21 found
Order:
  1.  1
    Interpreting Wittgenstein: A Cloud of Philosophy, a Drop of Grammar.Ronald SUTER - 1989 - Temple University Press.
  2.  25
    The Early Wittgenstein on Happiness.Ronald Suter - 1989 - International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (3):291-299.
  3.  67
    Russell's "Refutation" of Meinong in "On Denoting".Ronald Suter - 1967 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (4):512-516.
    The author replies to ronald suter's "russell's 'refutation' of meinong in 'on denoting'," "philosophy and phenomenological research," june, 1967. suter's interpretation of one of russell's arguments is criticized on exegetical grounds, and his defense of another argument is rebutted on logical grounds. meinong's thesis is presented as the thesis that all statements of a certain form are true. it is argued that all of russell's arguments are attempts to pose counter-examples to this single view. meinong is defended against russell's counter-examples.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4. Are You Moral?Ronald Suter - 1984 - Upa.
    To find more information about Rowman and Littlefield titles, please visit www.rowmanlittlefield.com.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  7
    Memorial Minutes.Charles McCracken & Ronald Suter - 2005 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 79 (2):123 - 124.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Augustine on Time with Some Criticisms From Wittgenstein.Ronald Suter - 1962 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 16 (61/62):378-394.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  15
    Characteristics of Criteria.Ronald Suter - 1990 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 2:195-202.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Clarifying the Question, "What is This Thing Called Love?".Ronald Suter - 2011 - In Adrianne Leigh McEvoy (ed.), Sex, Love, and Friendship: Studies of the Society for the Philosophy of Sex and Love: 1993-2003. Rodopi.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Disolviendo el Argumento del Sueño.Ronald Suter - 1978 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 13 (31):73.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Enunciados de identidad e implicaciones existenciales.Ronald Suter - 1969 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 6 (15):101.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  5
    George Kerner, 1927-2001.Ronald Suter - 2002 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 75 (5):195 - 196.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  10
    Isenberg's Answer to the Problem of Taste.Ronald Suter - 1971 - NTU Philosophical Review 1:104-121.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Moore's Defense of the Rule 'Do No Murder'.Ronald Suter - 1973 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 54 (4):361.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14. Solipsism as a Case Study in Philosophical Methodology.Ronald Suter - 1967 - Dissertation, Stanford University
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  28
    Strawson's Analysis of Identity Statements.Ronald Suter - 1971 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 31 (4):597-599.
    THIS PAPER DISCUSSES TWO THINGS. FIRST, STRAWSON'S EXPLANATION IN "ON REFERRING" ("MIND," 1950) WHY TWO USES OF SENTENCES OF THE FORM NN=NN MUST DIFFER FROM THOSE OF THE FORM NN=THE F, WHERE 'NN' AND 'THE F' ARE PROPER NAMES AND DEFINITE DESCRIPTIONS, RESPECTIVELY. IT IS SHOWN THAT HIS ACCOUNT OF THE MATTER HAS UNACCEPTABLE CONSEQUENCES. SECONDLY, IT IS DEMONSTRATED THAT HIS EXPLANATION OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SENTENCES OF THE FORM NN=THE F AND THOSE OF THE FORM NN IS (AN) F (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  34
    Sum is a Logical Consequence of Cogito.Ronald Suter - 1971 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 32 (2):235-240.
    HINTIKKA ("COGITO, ERGO SUM: INFERENCE OR PERFORMANCE?") WISHES TO REJECT (1) IF B(A) THEN THERE EXISTS X SUCH THAT X=A, POINTING OUT THAT IT WOULD CEASE TO BE PROVABLE IN QUANTIFICATION THEORY IF LOGICIANS DROPPED THE DUBIOUS ASSUMPTION THAT (2) ALL THE SINGULAR TERMS WITH WHICH WE HAVE TO DEAL DESIGNATE SOME ACTUALLY EXISTING INDIVIDUAL. HE ALSO ARGUES FOR THE FALSITY OF (3) THINKING ENTAILS EXISTENCE. WILLIAMS ("THE CERTAINTY OF THE COGITO") CONTENDS THAT DESCARTES INFERRED 'I EXIST' FROM 'I THINK' (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  27
    Statements of Identity and Existential Commitments.Ronald Suter - 1969 - Mind 78 (310):262-265.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  63
    Saul Wittgenstein's Skeptical Paradox.Ronald Suter - 1986 - Philosophical Research Archives 12:183-193.
    Saul Kripke is struck by a skeptical argument which he says is neither Wittgenstein’s nor his own. I call this new skeptic “Saul Wittgenstein”. SW’s conclusion is that there is no such thing as following a rule. My first aim is to show that Kripke misunderstands the Investigations when he says it offers a “skeptical solution” to SW’s paradox. Wittgenstein’s view of philosophy commits him to a dissolution of the paradox. I show next that LW’s writing contains an implicit dissolution (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  16
    Saul Wittgenstein’s Skeptical Paradox.Ronald Suter - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12:183-193.
    Saul Kripke is struck by a skeptical argument which he says is neither Wittgenstein’s nor his own. I call this new skeptic “Saul Wittgenstein”. SW’s conclusion is that there is no such thing as following a rule. My first aim is to show that Kripke misunderstands the Investigations when he says it offers a “skeptical solution” to SW’s paradox. Wittgenstein’s view of philosophy commits him to a dissolution of the paradox. I show next that LW’s writing contains an implicit dissolution (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  9
    Saul Wittgenstein’s Skeptical Paradox.Ronald Suter - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12:183-193.
    Saul Kripke is struck by a skeptical argument which he says is neither Wittgenstein’s nor his own. I call this new skeptic “Saul Wittgenstein”. SW’s conclusion is that there is no such thing as following a rule. My first aim is to show that Kripke misunderstands the Investigations when he says it offers a “skeptical solution” to SW’s paradox. Wittgenstein’s view of philosophy commits him to a dissolution of the paradox. I show next that LW’s writing contains an implicit dissolution (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  38
    The Dream Argument.Ronald Suter - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (3):185 - 194.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark