7 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Nandini K. Kumar [4]Nandini Kumar [3]
  1.  18
    Results of a Self-Assessment Tool to Assess the Operational Characteristics of Research Ethics Committees in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Henry Silverman, Hany Sleem, Keymanthri Moodley, Nandini Kumar, Sudeshni Naidoo, Thilakavathi Subramanian, Rola Jaafar & Malini Moni - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):332-337.
  2.  6
    Fostering Ethical Biomedical and Health Research in India During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Nandini K. Kumar & Vasantha Muthuswamy - 2020 - Research Ethics 16 (3-4):1-10.
    The COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented, major challenges to the ethical conduct of research including challenges for the rapid and robust ethical review of biomedical research. The Indian...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  21
    Ethical Issues in Post-Disaster Clinical Interventions and Research: A Developing World Perspective. Key Findings From a Drafting and Consensus Generation Meeting of the Working Group on Disaster Research and Ethics (WGDRE) 2007.Athula Sumathipala, Aamir Jafarey, Leonardo D. De Castro, Aasim Ahmad, Darryl Marcer, Sandya Srinivasan, Nandini Kumar, Sisira Siribaddana, Sleman Sutaryo, Anant Bhan, Dananjaya Waidyaratne, Sriyakanthi Beneragama, Chandrani Jayasekera, Sarath Edirisingha & Chesmal Siriwardhana - 2010 - Asian Bioethics Review 2 (2):124-142.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  8
    Ethics Dumping – How Not to Do Research in Resource-Poor Settings.Doris Schroeder, Kate Chatfield, Vasantha Muthuswamy & Nandini K. Kumar - unknown
    Ethics dumping is a global phenomenon involving the ‘off-shoring’of research. Research that would be prohibited, severely restrictedor regarded as highly patronizing in high-income regions is instead conducted inresource-poor settings. Twenty-eight case studies of ethics dumping were examined through inductive thematic analysis to reveal predisposing factors from the perspective of researchers from high-income regions. Six categories were agreed and further illuminated: Patronizing conduct, unfair distribution of benefits and/or burdens, culturally inappropriate conduct, double standards, lack of due diligence and lack of transparency. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  42
    The India Experience.Nandini Kumar, G. D. Ravindran, A. Bhan, J. S. Srivastava & V. M. Nair - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (4):295-303.
    This article featuring India constitutes one of five articles in a collection of essays on local capacity-building in research ethics by graduates from the University of Toronto’s Joint Centre for Bioethics MHSc in Bioethics, International Stream program funded by the Fogarty International Center for Advanced Study in the Health Sciences. Research ethics is a growing area of work and interest in India. Ethics review remains the weakest component in the mechanism of good clinical practice, and there is a severe dearth (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. India's Preparedness in Tackling Biopiracy and Biobanking : Still Miles to Go.Nandini K. Kumar - 2009 - In Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner (ed.), Human Genetic Biobanks in Asia: Politics of Trust and Scientific Advancement. Routledge.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  19
    Gender Disparity in Indian Renal Transplantation.Radha Malattiri & Nandini K. Kumar - 2014 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 5 (3):1-7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark