1920s and 1930s than is suggested in our commonplace narratives of this object in history. Instead, four organising threads capture much of evolutionary studies at this time. First, the nature of species and the process of speciation were dominating, unifying subjects. Second, research into these subjects developed along four main lines, or problem complexes: variation, divergence, isolation, and selection. Some (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  47.  42
    Explanatory Unification and the Early Synthesis.Anya Plutynski - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):595-609.
    The object of this paper is to reply to Morrison's ([2000]) claim that while ‘structural unity’ was achieved at the level of the mathematical models of population genetics in the early synthesis, there was explanatory disunity. I argue to the contrary, that the early synthesis effected by the founders of theoretical population genetics was unifying and explanatory both. Defending this requires a reconsideration of Morrison's notion of explanation. In Morrison's view, all and only answers to ‘why’ questions which (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  48.  19
    The Formal Darwinism Project in Outline.Alan Grafen - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (2):155-174.
    The broader context for the formal darwinism project established by two of the commentators, in terms of reconciling the Modern Synthesis with Darwinian arguments over design and in terms of links to other types of selection and design, is discussed and welcomed. Some overselling of the project is admitted, in particular of whether it claims to consider all organic design. One important fundamental question raised in two commentaries is flagged but not answered of whether design is rightly represented (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  49.  8
    Formal Darwinism as a Tool for Understanding the Status of Organisms in Evolutionary Biology.P. Huneman - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (2):271-279.
    This paper uses the framework of Formal Darwinism (FD) to evaluate organism-centric critiques of the Modern Synthesis (MS). The first section argues that the FD project reconciles two kinds of selective explanations in biology. Thus it is not correct to say that the MS neglects organisms—instead, it explains organisms’ design, as argued in the second section. In the third section I employ a concept of the organism derived from Kant that has two aspects: the parts presupposing the whole, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  50.  35
    Code Biology – A New Science of Life.Marcello Barbieri - 2012 - Biosemiotics 5 (3):411-437.
    Systems Biology and the Modern Synthesis are recent versions of two classical biological paradigms that are known as structuralism and functionalism, or internalism and externalism. According to functionalism (or externalism), living matter is a fundamentally passive entity that owes its organization to external forces (functions that shape organs) or to an external organizing agent (natural selection). Structuralism (or internalism), is the view that living matter is an intrinsically active entity that is capable of organizing itself from within, with (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000