Order:
  1.  23
    On Martial Vi, Lxi. 3.O. J. Todd - 1938 - The Classical Review 52 (05):166-.
  2.  23
    The Character of Zeus in Aeschylus' Prometheus Bound.O. J. Todd - 1925 - Classical Quarterly 19 (2):61-67.
    ‘A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin’ not only ‘of little minds,’ but of some classically trained minds as well. And it is surprising to see how this has caused certain unevennesses in ancient authors to be trued up. Aristophanes, for example, we are toldby a late venerable scholar, never permits a change of meter in a single speech directed to the same person; and to get rid of the two deviations from this rule, the framer of it cut down the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Index Aristophaneus.Lane Cooper & O. J. Todd - 1933 - American Journal of Philology 54 (3):299.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  15
    Sense and Sound in Classical Poetry.O. J. Todd - 1942 - Classical Quarterly 36 (1-2):29-.
    ‘Saepe stilum vertas’, says Horace; and he had excellent company in his friend Virgil, who wrote the Aeneid at the rate of only about 900 lines a year, and spent hours in licking his verses into shape. It would have been instructive to sit at the elbow of these two poets, to see what they altered and what they rejected. It is clear, e.g., that there were certain caesural arrangements which Virgil deliberately affected and others which he as deliberately avoided. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  8
    Servius on the Saturnian Metre.O. J. Todd - 1940 - Classical Quarterly 34 (3-4):133-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  11
    An Inelegant Greek Verse.O. J. Todd - 1939 - Classical Quarterly 33 (3-4):163-.
    Herodotus tells us in book vii, ch. 220, that the Pythian priestess gave the Spartans a warning couched in hexameters, of which the second line begins ἢ μγα στυ ρικυδς. To this text the admirable commentary of How and Wells takes exception in the following note: ‘The synizesis στυ ρικυδς is intolerable. Read δμ' ρικυδς, στυ being a gloss, H. Richards, Cl. Rev. xix. 345.’ Doubtless this union of vowels is harder than that of υω in ρινων or in γενων (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  3
    TPITAΓΩNIΣTHΣ: A Reconsideration.O. J. Todd - 1938 - Classical Quarterly 32 (1):30-38.