15 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Thomas Adajian [7]Tom Adajian [6]T. Adajian [2]Thomas Richards Vartan Adajian [1]
See also
Profile: Thomas Adajian (James Madison University)
  1. On the Prototype Theory of Concepts and the Definition of Art.Thomas Adajian - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (3):231–236.
  2.  99
    The Definition of Art.Thomas Adajian - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. On the Cluster Account of Art.Thomas Adajian - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):379-385.
    The cluster account of art is a purportedly non-definitional account of art, inspired by Wittgenstein's notion of family resemblance, and recently defended by Berys Gaut. Gaut does not provide good reasons to think that art is not definable, and his approach to possible counterexamples to the cluster account would, applied consistently, preclude this. The cluster account's theory of error, its resources for accounting for borderline cases, and its heuristic usefulness are not impressive. Reasons strong enough to warrant accepting the cluster (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4. Visual Music: Synaesthesia in Art and Music Since 1900 Edited by Brougher, Kerry, Olivia Mattis, Jeremy Strick, Ari Wiseman and Judith Zilczer.Thomas Adajian - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):488–489.
  5.  32
    Examining the Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Steven Hoeltzel - 2001 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):19-33.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam (1980). Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16, 37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  2
    WOLTERSTORFF, NICHOLAS. Art Rethought: The Social Practices of Art. Oxford University Press, 2015, Xvi + 332 Pp., $50.00 Cloth. [REVIEW]Thomas Adajian - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (4):415-418.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  18
    Artistic Judgment: A Framework for Philosophical Aesthetics.T. Adajian - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (4):453-456.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  19
    Subjects and Objects: Art, Essentialism, and Abstraction.T. Adajian - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (3):356-357.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  5
    Examining the Exam: A Critical Look at the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Dan Flage - 2003 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 21 (3):31-46.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam. Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16,37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As shown in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  4
    Examining the Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Dan Flage - 2009 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):31-46.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam. Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16,37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As shown in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  1
    Examining the Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Dan Flage - 2003 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 21 (3):31-46.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam. Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16,37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As shown in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Arabella Lyon, Intentions: Negotiated, Contested, and Ignored Reviewed By.Thomas Adajian - 1999 - Philosophy in Review 19 (6):432-434.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Arabella Lyon, Intentions: Negotiated, Contested, and Ignored. [REVIEW]Thomas Adajian - 1999 - Philosophy in Review 19:432-434.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Examining the Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Steven Hoeltzel - 2001 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (4):19-33.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam. Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16, 37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As shown (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Examining the Exam: A Critical Look at the Watson-Glaser Critcal Thinking Appraisal Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Steven Hoeltzel - 2001 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (4):19-33.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam. Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16, 37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As shown (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography