Results for 'Qasir Shah'

612 found
Order:
  1.  13
    Philosophy of Education in a New Key: A ‘Covid Collective’ of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.Janet Orchard, Philip Gaydon, Kevin Williams, Pip Bennett, Laura D’Olimpio, Raşit Çelik, Qasir Shah, Christoph Neusiedl, Judith Suissa, Michael A. Peters & Marek Tesar - 2021 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (12):1215-1228.
    This article is a collective writing experiment undertaken by philosophers of education affiliated with the PESGB. When asked to reflect on questions concerning the Philosophy of Education in a New Key in May 2020, it was unsurprising that the effects of the coronavirus pandemic on society and on education were foremost in our minds. We wanted to consider important philosophical and educational questions raised by the pandemic, while acknowledging that, first and foremost, it is a human tragedy. With nearly a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2. Shah Muhammad (992-1072/1584-1661) Shah Muhammad Ibn'abd Ahmad Was Born in Arkasa, in Badakhshan, and Spent His First Two Decades There. [REVIEW]Shah Waliyullah & Wali Allah - 2006 - In Oliver Leaman (ed.), The Biographical Encyclopedia of Islamic Philosophy. Thoemmes Continuum. pp. 2--266.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  1
    The Conclusive Argument From God: Shāh Walī Allāh of Delhi's Ḥujjat Allāh Al-Bāligha.Shāh Walī Allāh - 2020 - Brill.
    This important and comprehensive work of 18th-century Islamic religious thought written in Arabic by a pre-eminent South Asian scholar provides an extensive and detailed picture of Muslim theology and interpretive strategies on the eve of the modern period.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Profile In Courage: Dr. L. P. Shah.H. Shah - 2004 - Mens Sana Monographs 2 (1):1.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. How Truth Governs Belief.Nishi Shah - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (4):447-482.
    Why, when asking oneself whether to believe that p, must one immediately recognize that this question is settled by, and only by, answering the question whether p is true? Truth is not an optional end for first-personal doxastic deliberation, providing an instrumental or extrinsic reason that an agent may take or leave at will. Otherwise there would be an inferential step between discovering the truth with respect to p and determining whether to believe that p, involving a bridge premise that (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   272 citations  
  6.  11
    "Hir," zur strukturalen Deutung des Panjabi-Epos von Waris Shah.Peter Gaeffke, Doris Buddenberg & Waris Shah - 1987 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 107 (4):775.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  33
    How Truth Governs Belief.Nishi Shah - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (4):447-482.
    Why, when asking oneself whether to believe that p, must one immediately recognize that this question is settled by, and only by, answering the question whether p is true? Truth is not an optional end for first-personal doxastic deliberation, providing an instrumental or extrinsic reason that an agent may take or leave at will. Otherwise there would be an inferential step between discovering the truth with respect to p and determining whether to believe that p, involving a bridge premise that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   159 citations  
  8. Clearing Space For Doxastic Voluntarism.Nishi Shah - 2002 - The Monist 85 (3):436-445.
    It is common for philosophers to claim that doxastic voluntarism, the view that an agent can form beliefs voluntarily, is false, and therefore that agents do not have the kind of control over their beliefs required for a straightforward application of deontological concepts such as obligation or duty in the domain of epistemology. The role that the denial of doxastic voluntarism plays in an argument to the effect that agents do not have obligations with respect to belief is simply this.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   47 citations  
  9.  3
    Managing the Complexity of Dialogues in Context: A Data-Driven Discovery Method for Dialectical Reply Structures.Olena Yaskorska-Shah - 2021 - Argumentation 35 (4):551-580.
    Current formal dialectical models postulate normative rules that enable discussants to conduct dialogical interactions without committing fallacies. Though the rules for conducting a dialogue are supposed to apply to interactions between actual arguers, they are without exception theoretically motivated. This creates a gap between model and reality, because dialogue participants typically leave important content-related elements implicit. Therefore, analysts cannot readily relate normative rules to actual debates in ways that will be empirically confirmable. This paper details a new, data-driven method for (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10. Doxastic Deliberation.Nishi Shah & J. David Velleman - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (4):497-534.
    Believing that p, assuming that p, and imagining that p involve regarding p as true—or, as we shall call it, accepting p. What distinguishes belief from the other modes of acceptance? We claim that conceiving of an attitude as a belief, rather than an assumption or an instance of imagining, entails conceiving of it as an acceptance that is regulated for truth, while also applying to it the standard of being correct if and only if it is true. We argue (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   301 citations  
  11.  23
    A Mystical Interpretation of Prophetic Tales by an Indian Muslim. Shāh Walī Allāh's Ta'wīl Al-AḥādīthA Mystical Interpretation of Prophetic Tales by an Indian Muslim. Shah Wali Allah's Ta'wil Al-Ahadith.James A. Bellamy, J. M. S. Baljon, Shāh Walī Allāh & Shah Wali Allah - 1976 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 96 (1):158.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. A New Argument for Evidentialism.Nishi Shah - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):481–498.
    When we deliberate whether to believe some proposition, we feel immediately compelled to look for evidence of its truth. Philosophers have labelled this feature of doxastic deliberation 'transparency'. I argue that resolving the disagreement in the ethics of belief between evidentialists and pragmatists turns on the correct explanation of transparency. My hypothesis is that it reflects a conceptual truth about belief: a belief that p is correct if and only if p. This normative truth entails that only evidence can be (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   164 citations  
  13. How Action Governs Intention.Nishi Shah - 2008 - Philosophers' Imprint 8:1-19.
    Why can't deliberation conclude in an intention except by considering whether to perform the intended action? I argue that the answer to this question entails that reasons for intention are determined by reasons for action. Understanding this feature of practical deliberation thus allows us to solve the toxin puzzle.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  14. Bar and Line Graph Comprehension: An Interaction of Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Processes.Priti Shah & Eric G. Freedman - 2011 - Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (3):560-578.
    This experiment investigated the effect of format (line vs. bar), viewers’ familiarity with variables, and viewers’ graphicacy (graphical literacy) skills on the comprehension of multivariate (three variable) data presented in graphs. Fifty-five undergraduates provided written descriptions of data for a set of 14 line or bar graphs, half of which depicted variables familiar to the population and half of which depicted variables unfamiliar to the population. Participants then took a test of graphicacy skills. As predicted, the format influenced viewers’ interpretations (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  15. Welfare and Rational Care.Nishi Shah - 2004 - Philosophical Review 113 (4):577-582.
    George, feeling stressed and anxious about the criminal investigation into his firm’s accounting practices, decides that it would do him good to get away and take a long, relaxing vacation in Bermuda. According to popular informed-desire accounts of a person’s good, if George would desire to take a vacation to Bermuda upon being made fully aware of what his experience of the vacation would be like and of all the consequences therein, then this course of action would benefit him. This (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  16.  39
    Refocusing the Responsiveness Requirement.Seema Shah, Rebecca Wolitz & Ezekiel Emanuel - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (3):151-159.
    Many guidelines for international research require that studies be responsive to host community health needs or health priorities. Although responsiveness possesses great intuitive and rhetorical appeal, existing conceptions are confusing and difficult to apply. Not only are there few examples of what research the responsiveness requirement permits and what it rejects, but its application can lead to contradictory results. Because of the practical difficulties in applying responsiveness and the danger that misapplying responsiveness could harm the interests of developing countries, we (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  17.  11
    Ethically Allocating COVID-19 Drugs Via Pre-Approval Access and Emergency Use Authorization.Jamie Webb, Lesha D. Shah & Holly Fernandez Lynch - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (9):4-17.
    Allocating access to unapproved COVID-19 drugs available via Pre-Approval Access pathways or Emergency Use Authorization raises unique challenges at the intersection of clinical care and research....
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  18.  82
    The Normativity of Belief and Self-Fulfilling Normative Beliefs.Nishi Shah - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (S1):189-212.
  19.  14
    Ethical Considerations in Uterus Transplantation.Kavita Kavita Shah Arora, Jessica Woessner & Valarie Blake - forthcoming - Medicolegal and Bioethics:81.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  20. Why Believe the Truth? Shah and Velleman on the Aim of Belief.José L. Zalabardo - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (1):1 - 21.
    The subject matter of this paper is the view that it is correct, in an absolute sense, to believe a proposition just in case the proposition is true. I take issue with arguments in support of this view put forward by Nishi Shah and David Velleman.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  21.  57
    Is It Justifiable to Abandon All Search for a Logic of Discovery?Mehul Shah - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):253 – 269.
    In his influential paper, 'Why Was the Logic of Discovery Abandoned?', Laudan contends that there has been no philosophical rationale for a logic of discovery since the emergence of consequentialism in the 19th century. It is the purpose of this paper to show that consequentialism does not involve the rejection of all types of logic of discovery. Laudan goes too far in his interpretation of the historical shift from generativism to consequentialism, and his claim that the context of pursuit belongs (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  22. Review: Hilary Kornblith, On Reflection. [REVIEW]Nishi Shah & Katia Vavova - 2014 - Ethics 124 (3):632-636,.
  23.  60
    The Separability of Working Memory Resources for Spatial Thinking and Language Processing: An Individual Differences Approach.Priti Shah & Akira Miyake - 1996 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125 (1):4.
  24.  48
    Shah ʿAbbas: The King Who Refashioned Iran By Sholeh A. Quinn.Charles Melville - 2018 - Journal of Islamic Studies 29 (3):463-466.
    Shah ʿAbbas: The King who Refashioned Iran By QuinnSholeh A., xvii + 142 pp. Price HB £30.00. EAN 978–1851684250.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  25
    Uterus Transplantation: The Ethics of Using Deceased Versus Living Donors.Bethany Bruno & Kavita Shah Arora - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (7):6-15.
    Research teams have made considerable progress in treating absolute uterine factor infertility through uterus transplantation, though studies have differed on the choice of either deceased or living donors. While researchers continue to analyze the medical feasibility of both approaches, little attention has been paid to the ethics of using deceased versus living donors as well as the protections that must be in place for each. Both types of uterus donation also pose unique regulatory challenges, including how to allocate donated organs; (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  26.  6
    Contemplating the Impact of the Moderators Agency Cost and Number of Supervisors on Corporate Sustainability Under the Aegis of a Cognitive CEO.Muddassar Sarfraz, Ilknur Ozturk, Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Adnan Maqbool - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  27. Why We Reason the Way We Do.Nishi Shah - 2013 - Philosophical Issues 23 (1):311-325.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  28.  37
    Death and Legal Fictions.S. K. Shah, R. D. Truog & F. G. Miller - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):719-722.
    Advances in life-saving technologies in the past few decades have challenged our traditional understandings of death. Traditionally, death was understood to occur when a person stops breathing, their heart stops beating and they are cold to the touch. Today, physicians determine death by relying on a diagnosis of ‘total brain failure’ or by waiting a short while after circulation stops. Evidence has emerged, however, that the conceptual bases for these approaches to determining death are fundamentally flawed and depart substantially from (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  29.  26
    Why Censorship is Self-Undermining: John Stuart Mill’s Neglected Argument for Free Speech.Nishi Shah - 2021 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 95 (1):71-96.
    Two prejudices have hampered our understanding of John Stuart Mill’s central argument for free speech. One prejudice is that arguments for free speech can only be made in terms of values or rights. This prejudice causes us to miss the depth of Mill’s argument. He does not argue that silencing speech is harmful or violates rights, but instead that silencing speech is a uniquely self-undermining act; it undermines the ground upon which it is based. But even if we overcome this (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  30. The Socratic Teaching Method: A Therapeutic Approach to Learning.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (3):267-275.
    This paper will show how the three principles of the Socratic teaching method—midwifery, recollection, and cross-examination—are utilized in the treatment of learning diseases, that is, attitudes that interfere with effective learning. The Socratic teaching method differs from the traditional lecture model of teaching, but it does not sacrifice the therapeutic for the informative task of teaching. Rather, by indirectly imparting content and uncovering implicit content through careful questioning, it provides a careful balance between the informative and therapeutic aspects of teaching. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  31.  26
    A Narrative Review of the Empirical Evidence on Public Attitudes on Brain Death and Vital Organ Transplantation: The Need for Better Data to Inform Policy.Seema K. Shah, Kenneth Kasper & Franklin G. Miller - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):291-296.
  32.  27
    Outsourcing Ethical Obligations: Should the Revised Common Rule Address the Responsibilities of Investigators and Sponsors?Seema K. Shah - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):397-410.
    The Common Rule creates a division of moral labor in research. It implies that investigators and sponsors can outsource their ethical obligations to IRBs and participants, thereby fostering a culture of compliance, rather than one of responsibility. The proposed revisions to the Common Rule are likely to exacerbate this problem. To harness the expressive power of the law, I propose the Common Rule be revised to include the ethical responsibilities of investigators and sponsors.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  33. Can Reasons for Belief Be Debunked?Nishi Shah - 2011 - In Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  34.  14
    Corporate Governance and Business Ethics.Atul K. Shah - 1996 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 5 (4):225–233.
    “It is this distancing of personal relationships, combined with their replacement by written contractual terms and conditions, which make the discussion of ethics within a corporate institutionalised context highly limited and problematic.’ The challenge is to find means of personalising modern corporations so as to encourage ethical behaviour. Atul K. Shah PhD ACA gained his doctorate from the London School of Economics and is Lecturer in the Department of Accounting and Financial Management, at the University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Misunderstanding Metaethics: Korsgaard's Rejection of Realism.Nadeem Hussain & Nishi Shah - 2006 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 1. Clarendon Press. pp. 265-94.
    Contemporary Kantianism is often regarded as both a position within normative ethics and as an alternative to metaethical moral realism. We argue that it is not clear how contemporary Kantianism can distinguish itself from moral realism. There are many Kantian positions. For reasons of space we focus on the position of one of the most prominent, contemporary Kantians, Christine Korsgaard. Our claim is that she fails to show either that Kantianism is different or that it is better than realism. Our (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  36.  32
    Defending Shah’s Evidentialism From His Pragmatist Critics: The Carnapian Link.Robert Hudson - 2016 - Contemporary Pragmatism 13 (2):143-168.
    In an important 2006 paper, Nishi Shah defends ‘evidentialism’, the position that only evidence for a proposition’s truth constitutes a reason to believe this proposition. In opposition to Shah, Anthony Robert Booth, Andrew Reisner and Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen argue that things other than evidence of truth, so-called non-evidential or ‘pragmatic’ reasons, constitute reasons to believe a proposition. I argue that we can effectively respond to Shah’s pragmatist critics if, following Shah, we are careful to distinguish the evaluation (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  7
    Beyond the Apnea Test: An Argument to Broaden the Requirement for Consent to the Entire Brain Death Evaluation.Erin Paquette, Joel Frader, Seema Shah, Robert C. Tasker & Robert Truog - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):17-19.
    Volume 20, Issue 6, June 2020, Page 17-19.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  38.  51
    What Does the Duty to Warn Require?Seema K. Shah, Sara Chandros Hull, Michael A. Spinner, Benjamin E. Berkman, Lauren A. Sanchez, Ruquyyah Abdul-Karim, Amy P. Hsu, Reginald Claypool & Steven M. Holland - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (10):62 - 63.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  39.  6
    Developing an Efficient Deep Learning-Based Trusted Model for Pervasive Computing Using an LSTM-Based Classification Model.Yang He, Shah Nazir, Baisheng Nie, Sulaiman Khan & Jianhui Zhang - 2020 - Complexity 2020:1-6.
    Mobile and pervasive computing is one of the recent paradigms available in the area of information technology. The role of pervasive computing is foremost in the field where it provides the ability to distribute computational services to the surroundings where people work and leads to issues such as trust, privacy, and identity. To provide an optimal solution to these generic problems, the proposed research work aims to implement a deep learning-based pervasive computing architecture to address these problems. Long short-term memory (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  40. The Dignity of Parents: English Translation of Azmath-E-Walidain.Sayyid Shāh Aʻẓam ʻAlī Qādirī - 2001 - Syed Us Soofia Academy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. Reasoning in Stages.Nishi Shah & Matthew Silverstein - 2013 - Ethics 124 (1):101-113.
    Mark Schroeder has recently presented apparent counterexamples to the standard account of the distinction between the right and the wrong kinds of reasons. We argue that these examples appear to refute the standard account only because they blur the distinction between two kinds of reasoning: reasoning about whether to intend or believe that p and reasoning about whether to take up the question of whether to intend or believe that p.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  42.  28
    The Medical Student Global Health Experience: Professionalism and Ethical Implications.S. Shah & T. Wu - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):375-378.
    Medical student and resident participation in global health experiences (GHEs) has significantly increased over the last decade. In response to growing student interest and the proven impact of such experiences on the education and career decisions of resident physicians, many medical schools have begun to establish programmes dedicated to global health education. For the innumerable benefits of GHEs, it is important to note that medical students have the potential to do more harm than good in these settings when they exceed (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  43.  11
    Rethinking Brain Death as a Legal Fiction: Is the Terminology the Problem?Seema K. Shah - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S4):S49-S52.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  44. XV-The Limits of Normative Detachment.Nishi Shah - 2010 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (3pt3):347-371.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  45.  37
    Should Children Decide Whether They Are Enrolled in Nonbeneficial Research?David Wendler & Seema Shah - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):1 – 7.
    The U.S. federal regulations require investigators conducting nonbeneficial research to obtain the assent of children who are capable of providing it. Unfortunately, there has been no analysis of which children are capable of assent or even what abilities ground the capacity to give assent. Why should investigators be required to obtain the positive agreement of some children, but not others, before enrolling them in research that does not offer a compensating potential for direct benefit? We argue that the scope of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  46.  24
    Freedom, Obligations, and Rights: A Jaina Perspective.Hemant Shah - 1993 - Social Philosophy Today 9:79-85.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  15
    Corporate Governance and Business Ethics.Atul K. Shah - 1996 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 5 (4):225-233.
    “It is this distancing of personal relationships, combined with their replacement by written contractual terms and conditions, which make the discussion of ethics within a corporate institutionalised context highly limited and problematic.’ The challenge is to find means of personalising modern corporations so as to encourage ethical behaviour. Atul K. Shah PhD ACA gained his doctorate from the London School of Economics and is Lecturer in the Department of Accounting and Financial Management, at the University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  15
    Lesion Correlates of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Chronic Nonfluent Aphasia.Shah Priyanka, Norise Cathrine, Garcia Gabriella, Torres Jose, Faseyitan Olufunsho & Hamilton Roy - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  14
    Interpretation of the Subjects' Condition Requirement: A Legal Perspective.Seema Shah & David Wendler - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):365-373.
    The U.S. Federal regulations allow institutional review boards (IRBs) to approve non-beneficial pediatric research when the risks are a minor increase over minimal, provided that the research is likely to develop generalizable knowledge about the subjects' disorder or condition. This “subjects' condition” requirement is quite controversial; commentators have argued for a variety of interpretations. Despite this considerable disagreement in the literature, there have not been any attempts to apply principles of legal interpretation to determine how the subjects' condition requirement should (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  50.  27
    Examining the Ethics of Clinical Use of Unproven Interventions Outside of Clinical Trials During the Ebola Epidemic.Seema K. Shah, David Wendler & Marion Danis - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (4):11-16.
    The recent Ebola outbreak in West Africa began in the spring of 2014 and has since caused the deaths of over 6,000 people. Since there are no approved treatments or prevention modalities specifically targeted at Ebola Virus Disease , debate has focused on whether unproven interventions should be offered to Ebola patients outside of clinical trials. Those engaged in the debate have responded rapidly to a complex and evolving crisis, however, and this debate has not provided much opportunity for in-depth (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
1 — 50 / 612