25 found
Order:
  1. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
    The thirty-five chapters in this book describe various judgmental heuristics and the biases they produce, not only in laboratory experiments but in important...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1060 citations  
  2. Comparing the Effect of Rational and Emotional Appeals on Donation Behavior.Matthew Lindauer, Marcus Mayorga, Joshua D. Greene, Paul Slovic, Daniel Västfjäll & Peter Singer - 2020 - Judgment and Decision Making 15 (3):413-420.
    We present evidence from a pre-registered experiment indicating that a philosophical argument––a type of rational appeal––can persuade people to make charitable donations. The rational appeal we used follows Singer’s well-known “shallow pond” argument (1972), while incorporating an evolutionary debunking argument (Paxton, Ungar, & Greene 2012) against favoring nearby victims over distant ones. The effectiveness of this rational appeal did not differ significantly from that of a well-tested emotional appeal involving an image of a single child in need (Small, Loewenstein, and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):331-340.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   381 citations  
  4.  78
    The Construction of Preference.Sarah Lichtenstein & Paul Slovic (eds.) - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
    One of the main themes that has emerged from behavioral decision research during the past three decades is the view that people's preferences are often constructed in the process of elicitation. This idea is derived from studies demonstrating that normatively equivalent methods of elicitation (e.g., choice and pricing) give rise to systematically different responses. These preference reversals violate the principle of procedure invariance that is fundamental to all theories of rational choice. If different elicitation procedures produce different orderings of options, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  5.  35
    Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice.Amos Tversky, Shmuel Sattath & Paul Slovic - 1988 - Psychological Review 95 (3):371-384.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   76 citations  
  6.  73
    Reversals of Preference Between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions.Sarah Lichtenstein & Paul Slovic - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (1):46-55.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   94 citations  
  7. Facts Versus Fears.Paul Slovic, B. Fischoff & Sarah Lichtenstein - 1982 - In Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press. pp. 463--489.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations  
  8. Perception of Risk: Reflections on the Psychometric Paradigm.Paul Slovic - 1992 - In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Praeger. pp. 117--152.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  9.  14
    The Arithmetic of Emotion: Integration of Incidental and Integral Affect in Judgments and Decisions.Daniel Västfjäll, Paul Slovic, William J. Burns, Arvid Erlandsson, Lina Koppel, Erkin Asutay & Gustav Tinghög - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  10.  41
    Valuations of Human Lives: Normative Expectations and Psychological Mechanisms of (Ir)Rationality.Stephan Dickert, Daniel Västfjäll, Janet Kleber & Paul Slovic - 2012 - Synthese 189 (S1):95-105.
    A central question for psychologists, economists, and philosophers is how human lives should be valued. Whereas egalitarian considerations give rise to models emphasizing that every life should be valued equally, empirical research has demonstrated that valuations of lives depend on a variety of factors that often do not conform to specific normative expectations. Such factors include emotional reactions to the victims and cognitive considerations leading to biased perceptions of lives at risk (e.g., attention, mental imagery, pseudo-inefficacy, and scope neglect). They (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  11.  7
    Bringing Meaning to Numbers: The Impact of Evaluative Categories on Decisions.Ellen Peters, Nathan F. Dieckmann, Daniel Västfjäll, C. K. Mertz, Paul Slovic & Judith H. Hibbard - 2009 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15 (3):213-227.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  12.  52
    Relative Importance of Probabilities and Payoffs in Risk Taking.Paul Slovic & Sarah Lichtenstein - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (3p2):1.
  13.  17
    Greater Emotional Gain From Giving in Older Adults: Age-Related Positivity Bias in Charitable Giving.Pär Bjälkebring, Daniel Västfjäll, Stephan Dickert & Paul Slovic - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14. Amos Tversky, Eds. 1982.Daniel Kahneman & Paul Slovic - 1982 - In Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  8
    The More Who Die, the Less We Care Psychic Numbing and Genocide.Daniel Västfjäll & Paul Slovic - 2015 - In David Kim & Susanne Kaul (eds.), Imagining Human Rights. De Gruyter. pp. 55-68.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  67
    Affective Asynchrony and the Measurement of the Affective Attitude Component.Ellen Peters & Paul Slovic - 2007 - Cognition and Emotion 21 (2):300-329.
  17.  20
    Importance of Variance Preferences in Gambling Decisions.Paul Slovic & Sarah Lichtenstein - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):646.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  18.  26
    Differential Effects of Real Versus Hypothetical Payoffs on Choices Among Gambles.Paul Slovic - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):434.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  19.  8
    It Depends: Partisan Evaluation of Conditional Probability Importance.Leaf Van Boven, Jairo Ramos, Ronit Montal-Rosenberg, Tehila Kogut, David K. Sherman & Paul Slovic - 2019 - Cognition 188:51-63.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  17
    Effect of Instruction in Expected Value on Optimality of Gambling Decisions.Sarah Lichtenstein, Paul Slovic & Donald Zink - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):236.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21.  13
    Manipulating the Attractiveness of a Gamble Without Changing its Expected Value.Paul Slovic - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):139.
  22.  13
    Scope Insensitivity in Helping Decisions: Is It a Matter of Culture and Values?Tehila Kogut, Paul Slovic & Daniel Västfjäll - 2015 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (6):1042-1052.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  9
    Response: Commentary: Greater Emotional Gain From Giving in Older Adults: Age-Related Positivity Bias in Charitable Giving.Pär Bjälkebring, Daniel Västfjäll, Stephan Dickert & Paul Slovic - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. The Affect Heuristic and Risk Perception – Stability Across Elicitation Methods and Individual Cognitive Abilities.Kenny Skagerlund, Mattias Forsblad, Paul Slovic & Daniel Västfjäll - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Social, Cultural, and Psycholgocial Paradigm.Paul Slovic - 1992 - In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Praeger. pp. 117--152.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark