81 found
Order:
  1. Locke: His Philosophical Thought.Nicholas Jolley - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
    This book is a general introduction to the philosophy of John Locke, one of the most influential thinkers in modern times. Nicholas Jolley aims to show the fundamental unity of Locke's thought in his masterpiece, the Essay Concerning Human Understanding. In this work Locke advances a coherent theory of knowledge; as against Descartes he argues that knowledge is possible to the extent that it concerns essences which are constructions of the human mind.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  2.  29
    The Light of the Soul: Theories of Ideas in Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes.Nicholas Jolley - 1990 - Oxford University Press.
    The concept of an "idea" played a central role in 17th-century theories of mind and knowledge, but philosophers were divided over the nature of ideas. This book examines an important, but little-known, debate on this question in the work of Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes. Looking closely at the issues involved, as well as the particular context in which the debate took place, Jolley demonstrates that the debate has serious implications for a number of major topics in 17th-century philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  3.  53
    Occasionalism and Efficacious Laws in Malebranche.Nicholas Jolley - 2002 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 26 (1):245–257.
  4. Leibniz and Malebranche on Innate Ideas.Nicholas Jolley - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (1):71-91.
    This paper seeks to reconstruct an important controversy between leibniz and malebranche over innate ideas. It is argued that this controversy is in some ways more illuminating than the better-Known debate between leibniz and locke, For malebranche's objections to innate ideas raise fundamental questions concerning the status of dispositions and the relationship between logic and psychology. The paper shows that in order to meet malebranche's objections, Leibniz adopts a strategy which is doubly reductionist: ideas are reduced to dispositions to think (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5.  50
    Causality and Creation in Leibnitz.Nicholas Jolley - 1998 - The Monist 81 (4):591-611.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  6.  12
    Leibniz and Locke: A Study of the New Essays on Human Understanding.Nicholas Jolley - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
  7. Metaphysics.Nicholas Jolley - 2006 - In Donald Rutherford (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 95--135.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  8.  43
    Intellect and Illumination in Malebranche.Nicholas Jolley - 1994 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (2):209-224.
    One of the hallmarks of Descartes' philosophy is the doctrine that the human mind has a faculty of pure intellect. This doctrine is so central to Descartes' teaching that it is difficult to believe that any of his disciplines would abandon it. Yet this is what happened in the case of Malebranche. This paper argues that in his later philosophy Malebranche adopted a theory of divine illumination which leaves no room for a Cartesian doctrine of pure intellect. It is further (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  9.  25
    Leibniz.Nicholas Jolley - 1986 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1):129-130.
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) was hailed by Bertrand Russell as "one of the supreme intellects of all time." A towering figure in Seventeenth century philosophy, his complex thought has been championed and satirized in equal measure, most famously in Voltaire's Candide. In this outstanding introduction to his philosophy, Nicholas Jolley introduces and assesses the whole of Leibniz's philosophy. Beginning with an introduction to Leibniz's life and work, he carefully introduces the core elements of Leibniz's metaphysics: his theories of substance, identity (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  10.  56
    Berkeley, Malebranche, and Vision in God.Nicholas Jolley - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (4):535-548.
    Berkeley, Malebranche, and Vision in God NICHOLAS JOLLEY IN THE SECOND of the Three Dialogues Hylas, the materialist, asks Philonous: "But what say you, are not you too of opinion that we see all things in God? If I mistake not, what you advance comes near it."' In the first edition of the Dialogues Philonous's response was a temperate one; he expressed his agree- ment with Malebranche's emphasis on the Scriptural text that in God we live, move, and have our (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11.  4
    2 Malebranche on the Soul.Nicholas Jolley - 2000 - In Steven M. Nadler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche. Cambridge University Press. pp. 31.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12. Locke On Supposing a Substratum.Goldwin Smith Hall, John Heil, Nicholas Jolley, Norman Kretzmann & Lisa Shapiro - unknown
    It is an old charge against Locke that his commitment to a common substratum for the observable qualities of particular objects and his empiricist theory about the origin of ideas are inconsistent with one another. How could we have an idea of something in which observable qualities inhere if all our ideas are constructed from ideas of observable qualities? In this paper, I propose an interpretation of the crucial passages in Locke, according to which the idea of substratum is formed (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  29
    Leibniz and Phenomenalism.Nicholas Jolley - 1986 - Studia Leibnitiana 18 (1):38-51.
    Leibniz est-il devenu phénoménaliste pendant ses années dernières ? Contre Furth et Loeb, ce travail rend une réponse négative à cette question. Quoique Leibniz a caressé les idées phénoménalistes, il ne les a jamais vraiment acceptées ; au contraire, il soutient une autre thèse réductioniste, c'est-à-dire que les corps sont des agrégats des monades. Cependant, cette conclusion entraîne ses propres difficultés, car à certains égards, la doctrine phénoménaliste paraît plus satisfaisante que l'option concurrante. On soutient que la répugnance leibnizienne à (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  6
    The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz.Robert Merrihew Adams & Nicholas Jolley - 1996 - Philosophical Review 105 (2):245.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  71
    Locke's Enlightenment. G.A.J. Rogers.Nicholas Jolley - 2001 - Mind 110 (439):821-824.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  53
    The Rationalists: Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz.Nicholas Jolley - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2):339 – 341.
  17. Reason's Dim Candle: Locke's Critique of Enthusiasm.Nicholas Jolley - 2003 - In Peter R. Anstey (ed.), The Philosophy of John Locke: New Perspectives. Routledge. pp. 179--91.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. Descartes and the Action of Body on Mind.Nicholas Jolley - 1987 - Studia Leibnitiana 19 (1):41-53.
    In diesem Aufsatz versuche ich, die innere Kohärenz der Cartesischen Lehre von der Wechselwirkung zwischen Leib und Seele nachzuweisen. Ich versichte jedoch darauf, das Prinzip, daß die Ursache ebenso viel Realität enthalten muß wie die Wirkung, selbst und erst recht Descartes' Anwendung derselben auf die Ideen zu verteidigen. Mein Bemühen um die innere Kohärenz der Cartesischen Position erklärt die ausschließliche Blickrichtung auf nur eine Richtung der Wechselwirkung. Unter der Voraussetzung der Cartesischen Prinzipien kann sich durch die Annahme von durch Wollen (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19. The Reception of Descartes' Philosophy.Nicholas Jolley - 1992 - In John Cottingham (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 393--423.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  29
    Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature.Nicholas Jolley - 1995 - The Leibniz Review 5:18-21.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  14
    Malebranche and Ideas.Nicholas Jolley - 1994 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (3):497-498.
  22. The Relation Between Theology and Philosophy.Nicholas Jolley - 1998 - In Daniel Garber & Michael Ayers (eds.), The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 363--92.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  24
    Insiders and Outsiders in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy.Nicholas Jolley - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1220 - 1223.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 6, Page 1220-1223, December 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  12
    Locke and French Materialism.Nicholas Jolley - 1994 - International Studies in Philosophy 26 (1):144-145.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  22
    The Continuum Companion to Locke.Nicholas Jolley - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2):342-345.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  10
    Response: Mark Kulstad.Nicholas Jolley - 1982 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (Supplement):67-70.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  17
    Hume, Malebranche, and the Last Occult Quality.Nicholas Jolley - 2003 - Philosophical Topics 31 (1/2):199-213.
  28.  17
    The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe.Nicholas Jolley - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):191 - 195.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 20, Issue 1, Page 191-195, January 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  15
    The Tradition of Political Hedonism.Nicholas Jolley - 1986 - Review of Metaphysics 39 (3):589-590.
  30. Leibniz and Locke: A Study of the New Essays on Human Understanding.Peter Remnant & Nicholas Jolley - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (2):297.
  31.  8
    Leibniz, Locke, and the Epistemology of Toleration.Nicholas Jolley - 2007 - In P. Phemister & S. Brown (eds.), Leibniz and the English-Speaking World. Springer. pp. 133--143.
  32.  17
    Leibniz: Perception, Apperception, and Thought, Robert McRae. University of Toronto Press, Toronto and Buffalo. 1976. X + 148 Pages. [REVIEW]Nicholas Jolley - 1980 - Dialogue 19 (2):301-309.
  33.  7
    An Unpublished Leibniz MS on Metaphysics.Nicholas Jolley - 1975 - Studia Leibnitiana 7 (2):161 - 189.
    Diese Arbeit legt den Text einer bisher nicht publizierten Abhandlung aus Leibniz' Spätzeit (Ad Christophori Stegmanni Metaphysicam Unitariorum) zusammen mit einer einfiihrenden Erörterung vor. Diese „unbekannte" Schrift enthält wichtige und überraschende Sätze liber die Grundprinzipien der Leibnizschen Metaphysik: Über das Prinzip des zureichenden Grundes wird behauptet, es folge aus dem Prinzip des Widerspruchs, und die Existenz dieser Welt wird nur erklart mit den Begriffen der „praevalentia" der Essenzen. Diese ÄuBerungen zielen auf Notwendigkeit ab und stehen damit im Konflikt mit Leibniz' (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  14
    Hobbes's Dagger in the Heart.Nicholas Jolley - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):855 - 873.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Robert C. Sleigh, Jr., Leibniz and Arnauld: A Commentary on Their Correspondence Reviewed By.Nicholas Jolley - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (6):419-420.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  16
    Perception and Immateriality in The.Nicholas Jolley - 1978 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (2).
  37.  1
    New Essays on the Rationalists.Nicholas Jolley, Rocco J. Gennaro & Charles Huenemann - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (4):600.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  9
    Spinoza.Nicholas Jolley - 1983 - International Studies in Philosophy 15 (1):115-117.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  4
    Perception and Immateriality in The Nouveaux Essais.Nicholas Jolley - 1978 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (2):181-194.
  40.  8
    Leibniz et l'autosuffisance causale des substances.Nicholas Jolley - 2009 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 107 (4):699-716.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber, Eds. And Trans., GW Leibniz: Philosophical Essays Reviewed By.Nicholas Jolley - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (1):10-12.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  7
    Mark Kulstad: Leibniz on Consciousness and Reflection: The Early Years and the Late Years.Nicholas Jolley - 1983 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (S1):67-70.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  3
    The 'Nouveaux Essais': A Newly Discovered Draft.Nicholas Jolley - 1974 - Studia Leibnitiana 6 (1):69 - 75.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  2
    The Rise of Modem Philosophy: The Tension Between the New and Traditional Philosophies From Machiavelli to Leibniz.Nicholas Jolley - 1995 - Philosophical Books 36 (1):42-44.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  4
    Occult Powers and Hypotheses: Cartesian Natural Philosophy Under Louis XIV.Nicholas Jolley - 1990 - Philosophical Books 31 (3):144-146.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  1
    Leibniz on Locke and Socinianism.Nicholas Jolley - 1978 - Journal of the History of Ideas 39 (2):233.
  47.  1
    Treatise on Ethics.Nicholas Jolley - 1995 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (2):343-344.
  48.  3
    Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment.Nicholas Jolley - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (4):871-874.
  49.  1
    G. W. Leibniz: New Essays on Human Understanding.Nicholas Jolley - 1982 - Philosophical Books 23 (2):84-86.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  1
    Locke. Volume 1: Epistemology. Volume II: Ontology.Nicholas Jolley - 1992 - Philosophical Books 33 (4):205-208.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 81