Search results for 'Nathaniel Jason Goldberg' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Nathaniel Goldberg (Washington & Lee University)
  1. Nathaniel Jason Goldberg (2009). Historicism, Entrenchment, and Conventionalism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):259-276.
    W. V. Quine famously argues that though all knowledge is empirical, mathematics is entrenched relative to physics and the special sciences. Further, entrenchment accounts for the necessity of mathematics relative to these other disciplines. Michael Friedman challenges Quine’s view by appealing to historicism, the thesis that the nature of science is illuminated by taking into account its historical development. Friedman argues on historicist grounds that mathematical claims serve as principles constitutive of languages within which empirical claims in physics and the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  45
    Nathaniel Jason Goldberg (2003). Davidson, Analyticity, and Theory Confirmation. Dissertation, Georgetown University
    In this dissertation, I explore the work of Donald Davidson, reveal an inconsistency in it, and resolve that inconsistency in a way that complements a debate in philosophy of science. In Part One, I explicate Davidson's extensional account of meaning; though not defending Davidson from all objections, I nonetheless present his seemingly disparate views as a coherent whole. In Part Two, I explicate Davidson's views on the dualism between conceptual schemes and empirical content, isolating four seemingly different arguments that Davidson (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Nathaniel Goldberg (2004). E Pluribus Unum: Arguments Against Conceptual Schemes and Empirical Content. Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (4):411-438.
    The idea that there are conceptual schemes, relative to which we conceptualize experience, and empirical content, the “raw” data of experience that get conceptualized through our conceptual schemes into beliefs or sentences, is not new. The idea that there are neither conceptual schemes nor empirical content, however, is. Moreover, it is so new, that only four arguments have so far been given against this dualism, with Donald Davidson himself presenting versions of all four. In this paper, I show that in (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  4. Nathaniel Goldberg (2015). Albert Casullo, Essays on A Priori Knowledge and Justification. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 35 (1):1-3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  36
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2004). Do Principles of Reason Have Objective but Indeterminate Validity? Kant-Studien 95 (4):405-425.
    Reason is precariously positioned in the Critique of Pure Reason. The Transcendental Analytic leaves no entry for reason in the cognitive process, and the Transcendental Dialectic restricts reason to noncognitive roles. Yet, in the Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic, Kant contends that the ideas of reason can be used in empirical investigation and eventually knowledge acquisition. Given what Kant has said, how is this possible? Kant attempts to answer this in A663–A666/B691–B694 in the Appendix, where he argues that principles of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  6.  12
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2009). Universal and Relative Rationality. Principia 13 (1):67-84.
    In this paper I illustrate how a basic kind of universal rationality can be profitably combined with undeniable instances of relativism. I do so by engaging Michael Friedman’s recent response to a challenge from Thomas Kuhn.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  92
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2009). Triangulation, Untranslatability, and Reconciliation. Philosophia 37 (2):261-280.
    Donald Davidson used triangulation to do everything from explicate psychological and semantic externalism, to attack relativism and skepticism, to propose conditions necessary for thought and talk. At one point Davidson tried to bring order to these remarks by identifying three kinds of triangulation, each operative in a different situation. Here I take seriously Davidson’s talk of triangular situations and extend it. I start by describing Davidson’s situations. Next I establish the surprising result that considerations from one situation entail the possibility (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8.  12
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2008). Tension Within Triangulation. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):363-383.
    Philosophers disagree about how meaning connects with history. Donald Davidson, who helped deepen our understanding of meaning, even disagreed with himself. As Ernest Lepore and Kirk Ludwig note, Davidson’s account of radical interpretation treats meaning as ahistorical; his Swampman thought experiment treats it as historical. Here I show that while Lepore and Ludwig are right that Davidson’s views are in tension, they are wrong about its extent. Unbeknownst to them, Davidson’s account of radical interpretation and Swampman thought experiment both rely—in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9.  3
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2016). Lucy Allais, Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and His Realism. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (6):238-240.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  58
    Nathaniel Goldberg & Matthew Rellihan (2008). Incommensurability, Relativism, Scepticism: Reflections on Acquiring a Concept. Ratio 21 (2):147–167.
