5 found
Order:
See also
Stefan Brandt
Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
  1.  40
    Ryle on Knowing How: Some Clarifications and Corrections.Stefan Brandt - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 29 (1):152-167.
    European Journal of Philosophy, EarlyView.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  40
    Wilfrid Sellars and Twentieth-Century Philosophy.Anke Breunig & Stefan Brandt (eds.) - 2018 - London: Routledge.
    This collection features eleven original essays, divided into three thematic sections, which explore the work of Wilfrid Sellars in relation to other twentieth-century thinkers. Section I analyzes Sellars’s thought in light of some of his influential predecessors, specifically Ludwig Wittgenstein, Rudolf Carnap, John Cook Wilson, and Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz. The second group of essays explores from different perspectives Sellars’s place within the analytic tradition, including his relation with analytic Kantianism and analytic pragmatism. The book’s final section extracts some of the most (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  21
    Verantwortliche Kontrolle und Ryleanische Regresse. Kommentar zu David Löwensteins Know-how as Competence.Stefan Brandt - 2018 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 72 (1):100-104.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  56
    How Not to Read Philosophical Investigations: McDowell and Goldfarb on Wittgenstein on Understanding.Stefan Brandt - 2014 - Philosophical Investigations 37 (4):289-311.
    In a recent article, John McDowell has criticised Warren Goldfarb for attributing an anti-realist conception of linguistic understanding to Wittgenstein. 1 I argue that McDowell is right to reject Goldfarb's anti- realism, but does so for the wrong reasons. I show that both Goldfarb's and McDowell's interpretations are vitiated by the fact that they do not pay attention to Wittgenstein's positive claims about understanding, in particular his claim that understanding is a kind of ability. The cause of this oversight lies (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  52
    Sellars and Quine on Empiricism and Conceptual Truth.Stefan Brandt - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (1):108-132.
    I compare Sellars’s criticism of the ‘myth of the given’ with Quine’s criticism of the ‘two dogmas’ of empiricism, that is, the analytic–synthetic distinction and reductionism. In Sections I to III, I present Quine’s and Sellars’s views. In IV to X, I discuss similarities and differences in their views. In XI to XII, I show that Sellars’s arguments against the ‘myth of the given’ are incompatible with Quine’s rejection of the analytic–synthetic distinction.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation