70 found
Order:
  1. Spinoza's Cosmological Argument in the Ethics.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):439-462.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  2. Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58-84.
    In this article, I discuss Leibniz's interpretation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. In particular, I consider whether Leibniz's position on this point was developed partly in reference to Spinoza's position. First, I analyze Leibniz's annotations from 1676 on Spinoza's Letter 12. The traditional cosmological argument, as found in Avicenna and Saint Thomas for example, relies on the Aristotelian assumption that an actual infinite is impossible and on the idea that there can be no effect without a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  30
    Spinoza's Language.Mogens Lærke - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):519-547.
    when reading spinoza’s Ethics,1 one comes upon a particularly disconcerting passage in Part Three. In an explication of two definitions of ‘favor’ (favor) and ‘indignation’ (indignatio), Spinoza writes,I know that in their common usage these words mean something else. But my purpose is to explain the nature of things, not the meaning of words. I intend to indicate these things by words whose meaning is not entirely opposed to the meaning with which I wish to use them. One warning of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  28
    Spinoza and the Cosmological Argument According to Letter 12.Mogens Lærke - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1):57 - 77.
    (2013). Spinoza and the Cosmological Argument According to Letter 12. British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 57-77. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2012.696052.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  7
    Immanence et extériorité absolue.Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 134 (2):169-190.
    Cet article explore la conception spinozienne du rapport entre substance et mode en analysant les notions de cause de soi, de cause immanente et de puissance. Nous soutenons que la théorie spinozienne de la causalité constitue une tentative pour développer une ontologie relationnelle de la puissance dans laquelle toute dénomination intrinsèque est fondée sur une dénomination extrinsèque. Par opposition à une interprétation courante selon laquelle la substance de Spinoza est une sorte de grande monade dans laquelle toutes choses inhèrent comme (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  2
    Leibniz: On the Cartesian Philosophy.Mogens Lærke - 2017 - The Leibniz Review 27:93-114.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  13
    Anima Mundi: The Rise of the World Soul Theory in Modern German Philosophy (Review).Mogens Lærke - 2013 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (1):131-132.
  8.  3
    Dmitri Levitin. Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science: Histories of Philosophy in England, C. 1640–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp. Xxii+646. £93.00. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2018 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 8 (1):209-213.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  1
    Models of the History of Philosophy, Vol. II: From the Cartesian Age to Brucker. Edited By Gregorio Piaia and Giovanni Santinello. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):400-403.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  35
    Quod Non Omnia Possibilia Ad Existentiam Perveniant: Leibniz's Ontology of Possibility, 1668-1678.Mogens Lærke - 2007 - The Leibniz Review:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  35
    Quod Non Omnia Possibilia Ad Existentiam Perveniant.Mogens Lærke - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12. Four Things Deleuze Learned From Leibniz.Mogens Lærke - 2010 - In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and the Fold: A Critical Reader. Palgrave-Macmillan.
  13. Monism, Separability and Real Distinction in the Young Leibniz.Mogens Lærke - 2009 - The Leibniz Review 19:1-28.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14. Monism, Separability and Real Distinction in the Young Leibniz.Mogens Lærke - 2009 - The Leibniz Review 19:1-28.
    In this article, I discuss how Leibniz’s first correspondence with Malebranche from early 1676 can shed new light on the notorious “all-things-are-one”-passage found in the Quod ens perfectissimum sit possibile from late 1676—a passage that has been taken as an expression of monism or Spinozism in the young Leibniz. The correspondence with Malebranche provides a deeper understanding of Leibniz’s use of the notions of “real distinction” and “separability” in the ATOP. This forms the background for a discussion of Leibniz’s commitment (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  9
    Three Texts on the Kabbalah: More, Wachter, Leibniz, and the Philosophy of the Hebrews.Mogens Lærke - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (5):1011-1030.
    The article reconstructs a brief controversy between H. More, G. W. Leibniz and J. G. Wachter about the Kabbalah, or what they called ‘the philosophy of the Hebrews’. I study in particular the status of the proposition ‘nothing comes out of nothing’ in their exchanges - a proposition they all agreed was a fundamental kabbalist axiom while having differing views as to the prospects of reconciling that position with Christianity. I show how Wachter’s curious Kabbalistico-Spinozism provided the stage for an (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  28
    Five Figures of Folding: Deleuze on Leibniz's Monadological Metaphysics.Mogens Lærke - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (6):1192-1213.
    This article is about Gilles Deleuze's book Le Pli. Leibniz et le Baroque from 1988. It shows how Deleuze's notion of folding captures some basic intuitions in Leibniz and how they relate to each other. To this purpose, I propose five figures, all referring to the same basic fold, all illustrating how the consideration of such figures allows developing central elements of Leibniz's monadology. These figures can help, I hope, alleviate some of the fundamental difficulties in understanding Deleuze's approach to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  23
    A Conjecture About a Textual Mystery.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:33-68.
    In this article, I propose a conjecture concerning the transmission of Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling in the 1670s involving Leibniz. On the basis of a report about Spinoza’s philosophy written down by Leibniz after some conversations with Tschirnhaus in early 1676, I suggest that Tschirnhaus may have had in his possession a manuscript copy of KV and that his account of Spinoza’s doctrine to Leibniz was colored by this text. I support the hypothesis partly by means of external evidence, but mainly (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  30
    Toland et Leibniz. L’Invention du néo-spinozisme.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:165-170.
  19.  38
    Martine de Gaudemar and Philippe Hamou (Eds.), Locke Et Leibniz. Deux Styles de Rationalité.Mogens Lærke - 2012 - The Leibniz Review 22:153-155.
  20.  37
    Paul Rateau (Ed.), L'Idée de Théodicée de Leibniz À Kant: Héritage, Transformations, Critiques.Mogens Lærke - 2012 - The Leibniz Review 22:157-159.
  21.  10
    Leibniz on the Principle of Equipollence and Spinoza’s Causal Axiom.Mogens Lærke - 2015 - The Leibniz Review 25:123-130.
  22.  21
    A Conjecture About a Textual Mystery: Leibniz, Tschirnhaus and Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:33-68.
    In this article, I propose a conjecture concerning the transmission of Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling in the 1670s involving Leibniz. On the basis of a report about Spinoza’s philosophy written down by Leibniz after some conversations with Tschirnhaus in early 1676, I suggest that Tschirnhaus may have had in his possession a manuscript copy of KV and that his account of Spinoza’s doctrine to Leibniz was colored by this text. I support the hypothesis partly by means of external evidence, but mainly (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  26
    La Question du Mal Chez Leibniz.Mogens Lærke - 2009 - The Leibniz Review 19:77-91.
  24.  6
    Spinoza on the Eternity of the Mind.Mogens Lærke - 2016 - Dialogue 55 (2):265-286.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  32
    Response to Ohad Nachtomy on Possibilia in Leibniz, 1672-1676.Mogens Lærke - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:259-266.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  29
    Possibility, Agency and Individuality in Leibniz's Metaphysics.Mogens Lærke - 2008 - Dialogue 47 (2):395-397.
  27.  4
    Dictionnaire des Philosophes Français du XVIIe Siècle. Acteurs Et Réseaux de Savoir. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (1):209-215.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  9
    La vie selon la raison. Physiologie et métaphysique chez Spinoza et Leibniz.Mogens Lærke - 2015 - The Leibniz Review 25:99-104.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  22
    The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza's Ethica.Mogens Lærke - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4):843 - 847.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 20, Issue 4, Page 843-847, July 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  25
    Spinoza: une lecture d'Aristote.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):570 - 573.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 3, Page 570-573, May 2011.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  19
    The Continuum Companion to Spinoza.Mogens Lærke - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):420-425.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 20, Issue 2, Page 420-425, March 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  16
    Leibniz selon les Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain.Mogens Lærke - 2008 - Dialogue 47 (3-4):690-694.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  5
    Leibniz on the Principle of Equipollence and Spinoza’s Causal Axiom.Mogens Lærke - 2015 - The Leibniz Review 25:123-130.
  34.  3
    Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58-84.
    In this article, I discuss Leibniz's interpretation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. In particular, I consider whether Leibniz's position on this point was developed partly in reference to Spinoza's position. First, I analyze Leibniz's annotations from 1676 on Spinoza's Letter 12. The traditional cosmological argument, as found in Avicenna and Saint Thomas for example, relies on the Aristotelian assumption that an actual infinite is impossible and on the idea that there can be no effect without a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  16
    Leibniz selon les Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain François Duchesneau et Jérémie Griard Collection «Analytiques» Paris/Montréal, Vrin/Bellarmin, 2006, 352 p. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2008 - Dialogue 47 (3-4):690-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  17
    The Problem of Alloglossia . Leibniz on Spinoza's Innovative Use of Philosophical Language.Mogens Lærke - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (5):939 – 953.
  37.  10
    A Book Forged in Hell. Spinoza's Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age.Mogens Lærke - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):1037-1039.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 0, Issue 0, Page 1-3, Ahead of Print.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  2
    Response to Ohad Nachtomy on Possibilia in Leibniz, 1672-1676.Mogens Lærke - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:259-266.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  2
    La Vie Selon la Raison. Physiologie Et Métaphysique Chez Spinoza Et Leibniz. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2015 - The Leibniz Review 25:99-104.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  2
    Possibility, Agency and Individuality in Leibniz's Metaphysics. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2008 - Dialogue 47 (2):395-397.
  41.  8
    Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad By Daniel Garber Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Pp. 428 + Xxi.Mogens Lærke - 2012 - Philosophy 87 (3):449-452.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  9
    The Art of Controversies, G. W. Leibniz Édition, traduction et commentaire par Marcelo Dascal en collaboration avec Quintin Racionero et Adelino Cardoso Dordrecht, Springer , 20082, 520 p. doi:10.1017/S0012217309090106. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Dialogue 48 (1):205.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  3
    Response to Ohad Nachtomy on Possibilia in Leibniz, 1672-1676.Mogens Lærke - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:259-266.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  4
    Catherine Secrétan, Tristan Dagron et Laurent Bove (dir.), Qu'est-ce que les Lumières « radicales » ? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l'âge classique, Paris, Éditions Amsterdam (Caute !), 2007, 404 pages, 24 €. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Astérion 6.
    Ce beau volume rassemble vingt-trois contributions à un colloque international sur le thème des « Lumières radicales », tenu à l’École normale supérieure Lettres et sciences humaines à Lyon en février 2004. L’objectif du colloque était de s’interroger sur le sens et la pertinence de cette catégorie historiographique qui s’est imposée dans l’histoire intellectuelle du xviie et du xviiie siècle depuis quelques décennies déjà, mais avec une force considérable depuis une dizaine d’années. Le volu..
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  8
    The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's 'Ethics'.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (1):149-153.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  7
    Leibniz. An Intellectual Biography Maria Rosa Antognazza Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, Xxvii + 623 Pp. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Dialogue 48 (3):679.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  5
    Models of the History of Philosophy, Vol. II: From the Cartesian Age to Brucker. Edited By Gregorio Piaia and Giovanni Santinello. (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, Pp. XXIV + 604. Price £224.50 Hb.). [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):400-403.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  1
    Martine de Gaudemar and Philippe Hamou , Locke Et Leibniz. Deux Styles de Rationalité. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2012 - The Leibniz Review 22:153-155.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  1
    Monism, Separability and Real Distinction in the Young Leibniz.Mogens Lærke - 2009 - The Leibniz Review 19:1-28.
    In this article, I discuss how Leibniz’s first correspondence with Malebranche from early 1676 can shed new light on the notorious “all-things-are-one”-passage found in the Quod ens perfectissimum sit possibile from late 1676—a passage that has been taken as an expression of monism or Spinozism in the young Leibniz. The correspondence with Malebranche provides a deeper understanding of Leibniz’s use of the notions of “real distinction” and “separability” in the ATOP. This forms the background for a discussion of Leibniz’s commitment (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  1
    Quod Non Omnia Possibilia Ad Existentiam Perveniant: Leibniz’s Ontology of Possibility, 1668-1678.Mogens Lærke - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 70