Order:
  1.  24
    Expanding the use of posthumous assisted reproduction technique: Should the deceased’s parents be allowed to use his sperm?Efrat Ram-Tiktin, Roy Gilbar, Ronit B. Fruchter, Ido Ben-Ami, Shevach Friedler & Einat Shalom-Paz - 2018 - Clinical Ethics 14 (1):18-25.
    The posthumous retrieval and use of gametes is socially, ethically, and legally controversial. In the countries that do not prohibit the practice, posthumous assisted reproduction is usually permitted only at the request of the surviving spouse and only when the deceased left written consent. This paper presents the recommendations of an ethics committee established by the Israeli Fertility Association. In its discussions, the committee addressed the ethical considerations of posthumous use of sperm—even in the absence of written consent from the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  61
    The medical decision-making process and the family: The case of breast cancer patients and their husbands.Roy Gilbar & Ora Gilbar - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (3):183-192.
    Objectives: The objectives of the study were to assess similarities and differences between breast cancer patients and their husbands in terms of doctor-patient/spouse relationships and shared decision making; and to investigate the association between breast cancer patients and husbands in terms of preference of type of doctor, doctor-patient relationship, and shared decision making regarding medical treatment. Method: Fifty-seven women with breast cancer, and their husbands, completed questionnaires measuring doctor-patient/spouse relationships, and decision making regarding medical treatment. Results: Patients believe they have (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  20
    Solidarity as a Theoretical Framework for Posthumous Assisted Reproduction and the Case of Bereaved Parents.Efrat Ram-Tiktin & Roy Gilbar - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (2):501-517.
    Bioethicists, medical professionals and lawyers who support Posthumous Assisted Reproduction as an ethical procedure in the case of the deceased’s spouse often oppose it in the case of the deceased’s parents. In addition, supporters of PAR usually rely on an individualistic version of liberalism, thus focusing on a personal rather than relational approach to autonomy. This article proposes an alternative and comprehensive theoretical framework for the practice of PAR, based on the concepts of solidarity and relational autonomy. By analyzing empirical (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  12
    Companions or patients? The impact of family presence in genetic consultations for inherited breast cancer: Relational autonomy in practice.Roy Gilbar & Sivia Barnoy - 2018 - Bioethics 32 (6):378-387.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5. The end-of-life decision-making process in Israel : bioethics, law and the practice of doctors.Roy Gilbar & Nili Karako-Eyal - 2018 - In Hagai Boas, Shai Joshua Lavi, Yael Hashiloni-Dolev, Dani Filc & Nadav Davidovitch (eds.), Bioethics and biopolitics in Israel: socio-legal, political and empirical analysis. Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  10
    Erratum to: Companions or patients? The impact of family presence in genetic consultations for inherited breast cancer: Relational autonomy in practice.Roy Gilbar & Sivia Barnoy - 2018 - Bioethics 32 (9):643-643.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark