11 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Mohammad Hosseini [11]Mohammadali Hosseini [3]
See also
Mohammad Hosseini
Dublin City University
  1.  21
    A Review of the Literature on Ethical Issues Related to Scientific Authorship.Mohammad Hosseini & Bert Gordijn - 2020 - Accountability in Research 27 (5).
    The article at hand presents the results of a literature review on the ethical issues related to scientific authorship. These issues are understood as questions and/or concerns about obligations, values or virtues in relation to reporting, authorship and publication of research results. For this purpose, the Web of Science core collection was searched for English resources published between 1945 and 2018, and a total of 324 items were analyzed. Based on the review of the documents, ten ethical themes have been (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  22
    Suggestions to Improve the Comprehensibility of Current Definitions of Scientific Authorship for International Authors.Mohammad Hosseini, Luca Consoli, H. A. E. Zwart & Mariette A. Van den Hoven - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2):597-617.
    Much has been said about the need for improving the current definitions of scientific authorship, but an aspect that is often overlooked is how to formulate and communicate these definitions to ensure that they are comprehensible and useful for researchers, notably researchers active in international research consortia. In light of a rapid increase in international collaborations within natural sciences, this article uses authorship of this branch of sciences as an example and provides suggestions to improve the comprehensibility of the definitions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  18
    Iranian Nurses’ Experience of “Being a Wrongdoer”.Mohaddeseh Mohsenpour, MohammadAli Hosseini, Abbas Abbaszadeh, Farahnaz Mohammadi Shahboulaghi & HamidReza Khankeh - forthcoming - Nursing Ethics:096973301666088.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  32
    Suggestions to Improve the Comprehensibility of Current Definitions of Scientific Authorship for International Authors.Mohammad Hosseini, Luca Consoli, H. A. E. Zwart & Mariette A. Van den Hoven - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics:1-21.
    Much has been said about the need for improving the current definitions of scientific authorship, but an aspect that is often overlooked is how to formulate and communicate these definitions to ensure that they are comprehensible and useful for researchers, notably researchers active in international research consortia. In light of a rapid increase in international collaborations within natural sciences, this article uses authorship of this branch of sciences as an example and provides suggestions to improve the comprehensibility of the definitions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  29
    Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error.Mohammad Hosseini, Medard Hilhorst, Inez de Beaufort & Daniele Fanelli - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1):189-206.
    Retractions solicited by authors following the discovery of an unintentional error—what we henceforth call a “self-retraction”—are a new phenomenon of growing importance, about which very little is known. Here we present results of a small qualitative study aimed at gaining preliminary insights about circumstances, motivations and beliefs that accompanied the experience of a self-retraction. We identified retraction notes that unambiguously reported an honest error and that had been published between the years 2010 and 2015. We limited our sample to retractions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. The Norms of Authorship Credit: Challenging the Definition of Authorship in the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.Mohammad Hosseini & Jonathan Lewis - 2020 - Accountability in Research 27 (2):80-98.
    The practice of assigning authorship for a scientific publication tends to raise two normative questions: 1) ‘who should be credited as an author?’; 2) ‘who should not be credited as an author but should still be acknowledged?’. With the publication of the revised version of The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ECCRI), standard answers to these questions have been called into question. This article examines the ways in which the ECCRI approaches these two questions and compares these approaches (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  6
    A Scoping Review of the Literature Featuring Research Ethics and Research Integrity Cases.Péter Kakuk, Soren Holm, János Kristóf Bodnár, Mohammad Hosseini, Jonathan Lewis, Bert Gordijn & Anna Catharina Vieira Armond - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-14.
    BackgroundThe areas of Research Ethics and Research Integrity are rapidly evolving. Cases of research misconduct, other transgressions related to RE and RI, and forms of ethically questionable behaviors have been frequently published. The objective of this scoping review was to collect RE and RI cases, analyze their main characteristics, and discuss how these cases are represented in the scientific literature.MethodsThe search included cases involving a violation of, or misbehavior, poor judgment, or detrimental research practice in relation to a normative framework. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  11
    Team Sport, Match Analysis, Technical Variables, Football.Mohammad Hosseini & Samuel V. Bruton - 2020 - Accountability in Research 27 (8):496-520.
    Over the past several years, there has been a significant increase in the number of scientific articles with two or more authors claiming “Equal Co-First Authorship”. This study provides a critical background to ECFA designations, discusses likely causes of its increased use, and explores arguments for and against the practice. Subsequently, it presents the results of a qualitative study that sought the opinion of 19 authors listed among equal first authors of recent publications in leading scientific journals about ECFA designations. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  9
    MyCites: A Proposal to Mark and Report Inaccurate Citations in Scholarly Publications.Cameron Neylon, Bert Gordijn, Martin Paul Eve & Mohammad Hosseini - 2020 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 5 (1).
    BackgroundInaccurate citations are erroneous quotations or instances of paraphrasing of previously published material that mislead readers about the claims of the cited source. They are often unaddressed due to underreporting, the inability of peer reviewers and editors to detect them, and editors’ reluctance to publish corrections about them. In this paper, we propose a new tool that could be used to tackle their circulation.MethodsWe provide a review of available data about inaccurate citations and analytically explore current ways of reporting and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Gender Disparity in Publication Records: A Qualitative Study of Women Researchers in Computing and Engineering.Shiva Sharifzad & Mohammad Hosseini - 2021 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 6 (1).
    BackgroundThe current paper follows up on the results of an exploratory quantitative analysis that compared the publication and citation records of men and women researchers affiliated with the Faculty of Computing and Engineering at Dublin City University in Ireland. Quantitative analysis of publications between 2013 and 2018 showed that women researchers had fewer publications, received fewer citations per person, and participated less often in international collaborations. Given the significance of publications for pursuing an academic career, we used qualitative methods to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  7
    Equal Co‑Authorship Practices: Review and Recommendations.Mohammad Hosseini - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1133-1148.
    There has been an increase in the number of journal articles that are co-authored by researchers who claim to have made equal contributions. This growth has sparked discussions in the literature, especially within medical journals. To extend the debate beyond medical disciplines and support journal editors in forming an opinion, the current review collates and explores published viewpoints about so-called Equal Co-authorship practices. The Web of Science core database was used to identify publications that mention and discuss EC. Within the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark