30 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Steve F. Sapontzis [30]Steve Frederic Sapontzis [1]
  1.  38
    ‘Ought’ Does Imply ‘Can’.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1991 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):382-393.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  2.  69
    We Should Not Allow Dissection of Animals.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):181-189.
    This essay argues against routine dissection exercises on animals under three headings. First, attaining goals of general scientific education does not require dissection. The training of specialists, in whose vocations dissection skills are essential, could then be accomplished without killing animals specifically for the purpose of acquiring those skills. Second, killing and dissecting animals for unnecessary exercises teaches students bad attitudes toward animal life. Third, moral principles cannot justify killing and dissecting animals but not humans; consequently, such treatment of animals (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  3
    On Being Morally Expendable.Steve F. Sapontzis - unknown
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  43
    Moral Community and Animal Rights.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1985 - American Philosophical Quarterly 22 (3):251 - 257.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  5. Subjective Morals.Steve F. Sapontzis - 2011 - Upa.
    Subjective Morals breaks with tradition to provide a careful analysis of moral values and the goods and evils they produce. Sapontzis explores the subjective and objective bases of moral values and analyzes the concepts and categories that structure our moral practice.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  3
    ‘Ought’ Does Imply ‘Can’.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1991 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):383-393.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  7.  29
    Everyday Morality and Animal Rights.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1987 - Between the Species 3 (3):3.
  8.  30
    We Should Not Manipulate the Genome of Domestic Hogs.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1991 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (2):177-185.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  9. Aping Persons–Pro and Con.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1993 - In Peter Singer & Paola Cavalieri (eds.), The Great Ape Project. St. Martin's Griffin. pp. 269--279.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  10.  60
    Holism: Revolution or Reminder?Steve F. Sapontzis - 1993 - Topoi 12 (1):31-39.
    Among the four propositions considered in this paper, we have found two which can contribute to a holistic environmental ethic: individuals acquire some of their value through participating in communities, including biotic communities, and wholes, including biotic communities, can have values which are not the sum of the values of the individuals composing them. However, accepting these propositions does not represent a revolutionary break distinguishing holism from traditional value theories or ethics. On the other hand, the holistic propositions we considered (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  27
    "Concerning Therapeutic (For Humans) Research With Animals: A Response to Nelson's" Xenograft and Partical Affections".Steve F. Sapontzis - 1986 - Between the Species 2 (3):12.
  12.  13
    Speciesism.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1988 - Between the Species 4 (2):4.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  25
    Hegel's Immanent Critique.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1978 - Modern Schoolman 55 (3):281-287.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  19
    Speciesism, Painism, and Morality Speciesism, Painism and Happiness: A Morality for the Twenty-First Century Ryder Richard D. Academic Imprint Exeter, England.Steve F. Sapontzis - 2014 - Journal of Animal Ethics 4 (1):95-102.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  32
    The Moral Significance of Interests.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (4):345-358.
    Several philosophers opposed to animal rights have recently sought to justify their opposition by arguing that the epistemic differences between human and animal interests (often referred to as “taking an interest” vs. “having an interest”) constitute a morally significant difference. In this paper, I first detail the various forms ofhaving an interest and oftaking an interest. I then evaluate the moral significance of these differences from both utilitarian and deontological viewpoints. The conclusion of this analysis is that the epistemic differences (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  33
    On Exploiting Inferiors.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Between the Species 11 (1-2):1--24.
    This article critiques the contentions a) that human life is more valuable than animal life because it has a quality lacking in animal life due to the greater richness of human life and b) that because it is inferior, animal life may be sacrificed to benefit humans. Conclusions: value of life does not depend solely on quality; quality of life does not depend solely on richness; comparisons of richness are arbitrary; we lack sufficient evidence to comparatively value the quality of (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  23
    Consciousness and Numerical Identity.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1979 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):107-117.
    This article criticizes the thesis, Suggested by wittgenstein and elaborated and defended by malcolm and others, That the concepts of numerical identity and difference do not apply to pains, Afterimages, Sudden thoughts, And other contents of consciousness. I argue that the arguments offered in support of this thesis cannot account for much of our common practice and language concerning these contents while acknowledging that these categories apply to these contents can account for these practices and language as well as for (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  27
    Animal Rights and Biomedical Research.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1992 - Journal of Value Inquiry 26 (1):73-86.
  19.  13
    The Evolution of Animals in Moral Philosophy.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1987 - Between the Species 3 (2):4.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  12
    ""The Moral Significance of the" Innocence" of Animals.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1987 - Between the Species 3 (1):6.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  18
    Groundwork for a Subjective Theory of Ethics.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1990 - American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (1):27 - 38.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  8
    Must We Value Life to Have a Right to It?Steve F. Sapontzis - unknown
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  6
    Article Review of The Nature and Possibility of an Environmental Ethic, Environmental Ethics.Steve F. Sapontzis - unknown
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  6
    Article Review of Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair.Steve F. Sapontzis - unknown
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  7
    Commentary: On the Utility of Contracts.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1992 - Between the Species 8 (4):11.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  4
    The Moral Significance of Interests.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (4):345-358.
    Several philosophers opposed to animal rights have recently sought to justify their opposition by arguing that the epistemic differences between human and animal interests constitute a morally significant difference. In this paper, I first detail the various forms ofhaving an interest and oftaking an interest. I then evaluate the moral significance of these differences from both utilitarian and deontological viewpoints. The conclusion of this analysis is that the epistemic differences between human and animal interests are not morally significant.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  6
    Review of Rollin's The Frankenstein Syndrome. [REVIEW]Steve F. Sapontzis - 1996 - Between the Species 12 (1):15.
  28. The Nature of the Value of Nature.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy 3.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  3
    Dicussion: Environmental Ethics and the Locus of Value.Steve F. Sapontzis - unknown
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  1
    Consciousness and Numerical Identity.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1979 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):107-117.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark