169 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Sandra B. Rosenthal [169]Sandra Brener Rosenthal [1]
  1. William T. Harris, Vincent Colapietro, Lewis S. Ford, Michael Forest, Rajesh Sampath, Sandra B. Rosenthal, Bruce Wilshire & Julien S. Murphy (2002). Editorial Announcement on the Speculative V. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 16 (4).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  66
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2005). Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):137 - 148.
    . Atomic individualism is embedded in most definitions of stakeholder theory, and as a result, stakeholders are not integral to the basic identity of the corporation which is considered to be independent of, and separate from, its stakeholders. Feminist theory has been suggested as a way of developing a more relational view of the corporation and its stakeholders, but it lacks a systematically developed conceptual framework for undergirding its own insights. Pragmatic philosophy is offered as a way of providing this (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  3.  61
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2000). Rethinking Business Ethics: A Pragmatic Approach. Oxford University Press.
    Using classical American pragmatism, the authors provide a philosophical framework for rethinking the nature of the corporation--how it is embedded in its natural, technological, cultural, and international environments, emphasizing throughout its pervasive relational and moral dimensions. They explore the relationship of this framework to other contemporary business ethics perspectives, as well as its implications for moral leadership in business and business education.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  4. Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (1998). Business Ethics the Pragmatic Path Beyond Principles to Process.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  5. Sandra B. Rosenthal (2000). News From Abroad. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 14 (1):62-66.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  15
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1988). Heidegger and Peirce. Southwest Philosophy Review 4 (1):103-110.
    In both the phenomenological ontology of Martin Heidegger and the pragmatism of Charles Peirce, the rejection of the Kantian phenomenal/noumenal distinction leads to a rejection of the alternatives of realism or idealism as well. In their respective denials of such an existential or ontological gap between appearance or phenomena and the ontologically real, they each establish a fundamental intentional unity between man and world which cannot be understood within the framework of realism or of idealism and which reveals deeply rooted (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  6
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1994). Charles Peirce's Pragmatic Pluralism. State University of New York Press.
    This work runs counter to the traditional interpretations of Peirce's philosophy by eliciting an inherent strand of pragmatic pluralism that is embedded in the very core of his thought and that weaves his various doctrines into a systematic ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  8.  41
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2006). Integrating Ethics All the Way Through: The Issue of Moral Agency Reconsidered. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2-3):233-239.
    Integrating "ethics all the way through" an organization suggests that the issue of moral agency and the corporation be reconsidered. Is the corporation a moral agent in some sense or is it no more than the people who are a part of the organization? Views which stress the role of the individual lose sight of the whole corporate entity, and views which think of the corporation as a collective lose sight of the individual. A view which rejects both these alternatives (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  38
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2005). The Spirit of Entrepreneurship and the Qualities of Moral Decision Making: Toward A Unifying Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 60 (3):307-315.
    At the heart of entrepreneurship are imagination, creativity, novelty, and sensitivity. It takes these qualities to develop a new product or service and bring it to market, to envision the possible impacts a new product may make and come up with novel and creative solutions to problems that may arise. These qualities go to make up what could be called the spirit of entrepreneurship, a spirit that involves the ability to handle the experimental nature of entrepreunerial activity. These same qualities (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  5
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Patrick L. Bourgeois (1991). Mead and Merleau-Ponty: Toward a Common Vision. State University of New York Press.
    Unites George Herbert Mead and Maurice Merleau-Ponty in a shared rejection of substance philosophy as well as spectator theory of knowledge, in favor of a focus on the ultimacy of temporal process and the constitutive function of social praxis.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  11.  55
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2004). Stakeholder Theory and Public Policy: How Governments Matter. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):143-153.
    The Social Issues in Management Division has had a long history of research into various aspects of governmental influences on business. Recent years, however, have seen stakeholder theory sort of sweep the field, and under a stakeholder theory of capitalism, governments will matter less then they have in the past as stakeholder principles are implemented throughout the corporate world. This article will examine the nature of this claim by discussing problems with the implementation of stakeholder theory and examining the role (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  12.  1
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2007). C. I. Lewis in Focus: The Pulse of Pragmatism. Indiana University Press.
    C. I. Lewis was one of the most important thinkers of his generation. In this book, Sandra B. Rosenthal explores Lewis’s philosophical vision, and links his thought to the traditions of classical American pragmatism. Tracing Lewis’s influences, she explains the central concepts informing his thinking and how he developed a unique and practical vision of the human experience. She shows how Lewis contributed to the enrichment and expansion of pragmatism, opening new paths of constructive dialogue with other traditions. This book (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13.  11
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Rogene A. Buchholz (2000). The Empirical-Normative Split in Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (2):399-408.
    The empirical-normative split in business ethics is another manifestation of the fact-value problem that has existed betweenscience and philosophy for several centuries. This paper explores classical American pragmatism’s understanding of the fact-valuedistinction, showing how it offers a different way of understanding the empirical business ethics–normative business ethics issue.Unfolding the pragmatic perspective on this issue involves a focus on its understanding of both the nature of empirical inquiry and thenature of normative inquiry.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  14. Sandra B. Rosenthal (2003). A Time for Being Ethical: Levinas and Pragmatism. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 17 (3):192-203.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  25
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2008). The Unholy Alliance of Business and Science. Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):199-206.
    This paper will build on a recent article appearing in the Harvard Business Review that blamed the alleged crisis in management education on the scientific model that has been adopted as the sole means of gaining knowledge about human behavior and organizations. The solution, they argue, is for business schools to realize that business management is not a scientific discipline but a profession, and deal with the things a professional education requires. We will expand on this article and discuss its (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Paul Fairfield, James Scott Johnston, Tom Rockmore, James A. Good, Jim Garrison, Barry Allen, Joseph Margolis, Sandra B. Rosenthal, Richard J. Bernstein, David Vessey, C. G. Prado, Colin Koopman, Antonio Calcagno & Inna Semetsky (2010). John Dewey and Continental Philosophy. Southern Illinois University Press.
    _John Dewey and Continental Philosophy_ provides a rich sampling of exchanges that could have taken place long ago between the traditions of American pragmatism and continental philosophy had the lines of communication been more open between Dewey and his European contemporaries. Since they were not, Paul Fairfield and thirteen of his colleagues seek to remedy the situation by bringing the philosophy of Dewey into conversation with several currents in continental philosophical thought, from post-Kantian idealism and the work of Friedrich Nietzsche (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  11
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1986). Speculative Pragmatism. Open Court.
    Introduction CLASSICAL American pragmatism represents a historical period in American philosophy, spanning a particular time frame and including the ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  18.  30
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1979). Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence Between Charles S. Peirce and Lady Victoria Welby. Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (4):487-487.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  22
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1969). The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis. Southern Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):193-203.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2005). Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):137-148.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  13
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2001). A Philosophical Framework for Case Studies. Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):25 - 31.
    People who teach business ethics seem locked between two general approaches: an applied philosophy approach that emphasizes the application of abstract ethical theories and principles to specific cases, and the case method approach that leaves the students without any more general theoretical framework with which to approach ethical issues. Classical American Pragmatism, understood as a school of philosophical thought, links these two approaches by providing a new grounding for moral theory in which moral rules are understood as working hypotheses abstracted (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  34
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1981). C. I. Lewis and The Structure of Perceptual Beliefs. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 30:97-105.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  12
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Rogene A. Buchhholz (1998). Bridging Environmental and Business Ethics: A Pragmatic Framework. Environmental Ethics 20 (4):393-408.
    In the last few years, some attempts have been made to overcome the disparity between environmental ethics and business ethics. However, as the situation now stands the various positions in business ethics have not incorporated any well-developed theoretical foundation for environmental issues, and conversely, environmental ethics is failing to capture an audience that could profit greatly from utilizing its theoretical insights and research. In this paper, we attempt to provide a unified conceptual framework for business ethics and environmental ethics that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24.  18
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1988). The Ultimate Logical Interpretant and the Dynamical Object. Semiotics:109-115.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  30
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1973). Pragmatism and the Methodology of Metaphysics. The Monist 57 (2):252-264.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  62
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Patrick L. Bourgeois (1987). Peirce, Merleau-Ponty, and Perceptual Experience: A Kantian Heritage. International Studies in Philosophy 19 (3):33-42.
    Not only does peirce's theory of meaning as dispositional or as habit contain parallels with merleau-ponty's view of meaning in the structure of human behavior, but also both peirce and merleau-ponty alike attack reductivistic theories of perception. within this context, the present paper focuses on the use of kantian schemata in the philosophies of peirce and merleau-ponty, but to the extent that such incorporations are consistent with trends in pragmatism and phenomenology in general, it will reveal points of encounter not (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  48
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1968). The Analytic, the Synthetic, and C. I. Lewis. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 17:115-123.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  29
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1982). Meaning as Habit. The Monist 65 (2):230-245.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29.  4
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1990). Pragmatism, Heidegger, and the Context of Naturalism. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 4 (1):1 - 12.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  30.  7
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1996). Classical American Pragmatism: The Other Naturalism. Metaphilosophy 27 (4):399-407.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31.  25
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1987). Pragmatism Without Foundations. The Personalist Forum 3 (2):159-161.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  1
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (1995). Theoretical Foundations of Public Policy A Pragmatic Perspective. Business and Society 34 (3):261-279.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  33.  12
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (1996). Toward a New Understanding of Moral Pluralism. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (3):263-275.
    The current literature in business ethics is tending toward an unacknowledged\nmoral pluralism, with all the problems this position entails. An\nadequate moral pluralism cannot be achieved by a synthesis of existing\ntheoretical alternatives for moral action. Rather, what is needed\nis a radical reconstruction of the understanding of the moral situation\nthat undercuts some of the traditional dichotomies, provides a solid\nphilosophical grounding which is inherently pluralistic, and offers\na new understanding of what it is to think morally. The philosophical\nposition of American pragmatism, as briefly sketched (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  67
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2005). The Ontological Grounding of Diversity: A Pragmatic Overview. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 19 (2):107-119.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  4
    Patrick L. Bourgeois & Sandra B. Rosenthal (1990). Role Taking, Corporeal Intersubjectivity, and Self. Philosophy Today 34 (2):117-128.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  21
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1992). Free Selves, Enriched Values, and Experimental Method. International Philosophical Quarterly 32 (1):79-93.
  37. George G. Brenkert, Donald A. Brown, Rogene A. Buchholz, Herman E. Daly, Richard Dodd, R. Edward Freeman, Eric T. Freyfogle, R. Goodland, Michael E. Gorman, Andrea Larson, John Lemons, Don Mayer, William McDonough, Matthew M. Mehalik, Ernest Partridge, Jessica Pierce, William E. Rees, Joel E. Reichart, Sandra B. Rosenthal, Mark Sagoff, Julian L. Simon, Scott Sonenshein & Wendy Warren (1998). The Business of Consumption: Environmental Ethics and the Global Economy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    At the forefront of international concerns about global legislation and regulation, a host of noted environmentalists and business ethicists examine ethical issues in consumption from the points of view of environmental sustainability, economic development, and free enterprise.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  43
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2011). The Process of Pragmatism: Some Wide-Ranging Implications. The Pluralist 6 (3):5-18.
    The uprootedness of experience from its ontological embeddedness in a natural world is at the core of much contemporary philosophy which, like pragmatism, aims to reject foundationalism in all its forms. All hold positions that, in varying ways, there is a bedrock basis on which to build an edifice of knowledge, something objective that justifies rational arguments concerning what is the single best position for making available or picturing the structure of reality as it exists independently of our various contextually (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  36
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1971). C. I. Lewis and the Paradox of the Esthetic. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 20:95-115.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  32
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1987). The Defense of Freedom in Peirce and James. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 35:65-69.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  18
    B. Rosenthal Sandra & A. Buchholz Rogene (1995). Introduction. Studies in East European Thought 47 (3-4):151-154.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  31
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1999). Contemporary Metaphysics and the Issue of Time. International Philosophical Quarterly 39 (2):157-171.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  6
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2001). Pluralism, Change, and Corporate Community. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 20 (2):63-83.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  28
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2000). The Four Good Reasons for Limiting Consumption. The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2000:85-89.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  25
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1972). Charles Peirce and the Firstness of Process. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 21:39-50.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  24
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2000). The Democratic Self and Moral Community. Professional Ethics 8 (3/4):79-99.
  47.  15
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1990). Peirce's Ultimate Logical Interpretant and Dynamical Object: A Pragmatic Perspective. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26 (2):195 - 210.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48.  5
    Patrick L. Bourgeois & Sandra B. Rosenthal (1990). Role Taking, Corporeal Intersubjectivity, and Self: Mead and Merleau-Ponty. Philosophy Today 34 (2):117-128.
  49.  38
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1987). The Pragmatic a Priori: Lewis and Dewey. Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):109-121.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  27
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2006). Experience, Experimentalism, and Religious Overbelief. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:129-134.
    William James and John Dewey hold the view that all knowledge and experience are experimental. Within this common pragmatic context, James's theism and Dewey's atheism offer contrasting - indeed, contradictory - interpretations of the object of religious experience. This essay explores the intertwining of their common pragmatic context and differing objects of religious belief to show the way in which this intertwining gives rise to a unique position which can appeal to theists and atheists alike.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 169