5 found
Order:
  1.  23
    Magnets, Magic, and Other Anomalies: In Defense of Methodological Naturalism.John Perry & Sarah Lane Ritchie - 2018 - Zygon 53 (4):1064-1093.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  2.  46
    Dancing Around the Causal Joint: Challenging the Theological Turn in Divine Action Theories.Sarah Lane Ritchie - 2017 - Zygon 52 (2):361-379.
    Recent years have seen a shift in divine action debates. Turning from noninterventionist, incompatibilist causal joint models, representatives of a “theological turn” in divine action have questioned the metaphysical assumptions of approaches seeking indeterministic aspects of nature wherein God might act. Various versions of theistic naturalism offer specific theological frameworks that reimagine the basic God–world relationship. But do these explicitly theological approaches to divine action take scientific knowledge and methodology seriously enough? And do such approaches adequately address the problem of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  3.  19
    The Physicalized Mind and the Gut‐Brain Axis: Taking Mental Health Out of Our Heads.Lindsay Bruce & Sarah Lane Ritchie - 2018 - Zygon 53 (2):356-374.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4. The Divine Action 'Problem'? An Eastern Orthodox Challenge to Science and Theology.Sarah Lane Ritchie - 2019 - In David Fergusson, Bruce L. McCormack & Iain R. Torrance (eds.), Schools of faith: essays on theology, ethics and education in honour of Iain R. Torrance. T & T Clark.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  6
    Wait, But Why? Challenging the Intuitive Force of Substance Dualism.Sarah Lane Ritchie - 2021 - Scientia et Fides 9 (1):241-255.
    In responding to Joshua Farris’ The Soul of Theological Anthropology, I suggest several reasons for questioning the theological need for substance dualism in any form. Specifically, I argue that it is not at the level of analytic argumentation that the mind or soul is best understood, and that the sciences do indeed challenge substance dualism. In making this argument, I examine the roles of intuition and theological pre-commitments in one’s determination of the correct understanding of the mind or soul. I (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark