Order:
See also
Rami Israel
Open University of Israel
  1. Two Interpretations of ‘Grue’– or How to Misunderstand the New Riddle of Induction.Rami Israel - 2004 - Analysis 64 (4):335–339.
  2. A New View on Inductive Practices.Rami Israel - 2009 - VDM Verlag.
    The idea that reason can justify induction was famously criticized by David Hume. Hume concluded that there is no rational justification for inductive inferences and hence, no rational justification for most of our daily beliefs. Many philosophers attempted to solve Hume's problem with no success. Bertrand Russell commented regarding Hume's problem: "[if we cannot justify induction] we have no reason to expect the sun to rise tomorrow, to expect bread to be more nourishing than a stone, or to expect that (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Projectibility and Explainability or How to Draw a New Picture of Inductive Practices.Rami Israel - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):269-286.
    Goodman published his "riddle" in the middle of the 20th century and many philosophers have attempted to solve it. These attempts almost all shared an assumption that, I shall argue, might be wrong, namely, the assumption that when we project from cases we have examined to cases we have not, what we project are predicates. I shall argue that this assumption, shared by almost all attempts at a solution, looks wrong, because, in the first place, what we project are generalizations (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  23
    There is No New Riddle of Deduction: A Reply to Yehezkel.Rami Israel - 2018 - Philosophia 46 (2):311-318.
    Yehezkel presents an interesting argument to resolve Goodman’s New Riddle of Induction, and in effect to claim that a purely syntactical theory of confirmation is possible. In this paper I suggest that Yehezkel’s argument relies on two premises not proven in his paper. The first premise is that if “a New Riddle of Deduction” can be formulated then there is no New Riddle of Induction. This premise seems to be wrong as I claim in part 2 of this paper. The (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark