273 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Tom Rockmore [274]T. Rockmore [16]Thomas Rockmore [3]
See also:
Profile: Tom Rockmore (Duquesne University, Peking University)
  1. Tom Rockmore (2006). Before and After 9/11. Ars Disputandi 6:1566-5399.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Víctor Farías, Joseph Margolis & Tom Rockmore (1989). Heidegger and Nazism.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  3.  42
    Tom Rockmore (2011). Kant and Phenomenology. University of Chicago Press.
    From Platonism to phenomenology -- Kant's epistemological shift to phenomenology -- Hegel's phenomenology as epistemology -- Husserl's phenomenological epistemology -- Heidegger's phenomenological ontology -- Kant, Merleau-Ponty's descriptive phenomenology, and the primacy of perception -- On overcoming the epistemological problem through phenomenology.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  29
    Tom Rockmore (1994). Heidegger and French Philosophy: Humanism, Antihumanism, and Being. Routledge.
    Martin Heidegger's impact on contemporary thought is important and controversial. However in France, the influence of this German philosopher is such that contemporary French thought cannot be properly understood without reference to Heidegger and his extraordinary influence. Tom Rockmore examines the reception of Heidegger's thought in France. He argues that in the period after the Second World War, due to the peculiar nature of the humanist French Philosophical tradition, Heidegger became the master thinker of French philosophy. Perhaps most importantly, he (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  5.  50
    Tom Rockmore (1996). Merleau-Ponty, Marx, and Marxism: The Problem of History. Studies in East European Thought 48 (1):63-81.
    At the present time, Europe, particularly eastern Europe, is still immersed in a major political transformation, the most significant such change since the Second World War, arising out of the rejection of official Marxism. This unforeseen rejection requires meditation by all those concerned with the relation of philosophy to the historical context. Marxism, that follows Marx’s insistence on the link between a theory and the context in which it arises, cannot be indifferent to the rejection of Marxist theory in practice. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  23
    Tom Rockmore (2004). Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. Yale University Press.
    In this book-the first large-scale survey of the complex relationship between Hegel's idealism and Anglo-American analytic philosophy-Tom Rockmore argues that analytic philosophy has consistently misread and misappropriated Hegel. According to Rockmore, the first generation of British analytic philosophers to engage Hegel possessed a limited understanding of his philosophy and of idealism. Succeeding generations continued to misinterpret him, and recent analytic thinkers have turned Hegel into a pragmatist by ignoring his idealism. Rockmore explains why this has happened, defends Hegel's idealism, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7. Tom Rockmore (1990). Marx and Perestroika. Philosophy and Social Criticism 16 (3):193-206.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  50
    Tom Rockmore (1993). Aspects of French Hegelianism. The Owl of Minerva 24 (2):191-206.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  35
    Tom Rockmore (2009). Heidegger, National Socialism and “Imperialism”. Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 13 (2):128-145.
  10.  20
    Tom Rockmore (1987). Enlightenment and Reason. Journal of Philosophy 84 (11):699-701.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  33
    Tom Rockmore (2004). Derrida and Heidegger in France. Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 8 (2):339-362.
  12.  46
    Tom Rockmore (1999). Volume Introduction. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:13-20.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  12
    Tom Rockmore (2005). On Classical and Neo-Analytic Forms of Pragmatism. Metaphilosophy 36 (3):259-271.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14.  16
    Tom Rockmore (1992). On Heidegger's Nazism and Philosophy.
    Given the significant attachment of the philosopher to the climate and intellectual mood of National Socialism, it would be inappropriate to criticize or exonerate his political decision in isolation from the very principles of Heideggerian philosophy itself. It is not Heidegger, who, in opting for Hitler, "misunderstood himself"; instead, those who cannot understand why he acted this way have failed to understand him. A Swiss professor regretted that Heidegger consented to compromise himself with the "everyday," as if a philosophy that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  15.  3
    Tom Rockmore (2004). On Foundationalism: A Strategy for Metaphysical Realism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In ancient times, the main approaches to metaphysical realism were intuitive. In modern times, foundationalism has replaced intuition as the main strategy to make out metaphysical realist claims to know. In On Foundationalism, Rockmore argues that foundationalism fails in all its known variants.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16. Paul Fairfield, James Scott Johnston, Tom Rockmore, James A. Good, Jim Garrison, Barry Allen, Joseph Margolis, Sandra B. Rosenthal, Richard J. Bernstein, David Vessey, C. G. Prado, Colin Koopman, Antonio Calcagno & Inna Semetsky (2010). John Dewey and Continental Philosophy. Southern Illinois University Press.
    _John Dewey and Continental Philosophy_ provides a rich sampling of exchanges that could have taken place long ago between the traditions of American pragmatism and continental philosophy had the lines of communication been more open between Dewey and his European contemporaries. Since they were not, Paul Fairfield and thirteen of his colleagues seek to remedy the situation by bringing the philosophy of Dewey into conversation with several currents in continental philosophical thought, from post-Kantian idealism and the work of Friedrich Nietzsche (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  5
    Tom Rockmore (1999). Hegel, Peirce, and Knowledge. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 13 (3):166 - 184.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  18.  33
    Tom Rockmore (1989). From Marx to Kant. The Owl of Minerva 20 (2):216-222.
  19.  29
    Tom Rockmore (1989). Put' Gegelja K “Nauke Logiki”. The Owl of Minerva 21 (1):99-102.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  32
    Tom Rockmore (1979). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 20 (2):275-277.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  11
    Tom Rockmore (2004). On the So-Called War on Terrorism. Metaphilosophy 35 (3):386-401.
    : Since the terrorist attacks on the United States in September 2001, the country has embarked on a so‐called war on terrorism. This essay argues that so‐called war on terrorism has used the pretext of responding to terrorist attacks in the U.S. in September 2001 to wage wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that have objectives other than stamping out terrorism. It further argues that war requires a moral justification that cannot be provided for either the war in Afghanistan or the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  18
    Tom Rockmore (2015). Interprétations Hégéliennes de Marx. Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 19 (2):212-232.
    Marx est un grand penseur et, selon divers critères, un des plus importants des temps modernes. L’enjeu ici est de cerner ce que Marx peut nous apporter aujourd’hui sur le plan philosophique. Le déclin soudain du marxisme officiel présente une occasion de faire ressortir le côté philosophique de Marx. Or voici quatre conditions afin de cerner la philosophie marxienne. Ces conditions relèvent du marxisme, de Hegel, de l’économie politique, et du modèle marxien de la société industrialisée moderne.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Tom Rockmore (2007). Kant and Idealism. Yale University Press.
    Distinguished scholar and philosopher Tom Rockmore examines one of the great lacunae of contemporary philosophical discussion—idealism. Addressing the widespread confusion about the meaning and use of the term, he surveys and classifies some of its major forms, giving particular attention to Kant. He argues that Kant provides the all-important link between three main types of idealism: those associated with Plato, the new way of ideas, and German idealism. The author also makes a case for the contemporary relevance of at least (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. Tom Rockmore & Joseph Margolis (1992). The Heidegger Case: On Philosophy and Politics. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 4:167-170.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  25.  21
    Tom Rockmore (1982). Idealist Hermeneutics and the Hermeneutics of Idealism. Idealistic Studies 12 (2):91-102.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  38
    Tom Rockmore (1978). Marxian Man. The Monist 61 (1):56-71.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  17
    Tom Rockmore & Beth J. Singer (eds.) (1992). Antifoundationalism Old and New. Temple University Press.
    The debate over foundationalism, the viewpoint that there exists some secure foundation upon which to build a system of knowledge, appears to have been resolved and the antifoundationalists have at least temporarily prevailed. From a firmly historical approach, the book traces the foundationalism/antifoundationalism controversy in the work of many important figures Animaxander, Aristotle and Plato, Augustine, Descartes, Hegel and Nietzsche, Habermas and Chisholm, and others throughout the history of philosophy. The contributors, Joseph Margolis, Ronald Polansky, Gary Calore, Fred and Emily (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28. Tom Rockmore (2010). Is Marx a Fichtean? Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (1):93-104.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  36
    Tom Rockmore (1980). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 21 (3):275-277.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  14
    Tom Rockmore (2012). Marx Between Feuerbach and Hegel. Idealistic Studies 42 (2):109-118.
    This paper is about the uses made of Feuerbach’s position in Marxist hagiography as part of the process of the conceptual and politi­cal canonization of Marx.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Thomas Rockmore (1979). Kolakawski and Markovic on Stalinism, Marxism, and Marx. Philosophy and Social Criticism 6 (3):308-324.
  32.  35
    Tom Rockmore (1986). The Politics of Salvation. Idealistic Studies 16 (3):279-280.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  94
    Tom Rockmore (1978). Marxianpraxis. Philosophy and Social Criticism 5 (1):2-15.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Tom Rockmore (1987). Theory and Practice Again: Habermas on Historical Materialism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 13 (3):211-225.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  33
    Tom Rockmore (1990). Epistemology As Hermeneutics. The Monist 73 (2):115-133.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  53
    Tom Rockmore (2000). On Recovering Marx After Marxism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):95-106.
    If Marx is to survive as a source of unparalleled insight into the modern world, he needs to be recovered. This article will begin to address some of the difficulties which arise in recovering Marx, above all the need to free Marx from Marxism. Marx has always been studied through Marxism, hence in a way which profoundly distorts his philosophical ideas. If we remove this Marxist 'filter', we see a rather different, more philosophical, and more philosophically-interesting thinker, Hegel's most important (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  31
    Tom Rockmore & Friedrich Rapp (1983). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 25 (4):275-277.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  2
    Joseph Margolis, Tom Rockmore, Lisa Dolling, Jaakko Hintikka, Anton Alterman, Stephen Toulmin, Michel Paty, John Stachel, Gregg Horowitz, Michael Kelly, Tom Huhn, Barbara Savedoff, Saul Fisher, Sybil Schwarzenbach, John Pittman & Raphael Sassower (2002). Constructivism and Practice: Toward a Historical Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Constructivism and Practice advances the understanding of the role of construction and model creation and reflects on the relationship of these models to social practices.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  52
    T. Rockmore (1986). TILES, MARY [1984]: Bachelard: Science and Objectivity. Cambridge University Press. Xxii+242 Pp. (ISBN 0-521-24803-5 Hard Covers; 0-521-28973-4 Paperback). [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):529-531.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Joseph Margolis & Tom Rockmore (eds.) (2001). The Philosophy of Interpretation. Wiley-Blackwell.
    This is a lively, freshly invited collection of papers by a number of well-known philosophers and other specialists who have focused very pointedly on certain central conceptual puzzles posed by the general practice of interpretation in the arts, literature, history, and the natural and human sciences. The collection gives very nearly the impression of a sustained debate.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  18
    Tom Rockmore (1988). Marx's Social Critique of Culture. International Studies in Philosophy 20 (1):73-74.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  28
    Tom Rockmore, John D. Windhausen, Maurice A. Finocchiaro, Irving H. Anellis & Heinrich Bortis (1987). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 33 (4):265-267.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  30
    Tom Rockmore (1991). Fichte in the New World. The Owl of Minerva 23 (1):126-128.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  18
    Tom Rockmore (2000). Knowledge as Historical. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:123-132.
    With few exceptions, philosophers typically have contended that knowledge worthy of the name is beyond time and place. This venerable idea was turned on its head in the emergence of a rival view of knowledge as historical in the wake of the French Revolution. A claim that knowledge is not ahistorical but historical resolves some of these difficulties while creating others. This paper will briefly consider several of these difficulties, including how to argue for this position, the differences between contextualism, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Tom Rockmore (2007). Before and After 9/11: Religion, Politics, and Ethics. Ars Disputandi 7.
    My topic concerns the interrelation between religion, politics and ethics in a time of terror, or at least a historical moment when the general problem of terrorism has come to occupy center stage. The frequent view that 9/11 represents a wholly new situation, a break with the past makes it difficult, perhaps impossible to understand it. I believe that it is because 9/11 does not break with but continues tendencies already underway that it occurred and we can understand it. My (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  30
    Tom Rockmore (2000). Recent Analytical Philosophy and Idealism. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:173-181.
    The link between empiricism and realism is crucially important in analytic philosophy. Empiricism is roughly the claim that knowledge must arise out of experience; it cannot, as Descartes thought, be innate. Realism is roughly the associated claim that whatever thought refers to is real, in a word, exists, independently of the mind. However, idealism (or idealism as understood by analytic philosophers) not only violates the rigorous philosophical standards that analytical philosophy has always claimed to exemplify, but undermines empiricism (which in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Tom Rockmore (ed.) (2000). Heidegger, German Idealism & Neo-Kantianism. Humanity Books.
  48.  27
    James P. Scanlan, Tom Rockmore, David B. Myers, Juliana Geran Pilon, Friedrich Rapp, Jesse Zeldin & Thomas E. Bird (1982). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 24 (3):257-257.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  17
    Tom Rockmore (2004). Tradition(S). International Studies in Philosophy 36 (1):347-348.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  26
    Philip Grier, Tom Rockmore & John W. Murphy (1980). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 21 (1):89-108.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 273