33 found
Order:
See also
Paul Boghossian
New York University
  1. Color as a Secondary Quality.Paul A. Boghossian & J. David Velleman - 1989 - Mind 98 (January):81-103.
    Should a principle of charity be applied to the interpretation of the colour concepts exercised in visual experience? We think not. We shall argue, for one thing, that the grounds for applying a principle of charity are lacking in the case of colour concepts. More importantly, we shall argue that attempts at giving the experience of colour a charitable interpretation either fail to respect obvious features of that experience or fail to interpret it charitably, after all. Charity to visual experience (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   228 citations  
  2. Content and Self-Knowledge.Paul A. Boghossian - 1989 - Philosophical Topics 17 (1):5-26.
    This paper argues that, given a certain apparently inevitable thesis about content, we could not know our own minds. The thesis is that the content of a thought is determined by its relational properties.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   215 citations  
  3. The Normativity of Content.Paul A. Boghossian - 2003 - Philosophical Issues 13 (1):31-45.
  4. Epistemic Rules.Paul A. Boghossian - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (9):472-500.
  5. Blind Reasoning.Paul A. Boghossian - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):225–248.
    The paper asks under what conditions deductive reasoning transmits justification from its premises to its conclusion. It argues that both standard externalist and standard internalist accounts of this phenomenon fail. The nature of this failure is taken to indicate the way forward: basic forms of deductive reasoning must justify by being instances of ‘blind but blameless’ reasoning. Finally, the paper explores the suggestion that an inferentialist account of the logical constants can help explain how such reasoning is possible.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   143 citations  
  6.  14
    Content and Justification: Philosophical Papers.Paul A. Boghossian - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
    This volume presents a series of influential essays by Paul Boghossian on the theory of content and on its relation to the phenomenon of a priori knowledge. The essays are organized under four headings: the nature of content; content and self-knowledge; knowledge, content, and the a priori; and colour concepts.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  7. How Are Objective Epistemic Reasons Possible?Paul A. Boghossian - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 106 (1):1-40.
    Epistemic relativism has the contemporary academy in its grip. Not merely in the United States, but seemingly everywhere, most scholars working in the humanities and the social sciences seem to subscribe to some form of it. Even where the label is repudiated, the view is embraced. Sometimes the relativism in question concerns truth, sometimes justification. The core impulse appears to be a relativism about knowledge. The suspicion is widespread that what counts as knowledge in one cultural, or broadly ideological, setting (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   76 citations  
  8.  25
    Content and Self-Knowledge.Paul A. Boghossian - 1989 - Philosophical Topics 17 (1):5-26.
    This paper argues that, given a certain apparently inevitable thesis about content, we could not know our own minds. The thesis is that the content of a thought is determined by its relational properties.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   148 citations  
  9. The Status of Content.Paul A. Boghossian - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (2):157-84.
    An irrealist conception of a given region of discourse is the view that no real properties answer to the central predicates of the region in question. Any such conception emerges, invariably, as the result of the interaction of two forces. An account of the meaning of the central predicates, along with a conception of the sorts of property the world may contain, conspire to show that, if the predicates of the region are taken to express properties, their extensions would have (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   117 citations  
  10. Physicalist Theories of Color.Paul A. Boghossian & J. David Velleman - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (January):67-106.
    The dispute between realists about color and anti-realists is actually a dispute about the nature of color properties. The disputants do not disagree over what material objects are like. Rather, they disagree over whether any of the uncontroversial facts about material objects--their powers to cause visual experiences, their dispositions to reflect incident light, their atomic makeup, and so on--amount to their having colors. The disagreement is thus about which properties colors are and, in particular, whether colors are any of the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   59 citations  
  11. The Transparency of Mental Content.Paul A. Boghossian - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8:33-50.
    I believe that the notion of epistemic transparency does play an important role in our ordinary conception of mental content and I want to say what that role is. Unfortunately, the task is a large one; here I am able only to begin on its outline. I shall proceed somewhat indirectly, beginning with a discussion of externalist conceptions of mental content. I shall show that such conceptions violate epistemic transparency to an extent that has not been fully appreciated. Subsequently, I (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  12. Epistemic Analyticity: A Defense.Paul A. Boghossian - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):15-35.
    The paper is a defense of the project of explaining the a priori via the notion of meaning or concept possession. It responds to certain objections that have been made to this project—in particular, that there can be no epistemically analytic sentences that are not also metaphysically analytic, and that the notion of implicit definition cannot explain a priori entitlement. The paper goes on to distinguish between two different ways in which facts about meaning might generate facts about entitlement—inferential and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  13. Externalism and Inference.Paul A. Boghossian - 1992 - Philosophical Issues 2:11-28.
    The question I want to look at in this paper is this: To what extent does an externalist conception of mental content threaten our ability to know the contents of our thoughts? I shall argue that, in an important sense, externalism is inconsistent with the thesis that we have authoritative first-person knowledge of thought content: in particular, I shall argue, it is inconsistent with the thesis that our thought contents are epistemically transparent to us. I shall further argue that this (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  14.  34
    Wittgenstein on Meaning. [REVIEW]Paul A. Boghossian - 1989 - Philosophical Review 98 (1):83.
    Review of Wittgenstein on Meaning by Colin McGinn.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  15.  9
    Naturalizing Content.Paul A. Boghossian - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.
  16. Does an Inferential Role Semantics Rest Upon a Mistake?Paul A. Boghossian - 1993 - Mind and Language 8 (1):27-40.
  17.  27
    Does an Inferential Role Semantics Rest Upon a Mistake?Paul A. Boghossian - 1993 - Philosophical Issues 3:73-88.
  18. Rules, Meaning and Intention – Discussion. [REVIEW]Paul A. Boghossian - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 124 (2):185-197.
    Review of Philip Pettit’s Rules, Reasons and Norms.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  19. Inferential Role Semantics and the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction.Paul A. Boghossian - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 73 (2-3):109-122.
    This is a critical discussion of Jerry Fodor and Ernie Lepore's "Holism". The paper questions the existence of a slippery slope from some inferential liaisons are constitutive of meaning' to all inferential liaisons are constitutive of meaning'. "Interalia", it defends the existence of an analytic/synthetic distinction.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  20. What the Sokal Hoax Ought to Teach Us.Paul A. Boghossian - 1996 - Times Literary Supplement.
    The essay explores the meaning and implications of Alan Sokal’s hoax on the editors of Social Text. It examines the role that relativist/postmodernist views about knowledge may have played in that episode, and briefly explores the cogency of such conceptions.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  21.  8
    The Status of Content Revisited.Paul A. Boghossian - 1990 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 71 (December):264-278.
    This paper argues that Devitt’s arguments in "Transcendentalism About Content" don’t show how to answer the challenge I laid down in "Status Of Content". I proceed as follows. I begin by looking at why I didn’t formulate content eliminativism in the way that Devitt does, and why I did formulate it as the thesis of “content irrealism.” I then show in detail why his criticisms are off-target.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  22. The Case Against Epistemic Relativism: Replies to Rosen and Neta.Paul A. Boghossian - 2007 - Episteme 4 (1):49-65.
    Unlike the relativistic theses drawn from physics, normative relativisms involve relativization not to frames of reference but to something like our standards, standards that we have to be able to think of ourselves as endorsing or accepting. Th us, moral facts are to be relativized to moral standards and epistemic facts to epistemic standards. But a moral standard in this sense would appear to be just a general moral proposition and an epistemic standard just a general epistemic proposition. Pulling off (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  23. Seeking The Real.Paul A. Boghossian - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1):223-238.
    A critical discussion of Barry Stroud's claim, in his book "The Quest for Reality", that we could never rationally arrive at the conclusion that, for example, the world is not really colored.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  24.  12
    Blind Rule-Following.Paul A. Boghossian - 2012 - In Crispin Wright & Annalisa Coliva (eds.), Mind, Meaning, and Knowledge: Themes From the Philosophy of Crispin Wright. Oxford University Press. pp. 27-48.
    In this chapter a new problem about rule-following is outlined, one that is distinct both from Kripke’s and Wright’s versions of the problem. This new problem cannot be correctly responsed to, as Kripke’s can, by invoking Wright’s Intentional Account of rule-following. The upshot might be called, following Kant, an antinomy of pure reason: we both must — and cannot — make sense of someone’s following a rule. The chapter explores various ways out of this antinomy without here endorsing any of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  25. Replies to Wright, MacFarlane and Sosa.Paul A. Boghossian - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (3):409-432.
    The main impetus for my book came from the widespread acceptance of relativistic views about truth and knowledge within the Academy, especially within the humanities and the humanistic social sciences. In its introductory sections, though, I noted that there is one discipline within the humanities in which the influence of relativistic views is quite weak—namely, within analytic philosophy itself. Ironically, no sooner had the ink dried on the final version of my manuscript sometime in mid-2005—although, of course it had been (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  26. On Hearing the Music in the Sound: Scruton on Musical Expression.Paul A. Boghossian - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (1):49–55.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  27.  49
    Reply to Schiffer.Paul A. Boghossian - 1992 - Philosophical Issues 2:39-42.
    Reply to Schiffer's comment on Externalism and Inference.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  28. Analyticity and Conceptual Truth.Paul A. Boghossian - 1994 - Philosophical Issues 5:117-131.
  29.  60
    Reply to Commentators: [Loar, Yablo, Corbí, Moya].Paul A. Boghossian - 1998 - Philosophical Issues 9:253-260.
    Replies to commentators (Loar, Yablo, Corbí, Moya) on "What the Externalist Can Know A Priori".
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  30.  35
    Review: Sense, Reference and Rule-Following. [REVIEW]Paul A. Boghossian - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (1):139 - 144.
    Review of The Metaphysics of Meaning by Jerrold Katz.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  31. Content and Self-Knowledge.Paul A. Boghossian - 2000 - In Sven Bernecker & Fred I. Dretske (eds.), Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
    This paper argues that, given a certain apparently inevitable thesis about content, we could not know our own minds. The thesis is that the content of a thought is determined by its relational properties.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  32.  63
    Cognitive Science and the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction: Comments on Horwich.Paul A. Boghossian - 1993 - Philosophical Issues 3:135-142.
  33. Sense, Reference and Rule-Following. [REVIEW]Paul A. Boghossian - 1993 - Philosophical Issues 4:135-141.
    This is a critical discussion of Jerrold Katz's "The Metaphysics of Meaning". The essay raises some questions about exactly how Katz's new intensionalism' is to be understood, and about its plausibility. It also questions the views ability to solve the outstanding problems in the philosophy of mind and language.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark