Results for 'Mylan Engel Jr'

1000+ found
Order:
See also
Mylan Engel Jr
Northern Illinois University
  1.  6
    Exponentiating Entities by Necessity.Rayme Engel & M. G. Yoes Jr - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):293 – 304.
  2.  22
    What's Wrong with Contextualism, and a Noncontextualist Resolution of the Skeptical Paradox.Mylan Engel Jr - 2004 - Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):203 - 231.
    Skeptics try to persuade us of our ignorance with arguments like the following: 1. I don't know that I am not a handless brain-in-a-vat [BIV]. 2. If I don't know that I am not a handless BIV, then I don't know that I have hands. Therefore, 3. I don't know that I have hands. The BIV argument is valid, its premises are intuitively compelling, and yet, its conclusion strikes us as a absurd. Something has to go, but what? Contextualists contend (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Mylan ENGEL, Jr. Northern Illinois University.H. A. Prichard - 2000 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 60 (1):99-117.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Personal and Doxastic Justification in Epistemology.Mylan Engel - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 67 (2):133-150.
  5.  79
    What's Wrong with Contextualism, and a Noncontextualist Resolution of the Skeptical Paradox.Mylan Engel - 2004 - Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):203-231.
    Skeptics try to persuade us of our ignorance with arguments like the following: 1. I dont know that I am not a handless brain-in-a-vat [BIV]. 2. If I dont know that I am not a handless BIV, then I dont know that I have hands. Therefore, 3. I dont know that I have hands. The BIV argument is valid, its premises are intuitively compelling, and yet, its conclusion strikes us as absurd. Something has to go, but what? Contextualists contend that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  6.  21
    Demystifying Animal Rights.Mylan Engel - 2018 - Between the Species 21 (1).
    According to the mysteriousness objection, moral rights are wholly mysterious, metaphysically suspect entities. Given their unexplained character and dubious metaphysical status, the objection goes, we should be ontologically parsimonious and deny that such entities exist. I defend Tom Regan's rights view from the mysteriousness objection. In particular, I argue that what makes moral rights seem metaphysically mysterious is the mistaken tendency to reify such rights. Once we understand what moral rights are and what they are not, we will see that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  18
    Russellizing Russell: A Reply to His “a Critique of Lehrer's Coherentism”.Mylan Engel - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 66 (1):99 - 108.
  8.  1
    What’s Wrong with Contextualism, and a Noncontextualist Resolution of the Skeptical Paradox.Mylan Engel - 2004 - Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):203-231.
    Skeptics try to persuade us of our ignorance with arguments like the following: 1. I don't know that I am not a handless brain-in-a-vat [BIV]. 2. If I don't know that I am not a handless BIV, then I don't know that I have hands. Therefore, 3. I don't know that I have hands. The BIV argument is valid, its premises are intuitively compelling, and yet, its conclusion strikes us as a absurd. Something has to go, but what? Contextualists contend (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Inconsistency: The Coherence Theorist's Nemesis?Mylan Engel - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40:113-130.
    The relationship between inconsistency and Lehrerian coherence is scrutinized. Like most coherence theorists of epistemic justification, Lehrer contends that consistency is necessary for coherence. Despite this contention, minimally inconsistent belief-sets prove coherent and rationally acceptable on Lehrer's account of coherence. Lehrer is left with the following dilemma: If consistency is necessary for coherence, then he must revise his account of coherence accordingly and, more importantly, such coherence is nof necessary for justification, since intuitively we are justified in accepting such minimally (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. The Kiefer Argument.Mylan Engel & Wolfgang L. Gombocz - 1984 - In Wolfgang Leopold Gombocz (ed.), Philosophy of Religion. D. Reidel [Distributor].
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. The Moral Rights of Animals.Mylan Engel & Gary Lynn Comstock (eds.) - 2016 - Lanham, MD: Lexington.
    This volume brings together essays by seminal figures and rising stars in the fields of animal ethics and moral theory to analyze and evaluate the moral status of non-human animals, with a special focus on the question of whether or not animals have moral rights. Though wide-ranging in many ways, these fourteen original essays and one reprinted essay direct significant attention to both the main arguments for animal rights and the biggest challenges to animal rights. This volume explores the question (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  2
    Pascal Engel. Publications.Pascal Engel - 2017 - Philosophia Scientiæ. Travaux d'Histoire Et de Philosophie des Sciences 21:209-234.
    Livres [1] P. Engel, Identité et référence, la théorie des noms propres chez Frege et Kripke, Paris : Presses de l’École normale supérieure. [2] P. Engel, La Norme du vrai, philosophie de la logique, Paris : Gallimard, 3e éd. [3] P. Engel, The Norm of Truth, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic, New York : Harvester Wheatsheaf. Traduction en anglais de [2] par P. Engel & M. Kochan. [4] P. Engel, États d’esprit, questions de (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  11
    I—Pascal Engel: Doxastic Correctness.Pascal Engel - 2013 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 87 (1):199-216.
  14.  14
    Modern Philosophy in France: A Discussion with Pierre Jacob and Pascal Engel.Pierre Jacob, Pascal Engel, Kim Davis, Jonathan Leigh-Pemberton & Simon Whiteside - 1987 - Cogito 1 (3):21-23.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  6
    Engel, Bernhard Carl. Schiller als Denker.Bernhard Carl Engel - 1908 - Kant-Studien 13 (1-3).
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  2
    Continental Insularity: Contemporary French Analytical Philosophy: Pascal Engel.Pascal Engel - 1987 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 21:1-19.
    People outside France have always wondered why analytical philosophy has had so little influence in this country, while it has gained currency in many other European countries, such as Germany and Italy, not to speak of Northern Europe, where the analytical tradition is strongly established. This can be explained only by a particular conjunction of historical, cultural, sociological and maybe economical factors, which it would be too long to detail here. If there are natural characters of nations, there is no (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Versuch Einer Neuen Logik Oder Theorie des Denkens, Besorgt von B.C. Engel.Salomon Maimon & Bernhard Carl Engel - 1912
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  7
    Reply to Mylan Engel.Keith Lehrer - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40:131-133.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  1
    Reply to Mylan Engel.Keith Lehrer - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40:131-133.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  36
    Engel on Internalism & Externalism in Epistemology.David Reiter - 1998 - Erkenntnis 49 (2):175-184.
    Mylan Engel, Jr. has proposed a straightforward and attractive explanation of the internalism-externalism controversy (IEC) in contemporary epistemology. Engel's explanation posits that there are two distinct kinds of epistemic justification, and the IEC has arisen because epistemologists have inadvertently overlooked the fact that they are not all concerned with the same subject matter (internalists are concerned with one kind of epistemic justification while externalists are concerned with another kind). In this paper, I will explain two difficulties with (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  10
    The Laws of the Medieval Kingdom of Hungary/Decreta Regni Mediaevalis Hungariae, 2: 1301-1457.János M. Bak, Pál Engel, James Ross Sweeney, Paul B. Harvey, Jr. [REVIEW]Steven Béla Várdy - 1996 - Speculum 71 (2):386-387.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. The Immorality of Eating Meat.Mylan Engel Jr - 2000 - Chapter in The Moral Life:856-889.
    Unlike other ethical arguments for veganism, the argument advanced is not predicated on the wrongness of speciesism, nor does it depend on your believing that all animals are equal or that all animals have a right to life, nor is it predicated on some highly contentious metaethical theory which you reject. Rather, it is predicated on your beliefs. Simply put, the argument shows that even those of you who are steadfastly committed to valuing humans over nonhumans are nevertheless committed to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23. The Mere Considerability of Animals.Mylan Engel Jr - 2001 - Acta Analytica 27:89-108.
    Singer and Regan predicate their arguments -- for ethical vegetarianism, against animal experimentation, and for an end to animal exploitation generally -- on the equal considerability premise (EC). According to (EC), we owe humans and sentient nonhumans exactly the same degree of moral considerability. While Singer's and Regan's conclusions follow from (EC), many philosophers reject their arguments because they find (EC)'s implications morally repugnant and intuitively unacceptable. Like most people, you probably reject (EC). Never the less, you're already committed to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  24. Epistemic Luck.Mylan Engel Jr - 2011 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy:1-41.
    Epistemic luck is a generic notion used to describe any of a number of ways in which it can be accidental, coincidental, or fortuitous that a person has a true belief. For example, one can form a true belief as a result of a lucky guess, as when one believes through guesswork that “C” is the right answer to a multiple-choice question and one’s belief just happens to be correct. One can form a true belief via wishful thinking; for example, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  25. Vegetarianism.Mylan Engel Jr - 2016 - Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics.
    Ethical vegetarians maintain that vegetarianism is morally required. The principal reasons offered in support of ethical vegetarianism are: (i) concern for the welfare and well-being of the animals being eaten, (ii) concern for the environment, (iii) concern over global food scarcity and the just distribution of resources, and (iv) concern for future generations. Each of these reasons is explored in turn, starting with a historical look at ethical vegetarianism and the moral status of animals.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Is Epistemic Luck Compatible with Knowledge?Mylan Engel Jr - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):59-75.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  27. Intemalism, the Gettier Problem, and Metaepistemological Skepticism.Mylan Engel Jr - 2000 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 60 (1):99-117.
    When it comes to second-order knowledge, internalists typically contend that when we know that p, we can, by reflecting, directly know that we are knowing it. Gettier considerations are employed to challenge this internalistic contention and to make out a prima facie case for internalistic metaepistemological skepticism, the thesis that no one ever intemalistically knows that one internalistically knows that p. In particular, I argue that at the metaepistemological second-order level, the Gettier problem generates three distinct problems which, taken together, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  97
    Coherentism and the Epistemic Justification of Moral Beliefs: A Case Study in How to Do Practical Ethics Without Appeal to a Moral Theory.Mylan Engel Jr - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (1):50-74.
    This paper defends a coherentist approach to moral epistemology. In “The Immorality of Eating Meat”, I offer a coherentist consistency argument to show that our own beliefs rationally commit us to the immorality of eating meat. Elsewhere, I use our own beliefs as premises to argue that we have positive duties to assist the poor and to argue that biomedical animal experimentation is wrong. The present paper explores whether this consistency-based coherentist approach of grounding particular moral judgments on beliefs we (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29. A Noncontextualist Account of Contextualist Linguistic Data.Mylan Engel Jr - 2005 - Acta Analytica 20 (2):56-79.
    The paper takes as its starting point the observation that people can be led to retract knowledge claims when presented with previously ignored error possibilities, but offers a noncontextualist explanation of the data. Fallibilist epistemologies are committed to the existence of two kinds of Kp -falsifying contingencies: (i) Non-Ignorable contingencies [NI-contingencies] and (ii) Properly-Ignorable contingencies [PI-contingencies]. For S to know that p, S must be in an epistemic position to rule out all NI-contingencies, but she need not be able to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  30.  50
    The Commonsense Case for Ethical Vegetarianism.Mylan Engel Jr - 2016 - Between the Species: A Journal of Ethics 19 (1):2-31.
    The article defends ethical vegetarianism, which, for present purposes, is stipulatively taken to be the view that it is morally wrong to eat animals when equally nutritious plant-based foods are available. Several examples are introduced to show that we all agree that animals deserve some direct moral consideration and to help identify and clarify several commonsense moral principles—principles we all accept. These principles are then used to argue that eating animals is morally wrong. Since you no doubt accept these principles, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  98
    Taking Hunger Seriously.Mylan Engel Jr - 2004 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):29-57.
    An argument is advanced to show that affluent and moderately affluent people, like you and me, are morally obligated: (O1) To provide modest financial support for famine relief organizations and/or other humanitanan organizations working to reduce the amount of unnecessary suffering and death in the world, and (O2) To refrain from squandering food that could be fed to humans in situations of food scarcity. Unlike other ethical arguments for the obligation to assist the world’s absolutely poor, my argument is not (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32. The Commonsense Case Against Animal Experimentation.Mylan Engel Jr - 2012 - In Jeremy Garret (ed.), The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 215-236.
  33.  30
    The Problem of Other Minds: A Reliable Solution.Mylan Engel Jr - 1993 - Acta Analytica 11 (11):87-109.
    Paul Churchland characterizes the "epistemological problem" in philosophy of mind as the problem "concerned with how we come to have knowledge of the internal activities of conscious, intelligent minds." This problem is itself divided into two separate, but related problems: (1) the problem of self-consciousness -- that of determining how one comes to have knowledge of one's own mental states, and (2) the problem of other minds -- that of explaining how one can ever come to know that something other (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  29
    Do Animals Have Rights and Does It Matter If They Don't?Mylan Engel Jr - 2016 - In Mylan Engel & Gary Comstock (eds.), The Moral Rights of Animals. Lanham, MD: Lexington. pp. 39-64.
  35.  87
    The Equivocal or Question-Begging Nature of Evil Demon Arguments for External World Skepticism.Mylan Engel Jr - 2005 - Southwest Philosophy Review 21 (1):163-178.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. Epistemic Luck.Mylan Engel Jr - 2010 - In Jonathan Dancy, Ernest Sosa & Matthias Steup (eds.), A Companion to Epistemology, Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 336-340.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  37.  13
    Bernstein on Moral Status and the Comparative Value of Lives.Mylan Engel Jr - 2017 - Journal of Animal Ethics 7 (2):204.
    By stipulation, the Human Superiority Thesis [HST] consists of two claims: (1) the interests of humans should be given preferential consideration relative to the like interests of nonhuman animals, and (2) the lives of humans are more valuable than the lives of nonhuman animals. In his recent book, Mark Bernstein argues that both claims are false. I present and assess Bernstein’s main arguments, pointing out where they succeed and where they fall short. I then suggest ways of shoring up and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  42
    Positism: The Unexplored Solution to the Epistemic Regress Problem.Mylan Engel Jr - 2014 - Metaphilosophy 45 (2):146-160.
    As we trace a chain of reasoning backward, it must ultimately do one of four things: (i) end in an unjustified belief, (ii) continue infinitely, (iii) form a circle, or (iv) end in an immediately justified basic belief. This article defends positism—the view that, in certain circumstances, type-(i) chains can justify us in holding their target beliefs. One of the assumptions that generates the epistemic regress problem is: (A) Person S is mediately justified in believing p iff (1) S has (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  22
    Inconsistency: The Coherence Theorist's Nemesis?Mylan Engel Jr - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40:113-130.
    The relationship between inconsistency and Lehrerian coherence is scrutinized. Like most coherence theorists of epistemic justification, Lehrer contends that consistency is necessary for coherence. Despite this contention, minimally inconsistent belief-sets prove coherent and rationally acceptable on Lehrer's account of coherence. Lehrer is left with the following dilemma: If consistency is necessary for coherence, then (i) he must revise his account of coherence accordingly and, more importantly, (ii) such coherence is nof necessary for justification, since intuitively we are justified in accepting (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40.  32
    Review of Michael J. Murray, Nature Red in Tooth and Claw: Theism and the Problem of Animal Suffering[REVIEW]Mylan Engel Jr - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (2).
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. Coherentism Reliabilized.Mylan Engel Jr - 1986 - Acta Analytica 2:49-77.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  42.  20
    In Defense of Pure Reason Laurence Bonjour Cambridge Studies in Philosophy New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998, Xiv + 232 Pp., $54.95, $18.95 Paper. [REVIEW]Mylan Engel Jr - 2000 - Dialogue 39 (1):163-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  14
    Review ofPractical Ethics, 3rd Editionby Peter Singer. [REVIEW]Mylan Engel Jr - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):73-75.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 12, Page 73-75, December 2011.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  8
    Review of Practical Ethics, by Peter Singer. [REVIEW]Mylan Engel Jr - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):73 - 75.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  1
    Coarsening Brand on Events, While Proliferating Davidsonian Events.Mylan Engel Jr - 1994 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 47:155-183.
    A course-grained theory of event individuation is defended by arguing that events are spatiotemporal particulars with an ontological affinity to coarse-grained physical objects and by demonstrating that the metalinguistic correlate to one set of adequate identity conditions for events is most plausibly iterpreted as coarsely individuating events. Such coarse-grained events, it is argued, do admit of divisibility proliferation, much like the proliferation of physical objects entailed by Goodman's calculus of individuals. This coase-grained, divisibility proliferation account of events is then used (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Ethical Extensionism.Mylan Engel Jr - 2008 - In Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy, Vol. 1. Detroit, MI: Gale Cengage Learning. pp. 396-398.
  47. Is Epistemic Luck Compatible with Knowledge?Mylan Engel Jr - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):59-75.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  38
    Personal and Doxastic Variants of Epistemic Justification and Their Roles in the Theory of Knowledge.Mylan Engel Jr - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
    Most epistemologists agree that epistemic justification is required for knowledge. This requirement is usually formulated in one of two ways: S knows that p only if S is justified in believing that p. S knows that p only if S's belief that p is justified. Surprisingly and are generally regarded as synonymous formulations of the justification condition. In Chapter 1, I argue that such a synonymy thesis is mistaken and that, in fact, and specify substantively different requirements. requires that the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Paul Warren Taylor.Mylan Engel Jr - 2008 - In Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy, Vol. 2. Detroit, MI: Gale Cengage Learning. pp. 302-304.
  50. Review of Mark Devries’s Documentary Film "Speciesism: The Movie".Mylan Engel Jr - 2014 - The Philosophers’ Magazine (65):123-124.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 1000