    Some opponents of the incommensurability thesis, such as Davidson and Rorty, have argued that the very idea of incommensurability is incoherent and that the existence of alternative and incommensurable conceptual schemes is a conceptual impossibility. If true, this refutes Kuhnian relativism and Kantian scepticism in one fell swoop. For Kuhnian relativism depends on the possibility of alternative, humanly accessible conceptual schemes that are incommensurable with one another, and the Kantian notion of a realm of unknowable things-in-themselves gives rise to the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11.  84
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2004). The Principle of Charity. Dialogue 43 (4):671-683.
    The recent publication of a third anthology of Donald Davidson’s articles, and anticipated publication of two more, encourages a consideration of themes binding together Davidson’s lifetime of research. One such theme is the principle of charity (PC). In light of the mileage Davidson gets out of PC, I propose a careful examination of PC itself. In Part 1, I consider some ways in which Davidson articulates PC. In Part 2, I show that the articulation that Davidson requires in his work (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  31
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2011). Interpreting Thomas Kuhn as a Response-Dependence Theorist. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):729 - 752.
    Abstract Thomas Kuhn is the most famous historian and philosopher of science of the last century. He is also among the most controversial. Since Kuhn's death, his corpus has been interpreted, systematized, and defended. Here I add to this endeavor in a novel way by arguing that Kuhn can be interpreted as a global response-dependence theorist. He can be understood as connecting all concepts and terms in an a priori manner to responses of suitably situated subjects to objects in the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  44
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2003). Possibly V. Actually the Case: Davidson's Omniscient Interpreter at Twenty. Acta Analytica 18 (1-2):143-160.
    The publication of Davidson 2001, anthologizing articles from the 1980s and 1990s, encourages reconsidering arguments contained in them. One such argument is Davidson's omniscient-interpreter argument ('€˜OIA'€™) in Davidson 1983. The OIA allegedly establishes that it is necessary that most beliefs are true. Thus the omniscient interpreter, revived in 2001 and now 20 years old, was born to answer the skeptic. In Part I of this paper, I consider charges that the OIA establishes only that it is possible that most beliefs (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  57
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2012). Davidson, Dualism, and Truth. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1 (7).
    Happy accidents happen even in philosophy. Sometimes our arguments yield insights despite missing their target, though when they do others can often spot it more easily. Consider the work of Donald Davidson. Few did more to explore connections among mind, language, and world. Now that we have critical distance from his views, however, we can see that Davidson’s accomplishments are not quite what they seem. First, while Davidson attacked the dualism of conceptual scheme and empirical content, he in fact illustrated (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Nathaniel Goldberg (2003). Actually V. Possibly the Case: On Davidson's Omniscient Interpreter. Acta Analytica 18:143 - 60.
    Recent anthologizing of Davidson’s articles from the 1980s and 1990s encourages us to reconsider arguments contained in them. One such argument is Davidson’s omniscient-interpreter argument (“OIA”) in “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge,” first published 20 years ago. The OIA allegedly establishes that it is necessary that most beliefs are true. Thus the omniscient interpreter, now 20 years old, was born to answer the skeptic. In §1 of this paper, I consider charges that the OIA establishes only that it (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  28
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2004). McTaggart on Time. Logic and Logical Philosophy 13:71-76.
    Contemporary discussions on the nature of time begin with McTaggart, who introduces the distinction between what he takes to be the only two possible realist theories of time: the A-theory, maintaining that past, present, and future are absolute; and the B-theory, maintaining that they are relative. McTaggart argues against both theories to conclude that time is not real. In this paper, I reconstruct his argument against the A-theory. Then, I show that this argument is flawed. Finally, I draw a lesson (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  2
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2016). Margaret Cameron and Robert J. Stainton, Eds., Linguistic Content: New Essays on the History of Philosophy of Language. Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 36 (4):154-156.
  18.  12
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2014). Braine, David., Language and Human Understanding: The Roots of Creativity in Speech and Thought. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 68 (1):158-159.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  4
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2016). R. Lanier Anderson, The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics New York: Oxford University Press, 2015 Pp. 384 ISBN 9780198724575 £50.00. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 21 (1):146-151.
  20. Nathaniel Goldberg (2012). Swampman, Response-Dependence, and Meaning. In Gerhard Preyer (ed.), Donald Davidson on Truth, Meaning, and the Mental. Oxford University Press.
    Ernest Lepore and Kirk Ludwig correctly observe that Donald Davidson’s account of radical interpretation is in tension with his Swampman thought experiment. Nonetheless, I argue, they fail to see the extent of Davidson’s tension—and so do not handle it adequately—because they fail to appreciate that the thought experiment pits two incompatible response-dependent accounts of meaning against one another. I take an account of meaning to be response-dependent just in case it links the meaning of terms in an a priori manner (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  14
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2003). Buzaglo, Meir. The Logic of Concept Expansion. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 57 (1):141-143.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  12
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2004). Between Truth and Illusion. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 57 (4):832-833.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  14
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2005). The Cambridge Companion to Quine. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 58 (3):660-662.
  24.  39
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2009). Response-Dependence, Noumenalism, and Ontological Mystery. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):469-488.
    Philip Pettit has argued that all semantically basic terms are learned in response to ostended examples and all non-basic terms are defined via them. Michael Smith and Daniel Stoljar maintain that this “global response-dependence” entails noumenalism, the thesis that reality possesses an unknowable, intrinsic nature. Surprisingly Pettit acknowledges this, contending instead that his noumenalism, like Kant’s, can be construed ontologically or epistemically. Moreover, Pettit insists, construing his noumenalism epistemically renders it unproblematic. The article shows that construing noumenalism epistemically prevents Pettit (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  11
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2004). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physics. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 57 (3):631-633.
  26.  3
    Gary Goldberg & Nathaniel H. Mayer (1995). The Neurodynamics of Heavy PETing, at/Intention, Learning, Functional Recovery, and Rehabilitation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):348.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  2
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2009). Universal and Relative Rationality. Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 13 (1).
    I illustrate how a basic kind of universal rationality can be profitably combined with undeniable instances of relativism. I do so by engaging Michael Friedman’s recent response to a challenge from Thomas Kuhn.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  3
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2014). Intuition Pumps by Daniel C. Dennett. [REVIEW] Philosophy Now 101:39-40.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  2
    Gary Goldberg & Nathaniel H. Mayer (1996). The Goal of Treatment for Motor Impairment is Not to “Normalize” but to “Functionalize” Through Facilitative Modulation and Enabling Context. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):75.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  11
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2014). Kantian Conceptual Geography. Oxford University Press.
    This is a work in Kantian conceptual geography. It explores issues in analytic epistemology, philosophy of language, and metaphysics by appealing to theses drawn from Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Gary Goldberg & Nathaniel H. Mayer (1988). Motor Control as Adaptational Biology: Relevance to Education and Rehabilitation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (4):717.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  4
    Thomas Teufel (2016). Review: Nathaniel J. Goldberg. Kantian Conceptual Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 271 + Xiii Pages; $74/Hardcover. [REVIEW] Philosophical Forum 47 (1):79-82.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  52
    Sanford Goldberg (2010). Relying on Others: An Essay in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
    Sanford Goldberg investigates the role that others play in our attempts to acquire knowledge of the world.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   34 citations  
  34. Sanford C. Goldberg (2015). Assertion: On the Philosophical Significance of Assertoric Speech. Oxford University Press.
    Sanford C. Goldberg presents a novel account of the speech act of assertion. He argues that this type of speech act is answerable to an epistemic, context-sensitive norm. On this basis he shows the philosophical importance of assertion for key debates in philosophy of language and mind, epistemology, and ethics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  35.  53
    Sanford C. Goldberg (2012). Epistemic Extendedness, Testimony, and the Epistemology of Instrument-Based Belief. Philosophical Explorations 15 (2):181 - 197.
    In Relying on others [Goldberg, S. 2010a. Relying on others: An essay in epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press], I argued that, from the perspective of an interest in epistemic assessment, the testimonial belief-forming process should be regarded as interpersonally extended. At the same time, I explicitly rejected the extendedness model for beliefs formed through reliance on a mere mechanism, such as a clock. In this paper, I try to bolster my defense of this asymmetric treatment. I argue that a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  36. Elkhonon Goldberg (2009). The New Executive Brain: Frontal Lobes in a Complex World. Oxford University Press USA.
    Elkhonon Goldberg's groundbreaking The Executive Brain was a classic of scientific writing, revealing how the frontal lobes command the most human parts of the mind. Now he offers a completely new book, providing fresh, iconoclastic ideas about the relationship between the brain and the mind. In The New Executive Brain, Goldberg paints a sweeping panorama of cutting-edge thinking in cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology, one that ranges far beyond the frontal lobes. Drawing on the latest discoveries, and developing complex (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  37.  12
    Brenda Goldberg (1999). A Genealogy of the Ridiculous: From 'Humours' to Humour. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 1 (1):59-71.
    We tend to take the phenomenon of humour for granted, seeing it for the most part as something innately and fundamentally human. However we might go even further than this, and say that the phenomenon of humour is perceived as an essential part of what makes us human. In this respect, philosophers and theorists as wide apart as Aristotle and the French, feminist Julia Kristeva (1980; also see Goldberg, 1999a) have regarded a baby's ability to laugh as one of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  52
    Sanford C. Goldberg (2007). Anti-Individualism: Mind and Language, Knowledge and Justification. Cambridge University Press.
    Sanford C. Goldberg argues that a proper account of the communication of knowledge through speech has anti-individualistic implications for both epistemology and the philosophy of mind and language. In Part I he offers a novel argument for anti-individualism about mind and language, the view that the contents of one's thoughts and the meanings of one's words depend for their individuation on one's social and natural environment. In Part II he discusses the epistemic dimension of knowledge communication, arguing that the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Arnold I. Goldberg (ed.) (1991). Progress in Self Psychology, V. 7: The Evolution of Self Psychology. Routledge.
    A special section of papers on the evolution, current status, and future development of self psychology highlights _The Evolution of Self Psychology_, volume 7 of the Progress in Self Psychology series. A critical review of recent books by Basch, Goldberg, and Stolorow et al. is part of this endeavor. Theoretical contributions to Volume 7 examine self psychology in relation to object relations theory and reconsider the relationship of psychotherapy to psychoanalysis. Clinical contributions deal with an intersubjective perspective on countertransference, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Arnold I. Goldberg (ed.) (1993). Progress in Self Psychology, V. 9: The Widening Scope of Self Psychology. Routledge.
    _The Widening Scope of Self Psychology_ is a watershed in the self-psychological literature, being a contemporary reprise on several major clinical themes through which self psychology, from its inception, has articulated its challenge to traditional psychoanalytic thinking. The volume opens with original papers on interpretation by eminent theorists in the self-psychological tradition, followed by a series of case studies and clinically grounded commentaries bearing on issues of sex and gender as they enter into analysis. Two thoughtful reexaminations of the meaning (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  11
    Jonathan Goldberg (ed.) (1994). Reclaiming Sodom. Routledge.
    Within the Judeo-Christian tradition, Sodom and Gomorrah represent locales in which threats to national formation are couched in sexual terms. The biblical narrative insists on a particular social invisibility for those sexual activities not blessed by the bonds of matrimony. Reclaiming Sodom surveys a number of institutions that have had an interest in perpetuating these views: the police, the state, the church and the law. The collection ranges through biblical scholarship, an investigation of the Founding Fathers' beliefs, the legal mobilization (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Arnold Goldberg (2011). The Analysis of Failure: An Investigation of Failed Cases in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. Routledge.
    Psychotherapy and psychoanalysis don't always work. Inevitably, a therapy or analysis may fail to alleviate the suffering of the patient. The reasons why this occurs are as manifold as the patients and analysts themselves, and oftentimes are a source of frustration and vexation to clinicians, who aren't always eager to discuss them. Taking the challenge head-on, Arnold Goldberg proposes to demystify failure in an effort to determine its essential meaning before determining its causes. Utilizing multiple vignettes of failed cases, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Daniel S. Goldberg (2014). The Bioethics of Pain Management: Beyond Opioids. Routledge.
    In this book, public health ethicist Daniel S. Goldberg sets out to characterize the subjective experience of pain and its undertreatment within the US medical establishment, and puts forward public policy recommendations for ameliorating the undertreatment of pain. The book begins from the position that the overwhelming focus on opioid analgesics as a means for improving the undertreatment of pain is flawed, and argues instead that dominant Western models of biomedicine and objectivity delegitimize subjective knowledge of the body and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Arnold I. Goldberg (1990). The Prisonhouse of Psychoanalysis. Routledge.
    In _The Prisonhouse of Psychoanalysis_, Arnold Goldberg trains a searching, critical eye on his own profession. His subject matter is the system of interlocking constraints - theoretical, institutional, educational - that imprisons psychoanalysis and the psychoanalyst. His agenda is to sketch the shape analysis might take in the absence of these constraints. What emerges from these twin endeavors is a penetrating critique of psychoanalysis from the inside - from the vantage point of a senior analyst who has labored for (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Arnold I. Goldberg (2016). The Prisonhouse of Psychoanalysis. Routledge.
    In _The Prisonhouse of Psychoanalysis_, Arnold Goldberg trains a searching, critical eye on his own profession. His subject matter is the system of interlocking constraints - theoretical, institutional, educational - that imprisons psychoanalysis and the psychoanalyst. His agenda is to sketch the shape analysis might take in the absence of these constraints. What emerges from these twin endeavors is a penetrating critique of psychoanalysis from the inside - from the vantage point of a senior analyst who has labored for (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  2
    Jason W. Brown (1985). A Prelude to the Goldberg Variations on Motor Organization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):588-589.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Sanford Goldberg (2005). Testimonial Knowledge Through Unsafe Testimony. Analysis 65 (288):302–311.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  48.  75
    Sanford Goldberg & David Henderson (2006). Monitoring and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3):600 - 617.
    One of the central points of contention in the epistemology of testimony concerns the uniqueness (or not) of the justification of beliefs formed through testimony--whether such justification can be accounted for in terms of, or 'reduced to,' other familiar sort of justification, e.g. without relying on any epistemic principles unique to testimony. One influential argument for the reductionist position, found in the work of Elizabeth Fricker, argues by appeal to the need for the hearer to monitor the testimony for credibility. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  49.  56
    Sanford C. Goldberg (2007). Anti-Individualism, Content Preservation, and Discursive Justification. Noûs 41 (2):178-203.
    Most explorations of the epistemic implications of Semantic Anti- Individualism (SAI) focus on issues of self-knowledge (first-person au- thority) and/or external-world skepticism. Less explored has been SAIs implications forthe epistemology of reasoning. In this paperI argue that SAI has some nontrivial implications on this score. I bring these out by reflecting on a problem first raised by Boghossian (1992). Whereas Boghos- sians main interest was in establishing the incompatibility of SAI and the a priority of logical abilities (Boghossian 1992: 22), (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  50.  44
    Sanford C. Goldberg (2008). Testimonial Knowledge in Early Childhood, Revisited. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):1–36.
    Many epistemologists agree that even very young children sometimes acquire knowledge through testimony. In this paper I address two challenges facing this view. The first (building on a point made in Lackey (2005)) is the defeater challenge, which is to square the hypothesis that very young children acquire testimonial knowledge with the fact that children (whose cognitive immaturity prevents them from having or appreciating reasons) cannot be said to satisfy the No-Defeaters condition on knowledge. The second is the extension challenge, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000