7 found
Order:
See also
Profile: Patrick Hawley (University of Hong Kong)
  1. Inertia, Optimism and Beauty.Patrick Hawley - 2013 - Noûs 47 (1):85-103.
    The best arguments for the 1/3 answer to the Sleeping Beauty problem all require that when Beauty awakes on Monday she should be uncertain what day it is. I argue that this claim should be rejected, thereby clearing the way to accept the 1/2 solution.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  2. Moral Absolutism Defended.Patrick Hawley - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (5):273-275.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Skepticism and the Value of Knowledge.Patrick Hawley - 2007 - In Chienkuo Mi Ruey-lin Chen (ed.), Naturalized Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.
    The main claim of this essay is that knowledge is no more
    valuable than lasting true belief.
    This claim is surprising. Doesn't knowledge have a unique
    and special value? If the main claim is correct and if, as it seems,
    knowledge is not lasting true belief, then knowledge does not have a unique value:
    in whatever way knowledge is valuable, lasting true belief is just as valuable.
    However, this result does not show that knowledge is worthless, nor does it undermine
    our knowledge gathering practices. There (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. What Justifies That?Patrick Hawley - 2007 - Synthese 160 (1):47 - 61.
    I clarify and defuse an argument for skepticism about justification with the aid of some results from recent linguistic theory. These considerations illuminate debates about the structure of justification.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  71
    What is Said.Patrick Hawley - 2002 - Journal of Pragmatics 34 (8):969-991.
    A common misunderstanding of Grice's distinction between <br>saying and implicating is that the hearer in a conversation <br>needs to use what is said in a calculation to determine what <br>is implicated. This mistake lead some to misconstrue the relation <br>between pragmatics and semantics.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. MIT Working Papers in Philosophy and Linguistics, Volume 1.Rajesh Bhatt & Patrick Hawley (eds.) - 2000
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Skepticism Avoided.Patrick Hawley - 2003 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    I evaluate three replies to skepticism, drawing conclusions about the meaning of "justified", the viability of foundationalism, the value of knowledge, and the role of belief in rational action. ;In the first chapter, I examine the following skeptical argument: Something is justified only if justified by a justified thing; circular and infinite chains of justification are illegitimate; therefore, no belief is justified. A linguistic investigation reveals that this argument contains two ambiguities not yet noticed by epistemologists. The linguistic observations favor (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography