Results for 'Sarah J. Teetzel'

939 found
Order:
  1.  47
    The Complexities of Sport, Gender, and Drug Testing.Pam R. Sailors, Sarah J. Teetzel & Charlene Weaving - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):23 - 25.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 7, Page 23-25, July 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  28
    Defining Sport: Conceptions and Borderlines.Shawn E. Klein, Chad Carlson, Francisco Javier López Frías, Kevin Schieman, Heather L. Reid, John McClelland, Keith Strudler, Pam R. Sailors, Sarah Teetzel, Charlene Weaving, Chrysostomos Giannoulakis, Lindsay Pursglove, Brian Glenney, Teresa González Aja, Joan Grassbaugh Forry, Brody J. Ruihley, Andrew Billings, Coral Rae & Joey Gawrysiak (eds.) - 2016 - Lexington Books.
    This book examines influential conceptions of sport and then analyses the interplay of challenging borderline cases with the standard definitions of sport. It is meant to inspire more thought and debate on just what sport is, how it relates to other activities and human endeavors, and what we can learn about ourselves by studying sport.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  49
    A Code of Digital Ethics: laying the foundation for digital ethics in a science and technology company.Sarah J. Becker, André T. Nemat, Simon Lucas, René M. Heinitz, Manfred Klevesath & Jean Enno Charton - 2023 - AI and Society 38 (6):2629-2639.
    The rapid and dynamic nature of digital transformation challenges companies that wish to develop and deploy novel digital technologies. Like other actors faced with this transformation, companies need to find robust ways to ethically guide their innovations and business decisions. Digital ethics has recently featured in a plethora of both practical corporate guidelines and compilations of high-level principles, but there remains a gap concerning the development of sound ethical guidance in specific business contexts. As a multinational science and technology company (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  15
    Limitations to Contingency Measures: Reflections from COVID-19 Surges in the UK.Sarah J. L. Edwards, David A. Lomas, Sarah Yardley & Caitlin Gordon - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):31-34.
    Alfandre et al. helpfully outlines the case for attending to contingency planning as well as to crisis measures during a pandemic. The authors provides a helpful framework for reflecting on...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  37
    Earthly Powers and Affective Environments: An Ontological Politics of Flood Risk.Sarah J. Whatmore - 2013 - Theory, Culture and Society 30 (7-8):33-50.
    In this article I set out to trace some of the implications of recharging the political potency of nature in more-than-human terms. This shifts attention from a biopolitical focus on the inventiveness of the life sciences and what this means in terms of the emergence of ‘cyborg’ political subjects to an onto-political focus on the inventiveness of knowledge controversies and what these mean for techno-political practices. Specifically, the article examines the onto-politics of ‘natural’ hazard events and their capacity to force (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  6.  76
    Ethics versus morality: A problematic divide.Sarah J. Harper - 2009 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (9):1063-1077.
    I explicate the distinction between ethics and morality in terms of four central contrasts, and argue (1) that moral theories that embrace the implicit divide are both theoretically and practically problematic in their failure to meet certain widely accepted standards of theoretical coherence and in their resulting propensity to generate indeterminable conflicts among norms, and (2) that social roles represent one aspect of the moral life that cannot be understood in terms of this distinction. My suggestion will be that we (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  7.  33
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Assessing the Remedy: The Case for Contracts in Clinical Trials”.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (4):W1-W3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  19
    Manning's n–putting roughness to work.Sarah J. Whatmore & Catharina Landstrom - 2010 - In Peter Howlett & Mary S. Morgan (eds.), How well do facts travel?: the dissemination of reliable knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 111.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  13
    Reflections on an experiment in geographical practice.Sarah J. Whatmore - 2013 - In Andrew Barry & Georgina Born (eds.), Interdisciplinarity: reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 161.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  28
    The Role, Remit and Function of the Research Ethics Committee — 1. The Rationale for Ethics Review of Research by Committee.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (4):147-150.
    This is the first in a series of five papers on the role, remit and function of research ethics committees which are intended to provide for REC members a broad understanding of the most important issues in research ethics and governance. The first considers the rationale for having ethics review by committee at all; seeking to explain why ethics committees, as we currently have them, are so important to the wider system of governing research.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  11. Two Views of Vulnerability in the Evolution of Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying Law.Sarah J. Lazin & Jennifer A. Chandler - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (1):105-117.
    Canada is six years into a new era of legalized medical assistance in dying (MAiD). The law continues to evolve, following a pattern in which Canadian courts rule that legal restrictions on eligibility for MAiD are unconstitutional and Parliament responds by gradually expanding eligibility for MAiD. The central tension underlying this dialogue between courts and government has focused on two conceptions of how to best promote and protect the interests of people who are vulnerable by virtue of intolerable and irremediable (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  22
    The limited roles of cognitive capabilities and future time perspective in contributing to positivity effects.Sarah J. Barber, Noelle Lopez, Kriti Cadambi & Santos Alferez - 2020 - Cognition 200 (C):104267.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13.  18
    Protecting privacy interests in brain images : the limits of consent.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2012 - In Sarah Richmond, Geraint Rees & Sarah J. L. Edwards (eds.), I know what you're thinking: brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14.  35
    Assessing the Remedy: The Case for Contracts in Clinical Trials.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (4):3-12.
    Current orthodoxy in research ethics assumes that subjects of clinical trials reserve rights to withdraw at any time and without giving any reason. This view sees the right to withdraw as a simple extension of the right to refuse to participate all together. In this paper, however, I suggest that subjects should assume some responsibilities for the internal validity of the trial at consent and that these responsibilities should be captured by contract. This would allow the researcher to impose a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  15.  37
    Restricted treatments, inducements, and research participation.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2006 - Bioethics 20 (2):77–91.
    ABSTRACT In this paper, I support the claim that placing certain restrictions on public access to possible new treatments is morally problematic under some exceptional circumstances. Very ill patients may find that all available standard treatments are unacceptable, either because they are ineffective or have serious adverse effects, and these patients may understandably be desperate to try something new even if this means stepping into the unknown. Faced with certain death, it is rational to want to try something new and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  16.  52
    Research participation and the right to withdraw.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (2):112–130.
    Most ethics committees which review research protocols insist that potential research participants reserve unconditional or absolute ‘right’ of withdrawal at any time and without giving any reason. In this paper, I examine what consent means for research participation and a sense of commitment in relation to this right to withdraw. I suggest that, once consent has been given (and here I am excluding incompetent minors and adults), participants should not necessarily have unconditional or absolute rights to withdraw.This does not imply (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  17.  28
    Trials, Tribulations, and Triumphs: Research and Publishing From the Undergraduate Perspective.Sarah J. Matthews & Marissa N. Rosa - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  18.  10
    Cultural conceptions of mental capacity.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2017 - Research Ethics 13 (2):54-58.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations.Heather Schmidt Albinger & Sarah J. Freeman - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):243 - 253.
    This study investigates the hypothesis that the advantage corporate social performance (CSP) yields in attracting human resources depends on the degree of job choice possessed by the job seeking population. Results indicate that organizational CSP is positively related to employer attractiveness for job seekers with high levels of job choice but not related for populations with low levels suggesting advantages to firms with high levels of CSP in the ability to attract the most qualified employees.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   84 citations  
  20.  22
    A Reinforcement-Based Learning Paradigm Increases Anatomical Learning and Retention—A Neuroeducation Study.Sarah J. Anderson, Kent G. Hecker, Olave E. Krigolson & Heather A. Jamniczky - 2018 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12.
  21.  25
    The Animal Efficacy Rule and public health.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2015 - Research Ethics 11 (2):64-66.
  22.  46
    Who makes the rules? Using Wittgenstein in social theory.Sarah J. Bailyn - 2002 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32 (3):311–329.
  23.  38
    Evidence of Efficacy and Human Right to Health.Sarah J. L. Edwards, Sapfo Lignou & Elizabeth Oduwo - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (6):35-37.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 6, Page 35-37, June 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  24.  30
    The Case for Methodological Pluralism in Medical Science.Sarah J. L. Edwards, Thomas Bock, Ulo Palm, Sally Wang, Glen Cheng, Lixia Wang & Peter Pitts - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (9):39-41.
    Volume 20, Issue 9, September 2020, Page 39-41.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  25.  35
    Why sprint interval training is inappropriate for a largely sedentary population.Sarah J. Hardcastle, Hannah Ray, Louisa Beale & Martin S. Hagger - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  26.  49
    A Radical Approach to Ebola: Saving Humans and Other Animals.Sarah J. L. Edwards, Charles H. Norell, Phyllis Illari, Brendan Clarke & Carolyn P. Neuhaus - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (10):35-42.
    As the usual regulatory framework did not fit well during the last Ebola outbreak, innovative thinking still needed. In the absence of an outbreak, randomised controlled trials of clinical efficacy in humans cannot be done, while during an outbreak such trials will continue to face significant practical, philosophical, and ethical challenges. This article argues that researchers should also test the safety and effectiveness of novel vaccines in wild apes by employing a pluralistic approach to evidence. There are three reasons to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  27.  52
    Hard paternalism, fairness and clinical research: why not?Sarah J. L. Edwards & James Wilson - 2010 - Bioethics 26 (2):68 - 75.
    Jansen and Wall suggest a new way of defending hard paternalism in clinical research. They argue that non-therapeutic research exposing people to more than minimal risk should be banned on egalitarian grounds: in preventing poor decision-makers from making bad decisions, we will promote equality of welfare. We argue that their proposal is flawed for four reasons.First, the idea of poor decision-makers is much more problematic than Jansen and Wall allow. Second, pace Jansen and Wall, it may be practicable for regulators (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  28. Conclusion.Sarah J. L. Edwards & Geraint Rees - 2012 - In Sarah Richmond, Geraint Rees & Sarah J. L. Edwards (eds.), I know what you're thinking: brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  29
    The secreted kinase ROP18 defends Toxoplasma's border.Sarah J. Fentress & L. David Sibley - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (9):693-700.
    Toxoplasma gondii is a highly successful parasite capable of infecting virtually all warm-blooded animals by actively invading nucleated host cells and forming a modified compartment where it replicates within the cytosol. The parasite-containing vacuole provides a safe haven, even in professional phagocytes such as macrophages, which normally destroy foreign microbes. In an effort to eliminate the parasite, the host up-regulates a family of immunity-related p47 GTPases (IRGs), which are recruited to the parasite-containing vacuole, resulting in membrane rupture and digestion of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  14
    Children’s Academic, Artistic, and Athletic Competencies: Successes Are in the Eye of the Beholder.Sarah J. Racz, Diane L. Putnick, Gianluca Esposito & Marc H. Bornstein - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  41
    The Role, Remit and Function of the Research Ethics Committee — 3. Balancing Potential Social Benefits against Risks to Subjects.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2010 - Research Ethics 6 (3):96-100.
    This is the third in a series of five papers on the role, remit and function of research ethics committees which are intended to provide for REC members a broad understanding of the most important issues in research ethics and governance. This paper examines the role of ethics committees in balancing the social value of the research it reviews against the risks it imposes on those who take part. The ethics committee's role in assessing the social value of research goes (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  32.  18
    Ethical leadership in schools: creating community in an environment of accountability and The cultural proficiency journey: moving beyond ethical barriers toward profound school change.Sarah J. Noonan - 2010 - Journal of Moral Education 39 (4):519-522.
  33.  31
    Better safe than sorry: Simplistic fear-relevant stimuli capture attention.Sarah J. Forbes, Helena M. Purkis & Ottmar V. Lipp - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (5):794-804.
    It has been consistently demonstrated that fear-relevant images capture attention preferentially over fear-irrelevant images. Current theory suggests that this faster processing could be mediated by an evolved module that allows certain stimulus features to attract attention automatically, prior to the detailed processing of the image. The present research investigated whether simplified images of fear-relevant stimuli would produce interference with target detection in a visual search task. In Experiment 1, silhouettes and degraded silhouettes of fear-relevant animals produced more interference than did (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  34.  21
    Radical Discussions/Radical Subjectivities.Sarah J. DesRoches - 2017 - Philosophy of Education 73:144-148.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  13
    Remembering Otherwise: History and Citizenship Education of Shared Fates.Sarah J. DesRoches - 2016 - Philosophy of Education 72:484-492.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  30
    The Role, Remit and Function of the Research Ethics Committee — 4. Limits to Consent?Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2010 - Research Ethics 6 (4):159-163.
    This is the fourth in a series of five papers on the role, remit and function of research ethics committees which are intended to provide for REC members a broad understanding of the most important issues in research ethics and governance. This paper explores the role of ethics committees in reviewing proposed conditions for recruiting human subjects and in checking the intended procedures for gaining consent. In so doing the paper will reiterate the conditions which are traditionally thought to make (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  37.  16
    The Role, Remit and Function of the Research Ethics Committee — 2. Science and Society: The Scope of Ethics Review.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2010 - Research Ethics 6 (2):58-61.
    This is the second in a series of five papers on the role, remit and function of research ethics committees which are intended to provide for REC members a broad understanding of the most important issues in research ethics and governance. This paper examines the role of ethics committees in assessing the science of the research it reviews. While ethics committees are not specifically constituted to review the science of a project, they must nevertheless assess the social benefits of research (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  38.  19
    Structural and Functional MRI Differences in Master Sommeliers: A Pilot Study on Expertise in the Brain.Sarah J. Banks, Karthik R. Sreenivasan, David M. Weintraub, Deanna Baldock, Michael Noback, Meghan E. Pierce, Johannes Frasnelli, Jay James, Erik Beall, Xiaowei Zhuang, Dietmar Cordes & Gabriel C. Leger - 2016 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10.
  39.  19
    Editorial: The precautionary paradox and Zika.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2016 - Research Ethics 12 (4):178-181.
  40. From research governance to research integrity: What’s in a name?Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2013 - Research Ethics 9 (1):3-5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  41.  17
    A Failure to Care or a Failure to Communicate? Exploring Concerns about Decision Maker Suitability.Sarah J. Russe - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (1):142-143.
    Unfortunately, cases like Mr. Turner’s are common, and likely to become more so in the near future, as the number of people aged 65 and older is expected to increase to about 74 million by 2030, an...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  25
    Flavius josephus as interpreter of biblical law: The council of seven and the levitical servants in jewish antiquities 4.214.Sarah J. K. Pearce - 1995 - Heythrop Journal 36 (4):477–492.
  43.  15
    Are we educating our research ethics committees?Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2017 - Research Ethics 13 (3-4):99-101.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  12
    Conceptions and misconceptions of therapeutic benefit.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2016 - Research Ethics 12 (2):64-67.
  45.  13
    (1 other version)Editor's Choice.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (2):37-38.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  9
    Editorial: Continuous consent to, or discreet control over, sharing digital data?Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (4):184-186.
  47.  15
    Risk adapted regulation of clinical trials.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (1):2-5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  45
    Motivating the unmotivated: how can health behavior be changed in those unwilling to change?Sarah J. Hardcastle, Jennie Hancox, Anne Hattar, Chloe Maxwell-Smith, Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani & Martin S. Hagger - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  49.  27
    Experimental Treatments for Ebola.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (3):126-128.
  50.  28
    Tocqueville and the Ostroms.Sarah J. Wilford - 2023 - History of the Human Sciences 36 (3-4):27-54.
    Although it is commonplace for political scientists to draw upon historical thinkers and the ‘great books’ of the past, the practice of using historical works as reference points for contemporary issues remains under-investigated. To address this practice, this article is positioned at the crossroads of social science and intellectual history. By examining the relationship of political economists Elinor and Vincent Ostrom with Alexis de Tocqueville, the article demonstrates some of the potential risks incurred by social scientists drawing on historical thinkers. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 939