Order:
Disambiguations
Steven P. Tipper [16]S. Tipper [1]Steven Tipper [1]
  1.  23
    Affective Evaluations of Objects Are Influenced by Observed Gaze Direction and Emotional Expression.A. BAyliss, A. Frischen, M. Fenske & S. Tipper - 2007 - Cognition 104 (3):644-653.
    Gaze direction signals another person’s focus of interest. Facial expressions convey information about their mental state. Appropriate responses to these signals should reflect their combined influence, yet current evidence suggests that gaze-cueing effects for objects near an observed face are not modulated by its emotional expression. Here, we extend the investigation of perceived gaze direction and emotional expression by considering their combined influence on affective judgments. While traditional response-time measures revealed equal gaze-cueing effects for happy and disgust faces, affective evaluations (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  2.  11
    Bound Together: Social Binding Leads to Faster Processing, Spatial Distortion, and Enhanced Memory of Interacting Partners.Tim Vestner, Steven P. Tipper, Tom Hartley, Harriet Over & Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer - 2019 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 148 (7):1251-1268.
  3.  19
    Seeing the World Through Another Person’s Eyes: Simulating Selective Attention Via Action Observation.Alexandra Frischen, Daniel Loach & Steven P. Tipper - 2009 - Cognition 111 (2):212-218.
  4.  32
    Crossmodal and Action-Specific: Neuroimaging the Human Mirror Neuron System.Nikolaas N. Oosterhof, Steven P. Tipper & Paul E. Downing - 2013 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (7):311-318.
  5.  23
    An Electromyographic Investigation of the Impact of Task Relevance on Facial Mimicry.Peter R. Cannon, Amy E. Hayes & Steven P. Tipper - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (5):918-929.
  6.  25
    Sensorimotor Fluency Influences Affect: Evidence From Electromyography.Peter R. Cannon, Amy E. Hayes & Steven P. Tipper - 2010 - Cognition and Emotion 24 (4):681-691.
  7.  9
    Orienting Attention Via Observed Gaze Shift Evokes Longer Term Inhibitory Effects: Implications for Social Interactions, Attention, and Memory.Alexandra Frischen & Steven P. Tipper - 2004 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 (4):516-533.
  8.  7
    Implicit Action Encoding Influences Personal-Trait Judgments.Patric Bach & Steven P. Tipper - 2007 - Cognition 102 (2):151-178.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  9.  34
    Orienting of Attention Via Observed Eye Gaze is Head-Centred.Andrew P. Bayliss, Giuseppe di Pellegrino & Steven P. Tipper - 2004 - Cognition 94 (1):1-10.
    Observing averted eye gaze results in the automatic allocation of attention to the gazed-at location. The role of the orientation of the face that produces the gaze cue was investigated. The eyes in the face could look left or right in a head-centred frame, but the face itself could be oriented 90 degrees clockwise or anticlockwise such that the eyes were gazing up or down. Significant cueing effects to targets presented to the left or right of the screen were found (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  10.  7
    Less Attentional Selectivity as a Result of Declining Inhibition in Older Adults.Steven P. Tipper - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (1):45-47.
  11.  23
    I Want to Help You, but I Am Not Sure Why: Gaze-Cuing Induces Altruistic Giving.Robert D. Rogers, Andrew P. Bayliss, Anna Szepietowska, Laura Dale, Lydia Reeder, Gloria Pizzamiglio, Karolina Czarna, Judi Wakeley, Phillip J. Cowen & Steven P. Tipper - 2014 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143 (2):763-777.
  12.  17
    Self-Generated Cognitive Fluency as an Alternative Route to Preference Formation.Merryn D. Constable, Andrew P. Bayliss, Steven P. Tipper & Ada Kritikos - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (1):47-52.
    People tend to prefer fluently processed over harder to process information. In this study we examine two issues concerning fluency and preference. First, previous research has pre-selected fluent and non-fluent materials. We did not take this approach yet show that the fluency of individuals’ idiosyncratic on-line interactions with a given stimulus can influence preference formation. Second, while processing fluency influences preference, the opposite also may be true: preferred stimuli could be processed more fluently than non-preferred. Participants performed a visual search (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  17
    Vulnerability to Depression is Associated with a Failure to Acquire Implicit Social Appraisals.Andrew P. Bayliss, Steven P. Tipper, Judi Wakeley, Phillip J. Cowen & Robert D. Rogers - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (4):825-833.
  14. No Convincing Evidence Outgroups Are Denied Uniquely Human Characteristics: Distinguishing Intergroup Preference From Trait-Based Dehumanization.Florence E. Enock, Jonathan C. Flavell, Steven P. Tipper & Harriet Over - 2021 - Cognition 212:104682.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  10
    Early or Late Selection? Still an Open Issue.Steven P. Tipper - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (2):255-255.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  8
    The Effects of Practice on Mechanisms of Attention.Steven P. Tipper, Thomas Eissenberg & Bruce Weaver - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (1):77-80.
  17.  11
    The Impact of Social Gaze Perception on Attention.Steven Tipper & Andrew Bayliss - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press.
    This article reviews research into the attention mechanisms underlying a critical behavior in social interactions. It discusses findings from studies that investigate social gaze as a cue to attention and considers the perceptual mechanisms that may underlie these effects and their possible social functions. There is still debate as to whether gaze stimuli are “special” in terms of the attention processes engaged. However, there is evidence for the distinctive nature of gaze cues in their involvement in other aspects of social (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Searching for People: Non-Facing Distractor Pairs Hinder the Visual Search of Social Scenes More Than Facing Distractor Pairs.Tim Vestner, Harriet Over, Katie L. H. Gray, Steven P. Tipper & Richard Cook - 2021 - Cognition 214:104737.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark