15 found
Order:
  1.  6
    Not Set in Stone: Five Bad Arguments for Letting Monuments Stand.Nir Eisikovits - 2020 - Journal of Global Ethics 16 (3):404-413.
    ABSTRACT I examine five arguments against removing controversial monuments. I argue that none of these arguments provides good reasons for leaving controversial monuments in place. A close examination of these arguments also points to some of our misconceptions about the nature of monuments. The arguments include the claim that removing monuments rewrites history, that removal amounts to ex-post facto moralizing, that controversial monuments are needed to stir people to healthy debate, that the focus on monuments is a distraction preventing us (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  25
    Theorizing Transitional Justice.Claudio Corradetti, Nir Eisikovits & Jack Rotondi (eds.) - 2015 - Ashgate Publishing, Ltd..
    With the common goal of clarifying some of the theoretical profiles of transitional justice strategies, the study is organized along crucial intersections evaluating aspects connected to the genealogy, the nature, the scope and the most appropriate methodology for the study of transitional justice. The specific transitional instruments of war crime tribunals, truth commissions, administrative purges, reparations, and historical commissions are considered. The book brings together some of the most original writings from established experts as well as from promising young scholars (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  7
    The Non-Ideal Theory of Conflict Management: A Response to Critics of A Theory of Truces.Nir Eisikovits - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (1):52-57.
    This essay responds to criticisms of and reflections on A Theory of Truces offered by Keith Breen, David Lyons, Colleen Murphy and Thaddeus Metz. I focus on the place of truces within just war theory, the permissibility of making truces with particularly unsavory actors, the tension between present and future considerations in truce making, and Truce Thinking as an instance of non-ideal theory.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  43
    Forget Forgiveness.Nir Eisikovits - 2004 - Theoria 51 (105):31-63.
  5.  2
    Forget Forgiveness.Nir Eisikovits - 2004 - Theoria 51:31-63.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6.  25
    Transitional Justice.Nir Eisikovits - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  7.  98
    Stephen Nathanson, Terrorism and the Ethics of War.Nir Eisikovits - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):603-606.
    What is a disability? What sorts of limitations do persons with disabilities or impairments experience? What is there about having a disability or impairment that makes it disadvantageous for the individuals with it? Are persons with severe cognitive impairments capable of making autonomous decisions? What role should disability play in the construction of theories of justice? Is it ever ethical for parents to seek to create a child with an impairment? This anthology addresses these and other questions and is a (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  2
    I Am the Enemy You Killed, My Friend: Rethinking the Legitimacy of Truth Commissions.Nir Eisikovits - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (3-4):489-514.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  9.  2
    Truces: What They Mean, How They Work.Nir Eisikovits - 2015 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 62 (145).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10. Moral Luck and the Criminal Law.Nir Eisikovits - 2005 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Law and Social Justice. MIT Press. pp. 105--124.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11. Willing, Wanting, Waiting by Richard Holton. [REVIEW]Nir Eisikovits - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):603-606.
    What is a disability? What sorts of limitations do persons with disabilities or impairments experience? What is there about having a disability or impairment that makes it disadvantageous for the individuals with it? Are persons with severe cognitive impairments capable of making autonomous decisions? What role should disability play in the construction of theories of justice? Is it ever ethical for parents to seek to create a child with an impairment? This anthology addresses these and other questions and is a (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  14
    Murphy, Colleen. The Conceptual Foundations of Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Pp. 231. $74.95 ; $29.99. [REVIEW]Nir Eisikovits - 2018 - Ethics 129 (1):132-135.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  33
    Noncombatant Immunity in Asymmetrical Warfare.Evan Feinauer & Nir Eisikovits - 2012 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):165-180.
    The principle of noncombatant immunity (NCI) lies at the heart of jus in bello or the moral rules governing the conduct of war. This paper takes up the status of NCI in asymmetrical wars (AW). The argument proceeds in six parts. In the first we present a skeptical or realist position about the feasibility of NCI in AW. Part two surveys the development of the idea of NCI. Part three provides an account of the logic and dynamics of AW. Part (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  22
    Proportionality and Self-Interest.Nir Eisikovits - 2010 - Human Rights Review 11 (2):157-170.
    This paper offers a justification of the principle of military proportionality that is based in considerations of self-interest. By offering such a justification, I hope to vindicate the principle on the basis of the least controversial argument available. The war between Israel and Hezbollah in the summer of 2006 is used as a case study. Part 1 surveys recent work on military proportionality and suggests that the importance of this principle has increased in the age of asymmetrical warfare. Part 2 (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  29
    Rethinking the Legitimacy of Truth Commissions: "I Am the Enemy You Killed, My Friend".Nir Eisikovits - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (3-4):489–514.