44 found
Order:
See also
Profile: Robert J. Matthews (Rutgers University - New Brunswick)
  1.  69
    The Measure of Mind: Propositional Attitudes and Their Attribution.J. Matthews Robert - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
    A prospective introduction -- The received view -- Troubles with the received view -- Are propositional attitudes relations? -- Foundations of a measurement-theoretic account of the attitudes -- The basic measurement-theoretic account -- Elaboration and explication of the proposed measurement-theoretic account.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  2.  3
    On the Hypothesis That Grammars Are Mentally Represented.William Demopoulos & Robert J. Matthews - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3):405.
  3.  94
    Doing Cognitive Neuroscience: A Third Way.Frances Egan & Robert J. Matthews - 2006 - Synthese 153 (3):377-391.
    The “top-down” and “bottom-up” approaches have been thought to exhaust the possibilities for doing cognitive neuroscience. We argue that neither approach is likely to succeed in providing a theory that enables us to understand how cognition is achieved in biological creatures like ourselves. We consider a promising third way of doing cognitive neuroscience, what might be called the “neural dynamic systems” approach, that construes cognitive neuroscience as an autonomous explanatory endeavor, aiming to characterize in its own terms the states and (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  4.  94
    The Measure of Mind.Robert J. Matthews - 1994 - Mind 103 (410):131-46.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  5.  81
    Measurement-Theoretic Accounts of Propositional Attitudes.Robert J. Matthews - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (11):828-841.
    In the late 1970s and early 1980s a number of philosophers, notably Churchland, Field, Stalnaker, Dennett, and Davidson, began to argue that propositional attitude predicates are a species of measure predicate, analogous in important ways to numerical predicates by which we attribute physical magnitudes . Other philosophers, including myself, have subsequently developed the idea in greater detail. In this paper I sketch the general outlines of measurement‐theoretic accounts of propositional attitudes, explaining in the briefest terms the basic idea of such (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  53
    Three-Concept Monte: Explanation, Implementation, and Systematicity.Robert J. Matthews - 1994 - Synthese 101 (3):347-63.
    Fodor and Pylyshyn (1988), Fodor and McLaughlin (1990) and McLaughlin (1993) challenge connectionists to explain systematicity without simply implementing a classical architecture. In this paper I argue that what makes the challenge difficult for connectionists to meet has less to do with what is to be explained than with what is to count as an explanation. Fodor et al. are prepared to admit as explanatory, accounts of a sort that only classical models can provide. If connectionists are to meet the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  7.  49
    Knowledge of Language and Linguistic Competence.Robert J. Matthews - 2006 - Philosophical Issues 16 (1):200–220.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  8.  27
    Could Competent Speakers Really Be Ignorant of Their Language?Robert J. Matthews - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):457-467.
    This paper defends the commonsense conception of linguistic competence according to which linguistic competence involves propositional knowledge of language. More specifically, the paper defends three propositions challenged by Devitt in his Ignorance af Language. First, Chomskian linguists were right to embrace this commonsense conception of linguistic cornpetence. Second, the grammars that these linguists propose make a substantive claim about the computational processes that are presumed to constitute a speaker’s linguistic competence. Third, Chomskian linguistics is indeed a subfield of psychology, in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9. The Chomskyan Turn.Robert J. Matthews - 1991 - Blackwell.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  10.  36
    Measurement and Computational Skepticism.Robert J. Matthews & Eli Dresner - 2016 - Noûs 50 (1).
    Putnam and Searle famously argue against computational theories of mind on the skeptical ground that there is no fact of the matter as to what mathematical function a physical system is computing: both conclude that virtually any physical object computes every computable function, implements every program or automaton. There has been considerable discussion of Putnam's and Searle's arguments, though as yet there is little consensus as to what, if anything, is wrong with these arguments. In the present paper we show (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  46
    Cowie's Anti-Nativism.Robert J. Matthews - 2001 - Mind and Language 16 (2):215-230.
  12. Literary Works and Institutional Practices.Robert J. Matthews - 1981 - British Journal of Aesthetics 21 (1):39-49.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  4
    Measurement and Computational Skepticism.Robert J. Matthews & Eli Dresner - 2016 - Noûs.
    Putnam and Searle famously argue against computational theories of mind on the skeptical ground that there is no fact of the matter as to what mathematical function a physical system is computing: both conclude that virtually any physical object computes every computable function, implements every program or automaton. There has been considerable discussion of Putnam's and Searle's arguments, though as yet there is little consensus as to what, if anything, is wrong with these arguments. In the present paper we show (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. The Case for Linguistic Nativism.Robert J. Matthews - 2006 - In Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Malden MA: Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. Does Linguistic Competence Require Knowledge of Language?Robert J. Matthews - 2003 - In Alex Barber (ed.), Epistemology of Language. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16. Philosophy of Linguistics.John Collins, Robert J. Matthews, Barry C. Smith & Brian Epstein - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22).
  17.  60
    Can Connectionists Explain Systematicity?Robert J. Matthews - 1997 - Mind and Language 12 (2):154-77.
  18.  10
    Concerning a 'Linguistic Theory' of Metaphor.Robert J. Matthews - 1971 - Foundations of Language 7 (3):413-425.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  19.  33
    Are the Grammatical Sentences of a Language a Recursive Set?Robert J. Matthews - 1979 - Synthese 40 (2):209 - 224.
    Many believe that the grammatical sentences of a natural language are a recursive set. In this paper I argue that the commonly adduced grounds for this belief are inconclusive, if not simply unsound. Neither the native speaker's ability to classify sentences nor his ability to comprehend them requires it. Nor is there at present any reason to think that decidability has any bearing on first-language acquisition. I conclude that there are at present no compelling theoretical grounds for requiring that transformational (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  20.  2
    Cowie&Rsquos Anti-Nativism.Robert J. Matthews - 2001 - Mind and Language 16 (2):215-230.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  23
    The Plausibility of Rationalism.Robert J. Matthews - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy 81 (9):492-515.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  16
    Describing and Interpreting a Work of Art.Robert J. Matthews - 1977 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (1):5-14.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  23.  2
    The Elusive Case for Relationalism About the Attitudes: Reply to Rattan.Robert J. Matthews - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (2):453-462.
    The question I address here is whether there is anything about what Rattan describes as the normative and perspectival aspects of propositional attitudes that demands a relational account of the attitudes, specifically anything that cannot equally well be explained on measurement-theoretic accounts of the sort that I (and others) have defended which do not incorporate or presume a cognitive relation to a proposition. I argue that there is not.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Psychological Reality of Grammars.Robert J. Matthews - 1991 - In The Chomskyan Turn. Blackwell. pp. 182--200.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25. Is There Vindication Through Representationalism?Robert J. Matthews - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  3
    Language Learning Versus Grammar Growth.Robert J. Matthews - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):25.
  27. Perceptual Individualism: Reply to Burge [1988].Robert J. Matthews - 1988 - In R. H. Grimm & D. D. Merrill (eds.), Contents of Thought. University of Arizona Press.
  28.  5
    Two Remarks on the Characterization of IBBs.Robert J. Matthews - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (2):239.
  29.  4
    Can Connectionists Explain Systematicity?Robert J. Matthews - 1997 - Mind and Language 12 (2):154-177.
  30.  11
    Epistemic Heresies.Robert J. Matthews - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):45-55.
    Elaborating on views I have expressed elsewhere, I argue that the common-sense notion of linguistic competence as a kind of knowledge is both required by common-sense explanatory and justificatory practice and furthermore fully compatible with the non-intentional characterization of linguistic competence provided by current linguistic theory, which is itself non-intentional.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  19
    Traditional Aesthetics Defended.Robert J. Matthews - 1979 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 38 (1):39-50.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  6
    Does Cognitive Science Need “Real” Intentionality?Robert J. Matthews - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):616-617.
  33.  6
    Connectionism and Systematicity.Robert J. Matthews - 2003 - In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group.
  34.  2
    The Plausibility of Rationalism.Robert J. Matthews - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy 81 (9):492.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  9
    Arthur F. Smullyan 1912-1998.Robert J. Matthews & Laurent Stern - 1999 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 72 (5):216 - 217.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  11
    The Alleged Evidence for Representationalism.Robert J. Matthews - 1989 - In Stuart Silvers (ed.), Rerepresentation. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  5
    Troubles with Representationalism.Robert J. Matthews - 1984 - Social Research 51:1065-97.
  38.  8
    Explaining and Explanation.Robert J. Matthews - 1981 - American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (1):71 - 77.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  10
    Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Robert J. Matthews - 1992 - Mind 101 (403):576-578.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  3
    Book Review:Inquiries and Provocations: Selected Writings, 1929-1974 Herbert Feigl. [REVIEW]Robert J. Matthews - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (2):339-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  3
    The Act of Interpretation: A Critique of Literary Reason (Review).Robert J. Matthews - 1980 - Philosophy and Literature 4 (1):141-142.
  42. "Belief, Language, and Experience" by Rodney Needham. [REVIEW]Robert J. Matthews - 1974 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 4 (1):91.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Interpretation and Understanding: An Essay in Philosophical Metacriticism.Robert J. Matthews - 1974 - Dissertation, Cornell University
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Philosophical Hermeneutics.Robert J. Matthews, Hans-Georg Gadamer & David E. Linge - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (1):114.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography