9 found
Order:
  1.  32
    How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?Neil Davidson - 2005 - Historical Materialism 13 (3):3-54.
  2.  16
    The Frontiers of Uneven and Combined Development.Neil Davidson - 2018 - Historical Materialism 26 (3):52-78.
    Alexander Anievas and Kerem Nişancıoğlu’sHow the West Came to Ruleis an important intervention within Marxist historical debates which seeks to use the theory of uneven and combined development to explain the origin and rise to dominance of capitalism. The argument is shaped by a critique of Political Marxist ‘internalist’ explanations of the process, to which the authors counterpose an account which emphasises its inescapably ‘inter-societal’ nature. While recognising the many contributions that the book makes to our historical understanding, this article (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  4
    How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?Neil Davidson - 2005 - Historical Materialism 13 (3):3-33.
  4.  11
    Capitalist Outcomes, Ideal Types, Historical Realities.Neil Davidson - 2019 - Historical Materialism 27 (3):210-276.
    This article is a response to some of the criticisms made of How Revolutionary were the Bourgeois Revolutions? by Gerstenberger, Post and Riley. In particular, it focuses on two issues of definition – that of capitalism and the capitalist nation-state – which arise from the book’s ‘consequentialist’ claim that bourgeois revolutions are defined by a particular outcome: the establishment of nation-states dedicated to the accumulation of capital.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  45
    The American Civil War Considered as a Bourgeois Revolution.Neil Davidson - 2011 - Historical Materialism 19 (4):98-144.
    The discussion of the American Civil War as a bourgeois revolution, reopened by John Ashworth’s recent work, needs to be based on a more explicit conceptualisation of what the category does, and does not, involve. This essay offers one such conceptualisation. It then deals with two key issues raised by the process of bourgeois revolution in the United States: the relationship between the War of Independence and the Civil War, and whether the nature of the South made conflict unavoidable. It (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  16
    Centuries of Transition.Neil Davidson - 2011 - Historical Materialism 19 (1):73-97.
  7.  13
    Brill Online Books and Journals.Giovanni Arrighi, Ellen Meiksins Wood, Peter Thomas, Richard B. Day, Pavel V. Maksakovsky & Neil Davidson - 2002 - Historical Materialism 10 (3):115-131.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  14
    Stalinism, 'Nation Theory' and Scottish History: A Reply to John Foster.Neil Davidson - 2002 - Historical Materialism 10 (3):195-222.
  9. Alasdair MacIntyre and Trotskyism.Neil Davidson - 2011 - In Paul Blackledge & Kelvin Knight (eds.), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair Macintyre's Revolutionary Aristotelianism. University of Notre Dame Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark