Search results for 'Social sciences Comparative method' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  15
    Gideon Sjoberg (1955). The Comparative Method in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of Science 22 (2):106-117.
  2.  6
    Anatol Rapoport (1955). Comments on "the Comparative Method in the Social Sciences". Philosophy of Science 22 (2):118-122.
  3. David Collier & John Gerring (eds.) (2009). Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. Routledge.
    Drawing on the intellectual tradition of the leading comparative political science scholar, Giovanni Sartori, the contributors examine the theoretical and methodological basis of: Concept Analysis, Comparative Political Analysis and Qualitative Methods.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  31
    David Goldblatt (ed.) (2000). Knowledge and the Social Sciences: Theory, Method, Practice. Routledge, in Association with Open University.
    This book provides a clear introduction to key philosophical and epistemological issues in the social sciences, to both positivist and interpretative methodologies through comparing contemporary debates surrounding social change.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Ann Oakley (2000). Experiments in Knowing: Gender and Method in the Social Sciences. New Press.
  6.  10
    Amedeo Giorgi (2008). Difficulties Encountered in the Application of the Phenomenological Method in the Social Sciences. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 8 (1):1-9.
    While it is heartening to see that more researchers in the field of the social sciences are using some version of the phenomenological method, it is also disappointing to see that very often some of the steps employed do not follow phenomenological logic. In this paper, several dissertations are reviewed in order to point out some of the difficulties that are encountered in attempting to use some version of the phenomenological method. Difficulties encountered centred on the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. Daniel Little (1998). Microfoundations, Method and Causation on the Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
  8.  2
    Paul A. Roth (1992). Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism. Philosophical Review 101 (3):679-681.
  9.  15
    William P. Fisher (2004). Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences. Human Studies 27 (4):429-454.
    Academia’s mathematical metaphysics are briefly explored en route to an elaboration of the qualitatively rigorous requirements underpinning the calibration and unambiguous interpretation of quantitative instrumentation in any science. Of particular interest are Gadamer’s emphases on number as the paradigm of the noetic, on the role of play in interpretation, and on Hegel’s sense of method as the activity of the thing itself that thought experiences. These point toward and overlap with (1) Latour’s study of the metrological social networks (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  24
    Richard W. Miller (1987). Fact and Method: Explanation, Confirmation and Reality in the Natural and the Social Sciences. Princeton University Press.
    In this bold work of broad scope and rich erudition, Richard W. Miller sets out to reorient the philosophy of science.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   74 citations  
  11.  3
    Martyn Hammersley (forthcoming). Book Review: Felix Kaufmann’s Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, by Robert S. Cohen and Ingeborg K. Helling, Eds. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences:0048393116651578.
  12.  1
    K. D. Knorr-Cetina (1981). Social and Scientific Method or What Do We Make of the Distinction Between the Natural and the Social Sciences? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (3):335-359.
  13.  6
    Peter C. Sederberg (1972). Subjectivity and Typification : A Note on Method in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2 (1):167-176.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  5
    P. Stone (2002). Book Review: Microfoundations, Method, and Causation: On the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):120-126.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  3
    D. Rohatyn (1991). Book Reviews : Paul A. Roth, Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, 1987. Pp. Xii, 250, $26.95 (Cloth. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (3):412-415.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Dennis Rohatyn (1991). "Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism", by Paul A. Roth. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (3):412.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  26
    Hans Albert (1988). Critical Rationalism: The Problem of Method in Social Sciences and Law. Ratio Juris 1 (1):1-19.
    The author characterizes the model of rationality devised by critical rationalism in opposition to the classic model of rationality and as an alternative to this. He illustrates and criticizes the trichotomous theory of knowledge which, going back to Max Scheler, is received in a secularized version by Habermas and Apel, also under the influence of the hermeneutic tradition of Heidegger and Gadamer and of the so-called “critical theory” of Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno. The author criticizes historicism as it expects (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  52
    John Kekes (1974). Logical Dualism: Human Values and Method in the Social Sciences. Philosophy and Social Criticism 2 (1):61-73.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  1
    Gilbert Rozman (1987). The Comparative Study of Socialism in China: The Social Sciences at a Crossroads. Social Research 54.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi (2015). Method and Matter in the Social Sciences: Umbilically Tied to the Enlightenment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. M. A. Garreton (2005). Social Sciences in Latin America: A Comparative Perspective - Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Uruguay. Social Science Information 44 (2-3):557-593.
  22. S. Rokkan (1965). Activities of the International Social Science Council and the European Coordination Centre for Research and Documentation in the Social Sciences Activites Du Conseil International Des Sciences Sociales Et Du Centre Europeen De Coordination De Recherches Et De Documentation En Sciences Sociales: Trends and Possibilities in Comparative Social Science : Report on an International Conference. Social Science Information 4 (4):139-169.
  23.  99
    Alastair Davidson (1981). Historical Method and the Social Sciences: A Critique of the ANNALES Historiography. Thesis Eleven 2 (1):62-78.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Thomas Wheatland (2012). Debate About Methods in the Social Sciences, Especially the Conception of Social Science Method for Which the Institute Stands. Thesis Eleven 111 (1):123-129.
  25. Paul A. Roth (1989). Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences. Journal of Philosophy 86 (8):442-446.
  26. Étienne Balibar (2011). Structure: Method or Subversion of the Social Sciences?: From Structure to Rhizome: Transdisciplinarity in French Thought. Radical Philosophy 165.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  25
    Víndíng Kruse (1947). The Method of Social Sciences. Theoria 13 (2-3):85-135.
  28. Graham Macdonald (1989). Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences by Paul A. Roth. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 86 (8):442-446.
  29. Joseph Rouse & Richard W. Miller (1989). Fact and Method. Explanation, Confirmation and Reality in the Natural and the Social Sciences. History and Theory 28 (1):125.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  9
    F. Rapp (1972). Weltanschauung and Method. Philosophical Essays on the Unity of the Natural and Social Sciences. Philosophy and History 5 (1):23-24.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  8
    Roger Paden (1988). Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences. Review of Metaphysics 42 (2):409-410.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  13
    Richmond Campbell (1990). Book Review:Fact and Method: Explanation, Confirmation, and Reality in the Natural and Social Sciences. Richard W. Miller. [REVIEW] Ethics 100 (4):897-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  4
    Stephen Wallace (2007). Ann Oakley. Experiments in Knowing: Gender and Method in the Social Sciences. Spontaneous Generations 1 (1):151.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  6
    Arthur L. Stinchcombe (1989). Book Review:Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism. Paul A. Roth. [REVIEW] Ethics 99 (2):434-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  5
    Russell L. Ackoff (1955). Book Review:Theory and Method in the Social Sciences Arnold M. Rose. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 22 (1):67-.
  36.  2
    Martin Hollis (1980). Meaning and Method: Some Recent Work in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophy 55 (212):239 - 248.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  2
    O. de Selincourt (1936). Law and the Social Sciences. By Huntington Cairns. Foreword by Roscoe Pound. (International Library of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Method. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. 1935. Pp. Xiv + 279. Price 12s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 11 (42):229-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Étienne Balibar (2011). Structure: Method or Subversion of the Social Sciences? Radical Philosophy 165:17.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Ernst Cassirer (1997). The Contract and the Method of the Social Sciences. In Raymond Boudon, Mohamed Cherkaoui & Jeffrey C. Alexander (eds.), The Classical Tradition in Sociology: The European Tradition. Sage Publications. pp. 1--1.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. J. Fischer (1971). The Social Sciences and the Comparative Study of Educational Systems. British Journal of Educational Studies 19 (2):223-224.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Mihailo Marković (1975). Differences in Method Between the Natural and Social Sciences. Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy 6:609-612.
  42. Eric P. Polten & John C. Eccles (1975). Critique of the Psycho-Physical Identity Theory : A refutation of scientific materialism and an establishment of mind-matter dualism by means of philosophy and scientific method, 1 vol. coll., « New Babylon : Studies in the Social Sciences ». Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 165 (1):83-83.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Joseph Rouse (1989). RICHARD W. MILLER, "Fact and Method: Explanation, Confirmation and Reality in the Natural and the Social Sciences". [REVIEW] History and Theory 28 (1):125.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. David R. Schweitzer & R. Felix Geyer (1989). Alienation Theories and de-Alienation Strategies Comparative Perspectives in Philosophy and the Social Sciences.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Warren Schmaus (1988). Fact and Method: Explanation, Confirmation, and Reality in the Natural and Social Sciences by Richard W. Miller. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 79:492-493.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Paul Teller & Richard W. Miller (1990). Fact and Method: Explanation, Confirmation, and Reality in the Natural and the Social Sciences. Philosophical Review 99 (4):641.
  47. Stephen Turner (1990). Paul A. Roth, "Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism". [REVIEW] Theory and Society 19 (2):252.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  71
    Jay Joseph (2013). The Use of the Classical Twin Method in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: The Fallacy Continues. Journal of Mind and Behavior 34 (1):1-40.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Brian Fay (2006). For Science in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):227-240.
    All three of the books under review— Science and Social Science by Malcolm Williams, Rethinking Science by Jan Faye, and Open the Social Sciences by the members of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences (Immanuel Wallerstein, chair)—argue for a broadly naturalist approach in which the social sciences are seen as of a piece with the natural sciences. Fortunately, all three do so in a discriminating way that avoids simple (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  49
    Uskali Mäki (2008). Putnam's Realisms: A View From the Social Sciences. In Sami Pihlström, Panu Raatikainen & Matti Sintonen (eds.), Approaching Truth: Essays in Honour of Ilkka Niiniluoto. College Publications.
    For the last three decades, the discussion on Hilary Putnam’s provocative suggestions around the issue of realism has raged widely. Putnam’s various formulations of, and arguments for, what he called internal realism in contrast to what he called metaphysical realism have been scrutinised from a variety of perspectives. One angle of attack has been missing, though: the view from the social sciences and the ontology of society. This perspective, I believe, will provide further confirmation to the observation that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000