Results for 'Radzik Linda'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  13
    Contested Commodities.Linda Radzik & David Schmidtz - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (6):603-616.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Making amends: atonement in morality, law, and politics.Linda Radzik - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    An ethic for wrongdoers -- Repaying moral debts : self-punishment and restitution -- Changing one's heart, changing the past : repentance and moral transformation -- Reforming relationships : the reconciliation theory of atonement -- Forgiveness, self-forgiveness, and redemption -- Making amends for crime : an evaluation of restorative justice -- Collective atonement : making amends to the Magdalen penitents.
  3. On Minding Your Own Business: Differentiating Accountability Relations within the Moral Community.Linda Radzik - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (4):574-598.
    When is one person entitled to sanction another for moral wrongdoing? When, instead, must one mind one’s own business? Stephen Darwall argues that the legitimacy of social sanctioning is essential to the very concept of moral obligation. But, I will argue, Darwall’s “second person” theory of accountability unfortunately implies that every person is entitled to sanction every wrongdoer for every misdeed. In this essay, I defend a set of principles for differentiating those who have the standing to sanction from those (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  4. On the Virtue of Minding Our Own Business.Linda Radzik - 2012 - Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (2):173-182.
    Sometimes we should mind our own business. But at other times it would be wrong to mind one's own business. This paper explores the tension between these two claims by presenting a tendency to mind one's own business as an Aristotelian-style virtue. It is furthered argued that this is a different virtue than tolerance.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  5.  92
    Making Amends.Linda Radzik - 2004 - American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (2):141-54.
    The literature in ethics is filled with theories of what makes an action wrong, what makes an actor responsible and blamable for his wrongful actions and what we are justified in doing to wrongdoers (e.g., may we punish them? must we forgive them?). However, there is relatively little discussion of what wrongdoers themselves must do in the aftermath of their wrongful acts. This essay attempts to remedy that problem by critically evaluating some competing accounts of the moral obligations of wrongdoers. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  6. The Ethics of Social Punishment: The Enforcement of Morality in Everyday Life.Linda Radzik, Christopher Bennett, Glen Pettigrove & George Sher - 2020 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    How do we punish others socially, and should we do so? In her 2018 Descartes Lectures for Tilburg University, Linda Radzik explores the informal methods ordinary people use to enforce moral norms, such as telling people off, boycotting businesses, and publicly shaming wrongdoers on social media. Over three lectures, Radzik develops an account of what social punishment is, why it is sometimes permissible, and when it must be withheld. She argues that the proper aim of social punishment (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7. Reconciliation.Linda Radzik & Colleen Murphy - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Particular conceptions of reconciliation vary across a number of dimensions. As section 1 explains, the kind of relationship at issue in a specific context affects the type of improvement in relations that might be necessary in order to qualify as reconciliation. Reconciliation is widely taken to be a scalar concept. Section 2 discusses the spectrum of intensity along which kinds of improvement in relationships fall, and indicates why, in particular contexts, theorists often disagree about the point along this spectrum that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  8. Boycotts and the social enforcement of justice.Linda Radzik - 2017 - Social Philosophy and Policy 34 (1):102-122.
    This essay examines the ethics of boycotting as a social response to injustice or wrongdoing. The boycotts in question are collective actions in which private citizens withdraw from or avoid consumer or cultural interaction with parties perceived to be responsible for some transgression. Whether a particular boycott is justified depends, not only on the reasonableness of the underlying moral critique, but also on what the boycotters are doing in boycotting. The essay considers four possible interpretations of the kind of act (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  9.  28
    Collective Responsibility and Duties to Respond.Linda Radzik - 2001 - Social Theory and Practice 27 (3):455-471.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  10. Gossip and Social Punishment.Linda Radzik - 2016 - Res Philosophica 93 (1):185-204.
    Is gossip ever appropriate as a response to other people’s misdeeds or character flaws? Gossip is arguably the most common means through which communities hold people responsible for their vices and transgressions. Yet, gossiping itself is traditionally considered wrong. This essay develops an account of social punishment in order to ask whether gossip can serve as a legitimate means of enforcing moral norms. In the end, however, I argue that gossip is most likely to be permissible where it resembles punishment (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  11. Justice in the family: A defence of feminist contractarianism.Linda Radzik - 2005 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):45–54.
    Jean Hampton argues that we can detect exploitation in personal relationships by thinking about what we would agree to were we to set aside the emotional benefits we receive from those relationships. Hampton calls her account "feminist contractarianism," but it has recently been critiqued as decidedly unfeminist, on the grounds that it is hostile to women's interests and women's values. Furthermore, Hampton's requirement that we imaginatively distance ourselves from our emotional connections to our loved ones--the key element in her contractarian (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  12.  89
    Moral Bystanders and the Virtue of Forgiveness.Linda Radzik - 2010 - In Christopher R. Allers & Marieke Smit (eds.), Forgiveness in Perspective. Rodopi. pp. 66--69.
    According to standard philosophical analyses, only victims can forgive. There are good reasons to reject this view. After all, people who are neither direct nor indirect victims of a wrong frequently feel moral anger over injustice. The choice to foreswear or overcome such moral anger is subject to most of the same sorts of considerations as victims’ choices to forgive. Furthermore, bystanders’ reactions to their experiences of moral anger often reflect either virtues or vices that are of a piece with (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  13.  71
    Historical Memory as Forward‐ and Backward‐Looking Collective Responsibility.Linda Radzik - 2014 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 38 (1):26-39.
    Do future generations of a wrongdoing group have a responsibility to preserve the memory of the past? If so, what manner of responsibility is it? In this essay, I critically examine the categories of forward-looking and backward-looking collective responsibility to see what they might offer to this discussion. I argue that these concepts of responsibility are ambiguous in ways that threaten to prevent important questions from being raised. I draw my examples from contemporary German practices of preserving the memory of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  14.  63
    Moral Rebukes and Social Avoidance.Linda Radzik - 2014 - Journal of Value Inquiry 48 (4):643-661.
    IntroductionStrawsonian theories of moral responsibility, which aim to ground the phenomenon of moral responsibility in our practices of holding one another accountable for our actions, lead us to think more carefully about the content of those practices. Strawson and his followers have done much to explore the significance of the deontic reactive attitudes (resentment, indignation and guilt), which we tend to aim at wrongdoers.P. F. Strawson, "Freedom and Resentment," Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 48 (1962). See also, R. Jay (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  15. Tort Processes and Relational Repair.Linda Radzik - 2014 - In John Oberdiek (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts. Oxford University Press UK. pp. 231-49.
    The last twenty-five years or so of thought about tort law have been remarkably productive and dynamic, as the dominance of the law and economics model has been challenged by theories that reintroduce the language of corrective justice. Over this same time period, theorizing about corrective justice has sprung up in response to a wide range of social, political and moral issues. I have in mind work on restorative theories in criminal justice; on postwar justice; on truth commissions, political reconciliation (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  16.  25
    Offenders, the Making of Amends and the State.Linda Radzik - 2007 - In Gerry Johnstone & Daniel W. van Ness (eds.), Handbook of Restorative Justice. pp. 192--207.
    This essay asks whether restorative justice practices in criminal legal systems are consistent with the aims of a liberal state.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  17.  42
    Privacy and the Standing to Hold Responsible.Linda Radzik - forthcoming - Journal of Moral Philosophy:1-22.
    In order to be held responsible, it is not enough that you’ve done something blameworthy, someone else must also have the standing to hold you responsible. But a number of critics have claimed that this concept of ‘standing’ doesn’t hold up to scrutiny and that we should excise it from our analyses of accountability practices. In this paper, I examine James Edwards’ (2019) attempt to define standing. I pose objections to some key features of Edwards’ account and defend an alternative. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  16
    Do Wrongdoers Have a Right to Make Amends?Linda Radzik - 2003 - Social Theory and Practice 29 (2):325-341.
    The recent literature on criminal justice has yielded an intriguing suggestion: that someone who does wrong has a right to make amends. In this essay, I evaluate arguments for and against this claim with regard to cases of both criminal wrongdoing and private wrongs. I conclude that the balance of arguments speaks in favor of a right to make amends. This conclusion has ramifications for the just design of criminal sanctions, and these will also be addressed here.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  19.  79
    Do Wrongdoers Have a Right to Make Amends?Linda Radzik - 2003 - Social Theory and Practice 29 (2):325-41.
    Do people deserve a chance to right the wrongs they have committed? Would denying an offender the opportunity to make amends amount to an injustice? There are compelling reasons to grant such a right. However, there are also significant objections. First, a right to make amends potentially undermines the state's right to punish criminal wrongdoers. Secondly, the alleged right threatens to put undue pressure on victims to forgive their abusers. In this essay I argue that these objections can be met (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  20.  63
    A Normative Regress Problem.Linda Radzik - 1999 - American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (1):35-47.
    The article argues that theorists who try to justify 'ought'-claims, i.e., who try to show that a standard of behavior has normative authority, will run into a regress problem. The problem is similar in structure to the familiar regress in the justification of belief. The point of the paper is not skeptical. Rather, the aim is to help theorists better understand the challenges associated with formulating a theory of normative authority.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  21.  21
    Richardson on moral innovation.Linda Radzik - 2023 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 106 (1):245-250.
    Henry Richardson’s _Articulating the Moral Community_ develops an account of moral innovation, the process by which new moral norms come to be authoritatively binding and new ethical judgments come to be objectively true. In this essay, I argue Richardson’s proposed process of moral innovation is likely to be exceedingly rare, unnecessary for solving the problems posed by what he calls “objective moral gaps,” and not necessarily more desirable than moral innovation via local convention.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Hampton on the expressive power of punishment.Heather J. Gert, Linda Radzik & and Michael Hand - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (1):79–90.
    In her later writings Jean Hampton develops an expressive theory of punishment she takes to be retributivist. Unlike Feinberg, Hampton claims wrongdoings as well as punishments are expressive. Wrongdoings assert that the victim is less valuable than victimizer. On her view we are obligated to punish because we are obligated to respond to this false assertion. Punishment expresses the moral truth that victim and wrongdoer are equally valuable. We argue that Hampton's argument would work only if she held that exerting (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  23. Incorrigible Norms: Foundationalist Theories of Normative Authority.Linda Radzik - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):633-649.
    What makes a norm a genuinely authoritative guide to action? For many theorists, the answer takes a foundationalist form, analogous to foundationalism in epistemology. They say that there is at least one norm that is justified in itself. On most versions, the norm is said to be incorrigibly authoritative. All other norms are justified in virtue of their connection with it. This essay argues that all such foundationalist theories of normative authority fail because they cannot give an account of the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  24. Relationships and Respect for Persons.Linda Radzik - 2016 - Windsor Studies in Argumentation, Vol. 4.
    Many theorists writing on the aftermath of wrongdoing have been influenced by Trudy Govier’s emphasis on interpersonal relationships. But George Sher has recently challenged this talk of relationships. Read descriptively, he argues, claims about the interpersonal effects of wrongdoing are either exaggerated or false. Read normatively, relationships add nothing to more traditional moral theory. In this essay, I argue that Govier’s relational framework both avoids Sher’s dilemma and enables her to develop the notion of respect for persons in ways that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Moral Repair and the Moral Saints Problem.Linda Radzik - 2012 - Religious Inquiries 2 (4):5-19.
    This article explores the forms of moral repair that the wrongdoer has to perform in an attempt to make amends for her past wrongdoing, with a focus on the issues of interpersonal moral repair; that is, what a wrongdoer can do to merit her victim‘s forgiveness and achieve reconciliation with her community. The article argues against the very general demands of atonement that amount to an obligation to stop being someone who commits wrongs—to become a moral saint—and suggests a new (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  80
    Desert of What? On Murphy’s Reluctant Retributivism.Linda Radzik - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):161-173.
    In Punishment and the Moral Emotions, Jeffrie Murphy rejects his earlier, strong endorsements of retributivism. Questioning both our motivations for embracing retributivism and our views about the basis of desert, he now describes himself as a “reluctant retributivist.” In this essay, I argue that Murphy should reject retributivism altogether. Even if we grant that criminals have negative desert, why should we suppose that it is desert of suffering? I argue that it is possible to defend desert-based theories of punishment that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  45
    Forgiveness and Love, by Glen Pettigrove.Linda Radzik - 2013 - Mind 122 (488):1164-1167.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  19
    Incorrigible Norms: Foundationalist Theories of Normative Authority.Linda Radzik - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):633-649.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  77
    Justification and the authority of norms.Linda Radzik - 2000 - Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (4):451-461.
    What features does a norm have to have such that we really ought to follow it? This paper argues that norms are authoritative when they are justified in a particular sense. However, this brand of justification is not any of those with which we are currently familiar. The authority of norms is not a matter of moral, epistemic or prudential justification. It depends instead on what I call "justification simpliciter." The concept of justification simpliciter is defined and defended in this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  65
    Uncertainty in everyday life.Linda Radzik - 2014 - The Philosophers' Magazine 66:77-83.
    What should a bystander do when she witnesses something that may be morally problematic, but also may not be?
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Advocacy and Genuine Autonomy: The Lawyer's Role When the Client Has a Right to Do Wrong.Linda Radzik - 1999 - South Texas Law Review 40 (1):255-67.
    Stephen L. Pepper argues that lawyers and clients often act together in ways that their moral convictions would prevent them from acting individually. In an attempt to address this problem, I explore the nature of the attorney's responsibility to help her client reach autonomous decisions. To do this, I review the work of some prominent medical ethicists on a parallel to Pepper's problem in doctor-patient relationships.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. Standing and Accountability.Linda Radzik - forthcoming - American Journal of Jurisprudence.
    Increasingly, philosophers who write about moral responsibility and accountability practices invoke the concept of “standing,” a term they claim to borrow from legal contexts. Yet critics point out that these philosophers have been maddeningly unclear about what standing is. Worse yet, no single account of the concept of “standing” seems to accommodate its current usage. This essay presents a thin account of standing, defends its usefulness in philosophical analyses of accountability practices, and develops further conceptual tools for thinking about standing.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. A coherentist theory of normative authority.Linda Radzik - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (1):21-42.
    What makes an ``ought'''' claim authoritative? What makes aparticular norm genuinely reason-giving for an agent? This paper arguesthat normative authority can best be accounted for in terms of thejustification of norms. The main obstacle to such a theory, however, isa regress problem. The worry is that every attempt to offer ajustification for an ``ought'''' claim must appeal to another ``ought''''claim, ad infinitum. The paper argues that vicious regress canbe avoided in practical reasoning in the same way coherentists avoid theproblem in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  34. Joseph Butler on Forgiveness.Linda Radzik - 2014 - In Johannes Brachtendorf & Stephan Herzberg (eds.), Vergebung: Philosophische Perspektiven auf ein Problemfeld der Ethik. Mentis. pp. 139-47.
    While Charles Griswold's interpretation of Bishop Butler's theory of forgiveness is an improvement over the standard reading, it leaves Butler unable to distinguish between forgiveness and justice. The emotions and actions that are offered as definitive of forgiveness instead merely show that the agent is not unjust. However, if we refocus our interpretation of Butler, we can see how he might disentangle forgiveness and justice.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  35.  30
    Bystanders and Shared Responsibility.Linda Radzik - 2020 - In Saba Bazargan-Forward & Deborah Perron Tollefsen (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Collective Responsibility. Routledge. pp. 313-26.
    This chapter surveys the variety of ways in which people who may appear at first to be bystanders, or mere bystanders, to wrongdoing, harm or danger might instead share responsibility with other actors. My discussion divides cases into three rough, non- exclusive categories: (a) shared responsibility for wrongs and harms; (b) shared responsibility to provide aid; and (c) shared responsibility to enforce moral norms. The third category has received the least discussion to date. My modest goal for this portion of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  42
    Jus Post Bellum and Political Reconciliation.Colleen Murphy & Linda Radzik - 2013 - In Larry May & Elizabeth Edenberg (eds.), Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    The category of jus post bellum is a welcome addition to discussions of the justice of war. But, despite its handy Latin label, we will argue that it cannot be properly understood merely as a set of corollaries from jus ad bellum and jus in bello. Instead, an acceptable theory of justice in the postwar period will have to draw on a broader set of normative ideas than those that have been the focus of the just war tradition. In this (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. Atonement.Linda Radzik - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Christopher Kutz, Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age Reviewed by.Linda Radzik - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (1):43-45.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  20
    Gardner on Corrective Justice: Comment on From Personal Life to Private Law.Linda Radzik - 2019 - Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 19 (1):21-33.
    This article argues that John Gardner’s theory of corrective justice in _From Personal Life to Private Law_ relies on an overly narrow account of wrongdoing, one that it too heavily influenced by law to capture the broader conception of corrective justice that is his topic. I will suggest that these problems are avoided by a reconciliation theory of corrective justice.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  85
    Hampton on Forgiveness.Linda Radzik - 2011 - APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Law 10 (2):1-6.
    This essay argues that the theory of forgiveness that Jean Hampton presents in FORGIVENESS AND MERCY has been misunderstood and undervalued. By placing the impersonal reactive attitudes at the center of her account of forgiveness, Hampton offers a valuable alternative to the standard view.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. Moral Injury and the Making of Amends.Linda Radzik - 2024 - In Andrew I. Cohen & Kathryn McClymond (eds.), Moral Injury and the Humanities: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Routledge.
    The clinical literature on moral injury sometimes mentions the making of amends as part of a possible treatment plan. However, it is typically unclear how clinicians are conceiving of the making of amends or “atonement,” particularly in the context of the debilitating cluster of symptoms known as moral injury. This chapter reviews some culturally prominent conceptions of atonement. It then raises a number of objections to these and recommends an alternative model – a “reconciliation theory” of atonement – that can (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. The Role of the Public in Public Apology.Linda Radzik - 2023 - In Melissa Schwartzenberg & Eric Beerbohm (eds.), NOMOS LXV: Reconciliation and Repair. NYU Press. pp. 203-22.
    This chapter reflects on public apologies as means of moral repair by considering the various roles the public might play in these moral dramas. Audiences to public apologies include people who are related to the transgression in different ways. This chapter focuses on those parties in front of whom public apologies are intentionally performed but who are neither victims nor wrongdoers. Do such third parties add something of value to the apology? If so, how? How might they play their role (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. The Standing to Forgive.Linda Radzik - 2023 - In Glen Pettigrove & Robert Enright (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Psychology of Forgiveness. Routledge. pp. 323-335.
    This chapter reviews and evaluates the most common strategies for defending the view that, whatever other reasons might support forgiving in a particular case, forgiveness is defective when the person purporting to forgive lacks standing. Various arguments in favor of limiting standing are used in order to clarify what standing might be. In the end, I endorse an interpretation of standing as the possession of a normative power, which allows for the possibility of third-party forgiveness in some circumstances.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Uncertainty in everyday life.Linda Radzik - 2014 - The Philosophers' Magazine 66:77-83.
    We sometimes witness events that might be dangerous (e.g. that might end in someone being abused) but that might not be. These cases involve various kinds of uncertainty. How does a morally responsible bystander respond? This essay describes and evaluates Active Bystander training programs.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. The Ethical and Political Dimensions of Making Amends: A Dialogue.Claire Katz & Linda Radzik - 2010 - South Central Review 27 (3):144-61.
    Our topic is the moral task of righting one’s wrongful actions and the extent to which this should be considered primarily as a task for the wrongdoer alone, an interaction between the wrongdoer and victim, or a more broadly communal act. In considering this question, we are asked to consider what it means for justice to be served with regard to both victim and wrongdoer.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  46. Living with Uncertainty: The Moral Significance of Ignorance * By MICHAEL J. ZIMMERMAN. [REVIEW]Linda Radzik - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):785-787.
    Michael J. Zimmerman offers a conceptual analysis of the moral ‘ought’ that focuses on moral decision-making under uncertainty. His central case, originally presented by Frank Jackson, concerns a doctor who must choose among three treatments for a minor ailment. Her evidence suggests that drug B will partially cure her patient, that one of either drug A or C would cure him completely, but that the other drug would kill him. Accepting the intuition that the doctor ought to choose drug B, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  28
    Goldberg, John C. P., and Zipursky, Benjamin C. Recognizing Wrongs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2020. Pp. 392. $45.00 (cloth). [REVIEW]Linda Radzik - 2021 - Ethics 131 (3):610-614.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Christopher Kutz, Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. [REVIEW]Linda Radzik - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22:43-45.
  49.  33
    Forgiveness and Retribution, by Margaret R. Holmgren. [REVIEW]Linda Radzik - 2012 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2012.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  22
    The Ethics of Forgiveness, ed. Christel Fricke. [REVIEW]Linda Radzik - 2011 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 1000