11 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Steven W. Patterson [10]Steven Patterson [1]
See also
Steven W. Patterson
Wayne State University (PhD)
  1. Functionalism, Normativity and the Concept of Argumentation.Steven W. Patterson - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (1):1-26.
    In her 2007 paper, “Argument Has No Function” Jean Goodwin takes exception with what she calls the “explicit function claims”, arguing that not only are function-based accounts of argumentation insufficiently motivated, but they fail to ground claims to normativity. In this paper I stake out the beginnings of a functionalist answer to Goodwin.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2. The Methodological Usefulness of Deep Disagreement.Steven W. Patterson - 2015 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 6 (2).
    In this paper I begin by examining Fogelin’s account of deep disagreement. My contention is that this account is so deeply flawed as to cast doubt on the possibility that such deep disagreements actually happen. Nevertheless, I contend that the notion of deep disagreement itself is a useful theoretical foil for thinking about argumentation. The second part of this paper makes this case by showing how thinking about deep disagreements from the perspective of rhetoric, Walton-style argumentation theory, computation, and normative (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3. A Picture Held Us Captive: The Later Wittgenstein and Visual Argumentation.Steven W. Patterson - 2011 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 2 (2):105-134.
    The issue of whether or not there are visual arguments has been an issue in informal logic and argumentation theory at least since 1996. In recent years, books, sections of prominent conferences and special journals issues have been devoted to it, thus significantly raising the profile of the debate. In this paper I will attempt to show how the views of the later Wittgenstein, particularly his views on images and the no- tion of “picturing”, can be brought to bear on (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  36
    Are Arguments Abstract Objects?Steven W. Patterson - unknown
    Geoff Goddu's 2010 paper "Is 'Argument' subject to the process/product ambiguity?" and Paul Simard-Smith and Andrei Moldovan's 2011 paper “Arguments as abstract objects” have revived the dialogue about what might be called the "metaphysics of argument". Both papers are important. Both also seem to me to be open to significant objections. In this paper I will lay out some of these objections and give, in rough outline, the kernel of an alternative approach.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  19
    Commentary On: Fabio Paglieri's "Argumentation, Decision and Rationality".Steven W. Patterson - unknown
  6.  12
    Commentary on Ihnen.Steven W. Patterson - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Enforceability and Primary Rights.Steven W. Patterson - 2003 - Dissertation, Wayne State University
    In this dissertation I argue that the concept of a moral right is best explicated by means of the concept of morally legitimate coercion. This thesis, which I call the enforceability thesis, says that to have a right is to have a claim such that one would be justified in pursuing a course of action up to and including harm should the claim be dissatisfied. I contend that this thesis, if it is true, explains much about our intuitions concerning moral (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  50
    Kreacher's Lament: SPEW as a Parable on Discrimination, Indifference, and Social Justice.Steven W. Patterson - 2004 - In David Baggett, Shawn E. Klein & William Irwin (eds.), Harry Potter and Philosophy: If Aristotle Ran Hogwarts. Chicago: Open Court. pp. 105--117.
  9. Review of Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. [REVIEW]Steven W. Patterson - 2009 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 1 (1):139-147.
  10. Review of Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby, Reason in the Balance. [REVIEW]Steven W. Patterson - 2012 - Controvérsia 8 (1):87-91.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  31
    Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Conductive Argument.Steven Patterson & Charles V. Blatz - unknown
    In this paper I compare and contrast Rawls’s notion of reflective equilibrium with Wellman‘s notion of conductive argument. In the course of so doing I will address two key questions: Are conduc-tive argument and reflective equilibrium best understood as modes of reasoning or types of argument? and What relationship, if any, is there between them?
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark