Results for 'Normative conflicts'

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Norm Conflicts and Conditionals.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, David Kellen, Ulrike Hahn & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2019 - Psychological Review (5):611-633.
    Suppose that two competing norms, N1 and N2, can be identified such that a given person’s response can be interpreted as correct according to N1 but incorrect according to N2. Which of these two norms, if any, should one use to interpret such a response? In this paper we seek to address this fundamental problem by studying individual variation in the interpretation of conditionals by establishing individual profiles of the participants based on their case judgments and reflective attitudes. To investigate (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  2. Normative Conflicts and the Structure of Normativity.Andrew Reisner - 2015 - In Iwao Hirose & Andrew Reisner (eds.), Weighing and Reasoning: Themes from the Work of John Broome. Oxford University Press.
    This paper considers the relation between the sources of normativity, reasons, and normative conflicts. It argues that common views about how normative reasons relate to their sources have important consequences for how we can understand putative normative conflicts.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3. The Specter of Normative Conflict: Does Fairness Require Inaccuracy?Rima Basu - 2020 - In Erin Beeghly & Alex Madva (eds.), An Introduction to Implicit Bias: Knowledge, Justice, and the Social Mind. Routledge. pp. 191-210.
    A challenge we face in a world that has been shaped by, and continues to be shaped by, racist attitudes and institutions is that the evidence is often stacked in favor of racist beliefs. As a result, we may find ourselves facing the following conflict: what if the evidence we have supports something we morally shouldn’t believe? For example, it is morally wrong to assume, solely on the basis of someone’s skin color, that they’re a staff member. But, what if (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4. Normative Conflicts and the Logic of 'Ought'.Lou Goble - 2009 - Noûs 43 (3):450-489.
    On the face of it, normative conflicts are commonplace. Yet standard deontic logic declares them to be logically impossible. That prompts the question, What are the proper principles of normative reasoning if such conflicts are possible? This paper examines several alternatives that have been proposed for a logic of 'ought' that can accommodate normative conflicts, and finds all of them unsatisfactory as measured against three criteria of adequacy. It then introduces a new logic that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  5.  66
    Normative Conflicts in Legal Reasoning.Giovanni Sartor - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (2-3):209-235.
    This article proposes a formal analysis of a fundamental aspect of legal reasoning: dealing with normative conflicts. Firstly, examples are illustrated concerning the dynamics of legal systems, the application of rules and exceptions, and the semantic indeterminacy of legal sources. Then two approaches to cope with conflicting information are presented: the preferred theories of Brewka, and the belief change functions of Alchourrón, Gärdenfors, and Makinson. The relations between those approaches are closely examined, and some aspects of a model (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  12
    Solving Normative Conflicts Using Preferences Relations.Rafael Testa - 2008 - CLE E-Prints.
    This article proposes a general strategy to overcome normative conflicts, namely, paradoxes represented in Standard Deontic Logic. This solution is based on preference relations between norms that circumvent situations of conflict. Pragmatic justifications of the proposed method are also given.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  13
    Norm Conflict Identification in Contracts.João Paulo Aires, Daniele Pinheiro, Vera Strube de Lima & Felipe Meneguzzi - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (4):397-428.
    The exchange of goods and services between individuals is often formalised by a contract in which the parties establish norms to define what is expected of each one. Norms use deontic statements of obligation, prohibition, and permission, which may be in conflict. The task of manually detecting norm conflicts can be time–consuming and error-prone since contracts can be vast and complex. To automate such tasks, we develop an approach to identify potential conflicts between norms. We show the effectiveness (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Prioritized Imperatives and Normative Conflicts.Fengkui Ju & Fenrong Liu - 2011 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2):35-58.
    Imperatives occur ubiquitously in natural languages. They produce forces which change the addressee’s cognitive state and regulate her actions accordingly. In real life we often receive conflicting orders, typically, issued by various authorities with different ranks. A new update semantics is proposed in this paper to formalize this idea. The general properties of this semantics, as well as its background ideas are discussed extensively. In addition, we compare our framework with other approaches of deontic logics in the context of (...) conflicts. (shrink)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  9.  43
    Truthmakers and Normative Conflicts.Albert Anglberger & Johannes Korbmacher - 2020 - Studia Logica 108 (1):49-83.
    By building on work by Kit Fine, we develop a sound and complete truthmaker semantics for Lou Goble’s conflict tolerant deontic logic BDL.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  5
    A Realistic View on Normative Conflicts.Daniela Glavaničová & Matteo Pascucci - 2020 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 29 (3):447-462.
    Kulicki and Trypuz (2016) introduced three systems of multivalued deontic action logic to handle normative conflicts. The first system suggests a pessimistic view on normative conflicts, according to which any conflicting option represents something forbidden; the second system suggests an optimistic view, according to which any conflicting option represents something obligatory; finally, the third system suggests a neutral view, according to which any conflicting option represents something that is neither obligatory nor forbidden. The aim of the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  41
    Normative Conflict in the Newsroom: The Case of Digital Photo Manipulation.Wilson Lowrey - 2003 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 18 (2):123-142.
    Digital photo manipulation is often treated in the literature as a problem that occurs when individuals stray from a single set of ethical standards. It is proposed in this study that the newsroom comprises various subgroups, each with unique norms and values, and each seeking to shape newsroom decision making. It is expected that photo manipulation should result from subgroups' perceptions of, and reactions to, this plurality of newsroom norms. This expectation is assessed through both in-depth interviews and a national (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  79
    A Functional Taxonomy of Normative Conflict.H. Hamner Hill - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (2):227-247.
    In this paper I argue for three theses. First, most philosophical analyses of the problem of normative conflict, being based on the impossibility-of-joint-compliance test for conflict, are inadequate. Second, expanding on suggestions made by H. L. A. Hart and Stephen Munzer, I develop an understanding of normative conflict which is not tied to the concept of obedience. Such an understanding of normative conflict is expressly functional: normative conflicts arise when one norm interferes with the intended (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  13. Norm Conflicts: Kelsen's View in the Late Period and a Rejoinder.Bruno Celano - 1998 - In Stanley L. Paulson & Bonnie Litschewski Paulson (eds.), Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Oxford University Press. pp. 343--361.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14.  71
    An Inconsistency-Adaptive Deontic Logic for Normative Conflicts.Mathieu Beirlaen, Christian Straßer & Joke Meheus - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):285-315.
    We present the inconsistency-adaptive deontic logic DP r , a nonmonotonic logic for dealing with conflicts between normative statements. On the one hand, this logic does not lead to explosion in view of normative conflicts such as O A ∧ O ∼A, O A ∧ P ∼A or even O A ∧ ∼O A. On the other hand, DP r still verifies all intuitively reliable inferences valid in Standard Deontic Logic (SDL). DP r interprets a given (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  15.  12
    Deontic Logic for Normative Conflicts.L. Goble - 2014 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 22 (2):206-235.
  16.  2
    When Workplace Norms Conflict: Using Intersubjective Reflection to Guide Ethical Decision-Making.Tobey K. Scharding & Danielle E. Warren - forthcoming - Business Ethics Quarterly:1-29.
    We address how to ethically evaluate workplace practices when workplace behavioral norms conflict with employees’ attitudes toward those norms, which, according to research on psychological contract violations, regularly occurs. Drawing on Scanlonian contractualism, we introduce the intersubjective reflection process. The IR process ethically evaluates workplace practices according to whether parties to a workplace practice have intersubjectively valid grounds to veto the practice. We present normative and empirical justification for this process and apply the IR process to accounts of workplace (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  39
    Mediating Difference: Normative Conflict as Opportunity.Ellen Waldman - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):25 – 27.
  18.  3
    Non-Monotonic Reasoning with Normative Conflicts in Multi-Agent Deontic Logic.M. Beirlaen & C. Strasser - 2013 - Journal of Logic and Computation 24 (6):1179–1207.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  4
    Fostering Constructive Deviance by Leader Moral Humility: The Mediating Role of Employee Moral Identity and Moderating Role of Normative Conflict.Lianying Zhang, Xiaocan Li & Ziqing Liu - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics:1-16.
    Constructive deviance, rule-breaking to benefit the organization, is an emerging topic in the scholarly research and is considered to be an ethical decision. Despite the value of guiding constructive deviance in organizations, the effect of ethics-oriented leadership on employees’ constructive deviance remains unclear. This research identifies leader moral humility as a new antecedent of constructive deviance and examines how and when leader moral humility influences employee constructive deviance. Drawing on social–cognitive theory, we propose that leader moral humility fosters employee moral (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  30
    Surveillance in Ubiquitous Network Societies: Normative Conflicts Related to the Consumer in-Store Supermarket Experience in the Context of the Internet of Things.Jenifer Sunrise Winter - 2014 - Ethics and Information Technology 16 (1):27-41.
    The Internet of Things is an emerging global infrastructure that employs wireless sensors to collect, store, and exchange data. Increasingly, applications for marketing and advertising have been articulated as a means to enhance the consumer shopping experience, in addition to improving efficiency. However, privacy advocates have challenged the mass aggregation of personally-identifiable information in databases and geotracking, the use of location-based services to identify one’s precise location over time. This paper employs the framework of contextual integrity related to privacy developed (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  21. Conflicts of Normativity.Andrew Reisner - 2004 - Dissertation, University of Oxford
    The thesis contains my early work arguing against evidentialism for reasons for belief (chapter 1), my early argument that rationality is not normative (chapter 2), an argument that rationality is not responding reasons, at least understood in one way (chapter 2), a general discussion of how normative conflicts might (appear to) arise in many different ways (chapter 3), a discussion of how to weigh pragmatic and evidential reasons for belief (chapter 4), and a discussion of the general (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  22. How to Solve the Social Norm Conflict Dilemma of Green Consumption: The Moderating Effect of Self-Affirmation.Wanda Ge, Guanghua Sheng & Hongli Zhang - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Social norms are important social factors that affect individual behavioral change. Using social norms to promote green consumption is receiving increasing attention. However, due to the different formation processes and mechanisms of the behavioral influence of the different types of social norms, using social norms to promote green consumption often has social norm conflict situations. Thus, it is difficult to attain the maximum utility of social norms. The present research found that social norm conflict weakens the role of injunctive norms (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  33
    An Inconsistency-Adaptive Deontic Logic for Normative Conflicts.Mathieu Beirlaen, Christian Strasser & Joke Meheus - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophical Logic.
  24.  4
    A Paraconsistent Multi-Agent Framework for Dealing with Normative Conflicts.Mathieu Beirlaen & Christian Straßer - 2011 - In Joao Leite, Paolo Torroni, Thomas Agotnes, Guido Boella & Leon van der Torre (eds.), Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. CLIMA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6814. Berlin, Germany: Springer. pp. 312–329.
  25.  9
    ‘The Great Fiasco’ of the 1948 Presidential Election Polls: Status Recognition and Norms Conflict in Social Science.Dominic Lusinchi - 2018 - Annals of Science 75 (2):120-144.
    SUMMARYAll three ‘scientific’ pollsters wrongly predicted incumbent President Harry Truman’s defeat in the 1948 presidential election, and thus faced a potentially serious legitimacy crisis. This ‘fiasco’ occurred at a most inopportune time. Social science was embroiled in a policy debate taking place in the halls of Congress. It was fighting a losing battle to be included, along with the natural sciences, in the National Science Foundation, for which legislation was being drafted. Faced with the failure of the polls, the Social (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  19
    A Unifying Framework for Reasoning About Normative Conflicts.Mathieu Beirlaen - 2011 - In Michal Peliš & Vít Punčochář (eds.), The Logica Yearbook. College Publications. pp. 1--14.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Idealism and Realism in Kelsen's Treatment of Norms Conflicts.Ines Weyland - 1986 - In Richard Tur & William L. Twining (eds.), Essays on Kelsen. Clarendon Press. pp. 249--269.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28.  43
    Potential Conflicts Between Normatively-Responsible Advocacy and Successful Social Influence: Evidence From Persuasion Effects Research. [REVIEW]Daniel J. O’Keefe - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (2):151-163.
    This article approaches the relationship of normative argumentation studies and descriptive persuasion effects research by pointing to several empirical findings that raise questions or puzzles about normatively-proper argumentative conduct. These findings indicate some complications in the analysis of normatively desirable argumentative conduct – including some ways in which practical persuasive success may not be entirely compatible with normatively-desirable advocacy practices.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  29.  4
    On Normative Redundancies and Conflicts: A Material Approach.Federico Szczaranski - forthcoming - Law and Philosophy:1-26.
    The challenges that normative redundancies and normative conflicts pose to legal theory have been traditionally addressed by either altering the rules that trigger them, or by including preference rules that deactivate them. As an alternative to these routes, this paper argues that the problems with both redundancies and conflicts only arise as a consequence of a mistaken understanding of legal reasoning that ignores the material relations between the rules at issue. By resorting to inferential semantics, this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Collateral Conflicts and Epistemic Norms.J. Adam Carter - 2021 - In Kevin McCain, Scott Stapleford & Matthias Steup (eds.), Epistemic Dilemmas: New Arguments, New Angles. Routledge.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  8
    Conflicting Norms, Values, and Interests: A Perspective From Legal Academia.Stefan Oeter - 2019 - Ethics and International Affairs 33 (1):57-66.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  32. Conflicts of Norms and the Revision of Normative Systems.Carlos E. Alchourrón - 1991 - Law and Philosophy 10 (4):413 - 425.
  33.  14
    Secessionist Conflict: A Happy Marriage Between Norms and Interests?Rafael Biermann - 2019 - Ethics and International Affairs 33 (1):29-43.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  18
    Universal Norms and Conflicting Values.Michael J. Selgelid - 2005 - Developing World Bioethics 5 (3):267-273.
    ABSTRACTWhile UNESCO's Universal Draft Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights highlights appropriate ethical values, its principles are stated in absolute terms and conflict with one another. The Draft Declaration fails to sufficiently address the possibility of conflict between principles, and it provides no real guidance on how to strike a balance between them in cases where conflict occurs. The document's inadequate treatment of conflicting values is revealed by examination of cases where principles aimed at the promotion of autonomy and liberty (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  35.  12
    Competition and Conflict Between Communicative Norms.Michael Hoppmann - 2017 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 6 (2):220-246.
    When engaging with each other, discussants navigate a complex set of communicative norms that aim at very different goals. Within argumentation theory naturally the most studied set of norms are those aiming at reasonableness, of which I take the pragma-dialectical rule set to be a representative example. They are however far from the only norms that guide communicative behavior. This paper offers an analysis of the areas of intersection and potential conflict of reasonableness with other communicative norms in general and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  36. Conflict Between Empiricism and Idealism 277 the Homo Juridicus and the Inadequacy of Law as a Norm of Life.Giorgio Del Vecchio & L. L. Zarrilli - 1938 - In Jerome Hall (ed.), Readings in Jurisprudence. Gaunt.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. What If Ideal Advice Conflicts? A Dilemma for Idealizing Accounts of Normative Practical Reasons.Eric Sampson - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (4):1091-1111.
    One of the deepest and longest-lasting debates in ethics concerns a version of the Euthyphro question: are choiceworthy things choiceworthy because agents have certain attitudes toward them or are they choiceworthy independent of any agents’ attitudes? Reasons internalists, such as Bernard Williams, Michael Smith, Mark Schroeder, Sharon Street, Kate Manne, Julia Markovits, and David Sobel answer in the first way. They think that all of an agent’s normative reasons for action are grounded in facts about that agent’s pro-attitudes (e.g., (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Values in Law.Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet - 2015 - In Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet, Patrice Canivez & Matthias Armgardt (eds.), Past and Present Interactions in Legal Reasoning and Logic. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  77
    Two Women with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Caregivers: Conflicting Normative Expectations.Tineke A. Abma, Barth Oeseburg, Guy Am Widdershoven, Minke Goldsteen & Marian A. Verkerk - 2005 - Nursing Ethics 12 (5):479-492.
    It is not uncommon that nurses are unable to meet the normative expectations of chronically ill patients. The purpose of this article is to describe and illustrate Walker’s expressive-collaborative view of morality to interpret the normative expectations of two women with multiple sclerosis. Both women present themselves as autonomous persons who make their own choices, but who also have to rely on others for many aspects of their lives, for example, to find a new balance between work and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  40.  15
    Do Conflicts of Interest Create a New Professional Norm? Physical Therapists and Workers' Compensation.Maude Laliberté & Anne Hudon - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (10):26 - 28.
  41.  6
    Conflicts and Reasons in Contextual Normative Theory: A Reply to Modood and Thompson.Peter Matthew Hills - 2021 - Res Publica 27 (1):145-150.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  7
    Universal Norms and Conflicting Values.Phd Michael J. Selgelid - 2005 - Developing World Bioethics 5 (3):267–273.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  4
    Inverting Donaldson’s Framework: A Managerial Approach To International Conflicts Of Cultural And Economic Norms.Andrew Stark - 2015 - Business Ethics Quarterly 25 (4):535-558.
    ABSTRACT:Thomas Donaldson’s framework for dealing with value-conflicts between a manager’s home and host country distinguishes between a “conflict of relative [economic] development”—conflicting norms that arise because home and host are at two different stages of economic development—and a “conflict of culture,” which arises because the home and host’s different cultures generate conflicting norms on the issue the manager faces. My question here is a thought experiment. What different insights might emerge if we flipped Donaldson’s framework around? Specifically: What if (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  44. Conflicting Reasons, Unconflicting ‘Ought's.Shyam Nair - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (3):629-663.
    One of the popular albeit controversial ideas in the last century of moral philosophy is that what we ought to do is explained by our reasons. And one of the central features of reasons that accounts for their popularity among normative theorists is that they can conflict. But I argue that the fact that reasons conflict actually also poses two closely related problems for this popular idea in moral philosophy. The first problem is a generalization of a problem in (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  45.  7
    Still a Moral Dilemma: How Ethiopian Professionals Providing Abortion Come to Terms with Conflicting Norms and Demands.Morten Magelssen, Jan Helge Solbakk, Viva Combs Thorsen & Demelash Bezabih Ewnetu - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-7.
    BackgroundThe Ethiopian law on abortion was liberalized in 2005. However, as a strongly religious country, the new law has remained controversial from the outset. Many abortion providers have religious allegiances, which begs the question how to negotiate the conflicting demands of their jobs and their commitment to their patients on the one hand, and their religious convictions and moral values on the other.MethodA qualitative study based on in-depth interviews with 30 healthcare professionals involved in abortion services in either private/non-governmental clinics (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  46.  5
    From Social Conflicts to Human Rights: The Normative Meaning of Human Rights in Rainer Forst.Jorge Armindo Sell - 2019 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 64 (2):32885.
    ***Dos Conflitos Sociais aos Direitos Humanos: O Significado Normativo dos Direitos Humanos em Rainer Forst***A Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos celebra seu septuagésimoaniversário em 2018 e muito se discute sobre os ganhos jurídicos, políticos, sociais e civilizatórios que esta teria proporcionado. Por vezes, contudo, tais discussões focalizam aspectos periféricos da noção de direitos humanos, perdendo de vista aquilo que pode ser entendido como seu ganho normativo maior, quando não os reificam completamente, desvinculando-os das reivindicações sociais que de fato lhes conferem (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. Two Women with Multiple Sclerosis. Conflicting Normative Expectations Between Patients and Their Caregivers.T. A. Abma, B. Oeseburg, M. Goldsteen, G. A. M. Widdershoven & M. Verkerk - 2005 - Nursing Ethics 12 (5):479-492.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  48.  6
    How General Practitioners Decide on Maxims of Action in Response to Demands From Conflicting Sets of Norms: A Grounded Theory Study.Linus Johnsson & Lena Nordgren - 2019 - BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):33.
    The work of general practitioners is infused by norms from several movements, of which evidence based medicine, patient-centredness, and virtue ethics are some of the most influential. Their precepts are not clearly reconcilable, and structural factors may limit their application. In this paper, we develop a conceptual framework that explains how GPs respond, across different fields of interaction in their daily work, to the pressure exerted by divergent norms. Data was generated from unstructured interviews with and observations of sixteen Swedish (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  49. Visiting the Neo-Liberal University: New Public Management and Conflicting Normative Ideas. A Danish Case.Asger Sørensen - 2015 - Journal of Educational Controversy 10 (1):1--49.
    At Danish universities, the governance structure is regulated by law. This structure was radically changed in 2003, abolishing the republican rule of the senate consisting of academics, students, and staff in favour of an authoritarian system assigning all executive power to the vice-chancellor, or as we say in Denmark, the rector. To introduce the current situation at Danish universities, in the first two sections of this article, I will compare them with more well-known counterparts in other countries. This situation is (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  50.  33
    Normative Pluralism Worthy of the Name is False.Spencer Case - 2016 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 11 (1):1-20.
    Normative pluralism is the view that practical reason consists in an irreducible plurality of normative domains, that these domains sometimes issue conflicting recommendations and that, when this happens, there is never any one thing that one ought simpliciter to do. Here I argue against this view, noting that normative pluralism must be either unrestricted or restricted. Unrestricted pluralism maintains that all coherent standards are reason-generating normative domains, whereas restricted pluralism maintains that only some are. Unrestricted pluralism, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000