44 found
Order:
  1.  42
    IRBs and the Protection-Inclusion Dilemma: Finding a Balance.Phoebe Friesen, Luke Gelinas, Aaron Kirby, David H. Strauss & Barbara E. Bierer - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):75-88.
    Institutional review boards, tasked with facilitating ethical research, are often pulled in competing directions. In what we call the protection-inclusion dilemma, we acknowledge the tensions IRBs face in aiming to both protect potential research participants from harm and include under-represented populations in research. In this manuscript, we examine the history of protectionism that has dominated research ethics oversight in the United States, as well as two responses to such protectionism: inclusion initiatives and critiques of the term vulnerability. We look at (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  2.  74
    Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies.Sara Goering, Eran Klein, Laura Specker Sullivan, Anna Wexler, Blaise Agüera Y. Arcas, Guoqiang Bi, Jose M. Carmena, Joseph J. Fins, Phoebe Friesen, Jack Gallant, Jane E. Huggins, Philipp Kellmeyer, Adam Marblestone, Christine Mitchell, Erik Parens, Michelle Pham, Alan Rubel, Norihiro Sadato, Mina Teicher, David Wasserman, Meredith Whittaker, Jonathan Wolpaw & Rafael Yuste - 2021 - Neuroethics 14 (3):365-386.
    Advancements in novel neurotechnologies, such as brain computer interfaces and neuromodulatory devices such as deep brain stimulators, will have profound implications for society and human rights. While these technologies are improving the diagnosis and treatment of mental and neurological diseases, they can also alter individual agency and estrange those using neurotechnologies from their sense of self, challenging basic notions of what it means to be human. As an international coalition of interdisciplinary scholars and practitioners, we examine these challenges and make (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  3.  62
    Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?Effy Vayena, Minerva Rivas Velarde, Mahsa Shabani, Gabrielle Samuel, Camille Nebeker, S. Matthew Liao, Peter Kleist, Walter Karlen, Jeff Kahn, Phoebe Friesen, Bobbie Farsides, Edward S. Dove, Alessandro Blasimme, Mark Sheehan, Marcello Ienca & Agata Ferretti - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-13.
    BackgroundEthics review is the process of assessing the ethics of research involving humans. The Ethics Review Committee (ERC) is the key oversight mechanism designated to ensure ethics review. Whether or not this governance mechanism is still fit for purpose in the data-driven research context remains a debated issue among research ethics experts.Main textIn this article, we seek to address this issue in a twofold manner. First, we review the strengths and weaknesses of ERCs in ensuring ethical oversight. Second, we map (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  4. Personal responsibility within health policy: unethical and ineffective.Phoebe Friesen - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics Recent Issues 44 (1):53-58.
    This paper argues against incorporating assessments of individual responsibility into healthcare policies by expanding an existing argument and offering a rebuttal to an argument in favour of such policies. First, it is argued that what primarily underlies discussions surrounding personal responsibility and healthcare is not causal responsibility, moral responsibility or culpability, as one might expect, but biases towards particular highly stigmatised behaviours. A challenge is posed for proponents of taking personal responsibility into account within health policy to either expand the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  5.  65
    Pain, placebo, and cognitive penetration.Henry Shevlin & Phoebe Friesen - 2021 - Mind and Language 36 (5):771-791.
    There is compelling evidence that pain experience is influenced by cognitive states. We explore one specific form of such influence, namely placebo analgesia, and examine its relevance for the cognitive penetration debate in philosophy of mind. We single out as important a form of influence on experience that we termradical cognitive penetration,and argue that some cases of placebo analgesia constitute compelling instances of this phenomenon. Still, we urge caution in extrapolating from this to broader conclusions about cognitive penetration in perceptual (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  6.  39
    Trust, trustworthiness and sharing patient data for research.Mark Sheehan, Phoebe Friesen, Adrian Balmer, Corina Cheeks, Sara Davidson, James Devereux, Douglas Findlay, Katharine Keats-Rohan, Rob Lawrence & Kamran Shafiq - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e26-e26.
    When it comes to using patient data from the National Health Service for research, we are often told that it is a matter of trust: we need to trust, we need to build trust, we need to restore trust. Various policy papers and reports articulate and develop these ideas and make very important contributions to public dialogue on the trustworthiness of our research institutions. But these documents and policies are apparently constructed with little sustained reflection on the nature of trust (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  7.  77
    Rethinking the Belmont Report?Phoebe Friesen, Lisa Kearns, Barbara Redman & Arthur L. Caplan - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):15-21.
    This article reflects on the relevance and applicability of the Belmont Report nearly four decades after its original publication. In an exploration of criticisms that have been raised in response to the report and of significant changes that have occurred within the context of biomedical research, five primary themes arise. These themes include the increasingly vague boundary between research and practice, unique harms to communities that are not addressed by the principle of respect for persons, and how growing complexity and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  8.  48
    Standpoint Theory and the Psy Sciences: Can Marginalization and Critical Engagement Lead to an Epistemic Advantage?Phoebe Friesen & Jordan Goldstein - 2022 - Hypatia 37 (4):659-687.
    As participatory research practices are increasingly taken up in health research, claims related to experiential authority and expertise are frequently made. Here, in an exploration of what grounds such claims, we consider how feminist standpoint theory might apply to the psy sciences (psychiatry, psychology, psychotherapy, psychoanalysis, and so on). Standpoint theory claims that experiences of marginalization and critical engagement can lead to a standpoint that offers an epistemic advantage within a domain of knowledge. We examine experiences of marginalization and critical (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  9. Mind the Gaps: Ethical and Epistemic Issues in the Digital Mental Health Response to Covid‐19.Joshua August Skorburg & Phoebe Friesen - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (6):23-26.
    Well before the COVID-19 pandemic, proponents of digital psychiatry were touting the promise of various digital tools and techniques to revolutionize mental healthcare. As social distancing and its knock-on effects have strained existing mental health infrastructures, calls have grown louder for implementing various digital mental health solutions at scale. Decisions made today will shape the future of mental healthcare for the foreseeable future. We argue that bioethicists are uniquely positioned to cut through the hype surrounding digital mental health, which can (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  10.  47
    Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions.Sonja Erikainen, Phoebe Friesen, Leah Rand, Karin Jongsma, Michael Dunn, Annie Sorbie, Matthew McCoy, Jessica Bell, Michael Burgess, Haidan Chen, Vicky Chico, Sarah Cunningham-Burley, Julie Darbyshire, Rebecca Dawson, Andrew Evans, Nick Fahy, Teresa Finlay, Lucy Frith, Aaron Goldenberg, Lisa Hinton, Nils Hoppe, Nigel Hughes, Barbara Koenig, Sapfo Lignou, Michelle McGowan, Michael Parker, Barbara Prainsack, Mahsa Shabani, Ciara Staunton, Rachel Thompson, Kinga Varnai, Effy Vayena, Oli Williams, Max Williamson, Sarah Chan & Mark Sheehan - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (7):522-525.
    Population-level biomedical research offers new opportunities to improve population health, but also raises new challenges to traditional systems of research governance and ethical oversight. Partly in response to these challenges, various models of public involvement in research are being introduced. Yet, the ways in which public involvement should meet governance challenges are not well understood. We conducted a qualitative study with 36 experts and stakeholders using the World Café method to identify key governance challenges and explore how public involvement can (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  11.  69
    Educational pelvic exams on anesthetized women: Why consent matters.Phoebe Friesen - 2018 - Bioethics 32 (5):298-307.
    It is argued here that the practice of medical students performing pelvic exams on women who are under anesthetic and have not consented is immoral and indefensible. This argument begins by laying out the ethical justification for the practice of informed consent, which can be found in autonomy and basic rights. Foregoing the process of consent within medicine can result in violations of both autonomy and basic rights, as well as trust, forming the basis of the wrong of unauthorized pelvic (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  12.  29
    A Cross Sectional Survey of Recruitment Practices, Supports, and Perceived Roles for Unaffiliated and Non-scientist Members of IRBs.Stuart G. Nicholls, Holly A. Taylor, Richard James, Emily E. Anderson, Phoebe Friesen, Toby Schonfeld & Elyse I. Summers - 2023 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 14 (3):174-184.
