4 found
  1.  44
    The silent majority: Who speaks at IRB meetings.Philip J. Candilis, Charles W. Lidz, Paul S. Appelbaum, Robert M. Arnold, William P. Gardner, Suzanne Myers, Albert J. Grudzinskas Jr & Lorna J. Simon - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (4):15-20.
    Institutional review boards are almost universally considered to be overworked and understaffed. They also require substantial commitments of time and resources from their members. Although some surveys report average IRB memberships of 15 people or more, federal regulations require only five. We present data on IRB meetings at eight of the top 25 academic medical centers in the United States funded by the National Institutes of Health. These data indicate substantial contributions from primary reviewers and chairs during protocol discussions but (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  41
    A survey of researchers using a consent policy for cognitively impaired human research subjects.Philip J. Candilis, Robert W. Wesley & Alison Wichman - 1993 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 15 (6):1.
  3.  35
    Organizational ethics and the high cost of medicines.Philip J. Candilis - 2000 - HEC Forum 12 (4):303-310.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
  4.  11
    Role responsibilities in the conflict of clinic and courtroom.Philip J. Candilis & Paul S. Appelbaum - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (4):382 – 385.