Results for 'On Denoting'

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Year XVIII 2005 Number 2.Logical-Analytical Standpoint, On Referring & On Denoting - 2005 - Metalogicon: Rivista Internazionale di Logica Pura E Applicata di Linguistica E di Filosofia 18.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. The ‘Scottsboro Case’: On Responsibility, Rape, Race, Gender, and Class.Bat-Ami Bar On - 1999 - In Keith Burgess-Jackson (ed.), A Most Detestable Crime”: New Philosophical Essays on Rape. Oxford University Press.
  3. On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):873 - 887.
    By a `denoting phrase' I mean a phrase such as any one of the following: a man, some man, any man, every man, all men, the present King of England, the present King of France, the center of mass of the solar system at the first instant of the twentieth century, the revolution of the earth round the sun, the revolution of the sun round the earth. Thus a phrase is denoting solely in virtue of its form. We (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   104 citations  
  4. Reading ‘On Denoting’ on its Centenary.David Kaplan - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):933-1003.
    Part 1 sets out the logical/semantical background to ‘On Denoting’, including an exposition of Russell's views in Principles of Mathematics, the role and justification of Frege's notorious Axiom V, and speculation about how the search for a solution to the Contradiction might have motivated a new treatment of denoting. Part 2 consists primarily of an extended analysis of Russell's views on knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description, in which I try to show that the discomfiture between Russell's (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  5. The Power of Russell's Criticism of Frege: 'On Denoting' Pp. 48-50.Simon Blackburn & Alan Code - 1978 - Analysis 38 (2):65 - 77.
    The paper analyzes the famous passage in "on denoting" where russell appears to be attacking frege's theory of the sense and reference of proper names. We argue that russell's attack has been misinterpreted and unjustly condemned. The strategy is to show what difficulties do genuinely face a two-Part theory, And then to show that it is quite easy to interpret russell as having perceived them.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Making Sense of 'On Denoting'.Gideon Makin - 1995 - Synthese 102 (3):383 - 412.
    The widely held assumption about what motivated On Denoting is irreconcilable with Russell's position shortly beforehand; but discarding it leaves one with a carefully worked out solution whose problem is missing. The real motivation is to be found in a notoriously obscure passage in OD, in which Russell exposes a decisive (though easily overlooked) flaw in his former theory of denoting; a flaw which also cripples Frege's theory of sense and reference. A comprehensive account of this passage is (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  9
    Reply to Geach's Russell on Denoting.Simon Blackburn & Alan Code - 1978 - Analysis 38.
    Professor geach's article criticized our earlier "analysis" paper on pages 48-50 of "on denoting." he took us to have offered an account of russell's earlier use of the expression "denoting phrase" which he regarded as inadequate. But we had not done so: we were interested solely in the denoting phrases which are perplexing russell on those pages, And we repeat our view that the problem which russell had found arises as much for frege's theory of reference as (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  8.  73
    "On Denoting" and the Principle of Acquaintance.Russell Wahl - 2014 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 27 (1).
    While Russell’s concerns in developing the theory of descriptions were primarily with his foundation of logic, he was aware of the epistemological uses of both the theory of denoting concepts and the 1905 theory of deWnite descriptions. At the end of “On Denoting” he suggests that the principle of acquaintance is a “result” of the new theory of denoting. In this paper I examine the relation between the theory of descriptions and the principle of acquaintance, and I (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  32
    Russell's "Refutation" of Meinong in "on Denoting".Ronald Suter - 1967 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (4):512-516.
    The author replies to ronald suter's "russell's 'refutation' of meinong in 'on denoting'," "philosophy and phenomenological research," june, 1967. suter's interpretation of one of russell's arguments is criticized on exegetical grounds, and his defense of another argument is rebutted on logical grounds. meinong's thesis is presented as the thesis that all statements of a certain form are true. it is argued that all of russell's arguments are attempts to pose counter-examples to this single view. meinong is defended against russell's (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Explaining G.F. Stout's Reaction to Russell's on Denoting.Omar W. Nasim - 2009 - In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". Routledge.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Russell on Meaning and Denotation: The Argument of 'on Denoting'.Claudio de Almeida - 1992 - Dissertation, Mcmaster University (Canada)
    The aim of the thesis is twofold. Firstly, it is argued that Frege's theory of meaning and denotation is the first successful non-psychologistic response to what has been called 'the puzzle of identity' and that, where Frege's theory differs most significantly from the theory of meaning and denotation developed by Russell in The Principles of Mathematics and in his unpublished manuscripts on logic of 1903-1905, Russell was right. Secondly, it is shown that Russell was again right when he claimed that (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting".Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.) - 2012 - Routledge.
    A century after ‘On Denoting’ was published, the debate it initiated continues to rage. On the one hand, there is a mass of new historical scholarship, about both Russell and Meinong, which has not circulated very far beyond specialist scholars. On the other hand, there are continuing problems and controversies concerning contemporary Russellian and Meinongian theories, many of them involving issues that simply did not occur to the original protagonists. This work provides an overview of the latest historical scholarship (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  95
    Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting".Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.) - 2008 - Routledge.
    A century after ‘On Denoting’ was published, the debate it initiated continues to rage. On the one hand, there is a mass of new historical scholarship, about both Russell and Meinong, which has not circulated very far beyond specialist scholars. On the other hand, there are continuing problems and controversies concerning contemporary Russellian and Meinongian theories, many of them involving issues that simply did not occur to the original protagonists. This work provides an overview of the latest historical scholarship (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. On Denoting : Appearance and Reality.Gideon Makin - 2009 - In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of. Routledge.
    The widely held assumption about what motivated On Denoting is irreconcilable with Russell's position shortly beforehand; but discarding it leaves one with a carefully worked out solution whose problem is missing. The real motivation is to be found in a notoriously obscure passage in OD, in which Russell exposes a decisive (though easily overlooked) flaw in his former theory of denoting; a flaw which also cripples Frege's theory of sense and reference. A comprehensive account of this passage is (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Why ‘On Denoting’?Ray Perkins Jr - 2007 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 27 (1).
    A recent trend in Russell scholarship has been towards the thesis that, contrary to his own recollections, Bertrand Russell really didn’t need the 1905 theory of descriptions to deflate an excessive ontology, because there was no excessive ontology in The Principles of Mathematics, at least not one with golden mountains and the like, and so Russell’s real motive, at least his main one, was not ontological but rather was to replace the incoherent sense–reference distinction on which the old theory of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
    By a `denoting phrase' I mean a phrase such as any one of the following: a man, some man, any man, every man, all men, the present King of England, the present King of France, the center of mass of the solar system at the first instant of the twentieth century, the revolution of the earth round the sun, the revolution of the sun round the earth. Thus a phrase is denoting solely in virtue of its form. We (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   266 citations  
  17. Russell and Kaplan on Denoting.Palle Yourgrau - 1985 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (2):315-321.
    DAVID KAPLAN HAS ARGUED THAT RUSSELL'S THEORY OF\nDESCRIPTIONS IN EFFECT EXPLAINS AWAY THE VERY IDEA OF\nDEMOTING. IN THIS PAPER I TRY TO SHINE SOME LIGHT ON THE\nPUZZLE KAPLAN HAS UNCOVERED, AND IN THE PROCESS SHOW THAT\n1) RUSSELL DID NOT HIMSELF FULLY REALIZE EXACTLY WHAT HIS\nTHEORY ACCOMPLISHED, AND 2) IN EFFECT, RUSSELL'S THEORY IS,\nSURPRISINGLY, A KIND OF DEFINITIONAL VARIANT OF FREGE'S.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  13
    A theory of fictional entities based on denoting concepts.Francesco Orilia - 2012 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4:577-592.
    There are many data suggesting that we should acknowledge fictional entities in our ontological inventory, in spite of the paraphrasing strategies that Russell’s theory of descriptions can offer. Thus the realist attitude toward fictional entities of Meinongian and artifactualist accounts may seem well-motivated. Yet, these approaches infringe the Russellian “robust sense of reality.” A different realist account is proposed here, one that is compatible with the Russellian “robust sense of reality” in that it identifies fictional entities with denoting concepts, (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. On Denoting.William Boardman - unknown
    By a `denoting phrase' I mean a phrase such as any one of the following: a man, some man, any man, every man, all men, the present King of England, the presenting King of France, the center of mass of the solar system at the first instant of the twentieth century, the revolution of the earth round the sun, the revolution of the sun round the earth. Thus a phrase is denoting solely in virtue of its..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  51
    On Denoting Propositions and Facts.Terence Parsons - 1993 - Philosophical Perspectives 7:441-460.
  21.  41
    The Argument of "on Denoting".Michael Kremer - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (2):249-297.
  22.  38
    On the Theory of Meaning of "on Denoting".William Demopoulos - 1999 - Noûs 33 (3):439-458.
  23. Russell's Theory of Meaning and Denotation and "on Denoting".Russell Wahl - 1993 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 31 (1):71-94.
  24.  25
    Towards a Re-Evaluation of On Denoting.H. P. Boukema - 2005 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):133-149.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  73
    Russell on Denoting.P. T. Geach - 1978 - Analysis 38 (4):204 - 205.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26. Review of Nicholas Griffin, Dale Jacquette (Eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting"[REVIEW]Berit Brogaard - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (4).
  27. Logical Form, General Sentences, and Russell's Path to "On Denoting"'.James Levine - 2001 - In Richard Gaskin (ed.), Grammar in Early Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 74--115.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28.  37
    Russell on Meaning and Denoting.P. T. Geach - 1958 - Analysis 19 (3):69 - 72.
    The author states: "in a recent article searle has shown the odd irrelevance of russell's criticisms of frege in the famous paper 'on denoting'. I here offer an explanation of the oddity: russell had excusably, But wrongly, Conflated frege's distinction between sinn and bedeutung with his own distinction between what an expression 'means' and what it 'denotes'." (staff).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  29.  50
    Russell on Denoting.Dilip K. Basu - 1983 - Analysis 43 (2):65 - 70.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  62
    On Denoting What?Jaakko Hintikka - 1981 - Synthese 46 (2):167 - 183.
  31. ""Bertrand Russell," On Denoting"(1905) and" Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types"(1908).Stewart Shapiro - 2003 - In Jorge J. E. Gracia, Gregory M. Reichberg & Bernard N. Schumacher (eds.), The Classics of Western Philosophy: A Reader's Guide. Blackwell. pp. 460.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. `On Denoting' Against Denoting.Gregory Landini - 1998 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 18 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  13
    On Denoting.Alex Byrne & Michael Thau - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
    Richard Heck, in "The Sense of Communication" (Mind, 104, pp. 79-106, 1995), argues against the "Hybrid View"--the claim, roughly, that names are Millian while beliefs are Fregean. We argue that Heck's argument fails.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  1
    Russell's Early Views on Denoting.Terence D. Parsons - 1988 - In D. F. Austin (ed.), Philosophical Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 17--44.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  21
    Review of Guido Imaguire, Bernard Linsky (Eds.), On Denoting 1905-2005[REVIEW]Kevin C. Klement - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (10).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  15
    II.--On Denoting.B. Russell - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):873-887.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  2
    Definite Descriptions, A Reader, Edited by Ostertag Gary, Bradford Books, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., and London, 1998, Xii + 411 Pp.Ostertag Gary, Introduction, Pp. 1–34.Russell Bertrand, On Denoting, A Reprint of 1119. Pp. 35–49.Whitehead A. N. And Russell Bertrand, From Principia Mathematica, A Reprint of Pp. 30–32, 66–71, 173–175 of 1941. Pp. 51–65.Russell Bertrand, Descriptions, A Reprint of Pp. 167–180 of 11126. Pp. 67–77.Neale Stephen, Grammatical Form, Logical Form, and Incomplete Symbols. A Reprint of LXI 1391. Pp. 79–121.Carnap Rudolf, From Meaning and Necessity, A Reprint of Pp. 32–42 of XIV 237. Pp. 123–133.Strawson P. F., On Referring, A Reprint of XVIII 87, Pp. 135–160.Lambert Karel, A Theory of Definite Descriptions, A Revised Reprint of XXXII 252 with Altered Title, Pp. 161–171. .Donnellan Keith, Reference and Definite Descriptions, A Reprint of XL 276, Pp. 173–193.Grice H. P., From “Vacuous Names,” A Reprint of Pp. 138–144 of XL 479, Pp. 195–200.Peacocke Christoph. [REVIEW]Delia Graff - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1371-1374.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  3
    II.—On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):873-887.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  3
    De « On Denoting » de Β. Russell À « On Referring » de P.F. Strawson. L'avenir d'Un Paradigme.Francis Jacques - 1990 - Hermes 7:91.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  5
    On Denoting 1905-2005.Michael Beaney - unknown
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. "The Argument of" on Denoting," Michael Kremer".Is Platonism Epistemologically Bankrupt, Human Beings & Giant Squids - 1994 - Philosophy 69 (268).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. On the Philosophical Significance of Russell's “On Denoting”.Gilead Bar-Elli - 1998 - In Anat Biletzki & Anat Matar (eds.), The Story of Analytic Philosophy: Plot and Heroes. Routledge. pp. 167.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Readings in Philosophical Analysis. Selected and Edited by Feigl Herbert and Sellars Wilfrid. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., New York, 1949, X + 626 Pp.Quine W. V.. Designation and Existence, Pp. 44–51.Tarski Alfred. The Semantic Conception of Truth, Pp. 52–84.Frege Gottlob. On Sense and Nominatum, Pp. 85–102.Russell Bertrand. On Denoting, Pp. 103–115.Nagel Ernest. Logic Without Ontology, Pp. 191–210.Hempel Carl G.. On the Nature of Mathematical Truth, Pp. 222–237.Carnap Rudolf. The Two Concepts of Probability, Pp. 330–348.Chisholm Roderick M.. The Contrary-to-Fact Conditional, Pp. 482–497. [REVIEW]Max Black - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (3):184-185.
  44. Russell on denoting.P. T. Geach - 1978 - Erkenntnis 38 (4):204.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. ‘On Denoting’ Conference Report.Nicholas Griffin - 2004 - The Bertrand Russell Society Quarterly 124.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. "On Denoting" Against Denoting.Landini Gregory - 2014 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 18 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Russell and the Ontological Argument: It is Well Known That in Principia Mathematica Russell Offers a Theory of Definite Descriptions and Holds That ‘Existence’ is Not a Property. It is Less Well Known That in “On Denoting” He Discusses the Version of Anselm’s Ontological Argument for God Formulated by Descartes, Accepting the Premiss “Existence is a Perfection” and Assessing the Argument as Valid but Question-Begging. This is Different From His Later Comments in A History of Western Philosophy Which Find the Argument Invalid. Indeed, Given the Sanctions of Principia, One Might Have Thought He Would Find the Argument Logically Ungrammatical. This Paper Shows How Russell Might Formulate and Evaluate Anselm’s Ontological Argument and the Version Offered by Descartes in a Way That Avoids the Conflict. [REVIEW]Gregory Landini - 2009 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 29 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Why "On Denoting"? Perkins Jr - 2014 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 27 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Pre-`On Denoting' Manuscripts in the Russell Archives.John Richards - 1976 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 21:28.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Pre-"On Denoting" Manuscripts in the Russell Archives.John Richards - 2014 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000