38 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Phyllis Illari [31]Phyllis McKay Illari [10]Phyllis Kirstin Illari [2]
  1. What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences.Phyllis McKay Illari & Jon Williamson - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):119-135.
    After a decade of intense debate about mechanisms, there is still no consensus characterization. In this paper we argue for a characterization that applies widely to mechanisms across the sciences. We examine and defend our disagreements with the major current contenders for characterizations of mechanisms. Ultimately, we indicate that the major contenders can all sign up to our characterization.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   193 citations  
  2.  88
    Evaluating evidence of mechanisms in medicine.Veli-Pekka Parkkinen, Christian Wallmann, Michael Wilde, Brendan Clarke, Phyllis Illari, Michael P. Kelly, Charles Norell, Federica Russo, Beth Shaw & Jon Williamson - 2018 - Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. Edited by Brendan Clarke, Phyllis Illari, Michael P. Kelly, Charles Norell, Federica Russo, Beth Shaw, Christian Wallmann, Michael Wilde & Jon Williamson.
    The use of evidence in medicine is something we should continuously seek to improve. This book seeks to develop our understanding of evidence of mechanism in evaluating evidence in medicine, public health, and social care; and also offers tools to help implement improved assessment of evidence of mechanism in practice. In this way, the book offers a bridge between more theoretical and conceptual insights and worries about evidence of mechanism and practical means to fit the results into evidence assessment procedures.
  3. Mechanisms and the Evidence Hierarchy.Brendan Clarke, Donald Gillies, Phyllis Illari, Federica Russo & Jon Williamson - 2014 - Topoi 33 (2):339-360.
    Evidence-based medicine (EBM) makes use of explicit procedures for grading evidence for causal claims. Normally, these procedures categorise evidence of correlation produced by statistical trials as better evidence for a causal claim than evidence of mechanisms produced by other methods. We argue, in contrast, that evidence of mechanisms needs to be viewed as complementary to, rather than inferior to, evidence of correlation. In this paper we first set out the case for treating evidence of mechanisms alongside evidence of correlation in (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   100 citations  
  4. Causality: Philosophical theory meets scientific practice.Phyllis McKay Illari & Federica Russo - 2014 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Edited by Federica Russo.
    Scientific and philosophical literature on causality has become highly specialised. It is hard to find suitable access points for students, young researchers, or professionals outside this domain. This book provides a guide to the complex literature, explains the scientific problems of causality and the philosophical tools needed to address them.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  5.  32
    The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy.Stuart Glennan & Phyllis McKay Illari (eds.) - 2017 - Routledge.
    From the operation of the universe to DNA, the brain and the economy, natural and social frequently describe their activity as being concerned with discovering mechanisms. Despite this fact, for much of the twentieth century philosophical discussions of the nature of mechanisms remained outside philosophy of science. The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy is an outstanding reference source to the key topics, problems and debates in this exciting subject and is the first collection of its kind. Comprising over (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  6. Mechanistic Explanation: Integrating the Ontic and Epistemic.Phyllis Illari - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (2):237-255.
    Craver claims that mechanistic explanation is ontic, while Bechtel claims that it is epistemic. While this distinction between ontic and epistemic explanation originates with Salmon, the ideas have changed in the modern debate on mechanistic explanation, where the frame of the debate is changing. I will explore what Bechtel and Craver’s claims mean, and argue that good mechanistic explanations must satisfy both ontic and epistemic normative constraints on what is a good explanation. I will argue for ontic constraints by drawing (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  7. Mechanistic Evidence: Disambiguating the Russo–Williamson Thesis.Phyllis McKay Illari - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):139-157.
    Russo and Williamson claim that establishing causal claims requires mechanistic and difference-making evidence. In this article, I will argue that Russo and Williamson's formulation of their thesis is multiply ambiguous. I will make three distinctions: mechanistic evidence as type vs object of evidence; what mechanism or mechanisms we want evidence of; and how much evidence of a mechanism we require. I will feed these more precise meanings back into the Russo–Williamson thesis and argue that it is both true and false: (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   68 citations  
  8. The Evidence that Evidence-based Medicine Omits.Brendan Clarke, Donald Gillies, Phyllis Illari, Federica Russo & Jon Williamson - unknown
    According to current hierarchies of evidence for EBM, evidence of correlation (e.g., from RCTs) is always more important than evidence of mechanisms when evaluating and establishing causal claims. We argue that evidence of mechanisms needs to be treated alongside evidence of correlation. This is for three reasons. First, correlation is always a fallible indicator of causation, subject in particular to the problem of confounding; evidence of mechanisms can in some cases be more important than evidence of correlation when assessing a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  9. Function and organization: comparing the mechanisms of protein synthesis and natural selection.Phyllis McKay Illari & Jon Williamson - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (3):279-291.
    In this paper, we compare the mechanisms of protein synthesis and natural selection. We identify three core elements of mechanistic explanation: functional individuation, hierarchical nestedness or decomposition, and organization. These are now well understood elements of mechanistic explanation in fields such as protein synthesis, and widely accepted in the mechanisms literature. But Skipper and Millstein have argued that natural selection is neither decomposable nor organized. This would mean that much of the current mechanisms literature does not apply to the mechanism (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  10.  71
    Six Theses on Mechanisms and Mechanistic Science.Stuart Glennan, Phyllis Illari & Erik Weber - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (2):143-161.
    In this paper we identify six theses that constitute core results of philosophical investigation into the nature of mechanisms, and of the role that the search for and identification of mechanisms play in the sciences. These theses represent the fruits of the body of research that is now often called New Mechanism. We concisely present the main arguments for these theses. In the literature, these arguments are scattered and often implicit. Our analysis can guide future research in many ways: it (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  11. Mechanisms are Real and Local.Phyllis McKay Illari & Jon Williamson - 2011 - In Phyllis McKay Illari Federica Russo (ed.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press.
    Mechanisms have become much-discussed, yet there is still no consensus on how to characterise them. In this paper, we start with something everyone is agreed on – that mechanisms explain – and investigate what constraints this imposes on our metaphysics of mechanisms. We examine two widely shared premises about how to understand mechanistic explanation: (1) that mechanistic explanation offers a welcome alternative to traditional laws-based explanation and (2) that there are two senses of mechanistic explanation that we call ‘epistemic explanation’ (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  12. In Defence of Activities.Phyllis Illari & Jon Williamson - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (1):69-83.
    In this paper, we examine what is to be said in defence of Machamer, Darden and Craver’s (MDC) controversial dualism about activities and entities (Machamer, Darden and Craver’s in Philos Sci 67:1–25, 2000). We explain why we believe the notion of an activity to be a novel, valuable one, and set about clearing away some initial objections that can lead to its being brushed aside unexamined. We argue that substantive debate about ontology can only be effective when desiderata for an (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  13.  21
    The philosophy of information quality.Luciano Floridi & Phyllis Illari (eds.) - 2014 - Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    This work fulfills the need for a conceptual and technical framework to improve understanding of Information Quality (IQ) and Information Quality standards. The meaning and practical implementation of IQ are addressed, as it is relevant to any field where there is a need to handle data and issues such as accessibility, accuracy, completeness, currency, integrity, reliability, timeliness, usability, the role of metrics and so forth are all a part of Information Quality. -/- In order to support the cross-fertilization of theory (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  14.  98
    Information Channels and Biomarkers of Disease.Phyllis Illari & Federica Russo - 2016 - Topoi 35 (1):175-190.
    Current research in molecular epidemiology uses biomarkers to model the different disease phases from environmental exposure, to early clinical changes, to development of disease. The hope is to get a better understanding of the causal impact of a number of pollutants and chemicals on several diseases, including cancer and allergies. In a recent paper Russo and Williamson address the question of what evidential elements enter the conceptualisation and modelling stages of this type of biomarkers research. Recent research in causality has (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  15.  50
    A Radical Approach to Ebola: Saving Humans and Other Animals.Sarah J. L. Edwards, Charles H. Norell, Phyllis Illari, Brendan Clarke & Carolyn P. Neuhaus - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (10):35-42.
    As the usual regulatory framework did not fit well during the last Ebola outbreak, innovative thinking still needed. In the absence of an outbreak, randomised controlled trials of clinical efficacy in humans cannot be done, while during an outbreak such trials will continue to face significant practical, philosophical, and ethical challenges. This article argues that researchers should also test the safety and effectiveness of novel vaccines in wild apes by employing a pluralistic approach to evidence. There are three reasons to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  16. (1 other version)Why look at Causality in the Sciences?Phyllis McKay Illari, Federica Russo & Jon Williamson - 2011 - In Phyllis McKay Illari Federica Russo (ed.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  17.  57
    Causality in Cancer Research: a Journey Through Models in Molecular Epidemiology and their Philosophical Interpretation.Paolo Vineis, Phyllis Illari & Federica Russo - 2017 - Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 14 (7):1-8.
    In the last decades, Systems Biology (including cancer research) has been driven by technology, statistical modelling and bioinformatics. In this paper we try to bring biological and philosophical thinking back. We thus aim at making diferent traditions of thought compatible: (a) causality in epidemiology and in philosophical theorizing—notably, the “sufcient-component-cause framework” and the “mark transmission” approach; (b) new acquisitions about disease pathogenesis, e.g. the “branched model” in cancer, and the role of biomarkers in this process; (c) the burgeoning of omics (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  18. Information quality, data and philosophy.Luciano Floridi & Phyllis Illari - 2014 - In Luciano Floridi & Phyllis Illari (eds.), The philosophy of information quality. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 5–23.
    In this opening chapter, we review the literature on information quality. Our major aim is to introduce the issues, and trace some of the history of the debates, with a view to situating the chapters in this volume – whose authors come from different disciplines – to help make them accessible to readers with different backgrounds and expertise. We begin in this section by tracing some influential analyses of IQ in computer science. This is a useful basis for examining some (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  19.  19
    Mechanisms in medicine.Phyllis Illari - 2016 - In Miriam Solomon, Jeremy R. Simon & Harold Kincaid (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Medicine. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  20.  51
    Mechanisms, Models and Laws in Understanding Supernovae.Phyllis Illari - 2019 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (1):63-84.
    There has been a burst of work in the last couple of decades on mechanistic explanation, as an alternative to the traditional covering-law model of scientific explanation. That work makes some interesting claims about mechanistic explanations rendering phenomena ‘intelligible’, but does not develop this idea in great depth. There has also been a growth of interest in giving an account of scientific understanding, as a complement to an account of explanation, specifically addressing a three-place relationship between explanation, world, and the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21.  17
    Inclusive editing: a collegial approach to academic knowledge making.Phyllis Illari, Federica Russo, Dunja Šešelja & Mathias Frisch - 2024 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 14 (3):1-5.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Why Theories of Causality Need Production : an Information Transmission Account.Phyllis McKay Illari - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):95-114.
    In this paper, I examine the comparatively neglected intuition of production regarding causality. I begin by examining the weaknesses of current production accounts of causality. I then distinguish between giving a good production account of causality and a good account of production. I argue that an account of production is needed to make sense of vital practices in causal inference. Finally, I offer an information transmission account of production based on John Collier’s work that solves the primary weaknesses of current (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  23.  49
    Introduction.Phyllis Illari, Julian Reiss & Federica Russo - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (4):758-760.
  24.  18
    The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Mechanisms.Stuart Glennan & Phyllis McKay Illari (eds.) - 2017 - Routledge.
    From the operation of the universe to DNA, the brain and the economy, natural and social frequently describe their activity as being concerned with discovering mechanisms. Despite this fact, for much of the twentieth century philosophical discussions of the nature of mechanisms remained outside philosophy of science. This is an outstanding reference source to the key topics, problems and debates in this exciting subject and is the first collection of its kind. Comprising over thirty chapters by a team of international (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  25. Assessing Exposures.Jon Williamson, Beth Shaw, Federica Russo, Charles Norell, Michael Kelly, Phyllis Illari, Brendan Clarke, Michael Wilde, Christian Wallmann & Veli-Pekka Parkkinen - 2018 - In Veli-Pekka Parkkinen, Christian Wallmann, Michael Wilde, Brendan Clarke, Phyllis Illari, Michael P. Kelly, Charles Norell, Federica Russo, Beth Shaw & Jon Williamson (eds.), Evaluating evidence of mechanisms in medicine. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. An Introduction to Mechanisms.Jon Williamson, Beth Shaw, Federica Russo, Charles Norell, Michael Kelly, Phyllis Illari, Brendan Clarke, Michael Wilde, Christian Wallmann & Veli-Pekka Parkkinen - 2018 - In Veli-Pekka Parkkinen, Christian Wallmann, Michael Wilde, Brendan Clarke, Phyllis Illari, Michael P. Kelly, Charles Norell, Federica Russo, Beth Shaw & Jon Williamson (eds.), Evaluating evidence of mechanisms in medicine. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. How to Consider Evidence of Mechanisms: An Overview.Jon Williamson, Beth Shaw, Federica Russo, Charles Norell, Michael Kelly, Phyllis Illari, Brendan Clarke, Michael Wilde, Christian Wallmann & Veli-Pekka Parkkinen - 2018 - In Veli-Pekka Parkkinen, Christian Wallmann, Michael Wilde, Brendan Clarke, Phyllis Illari, Michael P. Kelly, Charles Norell, Federica Russo, Beth Shaw & Jon Williamson (eds.), Evaluating evidence of mechanisms in medicine. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Introduction.Jon Williamson, Beth Shaw, Federica Russo, Charles Norell, Michael Kelly, Phyllis Illari, Brendan Clarke, Michael Wilde, Christian Wallmann & Veli-Pekka Parkkinen - 2018 - In Veli-Pekka Parkkinen, Christian Wallmann, Michael Wilde, Brendan Clarke, Phyllis Illari, Michael P. Kelly, Charles Norell, Federica Russo, Beth Shaw & Jon Williamson (eds.), Evaluating evidence of mechanisms in medicine. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Particularisation to an Individual.Jon Williamson, Beth Shaw, Federica Russo, Charles Norell, Michael Kelly, Phyllis Illari, Brendan Clarke, Michael Wilde, Christian Wallmann & Veli-Pekka Parkkinen - 2018 - In Veli-Pekka Parkkinen, Christian Wallmann, Michael Wilde, Brendan Clarke, Phyllis Illari, Michael P. Kelly, Charles Norell, Federica Russo, Beth Shaw & Jon Williamson (eds.), Evaluating evidence of mechanisms in medicine. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Tools.Jon Williamson, Beth Shaw, Federica Russo, Charles Norell, Michael Kelly, Phyllis Illari, Brendan Clarke, Michael Wilde, Christian Wallmann, Veli-Pekka Parkkinen & Michael P. Kelly - 2018 - In Veli-Pekka Parkkinen, Christian Wallmann, Michael Wilde, Brendan Clarke, Phyllis Illari, Michael P. Kelly, Charles Norell, Federica Russo, Beth Shaw & Jon Williamson (eds.), Evaluating evidence of mechanisms in medicine. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  17
    IQ: Purpose and Dimensions.Phyllis Illari - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32. The Philosophy of Information - a Simple Introduction.Phyllis Illari - 2012 - Society for the Philosophy of Information.
    This book serves as the main reference for an undergraduate course on Philosophy of Information. The book is written to be accessible to the typical undergraduate student of Philosophy and does not require propaedeutic courses in Logic, Epistemology or Ethics. Each chapter includes a rich collection of references for the student interested in furthering her understanding of the topics reviewed in the book. -/- The book covers all the main topics of the Philosophy of Information and it should be considered (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33.  81
    Erratum to: Metaphysics, prescription and methodological disagreement: A comment on Mathias Frisch’s Causal reasoning in physics.Alexander Reutlinger, Phyllis Illari, Andreas Hüttemann & Mathias Frisch - 2016 - Metascience 25 (2):339-339.
  34. Routledge Handbook of mechanisms.Stuart Glennan & Phyllis Illari (eds.) - 2017
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  21
    (2 other versions)Editors’ letter.Phyllis Illari & Federica Russo - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (3):391-392.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  75
    Introduction: Evidence and Causality in the Sciences.Phyllis Illari & Federica Russo - 2014 - Topoi 33 (2):293-294.
    Evidence and CausalityCausality is a vibrant and thriving topic in philosophy of science. It is closely related to many other challenging scientific concepts, such as probability and mechanisms, which arise in many different scientific contexts, in different fields. For example, probability and mechanisms are relevant to both causal inference (finding out what causes what) and causal explanation (explaining how a cause produces its effect). They are also of interest to fields as diverse as astrophysics, biochemistry, biomedical and social sciences. At (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  33
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Radical Approach to Ebola: Saving Humans and Other Animals”.Carolyn P. Neuhaus, Brendan Clarke, Phyllis Illari, Charles H. Norell & Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):W8-W9.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  19
    The Routledge handbook of causality and causal methods.Federica Russo & Phyllis Illari (eds.) - 2024 - New York, NY: Routledge.
    The Routledge Handbook of Causality and Causal Methods adopts a pluralistic, interdisciplinary approach to causality. It formulates distinct questions and problems of causality as they arise across scientific and policy fields. Exploring, in a comparative way, how these questions and problems are addressed in different areas, the Handbook fosters dialogue and exchange. It emphasizes the role of the researchers and the normative considerations that arise in the development of methodological and empirical approaches. The Handbook includes authors from all over the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark