4 found
Order:
  1.  69
    Debating Ethical Expertise.Norbert L. Steinkamp, Bert Gordijn & Henk A. . M. . J. Ten Have - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (2):173-192.
    This paper explores the relevance of the debate about ethical expertise for the practice of clinical ethics. We present definitions, explain three theories of ethical expertise, and identify arguments that have been brought up to either support the concept of ethical expertise or call it into question. Finally, we discuss four theses: the debate is relevant for the practice of clinical ethics in that it (1) improves and specifies clinical ethicists' perception of their expertise; (2) contributes to improving the perception (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  2. Ethical Expertise Revisited: Reply to Giles Scofield.L. Steinkamp Norbert, Gordijn Bert & A. J. M. ten Have Henk - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (4):385-392.
    This reply to Giles Scofield's critique of the authors' article in the June 2008 issue of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal highlights two main topics. First, contrary to what Scofield suggests, using the terms "ethics" and "morality" interchangeably constitutes an oversimplification that blurs important distinctions. Second, in a representative democracy, ethical expertise and consultation need not generate a "tragic choice" of the kind Scofield has in mind.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  32
    Editorial: European Debates on Ethical Case Deliberation.Norbert L. Steinkamp - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):225-226.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  18
    By Author.David M. Craig, Robert I. Field, Ar Caplan, John P. Gluck, Mark T. Holdsworth, Bert Gordijn, L. Norbert, Henk A. M. J. ten Have, Norbert L. Steinkamp & Inmaculada de Melo-Martin - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (4):405-407.