7 found
  1.  46
    Exploring a Model Role Description for Ethicists.Paula Chidwick, Jennifer Bell, Eoin Connolly, Michael D. Coughlin, Andrea Frolic, Laurie Hardingham & Randi Zlotnik Shaul - 2010 - HEC Forum 22 (1):31-40.
    This paper provides a description of the role of the clinical ethicist as it is generally experienced in Canada. It examines the activities of Canadian ethicists working in healthcare institutions and the way in which their work incorporates more than ethics case consultation. The Canadian Bioethics Society established a “Taskforce on Working Conditions for Bioethics” (hereafter referred to as the Taskforce), to make recommendations on a number of issues affecting ethicists and to develop a model role description. This essay carefully (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  2.  54
    Accountability and Pediatric Physician-Researchers: Are Theoretical Models Compatible with Canadian Lived Experience?Christine Czoli, Michael Da Silva, Randi Zlotnik Shaul, Lori D'Agincourt-Canning, Christy Simpson, Katherine Boydell, Natalie Rashkovan & Sharon Vanin - 2011 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6:15.
    Physician-researchers are bound by professional obligations stemming from both the role of the physician and the role of the researcher. Currently, the dominant models for understanding the relationship between physician-researchers' clinical duties and research duties fit into three categories: the similarity position, the difference position and the middle ground. The law may be said to offer a fourth.
    Direct download (19 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  11
    Innovation in Medical Care: Examples From Surgery.Randi Zlotnik Shaul, Jacob C. Langer & Martin F. McKneally - 2008 - In Peter A. Singer & A. M. Viens (eds.), The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
  4.  8
    Predictive Genomic Testing of Children for Adult Onset Disorders: A Canadian Perspective.Michael J. Szego, M. Stephen Meyn, James A. Anderson, Robin Hayeems, Cheryl Shuman, Nasim Monfared, Sarah Bowdin & Randi Zlotnik Shaul - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (3):19-21.
  5.  5
    Maximizing the Benefit and Mitigating the Risks of Moral Hazard.Randi Zlotnik Shaul & Wendy J. Ungar - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (7):44-46.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
  6.  6
    Legal Liabilities in Research: Early Lessons From North America.Randi Zlotnik Shaul, Shelley Birenbaum & Megan Evans - 2005 - BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1):4.
    The legal risks associated with health research involving human subjects have been highlighted recently by a number of lawsuits launched against those involved in conducting and evaluating the research. Some of these cases have been fully addressed by the legal system, resulting in judgments that provide some guidance. The vast majority of cases have either settled before going to trial, or have not yet been addressed by the courts, leaving us to wonder what might have been and what guidance future (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
    Export citation  
  7.  3
    The Potential Value of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child in Pediatric Bioethics Settings.Michael Da Silva, Cheryl D. Lew, Laura Lundy, Kellie R. Lang, Irene Melamed & Randi Zlotnik Shaul - 2015 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 58 (3):290-305.
    In this article, we examine how the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child can be useful in pediatric bioethics. Adopted in 1989, the CRC reflects norms that have been deliberated upon for a long period of time and endorsed by most nations. The United States is now the only country that has not ratified the CRC.1 International human rights law shares many key moral concepts with clinical pediatric bioethics, and the CRC provides a considered language common to many (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation