23 found
Order:
  1.  36
    Teaching Argumentation Theory to Doctors: Why and What.Sara Rubinelli & Claudia Zanini - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):66-80.
    This paper supports the need for health professionals to be trained in argumentation theory, by illustrating the challenges that they face in interacting with patients and according to the different models of consultation that patients prefer. While there is no ideal model of consultation that can be promoted universally, the ability to construct arguments in support of health professionals’ points of view, as well as the ability to engage in critical discussion with patients, translate in essential skills for reaching patients’ (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  27
    “Let Me Tell You Why!”. When Argumentation in Doctor–Patient Interaction Makes a Difference.Sara Rubinelli & Peter J. Schulz - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):353-375.
    This paper throws some light on the nature of argumentation, its use and advantages, within the setting of doctor–patient interaction. It claims that argumentation can be used by doctors to offer patients reasons that work as ontological conditions for enhancing the decision making process, as well as to preserve the institutional nature of their relationship with patients. In support of these claims, selected arguments from real-life interactions are presented in the second part of the paper, and analysed by means of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3.  26
    Arguing 'For' the Patient: Informed Consent and Strategic Maneuvering in Doctor–Patient Interaction. [REVIEW]Peter J. Schulz & Sara Rubinelli - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):423-432.
    As a way to advance integration between traditional readings of the medical encounter and argumentation theory, this article conceptualizes the doctor–patient interaction as a form of info-suasive dialogue. Firstly, the article explores the relevance of argumentation in the medical encounter in connection with the process of informed consent. Secondly, it discloses the risks inherent to a lack of reconciliation of the dialectical and rhetorical components in the delivery of the doctor’s advice, as especially resulting from the less than ideal conditions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  4.  15
    The Ancient Argumentative Game: Τóπoι and Loci in Action. [REVIEW]Sara Rubinelli - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):253-272.
    In classical logic and rhetoric the strategies of argumentation known as topoi played a crucial role. Yet, topoi refer there to different kinds of strategies that this study intends to explain synoptically. Main focus will be on passages from Aristotle and Cicero. Indeed, these sources contain examples and theoretical considerations, which provide the basis for a general investigation of the complex phenomenon of topoi in the ancient world. Four main types of topoi will be juxtaposed and discusses comparatively as a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5.  16
    Erratum To: Arguing ‘for’ the Patient: Informed Consent and Strategic Maneuvering in Doctor–Patient Interaction.Peter J. Schulz & Sara Rubinelli - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (4):481-491.
    As a way to advance integration between traditional readings of the medical encounter and argumentation theory, this article conceptualizes the doctor–patient interaction as a form of info-suasive dialogue. Firstly, the article explores the relevance of argumentation in the medical encounter in connection with the process of informed consent. Secondly, it discloses the risks inherent to a lack of reconciliation of the dialectical and rhetorical components in the delivery of the doctor’s advice, as especially resulting from the less-than-ideal conditions of the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  24
    Tñpoi e àdia nella Retorica di Aristotele.Sara Rubinelli - 2003 - Phronesis 48 (3):3.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  24
    Argumentation as Rational Persuasion in Doctor-Patient Communication.Sara Rubinelli - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):550-569.
    The purpose of this article is to present a case for the value of argumentation as an instrument of rational persuasion in doctor-patient (and general health professional–patient) communication. By doing so, I also emphasize the value of argumentation theory—as a body of knowledge devoted to the study of argumentation—both to enrich the study of doctor-patient communication and to enhance its quality by contributing to dedicated training courses for health professionals and patient education interventions. Argumentation is used in health professional–patient interactions, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  2
    Easy Ways to Lose Weight with Pleasure.Daiana Betti, Claudia Zanini & Sara Rubinelli - 2018 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 7 (3):270-284.
    Weight-loss efforts have grown more prevalent worldwide. But diets are linked to perception of dissatisfaction, sacrifice and general reduction of pleasure. This paper examines the hypothesis that commercial diets attract consumers by presenting argumentation that appeals to and addresses the difficulties experienced while dieting. The objective of this paper is, therefore, to identify the main promotional strategies in the marketing of commercial diets and to examine if and how the goal of persuasion prevails over the reasonableness of the advice. This (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  26
    Tóπoι E I'δια Nella Retorica di Aristotele.Sara Rubinelli - 2003 - Phronesis 48 (3):238-247.
    Il passo della Retorica (1358 a 10-21) dove è introdotta la distinzione óo e i' è uno dei più controversi dell'opera aristotelica. Il presente lavoro propone un chiarimento della natura e del ruolo di óo e i' nella costruzione di un'argomentazione dialettico-retorica. Tale chiarimento viene presentato attraverso un confronto tra Topici e Retorica che, se pur espressamente evidenziato da Aristotele stesso, sembra essere stato trascurato da quanti si sono occupati dell'esegesi di tale sezione della Retorica.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  10.  19
    Tóπoι e i'δια nella Retorica di Aristotele.Sara Rubinelli - 2003 - Phronesis 48 (3):238-247.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  23
    Comments on 'Strategic Maneuvering with Dissociation'.Sara Rubinelli - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):489-493.
  12.  1
    Review of van Eemeren, Frans H., Ed. Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the Relationship Between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context. [REVIEW]Sara Rubinelli - 2018 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 7 (3):347-351.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  43
    Introduction: Dynamics of Well-Being. [REVIEW]Sara Rubinelli & Jerome Bickenbach - 2013 - Topoi 32 (2):135-136.
  14. Problemas de "Topoi" En Aristóteles: Notas Sobre Una Hipótesis Diacrónica.Sara Rubinelli - 2002 - Anuario Filosófico 35 (73):367-408.
    In the last fifty years a series of valuable contributions on Aristotle's Topics has helped to understand how a Topics functions in the dialectical argumentation. In contrast to this, Aristotle's topoi as set out in the Rhetoric does not seem to have received the same attention. Current opinion holds that the methodology in the Rhetoric involves two different kinds of topoi, the topoi koinoi and the ídia, considered by most scholars as idioi topoi. The problem, here, is that this distinctíon (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  9
    Review of Wierda, Renske Experience-Based Authority Argumentation in Direct-to-Consumer Medical Advertisements. [REVIEW]Sara Rubinelli - 2017 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 6 (1):101-104.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  19
    Argumentation in the Healthcare Domain.Sara Rubinelli & A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):1-4.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  25
    Cicero's Topica T. Reinhardt (Ed.): Marcus Tullius Cicero: Topica. Edited with a Translation, Introduction, and Commentary. Pp. Xvi + 435. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Cased, £74. ISBN: 0-19-926346-. [REVIEW]Sara Rubinelli - 2005 - The Classical Review 55 (02):514-.
  18.  10
    Poppel, L. Van . Getting the Vaccine Now Will Protect You in the Future! A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of Strategic Maneuvering with Pragmatic Argumentation in Health Brochures.Sara Rubinelli - 2014 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 3 (3):322-324.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  9
    Book Review: The Medicalisation of Cyberspace by Andy Miah and Emma Rich London and New York: Routledge, 2008, Pp. Xv, 160, ISBN 978—0-415—39364—5 (Pbk),£ 21.99. [REVIEW]Sara Rubinelli - 2009 - Body and Society 15 (1):109-112.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  7
    Argumentation in the Health Care Domain: Introduction.Sara Rubinelli & Af Snoeck Henkemans - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):1-3.
  21.  14
    “Your Risk is Low, Because …”: Argument-Driven Online Genetic Counselling.Uwe Hartung, Sara Rubinelli & Peter J. Schulz - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (3):199-214.
    Advances in genetic research have created the need to inform consumers. Yet, the communication of hereditary risk and of the options for how to deal with it is a difficult task. Due to the abstract nature of genetics, people tend to overestimate or underestimate their risk. This paper addresses the issue of how to communicate risk information on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer through an online application. The core of the paper illustrates the design of OPERA, a risk assessment instrument (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  5
    The Invention of the Young Cicero.Sara Rubinelli - 2002 - Classical Quarterly 52 (2):612-615.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Topioiota e ideltaiotaalpha nella Retorica di Aristotele.Sara Rubinelli - 2003 - Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 48 (3):238-247.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark