30 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Richard R. Sharp [27]Richard Sharp [4]Richard Roy Sharp [1]
  1.  15
    Toward Competency-Based Certification of Clinical Ethics Consultants: A Four-Step Process.Martin L. Smith, Richard R. Sharp, Kathryn Weise & Eric Kodish - 2010 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 21 (1):14.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  2.  29
    Patients' Views on Identifiability of Samples and Informed Consent for Genetic Research.Sara Chandros Hull, Richard Sharp, Jeffrey Botkin, Mark Brown, Mark Hughes, Jeremy Sugarman, Debra Schwinn, Pamela Sankar, Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic, Brian Clarridge & Benjamin Wilfond - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):62-70.
    It is unclear whether the regulatory distinction between non-identifiable and identifiable information—information used to determine informed consent practices for the use of clinically derived samples for genetic research—is meaningful to patients. The objective of this study was to examine patients' attitudes and preferences regarding use of anonymous and identifiable clinical samples for genetic research. Telephone interviews were conducted with 1,193 patients recruited from general medicine, thoracic surgery, or medical oncology clinics at five United States academic medical centers. Wanting to know (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  3.  5
    Involving Study Populations in the Review of Genetic Research.Richard R. Sharp & Morris W. Foster - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (1):41-51.
  4.  31
    Practical Guidance for Charting Ethics Consultations.Courtenay R. Bruce, Martin L. Smith, Olubukunola Mary Tawose & Richard R. Sharp - 2014 - HEC Forum 26 (1):79-93.
    It is generally accepted that appropriate documentation of activities and recommendations of ethics consultants in patients’ medical records is critical. Despite this acceptance, the bioethics literature is largely devoid of guidance on key elements of an ethics chart note, the degree of specificity that it should contain, and its stylistic tenor. We aim to provide guidance for a variety of persons engaged in clinical ethics consultation: new and seasoned ethics committee members who are new to ethics consultation, students and trainees (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  5.  26
    A Systematic Review of Activities at a High-Volume Ethics Consultation Service.Courtenay R. Bruce, Martin L. Smith, Sabahat Hizlan & Richard R. Sharp - 2011 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 22 (2):151.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  6.  7
    Involving Study Populations in the Review of Genetic Research.Richard R. Sharp & Morris W. Foster - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (1):41-51.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  7.  20
    Modernizing Research Regulations Is Not Enough: It's Time to Think Outside the Regulatory Box.Suzanne M. Rivera, Kyle B. Brothers, R. Jean Cadigan, Heather L. Harrell, Mark A. Rothstein, Richard R. Sharp & Aaron J. Goldenberg - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):1-3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  4
    Who Is Buying Bioethics Research?Richard R. Sharp, Angela L. Scott, David C. Landy & Laura A. Kicklighter - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):54-58.
    Growing ties to private industry have prompted many to question the impartiality of academic bioethicists who receive financial support from for-profit corporations in exchange for ethics-related services and research. To the extent that corporate sponsors may view bioethics as little more than a way to strengthen public relations or avoid potential controversy, close ties to industry may pose serious threats to professional independence. New sources of support from private industry may also divert bioethicists from pursuing topics of greater social importance, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  9.  28
    The Challenge of Informed Consent and Return of Results in Translational Genomics: Empirical Analysis and Recommendations.Gail E. Henderson, Susan M. Wolf, Kristine J. Kuczynski, Steven Joffe, Richard R. Sharp, D. Williams Parsons, Bartha M. Knoppers, Joon-Ho Yu & Paul S. Appelbaum - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (3):344-355.
    As exome and genome sequencing move into clinical application, questions surround how to elicit consent and handle potential return of individual genomic results. This study analyzes nine consent forms used in NIH-funded sequencing studies. Content analysis reveals considerable heterogeneity, including in defining results that may be returned, identifying potential benefits and risks of return, protecting privacy, addressing placement of results in the medical record, and data-sharing. In response to lack of consensus, we offer recommendations.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  10.  4
    Marketing the Research Missions of Academic Medical Centers: Why Messages Blurring Lines Between Clinical Care and Research Are Bad for Both Business and Ethics.Mark Yarborough, Timothy Houk, Sarah Tinker Perrault, Yael Schenker & Richard R. Sharp - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (3):468-475.
    :Academic Medical Centers offer patient care and perform research. Increasingly, AMCs advertise to the public in order to garner income that can support these dual missions. In what follows, we raise concerns about the ways that advertising blurs important distinctions between them. Such blurring is detrimental to AMC efforts to fulfill critically important ethical responsibilities pertaining both to science communication and clinical research, because marketing campaigns can employ hype that weakens research integrity and contributes to therapeutic misconception and misestimation, undermining (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  8
    Additional Thoughts on Rethinking Research Ethics.Richard R. Sharp & Mark Yarborough - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):40 – 42.
  12.  10
    Clinical Utility and Full Disclosure of Genetic Results to Research Participants.Richard R. Sharp & Morris W. Foster - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):42 – 44.
  13.  10
    Multiple Marginalizations: What Bioethics Can Learn From Black Feminism.Amal W. Cheema, Karen M. Meagher & Richard R. Sharp - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):1-3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  14
    Examining the Potential for Exploitation by Local Intermediaries.David Landy & Richard Sharp - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):12-13.
  15.  5
    A Belmont Reboot: Building a Normative Foundation for Human Research in the 21st Century.Kyle B. Brothers, Suzanne M. Rivera, R. Jean Cadigan, Richard R. Sharp & Aaron J. Goldenberg - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (1):165-172.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  9
    Ingestible Drug Adherence Monitors: Trending Toward a Surveillance Society?Richard R. Sharp - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (11):1-2.
  17.  18
    Grappling with Groups: Protecting Collective Interests in Biomedical Research.Richard R. Sharp & Morris W. Foster - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (4):321 – 337.
    Strategies for protecting historically disadvantaged groups have been extensively debated in the context of genetic variation research, making this a useful starting point in examining the protection of social groups from harm resulting from biomedical research. We analyze research practices developed in response to concerns about the involvement of indigenous communities in studies of genetic variation and consider their potential application in other contexts. We highlight several conceptual ambiguities and practical challenges associated with the protection of group interests and argue (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  18.  25
    The Environmental Genome Project and Bioethics.Richard R. Sharp & J. Carl Barrett - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (2):175-188.
  19.  7
    Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks: Continuing Education in Research Ethics.Richard R. Sharp - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):55 – 56.
  20.  13
    Currents in Contemporary Ethics: Informed Trust and the Financing of Biomedical Research.Richard R. Sharp & Mark Yarborough - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):460-464.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  7
    When to Avoid Giving Advice on the Ethical Conduct of Research.Richard R. Sharp & Megan A. Allyse - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):94-95.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  6
    A Study to Elicit Behavioral Health Patients' and Providers' Opinions on Health Records Consent.Maria Adela Grando, Anita Murcko, Srividya Mahankali, Michael Saks, Michael Zent, Darwyn Chern, Christy Dye, Richard Sharp, Laura Young, Patricia Davis, Megan Hiestand & Neda Hassanzadeh - 2017 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (2):238-259.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  7
    Owning Medical Professionalism.Jon C. Tilburt & Richard R. Sharp - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (9):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  5
    Genetic Fingerprints and National Security.Beau P. Sperry, Megan Allyse & Richard R. Sharp - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (5):1-3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  8
    Prudentia Populo: Involving the Community in Biobank Governance.Megan A. Allyse, Jennifer B. McCormick & Richard R. Sharp - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):1-3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  8
    AJOB 2.0: Taking Bioethics to a New Level.David Magnus, Kayhan Parsi & Richard Sharp - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  5
    Ruffling a Few Feathers.Richard R. Sharp - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (6):1-1.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  11
    Conflicts of Interest in Bioethics: A Response to Our Critics.David C. Landy & Richard R. Sharp - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  5
    What To Do With the Could-Be-Knowns of Genomic Medicine.Richard R. Sharp - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2):1 - 2.
  30.  6
    Knowing Who You Want to Be When You Grow Up: Implications for Pediatric Assent.Richard R. Sharp & Rosemary B. Quigley - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):14 – 15.