4 found
Order:
  1. Ethical Objections to Fairtrade.Peter Griffiths - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (3):357-373.
    The Fairtrade movement is a group of businesses claiming to trade ethically. The claims are evaluated, under a range of criteria derived from the Utilitarian ethic. Firstly, if aid or charity money is diverted from the very poorest people to the quite poor, or the rich, there is an increase in death and destitution. It is shown that little of the extra paid by consumers for Fairtrade reaches farmers, sometimes none. It cannot be shown that it has a positive impact (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2.  3
    Methodological Strategies for the Identification and Synthesis of 'Evidence' to Support Decision-Making in Relation to Complex Healthcare Systems and Practices.Angus Forbes & Peter Griffiths - 2002 - Nursing Inquiry 9 (3):141-155.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  23
    Fairtrade in Schools: Teaching Ethics or Unlawful Marketing to the Defenceless?Peter Griffiths - 2014 - Ethics and Education 9 (3):369-384.
    Schools in the UK teach pupils about Fairtrade as part of Religious Education, Personal and Social Education, Citizenship, Geography and so on. There are also Fairtrade Schools, where the whole school, including staff and parents, is committed to promoting the brand. It is argued here that promoting this commercial brand to schoolchildren and using the schoolchildren to press adults to buy a product amounts to indoctrination using criteria of intent, methods of teaching and the subject matter. This conflicts with educational (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  14
    Effectiveness of Nursing‐Led Inpatient Care for Patients with Post‐Acute Health Care Needs: Secondary Data Analysis From a Programme of Randomized Controlled Trials.Ruth Harris, Jenifer Wilson-Barnett & Peter Griffiths - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (2):198-205.