79 found
Order:
  1. New Studies in Deontic Logic.Risto Hilpinen (ed.) - 1981 - Wiley-Blackwell.
  2. Artifact.Risto Hilpinen - 1999 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  3.  82
    X—Authors and Artifacts.Risto Hilpinen - 1992 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93 (1):155-178.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  4. On Artifacts and Works of Art.Risto Hilpinen - 1992 - Theoria 58 (1):58-82.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  5. Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings.Risto Hilpinen (ed.) - 1976 - Sold and Distributed in the U.S.A. And Canada by Kluwer Boston.
  6.  60
    Notes onThe Cambridge Companion to Peirce.Risto Hilpinen - 2005 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (4):740-761.
  7.  70
    2012 Presidential Address: Types and Tokens: On the Identity and Meaning of Names and Other Words.Risto Hilpinen - 2012 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (3):259.
    Charles S. Peirce introduces the distinction between a token and a type into semiotics and philosophy by using as an example two ways of individuating words:(P1) A common mode of estimating the amount of matter in a MS. or printed book is to count the number of words. There will ordinarily be about twenty the's on a page, and of course they count as twenty words. In another sense of the word "word," however, there is but one word "the" in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8. Knowledge and Conditionals.Risto Hilpinen - 1988 - Philosophical Perspectives 2:157-182.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  9.  53
    On C. S. Peirce’s Theory of the Proposition.Risto Hilpinen - 1982 - The Monist 65 (2):182-188.
    Peirce discusses the nature and structure of propositions in several manuscripts written in the 1890’s and during the first decade of this century. In this paper I shall outline the main features of Peirce’s theory of the proposition, especially his account of what may be called indeterminate indices in propositions.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  10. Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings.Risto Hilpinen - 1976 - Critica 8 (23):118-125.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  11.  37
    On C. S. Peirce’s Theory of the Proposition.Risto Hilpinen - 1982 - The Monist 65 (2):182 - 188.
    Peirce discusses the nature and structure of propositions in several manuscripts written in the 1890’s and during the first decade of this century. In this paper I shall outline the main features of Peirce’s theory of the proposition, especially his account of what may be called indeterminate indices in propositions.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  12.  75
    Knowing That One Knows and the Classical Definition of Knowledge.Risto Hilpinen - 1970 - Synthese 21 (2):109 - 132.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  13.  25
    On Peirce's Philosophical Logic: Propositions and Their Objects.Risto Hilpinen - 1992 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28 (3):467 - 488.
  14. Rules of Acceptance and Inductive Logic.Risto Hilpinen - 1968 - Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co..
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  15.  62
    Belief Systems as Artifacts.Risto Hilpinen - 1995 - The Monist 78 (2):136-155.
    Many philosophers have used the concept of belief system or some related notion as a basic tool of epistemological discussion and analysis. A belief system is a set of propositions or statements which represents a person’s doxastic state or credal state in a certain situation; it consists of the propositions which the person either explicitly or implicitly accepts in the situation. One of the many concerns of epistemologists is to attempt to formulate general “conditions of rationality” for belief systems. I (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  16.  44
    Conception, Sense, and Reference in Peircean Semiotics.Risto Hilpinen - 2015 - Synthese 192 (4):1-28.
    In his Logical Investigations Edmund Husserl criticizes John Stuart Mill’s account of meaning as connotation, especially Mill’s failure to separate the distinction between connotative and non-connotative names from the distinction between the meaningful and the meaningless. According to Husserl, both connotative and non-connotative names have meaning or “signification”, that is, what Gottlob Frege calls the sense (“Sinn”) of an expression. The distinction between connotative and non-connotative names is a distinction between two kinds of meaning (or sense), attributive and non-attributive meaning (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17. Peirce on Language and Reference.Risto Hilpinen - 1995 - In Kenneth Laine Ketner (ed.), Peirce and Contemporary Thought: Philosophical Inquiries. Fordham University Press. pp. 272--303.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  18.  7
    On the Sick Father, the Repentant Sinner, and Other Problems in Medieval Deontic Logic.Risto Hilpinen - 2019 - Theoria 85 (6):420-434.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. On a Pragmatic Theory of Meaning and Knowledge.Risto Hilpinen - 2004 - Cognitio 5 (2):150.
    : According to C. S. Peirce, there are two ways of explaining what a sign means, namely, a definition and a precept. A precept tells the interpreters of a sign what the sign means by prescribing what they have to do in order to find or become acquainted with an object of the sign. A precept for a concept specifies how an interpreter can determine whether the concept is applicable to a given situation or object.Peirce accepted the scholastic definition of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  20.  54
    Carnap's New System of Inductive Logic.Risto Hilpinen - 1973 - Synthese 25 (3-4):307 - 333.
  21.  16
    Peirce's logic.Risto Hilpinen - 2004 - In Dov M. Gabbay, John Woods & Akihiro Kanamori (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Elsevier. pp. 3--611.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  22.  79
    On Practical Abduction.Risto Hilpinen - 2007 - Theoria 73 (3):207-220.
  23. New Studies in Deontic Logic Norms, Actions, and the Foundations of Ethics.Risto Hilpinen - 1981
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  24.  39
    Peirce, Goodman and the Aesthetic Sign.Risto Hilpinen - 1990 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 37 (1):177-184.
    Expressions of the form "s represents an F", "s represents t as G", and "s represents an F as G" are analysed by means of C. S. Peirce's and Nelson Goodman's semiotic theories, and these theories are compared with each other. It is argued that Peirce's concept of interpretant provides a plausible account of what Goodman calls the exemplification features of aesthetic signs (works of art).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  25. Conditionals and Possible Worlds : On C.S. Peirce's Conception of Conditionals and Modalities.Risto Hilpinen - 2008 - In Leila Haaparanta (ed.), The Development of Modern Logic. Oxford University Press.
  26.  10
    On the Immediate and Dynamical Interpretants and Objects of Signs.Risto Hilpinen - 2019 - Semiotica 2019 (228):91-101.
    In his semiotic system Peirce distinguished between two interpretants and two objects of a sign: an immediate and a dynamical interpretant, and an immediate and a dynamical object. It is argued that Peirce’s immediate object can be interpreted a qua-object which has the dynamical object as its basis, and the dynamical interpretant consists of an interpreter’s conception of the object of the sign. Peirce semiotic system is compared with the accounts given by Frege, Husserl, Meinong, and the Stoics.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  70
    Schlick on the Foundations of Knowledge.Risto Hilpinen - 1982 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 16 (1):63-78.
    This paper outlines the main features of the conception of empirical knowledge presented by Moritz Schlick in his paper 'Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis', and contains a detaüed analysis of Schlick's concept of "Konstatierung". It is argued that in spite of its basically foundationalist appearance, Schlick's theory resembles in important respects contemporary coherence theories of knowledge.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  4
    Lennart Åqvist in Memoriam.Åke Frändberg, Risto Hilpinen & Lars Lindahl - 2019 - Theoria 85 (5):345-349.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. The Semantics of Questions and the Theory of Inquiry.Risto Hilpinen - 1986 - Logique Et Analyse 29 (116):523-539.
  30.  7
    Remarks on the Iconicity and Interpretation of Existential Graphs.Risto Hilpinen - 2011 - Semiotica 2011 (186):169-187.
    In the 1890s, Peirce reformulated quantification theory by expressing it in a language of diagrams, called existential graphs. Peirce thought that the iconicity of his graphs made them suitable for analyzing logical reasoning. Iconic signs can be said to show their meaning, and this paper studies the ways in which graphs do this. Peirce's pragmatic analysis of propositions resembles game-theoretical semantics, and existential graphs show what they mean by displaying the structure of the semantic game for the proposition represented by (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  10
    E. J. Lemmon. If I Know, Do I Know That I Know? Epistemology, New Essays in the Theory of Knowledge, Edited by Avrum Stroll, Harper & Row, New York, Evanston, and London, 1967, Pp. 54–82. - Arthur C. Danto. On Knowing That We Know. Epistemology, New Essays in the Theory of Knowledge, Edited by Avrum Stroll, Harper & Row, New York, Evanston, and London, 1967, Pp. 32–53. [REVIEW]Risto Hilpinen - 1973 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (4):662.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  72
    Skepticism and Justification.Risto Hilpinen - 1983 - Synthese 55 (2):165 - 173.
    This paper discusses the skeptical argument presented by Keith Lehrer in his paper Why Not Scepticism?. It is argued that Lehrer's argument depends on unacceptable premises, and therefore fails to establish the skeptical conclusion. On the other hand, it is also shown that even if the skeptic's opponent (called a dogmatist) knows something, he may be unable to prove this in a way which could convince the skeptic; hence the difficulty of refuting skepticism. The paper also criticises Dretske's attempt to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33.  9
    Thomas Cornides. Ordinale Deontik. Zusammenhänge zwischen Präferenztheorie, Normlogik und Rechtstheorie. Forschungen aus Staat und Recht, no. 25. Springer-Verlag, Vienna and New York1974, X + 210 pp. [REVIEW]Risto Hilpinen - 1979 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (1):121-122.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. Some Remarks On Self-Deception: Mele, Moore And Lakatos.Risto Hilpinen - 2002 - Florida Philosophical Review 2 (1):82-97.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  35. New Studies in Deontic Logic. Norms, Actions and Foundations of Ethics.Risto Hilpinen - 1983 - Studia Logica 42 (1):110-111.
  36.  20
    On the Conditions of Causality.Risto Hilpinen - 1973 - Philosophical Studies 24 (6):386 - 391.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  37. Rules of Acceptance and Inductive Logic.Risto Hilpinen - 1971 - Synthese 22 (3):482-487.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  38.  7
    The Structure of Scientific Inference.Risto Hilpinen - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (15):485-491.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  39.  43
    Relational Hypotheses and Inductive Inference.Risto Hilpinen - 1971 - Synthese 23 (2-3):266 - 286.
    This paper discusses the probabilities of inductive generalizations in languages containing two-place predicates. The depth of the sentences considered here is restricted to two, that is, they contain at most two layers of quantifiers. The analysis of relational hypotheses presented below is based on the theory of distributive normal forms in first-order logic. The main purpose of this paper is not to present methods of calculating unique probability-values for various generalizations, but rather to clarify the general conceptual situation and concentrate (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  40.  54
    Rules of Acceptance, Indices of Lawlikeness, and Singular Inductive Inference: Reply to a Critical Discussion.Risto Hilpinen & Jaakko Hintikka - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (2):303-307.
  41.  32
    A Note on Necessary-and-Sufficient Causes.Risto Hilpinen - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 26 (5-6):447 - 448.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  42. Deontische Logik Und Semantik.Amedeo G. Conte, Risto Hilpinen, G. H. von Wright & Universität Bielefeld - 1977
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  43.  17
    Inquiry, Argumentation and Knowledge.Risto Hilpinen - 1991 - In André Fuhrmann & Michael Morreau (eds.), The Logic of Theory Change. Springer. pp. 1--18.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  44.  34
    International Union of History and Philosophy of Science Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science Bulletin No. 10.Risto Hilpinen - 1986 - Synthese 67 (2):381-382.
  45.  45
    Reviews. [REVIEW]Howard Smokler, R. Harré & Risto Hilpinen - 1971 - Synthese 23 (2-3):327-346.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  53
    On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's.Risto Hilpinen - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
    : This paper is a commentary on some topics discussed by Thomas Short in his recent book Peirce's Theory of Signs: Peirce's distinction between iconic and indexical signs, the objects of propositions, and different ways of interpreting the distinction between the immediate and dynamic objects of signs. Peirce's distinction between immediate and dynamic objects is in certain respects analogous to Alexius Meinong's distinction between the "auxiliary objects" and the "ultimate objects" ("target objects") of mental representations. It is suggested that the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  38
    On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs.Risto Hilpinen - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):610 - 618.
    This paper is a commentary on some topics discussed by Thomas Short in his recent book Peirce's Theory of Signs: Peirce's distinction between iconic and indexical signs, the objects of propositions, and different ways of interpreting the distinction between the immediate and dynamic objects of signs. Peirce's distinction between immediate and dynamic objects is in certain respects analogous to Alexius Meinong's distinction between the "auxiliary objects" and the "ultimate objects" ("target objects") of mental representations. It is suggested that the models (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  20
    Preface.Robert Demolombe & Risto Hilpinen - 2000 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):63-64.
  49.  46
    International Union of History and Philosophy of Science; Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science Bulletin No. 14.Risto Hilpinen - 1990 - Synthese 85 (1):179-183.
  50.  33
    Remarks on Personal and Impersonal Knowledge.Risto Hilpinen - 1977 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):1-9.
    THIS PAPER DISCUSSES A CONCEPT OF IMPERSONAL KNOWLEDGE ('Kp') SATISFYING THE PRINCIPLE ('K subscript a'p implies Kp), BUT NOT ITS CONVERSE. IT IS ARGUED THAT SEVERAL GETTIER-TYPE COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE CLASSICAL ANALYSIS KNOWLEDGE (ESPECIALLY THOSE DEPENDING UPON THE 'SOCIAL' ASPECT OF KNOWLEDGE) CAN BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN TERMS OF THE ABOVE PRINCIPLE.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 79