    Background Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are federally mandated to include both nonscientific and unaffiliated representatives in their membership. Despite this, there is no guidance or policy on the selection of unaffiliated or non-scientist members and reports indicate a lack of clarity regarding members’ roles. In the present study we sought to explore processes of recruitment, training, and the perceived roles for unaffiliated and non-scientist members of IRBs.Methods We distributed a self-administered REDCap survey of members of the Association for the Accreditation (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  13. Persons or datapoints?: Ethics, artificial intelligence, and the participatory turn in mental health research.Joshua August Skorburg, Kieran O'Doherty & Phoebe Friesen - 2024 - American Psychologist 79 (1):137-149.
    This article identifies and examines a tension in mental health researchers’ growing enthusiasm for the use of computational tools powered by advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML). Although there is increasing recognition of the value of participatory methods in science generally and in mental health research specifically, many AI/ML approaches, fueled by an ever-growing number of sensors collecting multimodal data, risk further distancing participants from research processes and rendering them as mere vectors or collections of data points. The (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  65
    National Standards for Public Involvement in Research: missing the forest for the trees.Matthew S. McCoy, Karin Rolanda Jongsma, Phoebe Friesen, Michael Dunn, Carolyn Plunkett Neuhaus, Leah Rand & Mark Sheehan - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):801-804.
    Biomedical research funding bodies across Europe and North America increasingly encourage—and, in some cases, require—investigators to involve members of the public in funded research. Yet there remains a striking lack of clarity about what ‘good’ or ‘successful’ public involvement looks like. In an effort to provide guidance to investigators and research organisations, representatives of several key research funding bodies in the UK recently came together to develop the National Standards for Public Involvement in Research. The Standards have critical implications for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  15.  18
    Community Research Ethics Oversight: Place, Experience, and Expertise.Alize E. Gunay, Phoebe Friesen & Emily M. A. Doerksen - 2023 - In Emily E. Anderson (ed.), Ethical Issues in Community and Patient Stakeholder–Engaged Health Research. Springer Verlag. pp. 275-297.
    Urban communities experiencing marginalization often disproportionately bear the risks and burdens of research and are left out of research ethics governance processes. To address this, many communities have created place-based and community-led research ethics governance initiatives to ensure that community voice is included in discussions surrounding research conduct. Place-based strategies in the Vancouver Downtown Eastside, the Bronx, and the Philadelphia Promise Zone successfully mobilize community perspectives in research ethics, filling in a significant gap in our current system of institutional research (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  16.  29
    Consent for Intimate Exams on Unconscious Patients: Sharpening Legislative Efforts.Phoebe Friesen, Robin Fretwell Wilson, Soyoon Kim & Jennifer Goedken - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (1):28-31.
    Hastings Center Report, Volume 52, Issue 1, Page 28-31, January/February 2022.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  17. Ethical Issues in Text Mining for Mental Health.Joshua Skorburg & Phoebe Friesen - forthcoming - In Morteza Dehghani & Ryan Boyd (eds.), The Atlas of Language Analysis in Psychology. Guilford Press.
    A recent systematic review of Machine Learning (ML) approaches to health data, containing over 100 studies, found that the most investigated problem was mental health (Yin et al., 2019). Relatedly, recent estimates suggest that between 165,000 and 325,000 health and wellness apps are now commercially available, with over 10,000 of those designed specifically for mental health (Carlo et al., 2019). In light of these trends, the present chapter has three aims: (1) provide an informative overview of some of the recent (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  18.  41
    Medically Assisted Dying and Suicide: How Are They Different, and How Are They Similar?Phoebe Friesen - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (1):32-43.
    The practice of medically assisted dying has long been contentious, and the question of what to call it has become increasingly contentious as well. Particularly among U.S. proponents of legalizing the practice, there has been a growing push away from calling it “physician‐assisted suicide,” with assertions that medically assisted dying is fundamentally different from suicide. Digging deeper into this claim about difference leads to an examination of the difference between two kinds of suffering—suffering from physical conditions and suffering from psychological (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  19.  31
    Equitable Access to Research Benefits: Considerations for COVID-19 Vaccine Development and Clinical Trial Crossover.Danish Zaidi, Jennifer Miller, Tanvee Varma, Dowin Boatright & Phoebe Friesen - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (3):86-88.
    COVID-19 vaccine research success and emergency use authorizations have shown the life sciences’ potential for positive health impact. But they also underscore potentially divergent and conf...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  20.  47
    Towards an account of the placebo effect: a critical evaluation alongside current evidence.Phoebe Friesen - 2020 - Biology and Philosophy 35 (1):1-23.
    This paper offers a critical analysis of several accounts of the placebo effect that have been put forward. While the placebo effect is most often thought of as a control in research and as a deceptive tool in practice, a growing body of research suggests that it ought to be thought of as a powerful phenomenon in its own right. Several accounts that aim to draw boundaries around the placebo effect are evaluated in relation to current evidence and it is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  21. The First Smart Pill: Digital Revolution or Last Gasp?Anna K. Swartz & Phoebe Friesen - 2023 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 33 (3):277-319.
    ABSTRACT: Abilify MyCite was granted regulatory approval in 2017, becoming the world’s first “smart pill” that could digitally track whether patients had taken their medication. The new technology was introduced as one that had gained the support of patients and ethicists alike, and could contribute to solving the widespread and costly problem of patient nonadherence. Here, we offer an in-depth exploration of this narrative, through an examination of the origins and development of Abilify, the drug that would later become MyCite. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  30
    Transforming Bioethics: The Need for Strong Objectivity and Standpoints.Phoebe Friesen - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (2):58-60.
    In their target article, Zamina Mithani, Jane Cooper, and J. Wesley Boyd make a compelling case for the importance of “counter storytelling” in bioethics. They obse...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  23.  39
    White Ignorance in Pain Research: Racial Differences and Racial Disparities.Phoebe Friesen & Nada Gligorov - 2022 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 32 (2):205-235.
    Racial disparities in pain treatment are well documented. Such disparities are explained with reference to factors related to providers, health care structures, and patient behaviors. Racial differences in pain experiences, although well documented, are less well understood. Explanations for such differences usually involve genetic or psychological factors. Here, we argue that racial differences in pain experiences might also be explained by disparities in pain treatment. Based on what we know about the nature of pain, particularly the cognitive and affective aspects (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24.  38
    Expanding Outcome Measures in Schizophrenia Research: Does the Research Domain Criteria Pose a Threat?Phoebe Friesen - 2019 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 26 (3):243-260.
    In the introduction to a recent anthology of contemporary issues in philosophy of psychiatry, editors Jeffrey Poland and Şerife Tekin declare this to be a moment of crisis within the field. They suggest that the state of psychiatry today reflects Thomas Kuhn's conception of a period of extraordinary science, which occurs when anomalies begin to build up, confidence in the dominant paradigm is shook, competing theories arise, and philosophical questions come to the fore. Although perhaps not all would agree that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  25.  53
    Placebo effects and racial and ethnic health disparities: an unjust and underexplored connection.Phoebe Friesen & Charlotte Blease - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics Recent Issues 44 (11):774-781.
    While a significant body of bioethical literature considers how the placebo effect might introduce a conflict between autonomy and beneficence, the link between justice and the placebo effect has been neglected. Here, we bring together disparate evidence from the field of placebo studies and research on health inequalities related to race and ethnicity, and argue that, collectively, this evidence may provide the basis for an unacknowledged route by which health disparities are exacerbated. This route is constituted by an uneven distribution (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  26.  27
    Extending Ethical Strides: From Tribal IRBs to the Bronx Community Research Review Board.Phoebe Friesen, Lisa Kearns, Barbara K. Redman & Arthur L. Caplan - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (11):W5-W8.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  27. Governing AI-Driven Health Research: Are IRBs Up to the Task?Phoebe Friesen, Rachel Douglas-Jones, Mason Marks, Robin Pierce, Katherine Fletcher, Abhishek Mishra, Jessica Lorimer, Carissa Véliz, Nina Hallowell, Mackenzie Graham, Mei Sum Chan, Huw Davies & Taj Sallamuddin - 2021 - Ethics and Human Research 2 (43):35-42.
    Many are calling for concrete mechanisms of oversight for health research involving artificial intelligence (AI). In response, institutional review boards (IRBs) are being turned to as a familiar model of governance. Here, we examine the IRB model as a form of ethics oversight for health research that uses AI. We consider the model's origins, analyze the challenges IRBs are facing in the contexts of both industry and academia, and offer concrete recommendations for how these committees might be adapted in order (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28.  40
    The Challenge of Demandingness in Citizen Science and Participatory Research.Karin Jongsma & Phoebe Friesen - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (8):33-35.
    Wiggins and Wilbanks’s (2019) article draws attention to the rise of citizen science in the medical domain, part of a larger participatory turn in which citizens and patients are increasingly invol...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29.  50
    Birthing Alone: An Ethical Analysis of Pandemic Policies Banning Birthing Partners.Phoebe Friesen, Sarah Towle & Tamara Perez - 2021 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 14 (2):114-143.
    During the COVID-19 pandemic, several hospitals implemented “birthing alone” policies, banning companions from accompanying individuals giving birth. We offer an ethical analysis of these policies. First, we examine them through a consequentialist framework of risks and benefits. Second, we consider the significance of birth, highlighting the unique ways in which risks, relationships, and rights are understood in the context of obstetrics. We conclude that birthing alone policies are largely unjustified, as the harm they are certain to cause outweighs their possible (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  30.  45
    Surrogate decision making for unrepresented patients: Proposing a harm reduction interpretation of the best interest standard.Nada Gligorov & Phoebe Friesen - 2020 - Clinical Ethics 15 (2):57-64.
    Unrepresented patients are individuals who lack decision makingcapacity and have no family or friends to make medical decisions for them. This population is growing in number in the United States, particularly within emergency and intensive care settings. While some bioethical discussion has taken place in response to the question of who ought to make decisions for these patients, the issue of how surrogate medical decisions ought to be made for this population remains unexplored. In this paper, we argue that standard (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  25
    Is the Right to a Healthy Environment Enough? Reckoning with a History of Failures in Chemical Valley.Elsa Tanré, Katerina Carayannis, Isabella Braga, Jean Pierre Abdallah & Phoebe Friesen - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (3):28-30.
    In “The Bioethics of Environmental Injustice: Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Implications of Unhealthy Environments,” Ray and Cooper (2024) advocate for environmental law efforts, with a focus on the...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  9
    (1 other version)Why Democratize Psychiatric Research?Phoebe Friesen - 2024 - Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology 31 (2):117-133.
    Building on decades of rich discussions of why 'nothing about us without us' matters in the field of psychiatry, this paper aims to illuminate the justifications underlying participatory research in psychiatry, and how these justifications might shape participatory methodologies. This is accomplished through the examination of several epistemic and ethical features of psychiatry that underlie the importance of engaging in participatory research in the field, unpacking their connection to participatory research, and offering suggestions related to their implications for research methodologies. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  8
    (1 other version)Democratizing Psychiatric Research: Recognizing the Potential and the Limits of Experiential Expertise.Phoebe Friesen - 2024 - Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology 31 (2):143-149.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Democratizing Psychiatric ResearchRecognizing the Potential and the Limits of Experiential ExpertiseThe author reports no conflict of interests.First, I want to express my gratitude for such thoughtful and generative responses to the manuscript "Why Democratize Psychiatric Research?," which has been in development for several years and is the product of much reflection that has taken place in academic, advocacy, and interpersonal contexts. I am delighted to see such insightful engagement (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  30
    On Female Genital Cutting: Factors to be Considered When Confronted With a Request to Re-infibulate.Mona Saleh, Phoebe Friesen & Veronica Ades - 2018 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15 (4):549-555.
    According to the World Health Organization, female genital cutting affects millions of girls and women worldwide, particularly on the African continent and in the Middle East. This paper presents a plausible, albeit hypothetical, clinical vignette and then explores the legal landscape as well as the ethical landscape physicians should use to evaluate the adult patient who requests re-infibulation. The principles of non-maleficence, beneficence, justice, and autonomy are considered for guidance, and physician conscientious objection to this procedure is discussed as well. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  35.  25
    Making up Monsters, Redirecting Blame: An Examination of Excited Delirium.Arjun Byju & Phoebe Friesen - 2023 - Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology 30 (4):333-351.
    This paper examines the controversial diagnosis of excited delirium, which is often employed after individuals die during an encounter with the police. Rather than asking the important, and widely explored, question of whether the diagnosis is real or not, here, we consider how it operates in the world and why it seems to stick around, despite growing controversy and resistance to its use. First, we consider the question of what kinds of people are made up through the diagnosis of excited (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  21
    Excited Delirium: Falsifiability, Causality, and the Importance of Advocacy.Arjun Byju & Phoebe Friesen - 2023 - Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology 30 (4):361-365.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Excited DeliriumFalsifiability, Causality, and the Importance of AdvocacyArjun Byju, MD (bio) and Phoebe Friesen, PhD (bio)We want to begin by thanking both Kathryn Petrozzo and Paul B. Lieberman for taking the time to read and respond to our article, “Making Up Monsters, Redirecting Blame: An Examination of Excited Delirium,” so thoughtfully. They each offered us an opportunity to consider dimensions of excited delirium that we had not encountered as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  34
    A Place for Subjectivity in Psychiatry.Phoebe Friesen - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (2):116-117.
  38.  24
    Acknowledging Complexity and Reimagining IRBs: A Reply to Discussions of the Protection–Inclusion Dilemma.Phoebe Friesen, Luke Gelinas, Aaron Kirby, David H. Strauss & Barbara E. Bierer - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (9):1-8.
    We are grateful to everyone who took the time to offer such insightful comments with regard to the protection–inclusion dilemma in research oversight. Nearly all respondents agreed that this dilemm...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  49
    Concerns about genetic testing for schizophrenia among young adults at clinical high risk for psychosis.Ryan E. Lawrence, Phoebe Friesen, Gary Brucato, Ragy R. Girgis & Lisa Dixon - 2016 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 7 (3):193-198.
    Background: Genetic tests for schizophrenia may introduce risks and benefits. Among young adults at clinical high risk for psychosis, little is known about their concerns and how they assess potential risks. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 15 young adults at clinical high risk for psychosis to ask about their concerns. Results: Participants expressed concerns about test reliability, data interpretation, stigma, psychological harm, family planning, and privacy. Participants’ responses showed some departure from the ethics literature insofar as participants were primarily (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40.  29
    Solidarity without Sovereignty: Extending the Belmont Principles Further?Phoebe Friesen, Emily Doerksen & Alize Gunay - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (10):25-27.
    Saunkeah et al. argue that the principles of sovereignty and solidarity form the moral foundation for extending the Belmont Principles to tribal communities, by providing tribes with a right...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  1
    Community-led approaches to research governance: a scoping review of strategies.Emily Doerksen, Alize E. Gunay, Scott D. Neufeld & Phoebe Friesen - forthcoming - Research Ethics.
    Around the world, a growing number of communities are voicing their demands for authority in the governance of research involving them. Many such communities have experienced histories of exploitative, stigmatizing, intrusive research that failed to benefit them. To better understand what strategies communities are developing in order to have a say in research oversight, we conducted a scoping review of the international peer-reviewed and grey literature. Three primary strategies were identified: (1) guidelines; (2) community review boards; and (3) community advisory (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Machine learning and suicide prevention: considering context as a guide to ethical design.Phoebe Friesen & Katie O'Leary - 2019 - In Kelso Cratsley & Jennifer Radden (eds.), Mental Health as Public Health: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Ethics of Prevention. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  32
    More Harm Than Good: Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension in Forensic Psychiatry.Mackenzie Graham & Phoebe Friesen - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):17-19.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  33
    Extraordinary science and psychiatry: Responses to the crisis in mental health research. [REVIEW]Phoebe Friesen - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (1):146-150.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark