18 found
Order:
See also
Profile: Tadeusz Ciecierski (University of Warsaw)
  1.  77
    The Multiple-Proposition Approach Reconsidered.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2009 - Logique Et Analyse 52 (208):423-440.
    The paper contains a critical analysis of pluripropositionalism (or: multiple proposition approach), the view defended in recent years by authors such as Eros Corazza, Kepa Korta and John Perry.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  62
    A Problem with Structured Propositions.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2011 - In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophical and Formal Approaches to Linguistic Analysis. Ontos-Verlag. pp. 81.
    The paper shows that the paradox of the totality of propositions rest on assumptions characteristic of some theories of structured contents (like Jeffrey King's "new account of structured propositions").
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  6
    Attitudes and Normativity.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2017 - Axiomathes 27 (3):265-283.
    The paper attempts to pose a problem for theories claiming that intentional attributions are essentially normative. Firstly, I argue that the claim is ambiguous. Secondly, that three possible interpretations of the claim can be distinguished: one that appeals to normative impositions put on agents of intentional states, another that exploits the fact that one can normatively assess the states in question and a further one that locates normativity in the domain of special intentional explanations. Thirdly, it is argued that each (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  19
    The Polish School of Argumentation: A Manifesto.Katarzyna Budzynska, Michal Araszkiewicz, Barbara Bogołȩbska, Piotr Cap, Tadeusz Ciecierski, Kamila Debowska-Kozlowska, Barbara Dunin-Kȩplicz, Marcin Dziubiński, Michał Federowicz, Anna Gomolińska, Andrzej Grabowski, Teresa Hołówka, Łukasz Jochemczyk, Magdalena Kacprzak, Paweł Kawalec, Maciej Kielar, Andrzej Kisielewicz, Marcin Koszowy, Robert Kublikowski, Piotr Kulicki, Anna Kuzio, Piotr Lewiński, Jakub Z. Lichański, Jacek Malinowski, Witold Marciszewski, Edward Nieznański, Janina Pietrzak, Jerzy Pogonowski, Tomasz A. Puczyłowski, Jolanta Rytel, Anna Sawicka, Marcin Selinger, Andrzej Skowron, Joanna Skulska, Marek Smolak, Małgorzata Sokół, Agnieszka Sowińska, Piotr Stalmaszczyk, Tomasz Stawecki, Jarosław Stepaniuk, Alina Strachocka, Wojciech Suchoń, Krzysztof Szymanek, Justyna Tomczyk, Robert Trypuz, Kazimierz Trzȩsicki, Mariusz Urbański, Ewa Wasilewska-Kamińska, Krzysztof A. Wieczorek, Maciej Witek, Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska, Olena Yaskorska, Maria Załȩska, Konrad Zdanowski & Żure - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (3):267-282.
    Building on our diverse research traditions in the study of reasoning, language and communication, the Polish School of Argumentation integrates various disciplines and institutions across Poland in which scholars are dedicated to understanding the phenomenon of the force of argument. Our primary goal is to craft a methodological programme and establish organisational infrastructure: this is the first key step in facilitating and fostering our research movement, which joins people with a common research focus, complementary skills and an enthusiasm to work (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  1
    A Note on Belief Reports and Context Dependence.Tadeusz Ciecierski - forthcoming - Acta Analytica:1-18.
    The aim of this paper is to pose a problem for theories that claim that belief reports are context dependent. Firstly, I argue that the claim is committed to verbalism, a theory that derives the context sensitivity of belief reports from the context sensitivity of the psychological verbs used in such reports. Secondly, I argue that verbalism is not an attractive theoretical option because it is in conflict with the non-proto-rigidity of verbs like ‘believe’. Finally, I describe various consequences that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  14
    Of Wolves and Philosophers. Interview with Mark Rowlands.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2012 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 3 (1).
  7.  12
    Leibniz o konieczności, możliwości i wolnej woli.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2003 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 45 (1):135-142.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  14
    O wilkach i filozofach. Wywiad z Markiem Rowlandsem.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2012 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 3 (1).
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Pragmatyka Roberta Stalnakera.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2001 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 39 (3):157-174.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Argument Sticha a Przyczynowe Teorie Nazw.Tadeusz Ciecierski & Katarzyna Kuś - 2010 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 75.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Bar-Hillel o semantyce i pragmatyce wyrażeń okazjonalnych.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2002 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 41 (1):115-132.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Dlaczego Logik Modalny Nie Musi Przejmować Się Argumentem Quine’A?Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2008 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 68.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Leibniz o konieczności.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2003 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 45 (1):135-142.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Niby-fakty i niby-mity.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2009 - Filozofia Nauki 17 (2).
    The paper is a reply to Leopold Hess' article "Proper Names - the Facts and the Myths". It is shown that the author misunderstood the issue of proper names and misconceived main ideas of the new theory of reference. The most important mistakes made by the author are: (i) considering the category of proper names in detachment from linguistic usage ;(ii) wrong reconstruction of the so-called modal argument and the notion of rigid designator; (iii) equivocating between two meanings of "a (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. O hipotezie Bar-Hillela.Tadeusz Ciecierski & Jakub Szymanik - 2004 - Studia Semiotyczne 25:201-212.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. O pojęciu sądu logicznego.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2003 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 48 (4):125-144.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Of Wolves and Philosophers. Interview.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2012 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 3 (1):123-132.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. O wskazującym użyciu wyrażeń.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2005 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 53 (1):153-173.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography