12 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Peter McLeod [11]Peter J. McLeod [1]
  1.  33
    Implicit Knowledge and Motor Skill: What People Who Know How to Catch Don't Know.Nick Reed, Peter McLeod & Zoltan Dienes - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):63-76.
    People are unable to report how they decide whether to move backwards or forwards to catch a ball. When asked to imagine how their angle of elevation of gaze would change when they caught a ball, most people are unable to describe what happens although their interception strategy is based on controlling changes in this angle. Just after catching a ball, many people are unable to recognise a description of how their angle of gaze changed during the catch. Some people (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  2.  13
    Why Good Thoughts Block Better Ones: The Mechanism of the Pernicious Einstellung Effect.Merim Bilalić, Peter McLeod & Fernand Gobet - 2008 - Cognition 108 (3):652-661.
  3.  58
    Expert and “Novice” Problem Solving Strategies in Chess: Sixty Years of Citing de Groot (1946).Fernand Gobet, Peter McLeod & Merim Bilalić - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):395-408.
    In a famous study of expert problem solving, de Groot (1946/1978) examined how chess players found the best move. He reported that there was little difference in the way that the best players (Grand Masters) and very good players (Candidate Masters) searched the board. Although this result has been regularly cited in studies of expertise, it is frequently misquoted. It is often claimed that de Groot found no difference in the way that experts and novices investigate a problem. Comparison of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  4.  26
    Specialization Effect and Its Influence on Memory and Problem Solving in Expert Chess Players.Merim Bilalić, Peter McLeod & Fernand Gobet - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (6):1117-1143.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  5.  2
    Demonstrations of Subconscious Processing with the Binary Exclusion Task.Navindra Persaud & Peter McLeod - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (1):37.
  6.  15
    Attractor Dynamics in Word Recognition: Converging Evidence From Errors by Normal Subjects, Dyslexic Patients and a Connectionist Model.Peter McLeod, Tim Shallice & David C. Plaut - 2000 - Cognition 74 (1):91-114.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  8
    How Intellectual is Chess? -- A Reply to Howard.Merim Bilalic & Peter McLeod - 2006 - Journal of Biosocial Science 38 (3):419-421.
    Howard's (2005) claim that male dominance in chess is 'consistent with the evolutionary psychology view that males predominate at high achievement levels at least partly because of ability differences' (p. 378) is based on the premise that top level chess skill depends on a high level of IQ and visuospatial abilities. This premise is not supported by empirical evidence. In 1927 Djakow et al. first showed that world-class chess players do not have exceptional intellectual abilities. This finding has subsequently been (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  19
    Connectionist Modelling of Word Recognition.Peter McLeod, David C. Plaut & Tim Shallice - 2001 - Synthese 129 (2):173 - 183.
    Connectionist models offer concretemechanisms for cognitive processes. When these modelsmimic the performance of human subjects theycan offer insights into the computationswhich might underlie human cognition. We illustratethis with the performance of a recurrentconnectionist network which produces the meaningof words in response to their spellingpattern. It mimics a paradoxical pattern oferrors produced by people trying to read degradedwords. The reason why the network produces thesurprising error pattern lies in the nature ofthe attractors which it develops as it learns tomap spelling patterns (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  3
    Connectionist Modelling of Word Recognition.Peter Mcleod, David Plaut & Tim Shallice - 2001 - Synthese 129 (2):173-183.
    Connectionist models offer concrete mechanisms for cognitive processes. When these models mimic the performance of human subjects they can offer insights into the computations which might underlie human cognition. We illustrate this with the performance of a recurrent connectionist network which produces the meaning of words in response to their spelling pattern. It mimics a paradoxical pattern of errors produced by people trying to read degraded words. The reason why the network produces the surprising error pattern lies in the nature (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  2
    How Are Base Rates Used? Interactive and Group Effects.Peter J. McLeod & Margo Watt - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):35.
  11.  2
    Response Strategies with a Cross-Coupled Control System.Peter McLeod - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1):64.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  2
    Participation Rates and the Difference in Performance of Women and Men in Chess.Merim Bilalić & Peter Mcleod - 2007 - Journal of Biosocial Science 39 (5):789.