8 found
Order:
See also
Simon R. Clarke
American University of Armenia
  1. Consequential Neutrality Revivified.Simon R. Clarke - 2014 - In Roberto Merrill & Daniel Marc Weinstock (eds.), Political Neutrality: A Re-evaluation. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 109-123.
    Liberal neutrality requires that, given the diversity of conceptions of the good life held by people, the state should be in some sense neutral between these conceptions. Just what that sense is has been a matter of debate but it seems generally accepted that neutrality is a property of the justifications for government action and not of the consequences of such action. In other words, the state must be neutral by avoiding invoking any conception of the good in its justification (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  47
    Prophylactic Neutrality, Oppression, and the Reverse Pascal's Wager.Simon R. Clarke - 2012 - Ethical Perspectives 19 (3):527-535.
    In Beyond Neutrality, George Sher criticises the idea that state neutrality between competing conceptions of the good helps protect society from oppression. While he is correct that some governments are non-neutral without being oppressive, I argue that those governments may be neutral at the core of their foundations. The possibility of non-neutrality leading to oppression is further explored; some conceptions of the good would favour oppression while others would not. While it is possible that a non-neutral state may avoid oppression, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. The Unjustified-Suffering Argument for Vegetarianism.Simon R. Clarke - 2009 - In Raymond Aaron Younis (ed.), On the Ethical Life. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 57-67.
    A major argument for vegetarianism is that eating animals causes unjustified suffering. While this argument has been articulated by several people, it has received surprisingly little attention. Here I restate it in a way that I believe is most convincing, considering and rejecting the two main justifications for causing suffering in order to eat animals. I compare it to some other prominent arguments for vegetarianism, and discuss a major objection to the argument which focuses on whether the animals would not (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Mill, Liberty, and Euthanasia.Simon R. Clarke - 2015 - Philosophy Now 1 (110):14-15.
    This article argues that deciding when to die is a matter of individuality.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  26
    Foundations of Freedom: Welfare-Based Arguments Against Paternalism.Simon R. Clarke - 2012 - Routledge.
    What makes individual freedom valuable? People have always believed in freedom, have sought it, and have sometimes fought and died for it. The belief that it is something to be valued is widespread. But does this belief have a rational foundation? This book examines answers to these questions that are based on the welfare of the person whose freedom is at stake. There are various conceptions of a worthwhile life, a life that is valuable for the person whose life it (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. A Trust-Based Argument Against Paternalism.Simon R. Clarke - 2013 - In Pekka Makela & Cynthia Townley (eds.), Trust: Analytic and Applied Persectives. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi. pp. 53-75.
    This essay addresses the role of trust in political philosophy. In particular, it examines the idea that trust is necessary for a particular type of government action — paternalistic action — to be justified. Liberal theory and liberal democratic practice are characterized by a large degree of anti-paternalism, understanding paternalism to be the restriction of individual liberty for a person’s good, instead of to protect or benefit others. It would be a mistake to think that liberal democracies have no paternalism; (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  44
    Messy Morality: The Challenge of Politics * By C. A. J. COADY.Simon R. Clarke - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):794-795.
    The aim of this book is to explore some of the relations between morality and politics. Areas in which these are explored include the role of ideals in foreign policy , committing evil for the sake of a greater good in wartime, and lying and deception in political affairs. Illustrative examples are used throughout and include the Iraq war and its political fallout , Allied and Axis actions during the Second World War, decisions made by former Australian Prime Minister John (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Principles of Paternalism.Simon R. Clarke - 2009 - Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):30-38.
    When, if ever, is paternalism justified? I defend the principle that paternalism is justified only if it is neutral, that is, the motivation for it is compatible with all conceptions of the good life. Three other principles of paternalism are examined. The balancing view says that we must balance the values of liberty and well-being against each other and that paternalism is justified only if well-being outweighs liberty. The consent principle says that paternalism is justified only if consented to. The (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark