16 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Rebecca Bennett (University of Manchester)
  1. Rebecca Bennett (2009). The Fallacy of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence. Bioethics 23 (5):265-273.
    The claim that we have a moral obligation, where a choice can be made, to bring to birth the 'best' child possible, has been highly controversial for a number of decades. More recently Savulescu has labelled this claim the Principle of Procreative Beneficence. It has been argued that this Principle is problematic in both its reasoning and its implications, most notably in that it places lower moral value on the disabled. Relentless criticism of this proposed moral obligation, however, has been (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  2.  22
    Bella L. Galperin, Rebecca J. Bennett & Karl Aquino (2011). Status Differentiation and the Protean Self: A Social-Cognitive Model of Unethical Behavior in Organizations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 98 (3):407 - 424.
    Based on social-cognitive theory, this article proposes a model that seeks to explain why high status organizational members engage in unethical behavior. We argue that status differentiation in organizations creates social isolation which initiates activation of high status group identity and a deactivation of moral identity. We further argue that high status group identity results in insensitivity to the needs of out-group members which, in turn, results in lessened motivation to selfregulate ethical decision making. As a result of this identity (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  3.  32
    Rebecca Bennett (2014). When Intuition is Not Enough. Why the Principle of Procreative Beneficence Must Work Much Harder to Justify Its Eugenic Vision. Bioethics 28 (9):447-455.
    The Principle of Procreative Beneficence claims that we have a moral obligation, where choice is possible, to choose to create the best child we can. The existence of this moral obligation has been proposed by John Harris and Julian Savulescu and has proved controversial on many levels, not least that it is eugenics, asking us to produce the best children we can, not for the sake of that child's welfare, but in order to make a better society. These are strong (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4. Rebecca Bennett (2007). Should We Criminalize HIV Transmission? In Charles A. Erin & Suzanne Ost (eds.), The Criminal Justice System and Health Care. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  44
    Rebecca Bennett (2008). Is Reproduction Women's Business? How Should We Regulate Regarding Stored Embryos, Posthumous Pregnancy, Ectogenesis and Male Pregnancy? Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2 (3).
    Traditionally reproduction, gestation and childbirth have all been regarded as being primarily a woman's domain. As natural reproduction occurs inside a woman's body, respect for autonomy and bodily integrity requires the pregnant woman to have the conclusive say over the fate of the embryo/fetus growing within her. Thus traditionally the ethics and law of reproduction is dominated by the importance of respecting women's reproductive choices. This paper argues that emerging technologies demand a radical rethink of ethics and law in the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  20
    Rebecca Bennett (2014). There Can Be No Moral Obligation to Eradicate All Disability. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (1):30-40.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Rebecca Bennett & John Harris (2007). Reproductive Choice. In Rosamond Rhodes, Leslie Francis & Anita Silvers (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics. Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  9
    Paul Benjamin Lowry, Clay Posey, Tom L. Roberts & Rebecca J. Bennett (2014). Is Your Banker Leaking Your Personal Information? The Roles of Ethics and Individual-Level Cultural Characteristics in Predicting Organizational Computer Abuse. Journal of Business Ethics 121 (3):385-401.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  1
    Rebecca Bennett (2013). Birth Control. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. George Agich, Priscilla Anderson, Alice Asby, Dominic Beer, Rebecca Bennett, Alec Bodkin, Stephen Braude, Dan Brock, Gideon Calder & Emma Cave (2002). Many Thanks to Bioethics Reviewers. In Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.), Bioethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 2002.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  7
    Amel Alghrani, Rebecca Bennett & Suzanne Ost (eds.) (2012). Bioethics, Medicine, and the Criminal Law: The Criminal Law and Bioethical Conflict: Walking the Tightrope. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction - when criminal law encounters bioethics: a case of tensions and incompatibilities or an apt forum for resolving ethical conflict? Amel Alghrani, Rebecca Bennett and Suzanne Ost; Part I. Death, Dying, and the Criminal Law: 2. Euthanasia and assisted suicide should, when properly performed by a doctor in an appropriate case, be decriminalised John Griffiths; 3. Five flawed arguments for decriminalising euthanasia John Keown; 4. Euthanasia excused: between prohibition and permission Richard Huxtable; Part II. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Amel Alghrani, Rebecca Bennett & Suzanne Ost (eds.) (2013). Bioethics, Medicine, and the Criminal Law. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction - when criminal law encounters bioethics: a case of tensions and incompatibilities or an apt forum for resolving ethical conflict? Amel Alghrani, Rebecca Bennett and Suzanne Ost; Part I. Death, Dying, and the Criminal Law: 2. Euthanasia and assisted suicide should, when properly performed by a doctor in an appropriate case, be decriminalised John Griffiths; 3. Five flawed arguments for decriminalising euthanasia John Keown; 4. Euthanasia excused: between prohibition and permission Richard Huxtable; Part II. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Bennett Rebecca & A. Erin Charles (eds.) (2001). Hiv and Aids, Testing, Screening, and Confidentiality. Clarendon Press.
    An international team of eighteen doctors, philosophers, and lawyers present a fresh and thorough discussion of the ethical, legal, and social issues raised by testing and screening for HIV and AIDS. They aim to point the way to practical advances but also to give an accessible guide for those new to the debate.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Rebecca Bennett & Charles A. Erin (2001). Introduction. In Rebecca Bennett & Charles A. Erin (eds.), Hiv and Aids, Testing, Screening, and Confidentiality. Clarendon Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Rebecca Bennett (2001). Should We Routinely Test Pregnant Women for HIV? In Rebecca Bennett & Charles A. Erin (eds.), Hiv and Aids, Testing, Screening, and Confidentiality. Clarendon Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Rebecca J. Bennett (1998). Taking the Sting Out of the Whip: Reactions to Consistent Punishment for Unethical Behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 4 (3):248-262.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography