Results for 'Religious epistemology'

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Religious Epistemology.Chris Tweedt & Trent Dougherty - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (8):547-559.
    Religious epistemology is the study of how subjects' religious beliefs can have, or fail to have, some form of positive epistemic status and whether they even need such status appropriate to their kind. The current debate is focused most centrally upon the kind of basis upon which a religious believer can be rationally justified in holding certain beliefs about God and whether it is necessary to be so justified to believe as a religious believer ought. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  2. Religious Epistemological Disjunctivism.Kegan Shaw - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (3):261-279.
    This paper explores religious belief in connection with epistemological disjunctivism. It applies recent advances in epistemological disjunctivism to the religious case for displaying an attractive model of specifically Christian religious belief. What results is a heretofore unoccupied position in religious epistemology—a view I call ‘religious epistemological disjunctivism’. My general argument is that RED furnishes superior explanations for the sort of ‘grasp of the truth’ which should undergird ‘matured Christian conviction’ of religious propositions. To (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  4
    Religious Epistemology.Tyler Dalton McNabb - 2018 - Cambridge University Press.
    If epistemology is roughly the study of knowledge, justification, warrant, and rationality, then religious epistemology is the study of how these epistemic concepts relate to religious belief and practice. This Element, while surveying various religious epistemologies, argues specifically for Plantingian religious epistemology. It makes the case for proper functionalism and Plantinga's AC models, while it also responds to debunking arguments informed by cognitive science of religion. It serves as a bridge between religious (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4. The Elusive God: Reorienting Religious Epistemology.Paul K. Moser - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
    Three questions motivate this book's account of evidence for the existence of God. First, if God's existence is hidden, why suppose He exists at all? Second, if God exists, why is He hidden, particularly if God seeks to communicate with people? Third, what are the implications of divine hiddenness for philosophy, theology, and religion's supposed knowledge of God? This book answers these questions on the basis of a new account of evidence and knowledge of divine reality that challenges skepticism about (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  5. Religious Epistemology.Kelly James Clark - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  6.  1
    Plantingian Religious Epistemology and World Religions: Prospects and Problems.Erik Baldwin & Tyler Dalton McNabb - 2018 - Lexington Books.
    Baldwin and McNabb explore how non-Christian religious traditions can utilize Plantinga’s epistemology. This book pays particular attention to the question, if there are believers from differing religious traditions that can rightfully utilize his epistemology, does this somehow prevent a Plantingian’s creedal-specific belief from being warranted?
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7. Plantinga’s Religious Epistemology, Skeptical Theism, and Debunking Arguments.Andrew Moon - 2017 - Faith and Philosophy 34 (4):449-470.
    Alvin Plantinga’s religious epistemology has been used to respond to many debunking arguments against theistic belief. However, critics have claimed that Plantinga’s religious epistemology conflicts with skeptical theism, a view often used in response to the problem of evil. If they are correct, then a common way of responding to debunking arguments conflicts with a common way of responding to the problem of evil. In this paper, I examine the critics’ claims and argue that they are (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8. Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology.Matthew A. Benton, John Hawthorne & Dani Rabinowitz (eds.) - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Recent decades have seen a fertile period of theorizing within mainstream epistemology which has had a dramatic impact on how epistemology is done. Investigations into contextualist and pragmatic dimensions of knowledge suggest radically new ways of meeting skeptical challenges and of understanding the relation between the epistemological and practical environment. New insights from social epistemology and formal epistemology about defeat, testimony, a priority, probability, and the nature of evidence all have a potentially revolutionary effect on how (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  9.  17
    Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology.R. Douglas Geivett & Brendan Sweetman (eds.) - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
    This unique textbook--the first to offer balanced, comprehensive coverage of all major perspectives on the rational justification of religious belief--includes twenty-four key papers by some of the world's leading philosophers of religion. Arranged in six sections, each representing a major approach to religious epistemology, the book begins with papers by noted atheists, setting the stage for the main theistic responses--Wittgensteinian Fideism, Reformed epistemology, natural theology, prudential accounts of religious beliefs, and rational belief based in (...) experience--in each case offering a representative sample of papers by leading exponents, a critical paper, and a substantial bibliography. A comprehensive introductory essay and ample cross-references help students to contrast and evaluate the different approaches, while the overall arrangement encourages them to assess the full range of philosophical positions on the issue. Carefully selected to provide both a comprehensive overview of current work and a series of modern perspectives on many classic sources--Swinburne's detailed discussion of Hume's critique of the design argument, for example, as well as an entire section evaluating and extending Pascal's famous Wager--the essays also provide a uniquely readable survey that will be useful in a wide range of undergraduate and graduate courses in philosophy of religion and epistemology. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  10. Berkeley’s Lockean Religious Epistemology.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2014 - Journal of the History of Ideas 75 (3):417-438.
    Berkeley's main aim in his well-known early works was to identify and refute "the grounds of Scepticism, Atheism, and irreligion." This appears to place Berkeley within a well-established tradition of religious critics of Locke's epistemology, including, most famously, Stillingfleet. I argue that these appearances are deceiving. Berkeley is, in fact, in important respects an opponent of this tradition. According to Berkeley, Locke's earlier critics, including Stillingfleet, had misidentified the grounds of irreligion in Locke's philosophy while all the while (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  21
    Three Ways to Improve Religious Epistemology.J. L. Schellenberg - 2017 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 81:1-18.
    Religious epistemology is widely regarded as being in a flourishing condition. It is true that some very sharp analytical work on religion has been produced by philosophers in the past few decades. But this work, for various cultural and historical reasons, has been kept within excessively narrow bounds, and the result is that the appearance of flourishing is to a considerable extent illusory. Here I discuss three important ways in which improvements to this situation might be made.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12. Phenomenal Conservatism and Evidentialism in Religious Epistemology.Chris Tucker - 2011 - In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press. pp. 52--73.
    Phenomenal conservatism holds, roughly, that if it seems to S that P, then S has evidence for P. I argue for two main conclusions. The first is that phenomenal conservatism is better suited than is proper functionalism to explain how a particular type of religious belief formation can lead to non-inferentially justified religious beliefs. The second is that phenomenal conservatism makes evidence so easy to obtain that the truth of evidentialism would not be a significant obstacle to justified (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  13. Responses to Evidentialism in Contemporary Religious Epistemology: Plantinga and Swinburne in Conversation with Aquinas.Edmond Eh - 2015 - GSTF Journal of General Philosophy 1 (2):33-41.
    In contemporary debates in religious epistemology, theistic philosophers provide differing responses to the evidentialist argument against religious beliefs. Plantinga’s strategy is to argue that evidence is not needed to justify religious beliefs while Swinburne’s strategy is to argue that religious beliefs can be justified by evidence. However, in Aquinas’ account of religious epistemology, he seems to employ both strategies. In his account of religious knowledge by faith, he argues that evidence is unnecessary (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14.  28
    Religious Epistemology: Naturalizing a Point of View.Jane Duran - 2001 - Heythrop Journal 42 (4):480–488.
    I construct and describe an epistemology for the religious – a naturalized epistemology – based on recent work in epistemics. Two points of view exemplary of religious thought are analyzed , and the normative/descriptive distinction in epistemology utilized to bolster the contention that the religious requires a less normative, more descriptive concomitant epistemology. I conclude that our reluctance to grapple with difficult ontological questions is directly related to the standard normative epistemology of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  4
    Religious Epistemology.Stephen Law (ed.) - 2018 - Cambridge University Press.
    This volume presents cutting edge research by many of the leading researchers in the field of religious epistemology, a field that has seen major development in recent years. This book attempts to answer the questions of: how reasonable is belief in God? Can a good evidential case be made either for the existence of God, or against the existence of God? Does the existence of enormous suffering, or religious disagreement, provide significant evidence against the existence of God? (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  4
    Religious Epistemology in John Hick’s Philosophy: A Nigerian Appreciation.Olusegun Noah Olawoyin - 2016 - Open Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):201-206.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  6
    Religious Epistemology and Dialectic.Muhammad Legenhausen - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 21 (3):43-58.
    Much recent discussion of the epistemology of religious belief has focused on justification of belief in the existence of God. Religious belief, however, includes much more than belief in God. In this paper, it is argued that the justification of belief in God is best seen in the context of other interrelated religious beliefs and practices. Philosophers of religion argue about whether religious belief requires evidence and on the sorts of arguments that have been presented. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  5
    Religious Epistemology: Naturalizing a Point of View.Jane Duran - 2001 - Heythrop Journal 42 (4):480-488.
    I construct and describe an epistemology for the religious – a naturalized epistemology – based on recent work in epistemics. Two points of view exemplary of religious thought are analyzed, and the normative/descriptive distinction in epistemology utilized to bolster the contention that the religious requires a less normative, more descriptive concomitant epistemology. I conclude that our reluctance to grapple with difficult ontological questions is directly related to the standard normative epistemology of the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  28
    Religious Epistemology, Rationality And TrustAn Introduction.Paul Cortois & Walter van Herck - 1999 - Bijdragen 60 (4):373-379.
    We are happy to present the proceedings of the international symposium on Rationality and Religious Trust which were held at the University of Antwerp in this volume of Bijdragen. Rationality and religious trust is of course a topic that falls within the scope of the epistemology of religion. Contemporary epistemology of religion has been the scene of a vigorous debate about the nature of religious belief, or more precisely about the role of rationality and rational (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. The Religious Epistemology and Theodicy of Edward John Carnell and Edgar Sheffield Brightman: A Study in Contrasts.Joe Edward Barnhart - 1964 - Dissertation, Boston University Graduate School
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. Religious Epistemology and the History of the Dead Sea Scrolls Community.Shane Berg - 2010 - In John J. Collins & Daniel C. Harlow (eds.), The "Other" in Second Temple Judaism: Essays in Honor of John J. Collins. W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  8
    Religious Epistemology and the Problem of Public Justification.Martin Breul - 2016 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 58 (2):176-189.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie Jahrgang: 58 Heft: 2 Seiten: 176-189.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  11
    Plantingian Religious Epistemology and World Religions: Prospects and Problems, Written byErik Baldwin and Tyler Dalton McNabb.Shawn M. Langley - 2021 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 48 (1):111-113.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  41
    Testimony, Error, and Reasonable Belief in Medieval Religious Epistemology.Richard Cross - 2018 - In Matthew A. Benton, John Hawthorne & Dani Rabinowitz (eds.), Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. First Person and Third Person Reasons and Religious Epistemology.Linda Zagzebski - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):285 - 304.
    In this paper I argue that there are two kinds of epistemic reasons. One kind is irreducibly first personal -- what I call deliberative reasons. The other kind is third personal -- what I call theoretical reasons. I argue that attending to this distinction illuminates a host of problems in epistemology in general and in religious epistemology in particular. These problems include (a) the way religious experience operates as a reason for religious belief, (b) how (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  26.  15
    Rethinking Religious Epistemology.Gary Stephen Elkins - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 45:101-108.
    Philosophers of religion propose an assortment of epistemic preferences with reference to the extent and limits of knowledge of God, ranging from moderate fideism to robust rationalism. In the past two decades, a seismic shift has occurred away from more classical strategies to movements that reflect the current Zeitgeist (e.g. postmodernism and pseudo-modernism). In my paper, I will argue for rational confidence and epistemic modesty in an attempt to find some balance between faith and reason.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  42
    Debating Christian Religious Epistemology: An Introduction to Five Views on the Knowledge of God.John DePoe & Tyler Dalton McNabb (eds.) - 2020 - Bloomsbury Academic.
    "Debating Christian Religious Epistemology introduces core questions in the philosophy of religion by bringing five competing viewpoints on the knowledge of God into critical dialogue with one another."--.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Paul K. Moser, The Elusive God: Reorienting Religious Epistemology: Cambridge University Press, New York, 2008, Xii and 292 Pp., $90.00. [REVIEW]J. L. Schellenberg - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):227-232.
    Paul K. Moser, The elusive God: reorienting religious epistemology Content Type Journal Article Pages 227-232 DOI 10.1007/s11153-010-9278-x Authors J. L. Schellenberg, Mount Saint Vincent University, 166 Bedford Hwy., Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3M2J6 Canada Journal International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Online ISSN 1572-8684 Print ISSN 0020-7047 Journal Volume Volume 69 Journal Issue Volume 69, Number 3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  9
    The Elusive God: Reorienting Religious Epistemology[REVIEW]E. J. Coffman & J. Cervantez - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (4):820-822.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  30. Locke's Natural and Religious Epistemology.Shelley Weinberg - 2020 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 58 (2):241-266.
    in their famous correspondence, Stillingfleet objects that Locke's definition of knowledge, by limiting certainty to the perception of the agreement or disagreement of ideas, lessens the credibility of faith. Locke replies that his definition of knowledge does not affect the credibility of an article of faith at all, for faith and knowledge are entirely different cognitive acts: The truth of the matter of fact is in short this, that I have placed knowledge in the perception of the agreement or disagreement (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Evidence and Transcendence: Religious Epistemology and the God-World Relationship.Anne E. Inman - 2008 - University of Notre Dame Press.
    In _Evidence and Transcendence_, Anne Inman critiques modern attempts to explain the knowability of God and points the way toward a religious epistemology that avoids their pitfalls. Christian apologetics faces two major challenges: the classic Enlightenment insistence on the need to provide evidence for anything that is put forward for belief; and the argument that all human knowledge is mediated by finite reality and thus no “knowledge” of a being interpreted as completely other than finite reality is possible. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  6
    The Elusive God: Reorienting Religious Epistemology.R. Douglas Geivett - 2011 - Philosophia Christi 13 (2):474-479.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  43
    Evidence and Transcendence: Religious Epistemology and the God‐World Relationship, by Anne E. Inman. Pp. Ix, 188, Notre Dame, IN, University of Notre Dame Press, 2008, $26.50. [REVIEW]Hugo Meynell - 2014 - Heythrop Journal 55 (1):141-142.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  60
    An Historical Perspective on Religious Epistemology.Gary Gutting - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:103-113.
    The project of “religious epistemology,” as it has developed and thrived among certain analytic philosophers over the last thirty years, has seldom exhibited a strong historical sensibility. Nonetheless, contemporary discussions of the rationality of religious belief obviously have important antecedents in the history of modern philosophy, particularly in the history of the Enlightenment project that so strongly challenged traditional religious belief. This paper develops two themes from this history that I will try to show are particularly (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  64
    Huang on Wittgenstein on Religious Epistemology.Jordan Curnutt - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (1):81-89.
    Yong Huang has recently claimed that after the demise of foundationalism, philosophy and theology can turn to Ludwig Wittgenstein's non-foundationalist or coherentist religious epistemology where, it is said, religious beliefs are justified by a 'reflective equilibrium' with other kinds of beliefs, with action, and with different 'forms of life'. I argue that there are very good reasons to reject this reading of Wittgenstein: not only unsupported, it is seriously mistaken. Once the epistemological terms of the debate are (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. Moral and Religious Epistemology.Bruno Niederbacher - 2005 - Philosophy and Culture 32 (4):19-42.
    The purpose of this paper is an overview of the theory of knowledge in recent years in religious discussion, and discussion with some of the more traditional, which outlines the future direction of further development. This paper describes the religion that advocates for the challenge, and the reply made ​​by Kaplan Dingge, in addition to other early works, his recent book "confirms Christian faith" have gradually shed light on this issue. The problem is that Kaplan Dingge for the formation (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  17
    Is a Religious Epistemology Possible?Terence Penelhum - 1969 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 3:263-280.
    Those who despair of the possibility of proving the existence of God tend, naturally, to hold that knowledge of God's existence and of those religious claims that depend upon it can only be had, if it can be had at all, through some direct religious awareness or insight. On this view appeals to authority or to revelation rest on appeals to such insight, if it is agreed that the credentials of the revealing authority cannot be established by the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  9
    Is a Religious Epistemology Possible?: Terence Penelhum.Terence Penelhum - 1969 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 3:263-280.
    Those who despair of the possibility of proving the existence of God tend, naturally, to hold that knowledge of God's existence and of those religious claims that depend upon it can only be had, if it can be had at all, through some direct religious awareness or insight. On this view appeals to authority or to revelation rest on appeals to such insight, if it is agreed that the credentials of the revealing authority cannot be established by the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Religious Belief and the Epistemology of Disagreement.Michael Thune - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (8):712-724.
    Consider two people who disagree about some important claim (e.g. the future moral and political consequences of current U.S. economic policy are X). They each believe the other person is in possession of relevant evidence, is roughly equally competent to evaluate that evidence, etc. From the epistemic point of view, how should such recognized disagreement affect their doxastic attitude toward the original claim? Recent research on the epistemology of disagreement has converged upon three general ways of answering this question. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  40.  21
    Paul Tillich's Religious Epistemology: JERRY H. GILL.Jerry H. Gill - 1968 - Religious Studies 3 (2):477-498.
    There is good reason to believe that Paul Tillich would have objected to the title of this paper. Several years ago I heard him begin a lecture on ‘Religious Existentialism’ with the comment, ‘There is no such thing as Religious Existentialism because there is only Religious Existentialism’. Similarly, he might have objected to the present paper's title by suggesting that every search for knowledge is, consciously or unconsciously, a religious search.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. Cumulative Case Arguments in Religious Epistemology.Robert Audi - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 8:1-15.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  20
    Flannery O'Connor and Religious Epistemology.Jason Baehr - forthcoming - Religious Studies:1-21.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. The Epistemology of Religious Diversity in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion.Amir Dastmalchian - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (3):298-308.
    Religious diversity is a key topic in contemporary philosophy of religion. One way religious diversity has been of interest to philosophers is in the epistemological questions it gives rise to. In other words, religious diversity has been seen to pose a challenge for religious belief. In this study four approaches to dealing with this challenge are discussed. These approaches correspond to four well-known philosophers of religion, namely, Richard Swinburne, Alvin Plantinga, William Alston, and John Hick. The (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  44.  17
    Paul Tillich's Religious Epistemology.Jerry H. Gill - 1968 - Religious Studies 3 (2):477 - 498.
  45. The Cambridge Handbook of Religious Epistemology.John Greco, Tyler Dalton McNabb & Jonathan Fuqua (eds.) - forthcoming - Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  65
    50 Years of Gettier: A New Direction in Religious Epistemology?Ian Michael Church - 2015 - Journal of Analytic Theology 3:147-171.
    In this paper, I lend credence to the move toward non-reductive religious epistemology by highlighting the systematic failings of Alvin Plantinga’s seminal, religious epistemology when it comes to surmounting the Gettier Problem. Taking Plantinga’s account as archetypal, I argue that we have systematic reasons to believe that no reductive theory of knowledge can viably surmount the Gettier Problem, that the future of religious epistemology lies in non-reductive models of knowledge.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  97
    The Epistemology of Religious Experience.Keith E. Yandell - 1993 - Cambridge University.
    This book addresses a fundamental question in the philosophy of religion. Can religious experience provide evidence for religious belief? If so, how? Keith Yandell argues against the notion that religious experience is ineffable, while advocating the view that strong numinous experience provides some evidence that God exists. An attractive feature of the book is that it does not confine its attention to any one religious cultural tradition, but tracks the nature of religious experience across different (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  48.  4
    The Epistemology of Religious Disagreement: A Better Understanding.James Kraft - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
    The opponent in either an ordinary or religious disagreement asserts you have made a mistake. To avoid mistakes we strive to have good justification for beliefs which holds us connected to them during difficult challenges, similar to how a good boat tether, pictured on this book's front cover, holds a valuable boat throughout the many stresses placed on it. The problem is that an equivalently informed and capable opponent shows a possible mistake as relevant, and this ought to reduce (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  49.  53
    Putnam's Internal Realism and Von Balthasar's Religious Epistemology.Victoria S. Harrison - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44 (2):67-92.
    This article is principally concerned with a possible defense of some of the epistemological presuppositions of von Balthasar’s theological philosophy. The article claims that, taken as a whole, von Balthasar’s writings provide a systematic critique of a widely held epistemological paradigm, thereby implying a novel conception of rationality and objectivity. In so doing, he anticipates the central concerns of Hilary Putnam, whose own more developed work on rationality and objectivity can be employed to supplement von Balthasar’s critique of these concepts (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  50. The Phenomenal Conservative Approach to Religious Epistemology.Logan Paul Gage & Blake McAllister - 2020 - In John M. DePoe & Tyler McNabb (eds.), Debating Christian Religious Epistemology: An Introduction to Five Views on the Knowledge of God. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 61-81.
    In this chapter, we argue for a phenomenal conservative perspective on religious epistemology and attempt to answer some common criticisms of this perspective.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 1000