33 found
Order:
  1.  67
    Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.
    In the pragma-dialectical approach, fallacies are considered incorrect moves in a discussion for which the goal is successful resolution of a dispute. Ten rules are given for effective conduct at the various stages of such a critical discussion (confrontation, opening, argumentation, concluding). Fallacies are discussed as violations of these rules, taking into account all speech acts which are traditionally recognized as fallacies. Special attention is paid to the role played by implicitness in fallacies in everyday language use. It is stressed (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  2.  21
    Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 271-291.
  3.  15
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.Rob Grootendorst, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 2015 - Springer Verlag.
    Some conspicuous characteristics of argumentation as we all know this phenomenon from our shared everyday experiences are in my view vital to its theoretical treatment because they should have methodological consequences for the way in which argumentation research is conducted. To start with, argumentation is in the first place a communicative act complex, which is realized by making functional verbal communicative moves.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  4.  31
    Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.FransH Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):271-291.
    Starting from a concept of reasonableness as well-consideredness, it is discussed in what way science could serve as a model for reasonable argumentation. It turns out that in order to be reasonable two requirements have to be fulfilled. The argumentation should comply with rules which are both problem-valid and intersubjectively valid. Geometrical and anthropological perspectives don't meet these criteria, but a critical perspective does. It is explained that a pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation which agrees with this critical perspective is indeed (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  5.  71
    Relevance Reviewed: The Case of Argumentum Ad Hominem. [REVIEW]Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):141-159.
    This article aims tt providing some conceptual tools for dealing adequately with relevance in argumentative discourse. For this purpose, argumentative relevance is defined as a functional interactional relation between certain elements in the discourse. In addition to the distinction between interpretive and evaluative relevance that can be traced in the literature, analytic relevance is introduced as an intermediary concept. In order to classify the various problems of relevance arising in interpreting, analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse, a taxonomy is proposed in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  6.  17
    Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectic Perspective.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 2 (2):271-92.
    Starting from a concept of reasonableness as well-consideredness, it is discussed in what way science could serve as a model for reasonable argumentation. It turns out that in order to be reasonable two requirements have to be fulfilled. The argumentation should comply with rules which are both problem-valid and intersubjectively valid. Geometrical and anthropological perspectives don't meet these criteria, but a critical perspective does. It is explained that a pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation which agrees with this critical perspective is indeed (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  7. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments.Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Ralph H. Johnson, Christian Plantin & Charles A. Willard - 1996 - Routledge.
    Argumentation theory is a distinctly multidisciplinary field of inquiry. It draws its data, assumptions, and methods from disciplines as disparate as formal logic and discourse analysis, linguistics and forensic science, philosophy and psychology, political science and education, sociology and law, and rhetoric and artificial intelligence. This presents the growing group of interested scholars and students with a problem of access, since it is even for those active in the field not common to have acquired a familiarity with relevant aspects of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  8.  26
    Rules for Argumentation in Dialogues.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 499-510.
  9.  22
    Perelman and the Fallacies.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1995 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (2):122-133.
  10.  16
    Editors' Introduction.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):137-139.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  11.  40
    A Pragma-Dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):365-386.
    According to the pragma-dialectical ideal of reasonableness, in case of a difference of opinion the protagonist and the antagonist of a standpoint should attempt to find out by means of a critical discussion whether the protagonist's standpoint is capable of withstanding the antagonist's criticism. In this paper, the authors formulate the latest version of their basic rules for the performance of speech acts in the various stages that can beanalytically distinguished in a critical discussion that can lead to the resolution (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  12.  11
    Everyday Argumentation From a Speech Act Perspective.Rob Grootendorst - forthcoming - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13.  51
    Rules for Argumentation in Dialogues.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):499-510.
    In this article it is pointed out what kind of rules for communication and argumentation are required in order to make it possible to resolve disputes in an orderly way. In section 2, Gricean maxims and Searlean speech act conditions are integrated in such a way that five general rules for communication can be formulated. In section 3, starting from Lewis's definition of convention, it is argued that the interactional effect of accepting is conventionally linked with the complex communicative act (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  14.  28
    Speech Act Conditions as Tools for Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse.FransH Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):367-383.
    According to the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation, for analysing argumentative discourse, a normative reconstruction is required which encompasses four kinds of transformations. It is explained in this paper how speech act conditions can play a part in carrying out such a reconstruction. It is argued that integrating Searlean insights concerning speech acts with Gricean insights concerning conversational maxims can provide us with the necessary tools. For this, the standard theory of speech acts has to be amended in several respects and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  15.  18
    Speech Act Conditions as Tools for Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):367-383.
    According to the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation, for analysing argumentative discourse, a normative reconstruction is required which encompasses four kinds of transformations. It is explained in this paper how speech act conditions can play a part in carrying out such a reconstruction. It is argued that integrating Searlean insights concerning speech acts with Gricean insights concerning conversational maxims can provide us with the necessary tools. For this, the standard theory of speech acts has to be amended in several respects and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  16. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective on Norms.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1991 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 24 (1):25-42.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  35
    Ruth Abbey, Ed., Charles Taylor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004). Thomas Baldwin, Ed., The Cambridge History of Philosophy (1870-1945)(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004). [REVIEW]Eric Bronson, Jeffrey Bloechl, Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Francois Raffoul, John Llewelyn, David Sedley & Jordan Howard Sobel - 2004 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 25 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  26
    Argumentation and Speech Act Theory.FransH Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):341-343.
  19. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analysing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. They develop a method for the reconstruction of argumentative discourse that takes into account all aspects that are relevant to a critical assessment. They also propose a practical code of behaviour (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations  
  20. Analyzing Argumentative Discourse.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  21. A Pragma-Dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
  22. From Analysis to Presentation: A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Writing Argumentative Texts.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Making the Best of Argumentative Discourse.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. The History of the Argumentum Ad Hominem Since the Seventeenth Century.Rob Grootendorst & Frans van Eemeren - 2015 - In Rob Grootendorst, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  25. The Speech Acts of Arguing and Convincing in Externalized Discussions.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  26. The Skill of Identifying Argumentation.Bert Meuffels, Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Bert Meuffels, Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  27. Student Performance in Identifying Unexpressed Premisses and Argumentation Schemes.Ron Oostdam, Rob Grootendorst, Kees Glopper, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Ron Oostdam, Rob Grootendorst, Kees Glopper, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse 1st ed. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  28. Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation.Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst & A. Francisca Sn Henkemans - 2015 - Routledge.
    This book concentrates on argumentation as it emerges in ordinary discourse, whether the discourse is institutionalized or strictly informal. Crucial concepts from the theory of argumentation are systematically discussed and explained with the help of examples from real-life discourse and texts. The basic principles are explained that are instrumental in the analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse. Methodical instruments are offered for identifying differences of opinion, analyzing and evaluating argumentation and presenting arguments in oral and written discourse. In addition, the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  29. Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline, Proceedings of the Conference on Argumentation 1986.Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair & Charles A. Willard - 1990 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 23 (1):70-75.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Argumentation Illuminated.Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair & Charles A. Willard - 1994 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 27 (2):169-172.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments.Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1998 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 31 (1):71-74.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  32. Perspectives and Approaches, Analysis and Evaluation, Reconstruction and Application, Special Fields and Cases.Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair & Charles A. Willard - 1998 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 31 (2):170-173.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation. Volumes 1A and 1B.Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair & Charles A. Willard - 1994 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 27 (2):163-169.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark