23 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Stephen F. Barker [15]Stephen Francis Barker [8]Stephen Frederic Barker [1]
  1.  6
    The elements of logic.Stephen Francis Barker - 1974 - New York,: McGraw-Hill.
  2.  9
    Philosophy of mathematics.Stephen Francis Barker - 1964 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
  3.  90
    The Legacy of Logical Positivism: Studies in the Philosophy of Science.Peter Achinstein & Stephen Francis Barker (eds.) - 1969 - Baltimore,: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  4.  18
    Induction and hypothesis.Stephen Francis Barker - 1957 - Ithaca, N.Y.,: Cornell University Press.
  5.  35
    Reasoning by Analogy in Hume’s Dialogues.Stephen F. Barker - 1989 - Informal Logic 11 (3).
  6.  4
    Thomas Reid: critical interpretations.Stephen Francis Barker & Tom L. Beauchamp (eds.) - 1976 - Philadelphia: University City Science Center.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  7.  29
    Murray Murphey's Work and C. I. Lewis's Epistemology: Problems with Realism and the Context of Logical Positivism.John Corcoran, Stephen F. Barker, Eric Dayton, John Greco, Naomi Zack, Richard S. Robin, Joel Isaac & Murray G. Murphey - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):32-44.
  8. Lewis on implication.Stephen Francis Barker - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):10-16.
  9.  33
    Lewis on Implication.Stephen Francis Barker - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):10-16.
  10.  35
    Induction and Hypothesis: A Study of the Logic of Confirmation.Stephen Francis Barker - 1957 - Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.
  11.  24
    Scientific Inference.Stephen F. Barker - 1958 - Philosophical Review 67 (3):404.
  12.  63
    What is a Profession?Stephen F. Barker - 1992 - Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 1 (1-2):73-99.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13.  32
    Discussion: Is There a Problem of Induction?Stephen F. Barker - 1965 - American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (4):271 - 273.
  14.  99
    How wrong was Kant about geometry?Stephen F. Barker - 1984 - Topoi 3 (2):133-142.
  15.  12
    Intensionality and Intentionality.Stephen F. Barker - 1982 - Philosophy Research Archives 8:95-109.
    This paper proposes interpretations of the vexed notions of intensionality and intentionality and then investigates their resulting interrelations.The notion of intentionality comes from Brentano, in connection with his view that it can help us understand the mental. Setting aside Husserl’s basic definition of intentionality as not quite in line with Brentano’s explanatory purpose, this paper proposes that intentionality be defined in terms of inexistence and indeterminacy.It results that Brentano’s thesis (that all and only mental phenomena are intentional) will not be (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  96
    Intensionality and Intentionality.Stephen F. Barker - 1982 - Philosophy Research Archives 8:95-109.
    This paper proposes interpretations of the vexed notions of intensionality and intentionality and then investigates their resulting interrelations.The notion of intentionality comes from Brentano, in connection with his view that it can help us understand the mental. Setting aside Husserl’s basic definition of intentionality as not quite in line with Brentano’s explanatory purpose, this paper proposes that intentionality be defined in terms of inexistence and indeterminacy.It results that Brentano’s thesis (that all and only mental phenomena are intentional) will not be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Improving your thinking.Stephen F. Barker - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  49
    James’ “The Will To Believe”.Stephen F. Barker - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 4:69-76.
    In “The Will to Believe,” William James affirms that we have some control over what we believe and asks how this control should be exercised. He rejects the evidentialists’ view that we ought to believe only when intellectual grounds make it quite sure that the belief is true. For him, “options” are choices among contrary beliefs. Some options are “living,” “forced,” and “momentous.” James’ thesis concerns belief-options that have these three features and where proof as to the truth is unavailable. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Logical positivism and the philosophy of mathematics.Stephen F. Barker - 1969 - In Peter Achinstein & Stephen Francis Barker (eds.), The Legacy of Logical Positivism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 229--257.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  9
    Realism as a Philosophy of Mathematics.Stephen F. Barker, Jack J. Bulloff, Thomas C. Holyoke & S. W. Hahn - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (4):593-593.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  22
    Realism as a Philosophy of Mathematics.Stephen F. Barker - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (4):1--9.
  22. The role of simplicity in explanation.Stephen F. Barker - 1961 - In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York. pp. 265--274.
  23.  47
    The Legacy of Logical Positivism: Studies in the Philosophy of Science.T. Greenwood, Peter Achinstein & Stephen F. Barker - 1971 - Philosophical Quarterly 21 (82):85.