30 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Paul Oppenheim [26]P. Oppenheim [4]
  1. Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim (1948). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
  2. Paul Oppenheim & Hilary Putnam (1958). Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2:3-36.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   55 citations  
  3. John G. Kemeny & Paul Oppenheim (1956). On Reduction. Philosophical Studies 7 (1-2):6 - 19.
  4.  22
    John G. Kemeny & Paul Oppenheim (1952). Degree of Factual Support. Philosophy of Science 19 (4):307-324.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   46 citations  
  5.  35
    Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim (1945). A Definition of "Degree of Confirmation". Philosophy of Science 12 (2):98-115.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  6. Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim (1948). Reply to David L. Miller's Comments. Philosophy of Science 15 (4):350-352.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  59
    Hugo Bedau & Paul Oppenheim (1961). Complementarity in Quantum Mechanics: A Logical Analysis. Synthese 13 (3):201 - 232.
  8.  71
    Nicholas Rescher & Paul Oppenheim (1955). Logical Analysis of Gestalt Concepts. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (August):89-106.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9.  20
    Nathan Brody & Paul Oppenheim (1969). Application of Bohr's Principle of Complementarity to the Mind-Body Problem. Journal of Philosophy 66 (4):97-113.
  10.  8
    Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim (1936). Der Typusbegriff Im Lichte der Neuen Logik. Wissenschaftstheoretische Untersuchungen Zur Konstitutionsforschung Und Psychologie. Journal of Philosophy 33 (22):611-611.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11. K. Grelling & P. Oppenheim (1988). The Concept of Gestalt in the Light of Modern Logic. In Barry Smith (ed.), Foundations of Gestalt Theory. Philosophia.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  36
    Siegwart Lindenberg & Paul Oppenheim (1974). Generalization of Complementarity. Synthese 28 (2):117 - 139.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  2
    Paul Oppenheim (1969). Reminiscences of Peter. In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Reidel. pp. 1--4.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  38
    Siegwart Lindenberg & Paul Oppenheim (1978). The Bargain Principle. Synthese 37 (3):387 - 412.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  27
    Kurt Grelling & Paul Oppenheim (1939). Concerning the Structure of Wholes. Philosophy of Science 6 (4):487-489.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  1
    Kurt Grelling & Paul Oppenheim (1937). Der Gestaltbegriff im Lichte der neuen Logik. Erkenntnis 7 (1):211-225.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17.  5
    Carl G. Hempel & P. Oppenheim (1938). Der Typusbegriff Im Lichte der Neuen Logik. Philosophical Review 47 (3):314-315.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  19
    Olaf Helmer & Paul Oppenheim (1945). A Syntactical Definition of Probability and of Degree of Confirmation. Journal of Symbolic Logic 10 (2):25-60.
  19.  1
    Paul Oppenheim (1930). Die natürliche Ordnung der Wissenschaften. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 37 (2):8-9.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Kuft Grelling & Paul Oppenheim (1937). Supplementary Remarks on the Concept of Gestalt. Erkenntnis 7 (1):357-359.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  7
    John G. Kemeny & Paul Oppenheim (1955). Systematic Power. Philosophy of Science 22 (1):27-33.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  2
    Paul Oppenheim (1930). Der denkraum. Kant-Studien 35 (1-4):227-239.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Nathan Brody & Paul Oppenheim (1967). Methodological Differences Between Behaviorism and Phenomenology in Psychology. Psychological Review 74 (4):330-334.
  24. Nathan Brody & Paul Oppenheim (1966). Tensions in Psychology Between the Methods of Behaviorism and Phenomenology. Psychological Review 73 (4):295-305.
  25. Kurt Grelling & Paul Oppenheim (1939). Logical Analysis of "Gestalt" as "Functional Whole.". Journal of Symbolic Logic 4 (4):169-170.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. C. Hempel & P. Oppenheim (1946). Der Typusbegriff im Lichte der neuen Logik, Leiden 1936. Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 16 (1):98-100.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. C. H. Langford, Carl G. Hempel & P. Oppenheim (1937). Der Typusbegriff im Lichte der Neuen Logik. Journal of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):61.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Paul Oppenheim (1959). A Natural Order Of Scientific Disciplines. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 13 (49):354-360.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Paul Oppenheim (1957). Dimensions of Knowledge. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 11 (2):151.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Paul Oppenheim (1937). Von Klassenbegriffen zu Ordnungsbegriffen. Travaux du IXe Congrès International de Philosophie 6:69-76.
    La théorie traditionnelle des concepts étant classificatoire, ne comprend qu’une partie des formes de notre pensée. Comme complément nécessaire, l’auteur met en relief l’importance d’une catégorie de concepts qu’il propose de dénommer « concepts ordinateurs », parce qu’ils déterminent un certain ordre des objets de leur domaine d’application. Leur structure logique est élucidée par la théorie logistique des relations. L’auteur compare les avantages et les désavantages des deux formes de pensée et explique les raisons pour lesquelles une tendance à favoriser (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography