15 found
Order:
  1.  72
    Aristotle’s Argument From Universal Mathematics Against the Existence of Platonic Forms.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper - 2019 - Manuscrito 42 (4):544-581.
    In Metaphysics M.2, 1077a9-14, Aristotle appears to argue against the existence of Platonic Forms on the basis of there being certain universal mathematical proofs which are about things that are ‘beyond’ the ordinary objects of mathematics and that cannot be identified with any of these. It is a very effective argument against Platonism, because it provides a counter-example to the core Platonic idea that there are Forms in order to serve as the object of scientific knowledge: the universal of which (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  27
    Sources of Delusion in Analytica Posteriora 1.5.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper - 2006 - Phronesis 51 (3):252 - 284.
    Aristotle's philosophically most explicit and sophisticated account of the concept of a (primary-)universal proof is found, not in "Analytica Posteriora" 1.4, where he introduces the notion, but in 1.5. In 1.4 Aristotle merely says that a universal proof must be of something arbitrary as well as of something primary and seems to explain primacy in extensional terms, as concerning the largest possible domain. In 1.5 Aristotle improves upon this account after considering three ways in which we may delude ourselves into (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  3.  29
    Logic and Linguistics: Aristotle's Account of the Fallacies of Combination and Division in the Sophistical Refutations.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper - 2009 - Apeiron 42 (2):105-152.
  4.  38
    Zeno Unlimited.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper - 2006 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30:49-85.
  5.  45
    Sources of Delusion in Analytica Posteriora 1.5.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper - 2006 - Phronesis 51 (3):252-284.
    Aristotle's philosophically most explicit and sophisticated account of the concept of a (primary-)universal proof is found, not in "Analytica Posteriora" 1.4, where he introduces the notion, but in 1.5. In 1.4 Aristotle merely says that a universal proof must be of something arbitrary as well as of something primary and seems to explain primacy in extensional terms, as concerning the largest possible domain. In 1.5 Aristotle improves upon this account after considering three ways in which we may delude ourselves into (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6. Zeno Unlimited.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper - 2006 - In David Sedley (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy Xxx: Summer 2006. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  7.  1
    Between Science and Dialectic.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper - 2012 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 15 (1):286-322.
    How do, according to Aristotle, peirastic arguments, which are employed by nonscientists to put professed scientists to the test, work, and how do they differ from genuine scientific arguments? A peirastic argument succeeds in unmasking a would-be scientist if it establishes an inconsistency among the answers given. These answers may only comprise: propositions which are proper to the field and which everybody can know; propositions which only scientists may know; “common” propositions that everybody, including various sciences, uses in all kind (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  54
    The Ingredients of Aristotle’s Theory of Fallacy.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):31-47.
    In chapter 8 of the Sophistical Refutations, Aristotle claims that his theory of fallacy is complete in the sense that there cannot be more fallacies than the ones he lists. In this article I try to explain how Aristotle could have justified this completeness claim by analysing how he conceptualizes fallacies (dialectical mistakes which do not appear so) and what conceptual ingredients play a role in his discussion of fallacies. If we take the format of dialectical discussions into account, we (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9. The Foundations of Presocratic Atomism.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper - 1999 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17:1-14.
  10.  2
    Foreword.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper & Katerina Ierodiakonou - 2016 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 19 (1):13-15.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  1
    Preface of the General Editors.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper, Uwe Meixner & Albert Newen - 2016 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 19 (1):9.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  1
    Preface of the General Editors.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper, Uwe Meixner & Albert Newen - 2015 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 18 (1):9.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Aristoteles en de grondslagen van wetenschappelijk redeneren.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper - 2007 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 99 (2):140-145.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Zeno zonder einde.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper - 2003 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 95 (1):2-21.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Congresbundel Filosofiedag Groningen 1995.Michel ter Hark, Pieter Sjoerd Hasper & Riegholt G. Hilbrands - 1995
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark